Skip to content

New RT in a trade

The Browns Board
26 11 757 1
  • I guess I'll put this here.  No OLinemen.  Sadly, Thrash seems like a dud.  

    image.png.a03c86ddb4eeb7594f1cdb660b318773.png

  • I guess I'll put this here.  No OLinemen.  Sadly, Thrash seems like a dud.  

    image.png.a03c86ddb4eeb7594f1cdb660b318773.png

    @orion said:

    I guess I'll put this here.  No OLinemen.  Sadly, Thrash seems like a dud.  

    image.png.a03c86ddb4eeb7594f1cdb660b318773.png

    very interesting:

    https://atozsports.com/nfl/chicago-bears-news/undrafted-rookie-brenden-bates-claimed-by-the-jets-after-being-cut-by-bears/

    "The former Kentucky pass catcher was the highest graded PFF rookie tight end during the preseason with an 85.8 grade while adding six receptions on seven targets for 100 receiving yards. He also had a 77.0 pass blocking grade and 74.9 run blocking grade."

  • One week ahead of legal tampering and they've brought in an OLineman.  It's a good sign.  But I would still stay laser focused on LT.  Get one, move Jones back to RT, put this new guy at RG (or LG depending on Bitonio) and we're almost there.  

    As for whether it's a WR or OT at pick #6, this trade might have moved the needle a little bit.  In a week or so, FA starts, and that might make the needle bounce back & forth.  

    @orion said:

    One week ahead of legal tampering and they've brought in an OLineman.  It's a good sign.  But I would still stay laser focused on LT.  Get one, move Jones back to RT, put this new guy at RG (or LG depending on Bitonio) and we're almost there.  

    As for whether it's a WR or OT at pick #6, this trade might have moved the needle a little bit.  In a week or so, FA starts, and that might make the needle bounce back & forth.  

    Indeed.  The needle may be way different in 2-3 weeks.  We may still make some trades and we will probably sign one more FA for the OL and one at receiver.  That will give us more flexibility in the draft where we aren't forced to reach for players for position over getting the best players. I could see where we don't even take a receiver until maybe round 4.

  • @orion said:

    One week ahead of legal tampering and they've brought in an OLineman.  It's a good sign.  But I would still stay laser focused on LT.  Get one, move Jones back to RT, put this new guy at RG (or LG depending on Bitonio) and we're almost there.  

    As for whether it's a WR or OT at pick #6, this trade might have moved the needle a little bit.  In a week or so, FA starts, and that might make the needle bounce back & forth.  

    Indeed.  The needle may be way different in 2-3 weeks.  We may still make some trades and we will probably sign one more FA for the OL and one at receiver.  That will give us more flexibility in the draft where we aren't forced to reach for players for position over getting the best players. I could see where we don't even take a receiver until maybe round 4.

    @ballpeen said:

    I could see where we don't even take a receiver until maybe round 4.

    Fortunately, I'm not a betting man...but if I were I'd bet that we take one earlier than that.  Berry has stated that the offense is a priority this year.  And receiver was/is a main problem.  

  • @ballpeen said:

    I could see where we don't even take a receiver until maybe round 4.

    Fortunately, I'm not a betting man...but if I were I'd bet that we take one earlier than that.  Berry has stated that the offense is a priority this year.  And receiver was/is a main problem.  

    @orion said:

    Fortunately, I'm not a betting man...but if I were I'd bet that we take one earlier than that.  Berry has stated that the offense is a priority this year.  And receiver was/is a main problem.  

    The reason I say that stems back to my earlier comment. If we sign a good receiver in free agency that goes in line with Berry stating O was going to be a big focus.  With Judey, a new FA, Fannin and as a wildcard I could see the team using Sampson in more of a receiving role, we will have some weapons in addition to anybody drafted and already have.

    If we don't sign a FA receiver, then we  will sign a receiver before round 4.  I don't know about round 1.  There are a lot of good receivers who will be there in round 2 that won't be that much of a drop off from round 1 guys IMO.

    Again, I am not saying we won't.  I am simply saying I can see possibilities where we won't.  The top receivers as it stand now don't exactly blow me away.  I don't think Tate is "elite" to take at #6.  Lemon looks like he will be a hard to coach player, and guym brain fart here, looks to have injury concerns.

    I like Cooper from Indiana and Branch from Georgia.  I think at least one of those guys will be there in the 2nd round for us.

