Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Final: Jets (2-3) 17, Browns (3-2) 12 · Week 5

Final: Jets (2-3) 17, Browns (3-2) 12 · Week 5

The Browns Board
182 23 2.7k 1
  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote CLE 26-23 · 5 −5
    #96

    They got it right ! Browns recover fumble in Jets redzone

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @bjh2130

    In empty, if you get that Off-ball over the B gap, the OT is going to squeeze and take away the most immediate, straight path threat. That means Deshaun now has to account for Bailey and be hot.

    bjh2130B bjh2130 wrote
    #97
    @tiamat63 said:
    @bjh2130

    In empty, if you get that Off-ball over the B gap, the OT is going to squeeze and take away the most immediate, straight path threat. That means Deshaun now has to account for Bailey and be hot.


    I know you're always supposed to take the inside guy but I can't accept them blitzing 4 and getting a guy completely unblocked. If that is what is going to happen schematically everytime in empty every team ever should go double a gap vs empty and drop 7 if you get a free unblocked rusher only bringing 4

    tiamat63T 1 Reply
  • bbedwardB bbedward

    Two full steps after, a catch and fumble in my opinion

    If I was a Jets fan I might think differently

    Captain TripsC Captain Trips wrote
    #98
    @bbedward said:
    Two full steps after, a catch and fumble in my opinion
    If I was a Jets fan I might think differently


    Good eye on the steps.

    "See the turtle, ain't he keen? All things serve the f*cking beam!"
  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote
    #99

    Wow we suck today
    Nothing is going right...

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote CLE 17-14 · 5 −4
    #100

    The offense looks like they've literally never played in rain before in their lives.

    gumby73G 1 Reply
  • bjh2130B bjh2130
    @tiamat63 said:
    @bjh2130

    In empty, if you get that Off-ball over the B gap, the OT is going to squeeze and take away the most immediate, straight path threat. That means Deshaun now has to account for Bailey and be hot.


    I know you're always supposed to take the inside guy but I can't accept them blitzing 4 and getting a guy completely unblocked. If that is what is going to happen schematically everytime in empty every team ever should go double a gap vs empty and drop 7 if you get a free unblocked rusher only bringing 4

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote
    #101
    @bjh2130 said:
    I know you're always supposed to take the inside guy but I can't accept them blitzing 4 and getting a guy completely unblocked. If that is what is going to happen schematically everytime in empty every team ever should go double a gap vs empty and drop 7 if you get a free unblocked rusher only bringing 4


    That's uhh.... that's probably the most popular look vs empty in the NFL when it comes to pressure designs. Especially when you factor in slide reads & 2pt edge droppers. We have to break protection rules.

    bjh2130B 1 Reply
  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven

    The offense looks like they've literally never played in rain before in their lives.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote CLE 26-23 · 5 −5
    #102
    @Dutch-Oven said:
    The offense looks like they've literally never played in rain before in their lives.


    I'll take another TB delay game winner at this point..

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • bbedwardB bbedward wrote CLE 27-17 · 8 −8
    #103

    How come that pass wasn't intentional grounding?

    👍
  • bjh2130B bjh2130 wrote
    #104

    Time for the offense to go get 6. Need watson to be 4th quarter Watson again and need bond to catch balls that hit him in the hands

  • sydS syd wrote CLE 31-6 · 9 −9
    #105

    fuck it, i wanted him to miss the kick,but at least now we can start from outside the 10 yard line

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote CLE 26-23 · 5 −5
    #106

    This hurricane rain trail is freakish.. NC had no wind with hours of continuing drizzle... NY looks like a hard rain monsoon.. crazy

    Jets FG.. we go down 10-6 14 mins to play...

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote
    #107

    Our O line is hot garbage

  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote
    #108

    Just fuckin punt...maybe we can get a pick 6

  • Browns149B Browns149 wrote CLE 24-13 · 8 −8
    #109

    3rd and 30. Is Stefanski still here?

    And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve OZZY
    😂
  • KvoetheK Kvoethe wrote
    #110

    Browns gonna Brown

  • bbedwardB bbedward wrote CLE 27-17 · 8 −8
    #111

    Felt like bond could have turned upfield on that catch

    Also not sure how that's considered a sack

    bjh2130B 1 Reply
  • tiamat63T tiamat63
    @bjh2130 said:
    I know you're always supposed to take the inside guy but I can't accept them blitzing 4 and getting a guy completely unblocked. If that is what is going to happen schematically everytime in empty every team ever should go double a gap vs empty and drop 7 if you get a free unblocked rusher only bringing 4


    That's uhh.... that's probably the most popular look vs empty in the NFL when it comes to pressure designs. Especially when you factor in slide reads & 2pt edge droppers. We have to break protection rules.

    bjh2130B bjh2130 wrote
    #112
    @tiamat63 said:
    That's uhh.... that's probably the most popular look vs empty in the NFL when it comes to pressure designs. Especially when you factor in slide reads & 2pt edge droppers. We have to break protection rules.


    But typically if they are bringing more than 4 from double a gap looks where you would slide down is it not typically a cover 0 maybe cover 1? Where as presnap on that play it was pretty evident they were in zone. I believe it was a match maybe cover 9 but still presnap look to me would have suggested they weren't gonna bring extreme heat. Dawand just got beat on that penalty ridden drive

  • bbedwardB bbedward

    Felt like bond could have turned upfield on that catch

    Also not sure how that's considered a sack

    bjh2130B bjh2130 wrote
    #113
    @bbedward said:
    Felt like bond could have turned upfield on that catch
    Also not sure how that's considered a sack


    Even if not a sack it would have been grounding as the ball didn't get back to the line

  • Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote CLE 17-14 · 5 −4
    #114

    The OLine is getting brought behind the old proverbial woodshed and made to squeal like a pig today.

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote CLE 26-23 · 5 −5
    #115

    and the steelers are going to steelers...

    we got time to go win this game

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
Log in to reply