Skip to content

Checking in on the "Young" Republicans

Political Discussion
74 10 711 1
  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    Cal you haven't made a relevant point in this thread, yet. 

    But I also understand your cognitive dissonance (dementia?) is very strong and you have zero understanding of your own hypocrisy 

    This is a thread about random posts from people we don't know. Can you really squeeze anything relevant from it?

    ...word salad...

    @jax said:

    This is a thread about random posts from people we don't know. Can you really squeeze anything relevant from it?

    ...word salad...

    Hahahaha damn don't hurt yourself bending over backwards like that. "Posts from people we don't know". Christ, could you be anymore disingenuous?

    You all will literally do anything but acknowledge fault or criticize your own people. 

    "Posts from people we don't know".... Hahaha

    Absolutely pathetic man

  • wtf, you must be a girl because you twist whatever is actually being said 

  • birdgirl and the whoreta are pathetic, just posting garbage to get into peoples' discussions in a negative way, for attention.

  • birdgirl and the whoreta are pathetic, just posting garbage to get into peoples' discussions in a negative way, for attention.

    @calfoxwc said:

    birdgirl and the whoreta are pathetic, just posting garbage to get into peoples' discussions in a negative way, for attention.

    You don't have to respond, champ 

    But I know you have WDS

  • birdgirl and the whoreta are pathetic, just posting garbage to get into peoples' discussions in a negative way, for attention.

    @calfoxwc said:

    birdgirl and the whoreta are pathetic, just posting garbage to get into peoples' discussions in a negative way, for attention.

    Yep.  Replying to them is acknowledging them….  Ignore them.

    people would rather discuss ideas than debate weirdos.  Talks to us Cal and ignore the background noise

  • AxeA Axe

    Heya Peckerhead..

    Just helpin ya out ?

    @axe said:

    Heya Peckerhead..

    Just helpin ya out ?

    Love the idea. There would be no more demonrat presidents.

    As the old saying goes.

     "If you're not a liberal at 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by 35, you have no brain," 

  • Pretty dumb argument... And pretty easy to get blown up

    - people 17-34 absolutely are greatly impacted by what an administration is pushing. None of y'all would get drafted into a war. Fucking up social programs will create decades of damage. Etc

    - by his logic, you should have less weight to your vote after a certain age and as you become older as well. Is an 80 year old just living off retirement in a home they fully own, or in a retirement home, really that affected by an administration's policies? No. Certainly not as much as the 18-34 year old. 

    - the founders also didn't allow non whites, non property owners, or women to vote for president. Some states even restricted Catholics, Quakers, etc. If we're going with the "founders are always right" nonsense, then by this guy's argument, none of those groups should ever be president. 

  • Pretty dumb argument... And pretty easy to get blown up

    - people 17-34 absolutely are greatly impacted by what an administration is pushing. None of y'all would get drafted into a war. Fucking up social programs will create decades of damage. Etc

    - by his logic, you should have less weight to your vote after a certain age and as you become older as well. Is an 80 year old just living off retirement in a home they fully own, or in a retirement home, really that affected by an administration's policies? No. Certainly not as much as the 18-34 year old. 

    - the founders also didn't allow non whites, non property owners, or women to vote for president. Some states even restricted Catholics, Quakers, etc. If we're going with the "founders are always right" nonsense, then by this guy's argument, none of those groups should ever be president. 

    @mld-woody said:

    Pretty dumb argument... And pretty easy to get blown up

    - people 17-34 absolutely are greatly impacted by what an administration is pushing. None of y'all would get drafted into a war. Fucking up social programs will create decades of damage. Etc

    - by his logic, you should have less weight to your vote after a certain age and as you become older as well. Is an 80 year old just living off retirement in a home they fully own, or in a retirement home, really that affected by an administration's policies? No. Certainly not as much as the 18-34 year old. 

    - the founders also didn't allow non whites, non property owners, or women to vote for president. Some states even restricted Catholics, Quakers, etc. If we're going with the "founders are always right" nonsense, then by this guy's argument, none of those groups should ever be president. 

    great, an anti-founder

  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    Pretty dumb argument... And pretty easy to get blown up

    - people 17-34 absolutely are greatly impacted by what an administration is pushing. None of y'all would get drafted into a war. Fucking up social programs will create decades of damage. Etc

    - by his logic, you should have less weight to your vote after a certain age and as you become older as well. Is an 80 year old just living off retirement in a home they fully own, or in a retirement home, really that affected by an administration's policies? No. Certainly not as much as the 18-34 year old. 