  • @orion said:

    Fortunately, I'm not a betting man...but if I were I'd bet that we take one earlier than that.  Berry has stated that the offense is a priority this year.  And receiver was/is a main problem.  

    The reason I say that stems back to my earlier comment. If we sign a good receiver in free agency that goes in line with Berry stating O was going to be a big focus.  With Judey, a new FA, Fannin and as a wildcard I could see the team using Sampson in more of a receiving role, we will have some weapons in addition to anybody drafted and already have.

    If we don't sign a FA receiver, then we  will sign a receiver before round 4.  I don't know about round 1.  There are a lot of good receivers who will be there in round 2 that won't be that much of a drop off from round 1 guys IMO.

    Again, I am not saying we won't.  I am simply saying I can see possibilities where we won't.  The top receivers as it stand now don't exactly blow me away.  I don't think Tate is "elite" to take at #6.  Lemon looks like he will be a hard to coach player, and guym brain fart here, looks to have injury concerns.

    I like Cooper from Indiana and Branch from Georgia.  I think at least one of those guys will be there in the 2nd round for us.

    @ballpeen said:

    guym

    Jordan Tyson?

  • @ballpeen said:

    guym

    Jordan Tyson?

    @orion said:

    Jordan Tyson?

    LOL....Yeah....not sure what that guym was  lol

  • @orion said:

    Jordan Tyson?

    LOL....Yeah....not sure what that guym was  lol

    @ballpeen said:

    LOL....Yeah....not sure what that guym was  lol

    The 'y' was a clue.  🙂     Yeah, it's the injury situation that troubles me also.  

    I think we need more than one 'good' WR brought in.

  • @ballpeen said:

    LOL....Yeah....not sure what that guym was  lol

    The 'y' was a clue.  🙂     Yeah, it's the injury situation that troubles me also.  

    I think we need more than one 'good' WR brought in.

    @orion said:

    The 'y' was a clue.  🙂     Yeah, it's the injury situation that troubles me also.  

    I think we need more than one 'good' WR brought in.

    And we probably will.  I expect we will bring in one free agent with proven results, at least 1 drafted guy who at least shows solid talent and one later round guy.  We still have a few guys on the roster that still need more time to prove and some who have proven they are who they are and need to be replaced with something new.

  • @orion said:

    Fortunately, I'm not a betting man...but if I were I'd bet that we take one earlier than that.  Berry has stated that the offense is a priority this year.  And receiver was/is a main problem.  

    The reason I say that stems back to my earlier comment. If we sign a good receiver in free agency that goes in line with Berry stating O was going to be a big focus.  With Judey, a new FA, Fannin and as a wildcard I could see the team using Sampson in more of a receiving role, we will have some weapons in addition to anybody drafted and already have.

    If we don't sign a FA receiver, then we  will sign a receiver before round 4.  I don't know about round 1.  There are a lot of good receivers who will be there in round 2 that won't be that much of a drop off from round 1 guys IMO.

    Again, I am not saying we won't.  I am simply saying I can see possibilities where we won't.  The top receivers as it stand now don't exactly blow me away.  I don't think Tate is "elite" to take at #6.  Lemon looks like he will be a hard to coach player, and guym brain fart here, looks to have injury concerns.

    I like Cooper from Indiana and Branch from Georgia.  I think at least one of those guys will be there in the 2nd round for us.

    @ballpeen said:

    The reason I say that stems back to my earlier comment. If we sign a good receiver in free agency that goes in line with Berry stating O was going to be a big focus.  With Judey, a new FA, Fannin and as a wildcard I could see the team using Sampson in more of a receiving role, we will have some weapons in addition to anybody drafted and already have.

    If we don't sign a FA receiver, then we  will sign a receiver before round 4.  I don't know about round 1.  There are a lot of good receivers who will be there in round 2 that won't be that much of a drop off from round 1 guys IMO.

    Again, I am not saying we won't.  I am simply saying I can see possibilities where we won't.  The top receivers as it stand now don't exactly blow me away.  I don't think Tate is "elite" to take at #6.  Lemon looks like he will be a hard to coach player, and guym brain fart here, looks to have injury concerns.

    I like Cooper from Indiana and Branch from Georgia.  I think at least one of those guys will be there in the 2nd round for us.

    NOW YOU LISTEN HERE!  Thank you - that was very well said...