Skip to content

Starting WR's to be announced by the end of the week

The Browns Board
19 15 1.7k
  • 😛 Nothing open downfield. DA will be benched at halftime for Quinn!

    @glenby73 said:

    😛 Nothing open downfield. DA will be benched at halftime for Quinn!

    Awww... cut him slack, he may pass it downfield someday, no reason to only play him when nothing is open down there.

  • @blowe said:

    MoMass

    Don't you think it's a little bit too much pressure for a rookie?

    suns said:

    Don't you think it's a little bit too much pressure for a rookie?

    Dwayne Bowe had no problem with it in Kansas, so why not.

    When was the last time the Browns had an offensive player post a fantasy-worthy week? Massoquai played amazing football last week. Dude is definitely a starter.

  • @blowe said:

    MoMass

    I don't think the trade would go down without MoMass' stepping up on Sunday.

    That's a pretty big promotion to the team's #1 WR in his 5th week in the NFL.

    @lumbergh said:

    I don't think the trade would go down without MoMass' stepping up on Sunday.

    That's a pretty big promotion to the team's #1 WR in his 5th week in the NFL.

    And if MoMass is the #1 receiver it bodes very well for Mangini's first draft.

  • @blowe said:

    MoMass

    Don't you think it's a little bit too much pressure for a rookie?

    suns said:

    Don't you think it's a little bit too much pressure for a rookie?

    Not on a team going nowhere.

  • @lumbergh said:

    I don't think the trade would go down without MoMass' stepping up on Sunday.

    That's a pretty big promotion to the team's #1 WR in his 5th week in the NFL.

    And if MoMass is the #1 receiver it bodes very well for Mangini's first draft.

    @hammertime said:

    And if MoMass is the #1 receiver it bodes very well for Mangini's first draft.

    Not when he becomes it by default.

    I do like him, though, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    I'm greedy. I think this trade kinda stinks for us.

  • . .mz

    @hammertime said:

    And if MoMass is the #1 receiver it bodes very well for Mangini's first draft.

    Not when he becomes it by default.

    I do like him, though, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    I'm greedy. I think this trade kinda stinks for us.

    @.mz said:

    Not when he becomes it by default.

    I do like him, though, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.

    I'm greedy. I think this trade kinda stinks for us.

    This doesn't stink at all. We are ridding ourselves of losers.

    Just like all the talk about offers of 1st round picks for Quinn and none for DA, i don't beleive any of it.

    Theres a few more losers on the roster an will get weeded out eventually.

    I think its great.

  • I'm not particularly busted up over losing Edwards, hammer, I just wanted MMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEE!

  • Im putting my money on MoMass and Furrey.

  • @blowe said:

    MoMass

    I don't think the trade would go down without MoMass' stepping up on Sunday.

    That's a pretty big promotion to the team's #1 WR in his 5th week in the NFL.

    @lumbergh said:

    I don't think the trade would go down without MoMass' stepping up on Sunday.

    That's a pretty big promotion to the team's #1 WR in his 5th week in the NFL.

    That's why I think this deal was in the works before the incident. And, why does someone have to be the #1. Isn't it to DA's benefit that Buffalo doesn't know who the go to guy will be in some situations? If they come out with MoMass, Robo and Furrey or even Cribbs, where do you roll the coverage to?

    Fact is DA doesn't have to force the ball to MoMass because he is now the #1.

    Why does someone have to be labeled the #1? Is that so defenses know who to double?

    DA just has to find the guy in single coverage or throw underneath or in the seam if they play a cover 2.

  • At least now we won't have to hear DA knob slobberers blame BE for Dereks lack of production anymore.