Skip to content

Amendment 4 Fails in Missouri

Political Discussion
19 5 168 1
  • @mld-woody said:

    ***************************************** ASSBIRD FART*****************************************

    Your assbird conclusions are invalid, as most always. HTownBrown nailed it again. The ulterior motive is reflected in most if not all your stupid assbird posts.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Your assbird conclusions are invalid, as most always. HTownBrown nailed it again. The ulterior motive is reflected in most if not all your stupid assbird posts.

    Cal, you have no idea what you're talking about. You exist to blindly tow the party line without any logic or reason.

    What "ulterior motive"? Wtf are you talking about? Reps wrote the amendment. Did they have an "ulterior motive"?

  • A "NO" vote opposed amending the Missouri Constitution to require voter approval of citizen-initiated constitutional amendments in each congressional district, rather than statewide;

    This is probably why it didn't pass. I get it.

    add language prohibiting ''foreign nationals'' and ''foreign adversaries'', as defined, from spending to support or oppose ballot measures, with penalties for violations; and add language regarding penalties for ballot initiative signature petition fraud, among other changes.

    If this was written by itself, it would have likely passed. I mean why not for safety sake? It was a bad decision to put these together.

    @htownbrown said:

    A "NO" vote opposed amending the Missouri Constitution to require voter approval of citizen-initiated constitutional amendments in each congressional district, rather than statewide;

    This is probably why it didn't pass. I get it.

    add language prohibiting ''foreign nationals'' and ''foreign adversaries'', as defined, from spending to support or oppose ballot measures, with penalties for violations; and add language regarding penalties for ballot initiative signature petition fraud, among other changes.

    If this was written by itself, it would have likely passed. I mean why not for safety sake? It was a bad decision to put these together.

    Sure, last part by itself probably passes. Hopefully it would include AIPAC. But, as I mentioned in my other post, Reps combined them for a pretty clear reason of political BS.

  • honestly answer your own questions just ONCE, ASSbird.

    Ascribing intentions on others that are not accurate, then assbird bitching about what

    you incorrectly ascribed, is your inconvenient modus operandi.

    It has gotten old, but still, every single time, it makes you look like the ASSbird that you are.

  • STLPR
    No image preview

    Missouri voters reject Amendment 4, say no to making it h...

    Because voters rejected Amendment 4, proposed state constitutional amendments brought by the public will still require a simple majority to pass once on the ballot.

    Republican effort in Missouri to effectively silence will of the people fails as 80%+ of voters vote against it

    We're all pro individual liberties and pro state's rights, and the rights of people in those states, right? All happy about this?

    Funny how this was most recently used to pass more progressive measures that Republicans in state office refused to pass.

    And funny how Reps wanted this to reduce the influence of phantom outside money, when so many are already bought and paid for by super pacs and corporations. Or Israel

    He blamed Jews again didn't he?

    @mld-woody said:

    And funny how Reps wanted this to reduce the influence of phantom outside money, when so many are already bought and paid for by super pacs and corporations. Or Israel

  • honestly answer your own questions just ONCE, ASSbird.

    Ascribing intentions on others that are not accurate, then assbird bitching about what

    you incorrectly ascribed, is your inconvenient modus operandi.

    It has gotten old, but still, every single time, it makes you look like the ASSbird that you are.

    @calfoxwc said:

    honestly answer your own questions just ONCE, ASSbird.

    Ascribing intentions on others that are not accurate, then assbird bitching about what

    you incorrectly ascribed, is your inconvenient modus operandi.

    It has gotten old, but still, every single time, it makes you look like the ASSbird that you are.

    What in the fuck are you even trying to say here?

  • JaxJ Jax

    He blamed Jews again didn't he?

    @mld-woody said:

    And funny how Reps wanted this to reduce the influence of phantom outside money, when so many are already bought and paid for by super pacs and corporations. Or Israel

    @jax said:

    He blamed Jews again didn't he?

    Israel. As in AIPAC.

    Not Jews

    Very, very sad you can't understand the difference.

  • @jax said:

    He blamed Jews again didn't he?

    Israel. As in AIPAC.

    Not Jews

    Very, very sad you can't understand the difference.

    @mld-woody said:

    Israel. As in AIPAC.

    Not Jews

    Very, very sad you can't understand the difference.

    Right....

  • @calfoxwc said:

    honestly answer your own questions just ONCE, ASSbird.

    Ascribing intentions on others that are not accurate, then assbird bitching about what

    you incorrectly ascribed, is your inconvenient modus operandi.

    It has gotten old, but still, every single time, it makes you look like the ASSbird that you are.

    What in the fuck are you even trying to say here?

    @mld-woody said:

    **************ASSABIRD FART*******************

    did I use too many big non-ASSBIRD words that you got lost?

    others got it fine.

    Surely you are only pretending to be profoundly stupid.

    Was your nest in the top of a very tall tree when you fell out soon after being hatched? lol

  • @mld-woody said:

    **************ASSABIRD FART*******************

    did I use too many big non-ASSBIRD words that you got lost?

    others got it fine.

    Surely you are only pretending to be profoundly stupid.

    Was your nest in the top of a very tall tree when you fell out soon after being hatched? lol

    @calfoxwc said:

    did I use too many big non-ASSBIRD words that you got lost?

    others got it fine.

    Surely you are only pretending to be profoundly stupid.

    Was your nest in the top of a very tall tree when you fell out soon after being hatched? lol

    Again, nothing

  • @calfoxwc said:

    did I use too many big non-ASSBIRD words that you got lost?

    others got it fine.

    Surely you are only pretending to be profoundly stupid.

    Was your nest in the top of a very tall tree when you fell out soon after being hatched? lol

    Again, nothing

    @mld-woody said:

    Again, nothing

    Look in the mirror faggot... you never have "anything'

  • It's really my own fault for even attempting to engage in a back and forth with any of you. I can't try to play chess with a pigeon and get mad when the pigeon shits on the board

    You will completely shut reality if it's necessary to praise your king and party.

  • Thumbnail

  • like most all liberals, woodpecker hates itself, and tries to "lol" at every post that is legit with ASSBIRD antagonistic posts.

    Woodpecker Face Knife Meme at Lillian Hecker blog

  • some woodpecker-like assbird leftie puts a croc into a lake in America - Indian Lake in Ohio.

    So dramatic woodpecker might censor it like another time.

    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1079084497876728