If There's One Video I Post You Should Want To Watch
-
-
-
Lomu, Mauigoa, Fano seem interchangeable and a matter of personal taste.
Proctor is a guard.
Miller and Freeling not far behind the top 3.
Definitely value at 24
-
I'm thinking there's some drop-off after the top 2 tackles and top 2 receivers. (our luck, they'll probably all go with picks 2-5)
If we pick the top OT at #6, then we'll miss the top 4 or more WR's. The same/reverse is true if we pick the top WR at #6.
BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE -
I'm thinking there's some drop-off after the top 2 tackles and top 2 receivers. (our luck, they'll probably all go with picks 2-5)
If we pick the top OT at #6, then we'll miss the top 4 or more WR's. The same/reverse is true if we pick the top WR at #6.
I'm thinking there's some drop-off after the top 2 tackles and top 2 receivers. (our luck, they'll probably all go with picks 2-5)
If we pick the top OT at #6, then we'll miss the top 4 or more WR's. The same/reverse is true if we pick the top WR at #6.
If the top 2 tackles whomever that is are taken before us….significant reach.
Tackle WR This class is not top heavy.
The WRs might be the deepest position group and at least half that group is Day 1 ready.
Omar Cooper is a sleeper
-
I'm thinking there's some drop-off after the top 2 tackles and top 2 receivers. (our luck, they'll probably all go with picks 2-5)
If we pick the top OT at #6, then we'll miss the top 4 or more WR's. The same/reverse is true if we pick the top WR at #6.
If the top 2 tackles whomever that is are taken before us….significant reach.
Tackle WR This class is not top heavy.
The WRs might be the deepest position group and at least half that group is Day 1 ready.
Omar Cooper is a sleeper
Omar Cooper is a sleeper
Just saw a clip from McShay where he calls Cooper "a faster Jarvis Landry".
I'll take that.
-
I'm thinking there's some drop-off after the top 2 tackles and top 2 receivers. (our luck, they'll probably all go with picks 2-5)
If we pick the top OT at #6, then we'll miss the top 4 or more WR's. The same/reverse is true if we pick the top WR at #6.
I'm thinking there's some drop-off after the top 2 tackles and top 2 receivers. (our luck, they'll probably all go with picks 2-5)
If we pick the top OT at #6, then we'll miss the top 4 or more WR's. The same/reverse is true if we pick the top WR at #6.
The combine may tell a different story, but l honestly don’t see a huge difference between Carnell Tate and Elijah Sarratt. Both are really really good possession receivers who got NFL level juke moves up their sleeve, but neither one is going to mow dudes down on the way to the endzone like a Megatron or Josh Gordon’s magical year.
Maybe Tate is faster? The combine will shed some light there.
I think prioritizing the Oline is the way to go because l see a deeper WR class than OT class.
I also wouldn’t fault them for using their first pick on a ringer defensive player like Bain or Downs.
-
I'll wait until after FA and Combine before making a guess on who we go with. WR Sat and OL Sunday
https://www.nfl.com/combine/tracker/participants/
Date Combine Experience Inside Look Drills Start Time THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 26 (PK, DL, LB) Gates Open 1:00pm – 7:00pm Gates Open 1:00pm – 8:30pm 3:00pm ET FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 27 (TE, DB) Gates Open 1:00pm – 7:00pm Gates Open 1:00pm – 9:00pm 3:00pm ET SATURDAY, FEBRUARUY 28 (QB, WR, RB) Gates Open 11:00am – 7:00pm Gates Open 11:00am – 8:30pm 1:00pm ET SUNDAY, MARCH 1 (OL) Gates Open: 11:00am – 4:00pm Gates Open 11:00am – 4:30pm 1:00pm ET -
I will wait until after free agency and any trades we make before trying to say who or what position we should take.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. -
I will wait until after free agency and any trades we make before trying to say who or what position we should take.
I will wait until after free agency and any trades we make before trying to say who or what position we should take.
Makes sense in theory, but regardless the Browns will need OLine and WRs.
Both rooms are ghost towns regarding talent for the future. Neither are getting fixed enough through free agency and trades to make them a lesser need regarding the draft.
-
What tackles beyond Utah's Caleb Lomu are legit LEFT tackle prospects?
I'd love to trade down and take Lomu to get the LT position locked down, then find the RT in Round 2 hypothetically. I'd be fine for example moving to #12 with Dallas for their second rounders this draft and next. (Would that work point wise?)