    - the founders also didn't allow non whites, non property owners, or women to vote for president. Some states even restricted Catholics, Quakers, etc. If we're going with the "founders are always right" nonsense, then by this guy's argument, none of those groups should ever be president. 

    great, an anti-founder

    @jax said:

    great, an anti-founder

    woodpecker is anti-everthing that is decent to believe in.

  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    Pretty dumb argument... And pretty easy to get blown up

    - people 17-34 absolutely are greatly impacted by what an administration is pushing. None of y'all would get drafted into a war. Fucking up social programs will create decades of damage. Etc

    - by his logic, you should have less weight to your vote after a certain age and as you become older as well. Is an 80 year old just living off retirement in a home they fully own, or in a retirement home, really that affected by an administration's policies? No. Certainly not as much as the 18-34 year old. 

    - the founders also didn't allow non whites, non property owners, or women to vote for president. Some states even restricted Catholics, Quakers, etc. If we're going with the "founders are always right" nonsense, then by this guy's argument, none of those groups should ever be president. 

    great, an anti-founder

    @jax said:

    great, an anti-founder

    Is that what you took from that? Lol

  • I read the article in the OP. I sorta figured this sort of thing would happen, l didn’t expect a scathing snapshot like this so soon.

    I’m of a certain age and of a certain demographic that l know full well what racists sound like when they think they are among “cool” company. Fair chance some of you do too. Our younger generation seems to be dumb as fuck for thinking that some online “chat” app is “cool” company.

    Nonetheless l’m thankful for the snapshot. I’m sure deep down republican supporters are thankful too. If you consider yourself a non-racist republican, this is the sort of thing you’ll have to contend with because right now the republican party looks very attractive to racists and homophobes. 

  • @mld-woody said:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

    And fyi, the messages aren't photoshopped 

    And you know this how?

    @ibleedbrown said:

    I read the article in the OP. I sorta figured this sort of thing would happen, l didn’t expect a scathing snapshot like this so soon.

    I’m of a certain age and of a certain demographic that l know full well what racists sound like when they think they are among “cool” company. Fair chance some of you do too. Our younger generation seems to be dumb as fuck for thinking that some online “chat” app is “cool” company.

    Nonetheless l’m thankful for the snapshot. I’m sure deep down republican supporters are thankful too. If you consider yourself a non-racist republican, this is the sort of thing you’ll have to contend with because right now the republican party looks very attractive to racists and homophobes. 

    You’re all in on an article written on a Left Wing website?

    If you believe that, they will spoon feed you that only Caucasian Republicans are the only racists.

    You need to get out more.

  • I read the article in the OP. I sorta figured this sort of thing would happen, l didn’t expect a scathing snapshot like this so soon.

    I’m of a certain age and of a certain demographic that l know full well what racists sound like when they think they are among “cool” company. Fair chance some of you do too. Our younger generation seems to be dumb as fuck for thinking that some online “chat” app is “cool” company.

    Nonetheless l’m thankful for the snapshot. I’m sure deep down republican supporters are thankful too. If you consider yourself a non-racist republican, this is the sort of thing you’ll have to contend with because right now the republican party looks very attractive to racists and homophobes. 

    @ibleedbrown said:

    I read the article in the OP. I sorta figured this sort of thing would happen, l didn’t expect a scathing snapshot like this so soon.

    I’m of a certain age and of a certain demographic that l know full well what racists sound like when they think they are among “cool” company. Fair chance some of you do too. Our younger generation seems to be dumb as fuck for thinking that some online “chat” app is “cool” company.

    Nonetheless l’m thankful for the snapshot. I’m sure deep down republican supporters are thankful too. If you consider yourself a non-racist republican, this is the sort of thing you’ll have to contend with because right now the republican party looks very attractive to racists and homophobes. 

    Can you agree racist are everywhere from every race?

    I've heard in person a lot of racist comments from blacks and hispanics just the same as whites. All of it I consider just 'mad' at someone, I didn't count as any true racists, maybe ignorant though.

    I promise there are people on the left, right and the middle saying the same things and it doesn't stop at race. They hate or make fun of women, nerds, jocks, stoners, men, other countries, northerners, southerners, west cost, east coast, Steelers, Steelers fans, PA drivers, Michigan drivers, you name it there is a group somewhere hating on it. Who gives a shit? Fuck I've been discriminated against because I wasn't part of a certain click, no one gives a shit, I don't give a shit, move on.

    Name a system in place that is racist/discriminating, other than DEI or affirmative action.

  • Pretty dumb argument... And pretty easy to get blown up

    - people 17-34 absolutely are greatly impacted by what an administration is pushing. None of y'all would get drafted into a war. Fucking up social programs will create decades of damage. Etc

    - by his logic, you should have less weight to your vote after a certain age and as you become older as well. Is an 80 year old just living off retirement in a home they fully own, or in a retirement home, really that affected by an administration's policies? No. Certainly not as much as the 18-34 year old. 