-
What tackles beyond Utah's Caleb Lomu are legit LEFT tackle prospects?
I'd love to trade down and take Lomu to get the LT position locked down, then find the RT in Round 2 hypothetically. I'd be fine for example moving to #12 with Dallas for their second rounders this draft and next. (Would that work point wise?)
a) What tackles beyond Utah's Caleb Lomu are legit LEFT tackle prospects?
b..) I'd love to trade down and take Lomu to get the LT position locked down, then find the RT in Round 2 hypothetically. I'd be fine for example moving to #12 with Dallas for their second rounders this draft and next. (Would that work point wise?)
a) PFF Legit LT* snaps Proctor Lomo Tiernan Freeling
b) Dallas is a mess in future picks... https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/draft
-
a) What tackles beyond Utah's Caleb Lomu are legit LEFT tackle prospects?
b..) I'd love to trade down and take Lomu to get the LT position locked down, then find the RT in Round 2 hypothetically. I'd be fine for example moving to #12 with Dallas for their second rounders this draft and next. (Would that work point wise?)
a) PFF Legit LT* snaps Proctor Lomo Tiernan Freeling
b) Dallas is a mess in future picks... https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/draft
a) PFF Legit LT* snaps Proctor Lomo Tiernan Freeling
b) Dallas is a mess in future picks... https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/draft
I want nothing to do with Proctor
Dallas might be a bad trade partner then.
-
a) PFF Legit LT* snaps Proctor Lomo Tiernan Freeling
b) Dallas is a mess in future picks... https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/draft
I want nothing to do with Proctor
Dallas might be a bad trade partner then.
I want nothing to do with Proctor
Dallas might be a bad trade partner then.
Team USA Hockey ! Gold ? Boyz & Gals!
Proctor... He has the most confusing media scouting reports of all tackles.. some up/some down.. well, they all need pro coaching & some Dawand Jones weight off for Proctor
The sneaky trade team maybe the Rams? Pick 13 & 29.. Who would they need at #6 though?
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends -
I will wait until after free agency and any trades we make before trying to say who or what position we should take.
I will wait until after free agency and any trades we make before trying to say who or what position we should take.
Well, any thoughts that we express are based on current information and not projecting what will happen in FA. But as Dutch said, the OL & WR's are so deficient that about the only thing FA might do is flip flop whether we pick a Tackle or WR at #6 & 24. We've been using practice squad caliber players at those two position groups. LOTS of players needed.
BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE -
I want nothing to do with Proctor
Dallas might be a bad trade partner then.
Team USA Hockey ! Gold ? Boyz & Gals!
Proctor... He has the most confusing media scouting reports of all tackles.. some up/some down.. well, they all need pro coaching & some Dawand Jones weight off for Proctor
The sneaky trade team maybe the Rams? Pick 13 & 29.. Who would they need at #6 though?
Team USA Hockey ! Gold ? Boyz & Gals!
Proctor... He has the most confusing media scouting reports of all tackles.. some up/some down.. well, they all need pro coaching & some Dawand Jones weight off for Proctor
The sneaky trade team maybe the Rams? Pick 13 & 29.. Who would they need at #6 though?
Every team wants more pass rushers
-
I will wait until after free agency and any trades we make before trying to say who or what position we should take.
Well, any thoughts that we express are based on current information and not projecting what will happen in FA. But as Dutch said, the OL & WR's are so deficient that about the only thing FA might do is flip flop whether we pick a Tackle or WR at #6 & 24. We've been using practice squad caliber players at those two position groups. LOTS of players needed.
Well, any thoughts that we express are based on current information and not projecting what will happen in FA. But as Dutch said, the OL & WR's are so deficient that about the only thing FA might do is flip flop whether we pick a Tackle or WR at #6 & 24. We've been using practice squad caliber players at those two position groups. LOTS of players needed.
I agree that the odds are near 100% we draft Oline (probably tackle) with at least one of our 1st rounders and the other WR, OL, or other position with the other, in that order of probability.
-
McShay goes over Wide Recievers and OTackles...
McShay goes over Wide Recievers and OTackles...
I out Rain Man'd Rain Man repeating there's a very limited supply for the huge demand at OTackle? And that ain't easy... Right now we're counting on Dawand Jones to play LT on a pogo stick while we don't have a RT that can tie his own shoes. Outside of that, things are flawless...
-
Actually since it's Springtime and baseball is about to start, this is the video you want to watch.
-
"When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login