    - the founders also didn't allow non whites, non property owners, or women to vote for president. Some states even restricted Catholics, Quakers, etc. If we're going with the "founders are always right" nonsense, then by this guy's argument, none of those groups should ever be president. 

    @mld-woody said:

    - people 17-34 absolutely are greatly impacted by what an administration is pushing. None of y'all would get drafted into a war. Fucking up social programs will create decades of damage.

    What is the administration pushing that worries you about 17 - 34?

    We all had our chance to be drafted into war just the same, some may have been, this is no different. If there is a war and people are needed, it doesn't matter who is in office.

    Since you brought up this administration though, Trump has done nothing but end wars. Odd to bring up draft...not only that but they are easily hitting recruitment quotas.

    Fucking up social programs might do some damage, which ones are being fucked up? Though, it's not black and white, people who take advantage of social programs fuck the social programs up.

    @mld-woody said:

    by his logic, you should have less weight to your vote after a certain age and as you become older as well. Is an 80 year old just living off retirement in a home they fully own, or in a retirement home, really that affected by an administration's policies? No. Certainly not as much as the 18-34 year old.

    I am not defending his logic, but I see the point he's trying to make. If you want to visit taking away old peoples right to vote, you may have a point as well. But yes, even if they own their home and are collecting retirement, you're damn right they can be affected. More so than your young generation, mostly living at home with parents. 

    Just by you bringing up old people that own their own shit worries me about the propaganda of generational wealth.

    @mld-woody said:

    the founders also didn't allow non whites, non property owners, or women to vote for president. Some states even restricted Catholics, Quakers, etc. If we're going with the "founders are always right" nonsense, then by this guy's argument, none of those groups should ever be president. 

    apples and oranges, you're probably the worst at trying to give analogies all the while grasping at straws.

    @mld-woody said:

    Is that what you took from that? Lol

    Nothing you wrote was worth responding to, so there was nothing to take away from it.

    You could make some decent points about it but the points you made were dumb.

    Don't bother researching now or twisting everything, you had your shot. Nothing he said will catch on or matter so whatever. His point I seen said if you don't know enough about politics to be President until 35, then you probably shouldn't vote until 35 either. Neither she or you made a compelling argument against this.

    Go back to crying about white racists or old people.

  • @mld-woody said:

    https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

    And fyi, the messages aren't photoshopped 

    And you know this how?

    @ibleedbrown said:

    I read the article in the OP. I sorta figured this sort of thing would happen, l didn’t expect a scathing snapshot like this so soon.

    I’m of a certain age and of a certain demographic that l know full well what racists sound like when they think they are among “cool” company. Fair chance some of you do too. Our younger generation seems to be dumb as fuck for thinking that some online “chat” app is “cool” company.

    Nonetheless l’m thankful for the snapshot. I’m sure deep down republican supporters are thankful too. If you consider yourself a non-racist republican, this is the sort of thing you’ll have to contend with because right now the republican party looks very attractive to racists and homophobes. 

    You’re all in on an article written on a Left Wing website?

    If you believe that, they will spoon feed you that only Caucasian Republicans are the only racists.

    You need to get out more.

    @canton-dawg said:

    You’re all in on an article written on a Left Wing website?

    If you believe that, they will spoon feed you that only Caucasian Republicans are the only racists.

    You need to get out more.

    “All in” is a goofy way of putting it. Remember, l’m your middle school civics teacher buddy. 

    It’s a snapshot of “young republican leaders.” They actually think this is a valid approach to whip up votes for the republican party. Your next assignment is to figure out why they think that. Hop to it.

    Young people are dumb but malleable. They seemed to think this behavior is acceptable. It is not. And now they know. 

  • I don't doubt that lefties infiltrated the Young Republicans online.

    it's what they do, a lot.

    Dec 12, 2023Voters aren't mere spectators. Those worried about Trump should register Republican and vote for Nikki Haley so the former president isn't his party's nominee.
  • and four members who were doing that asinine, offensive garbage are out.

    4 days agoTopline At least four members of a Young Republicans group chat in which members fantasized about violence against their enemies, celebrated Hitler and repeatedly used racist slurs have resigned ...
  • see, even if they really are young republicans...

    the republican party does not embrace them like the dems do.

    They reject them.

    But I think they are dem plants.

    2 days agoALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — New York's Republican State Committee on Friday suspended a Young Republican organization following the release of a group chat that included jokes about rape and flippant ...