Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. DA's stats in the snow against the Bills

DA's stats in the snow against the Bills

The Browns Board
30 19 2.0k

  • I gotta laugh at the girlie-boys we have here. They bitch, moan and whine about Lums, but can't stop keeping Anderson out there in the limelight as fuel for Lums.

    You girlieboys don't have Lum's on ignore, you have the rest of the aspects of the team on ignore, including the defense and running game.

    Legacy FanL ? 2 Replies
  • ATENEARSA ATENEARS

    I gotta laugh at the girlie-boys we have here. They bitch, moan and whine about Lums, but can't stop keeping Anderson out there in the limelight as fuel for Lums.

    You girlieboys don't have Lum's on ignore, you have the rest of the aspects of the team on ignore, including the defense and running game.

    @atenears said:

    I gotta laugh at the girlie-boys we have here. They bitch, moan and whine about Lums, but can't stop keeping Anderson out there in the limelight as fuel for Lums.

    You girlieboys don't have Lum's on ignore, you have the rest of the aspects of the team on ignore, including the defense and running game.

    I'm pretty sure I reminded everyone of the impossibility of kicking 50 yd field goals in those conditions. Good thing our D got that safety. I guess all we can hope for is another 2-0 win, right? 🤔

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
    ATENEARSA 1 Reply

  • Buffalo weather said snow accumulations under a inch, with snow showers possible...temp about 28, and winds in the manageable 10 mph range.

    While cold, it isn't going to be blizzard conditions as it was the last time we played.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
  • Legacy FanL Legacy Fan

    @atenears said:

    I gotta laugh at the girlie-boys we have here. They bitch, moan and whine about Lums, but can't stop keeping Anderson out there in the limelight as fuel for Lums.

    You girlieboys don't have Lum's on ignore, you have the rest of the aspects of the team on ignore, including the defense and running game.

    I'm pretty sure I reminded everyone of the impossibility of kicking 50 yd field goals in those conditions. Good thing our D got that safety. I guess all we can hope for is another 2-0 win, right? 🤔

    @legacy-fan said:

    I guess all we can hope for is another 2-0 win, right? 🤔

    A 2-0 win is better than going 23-of-35 for 239yrds in a loss ... with or without a 4th quarter TD Drive.

    Legacy FanL 1 Reply
  • LumberghL Lumbergh

    @flugel said:

    I'm pretty sure Penn State considered Ohio State the better opponent but you can go on playing pretend. You're good at that.

    Guess who USC thinks is a better opponent?

    Let's just hope that BQ doesn't lose to Buffalo which would make it obvious which Browns QB they'd rather be facing.

    @lumbergh said:

    Guess who USC thinks is a better opponent?

    Let's just hope that BQ doesn't lose to Buffalo which would make it obvious which Browns QB they'd rather be facing.

    Good point - maybe I need to include Stanford because 100% of their players and fans would tell me they'd much rather play Oregon State. If that doesn't work, we could look at the polls. If that doesn't work we can go back to comparing National Championships and/or BCS appearances. Either way, sucks to be you one more time.

    BTW, the FIRST opponent BQ faced said they'd rather face DA as mentioned by the fellers broadcasting the Thursday Night Game. It doesn't take a genious to figure out why. I'm assuming you didn't put the commentators on mute until AFTER you heard that. 30 points later - dey wuz right.

    Dumb Ass usually does all the dirty work for our opponents. When he's throwing INTs for TDs - we really never had a chance to see what our defense could do to defend a lead because he was too busy treating Ratbird defenders to TD passes. Although a couple of those suckers followed some INTs of the rookie QB in the first matchup. He had the right concept with TDs but the wrong TEAM, which pretty much solidified every football soothsayer's prediction "Beware the Ides of Football Season." DA was O-for-Roethlisberger and O-for-Flacco. Looks good on you though.

    If I ever wanted an "Uh-oh QB" - DA would be my guy. I don't though. I'd prefer a QB that can complete more than 37% of his passes against Buffalo so our means of scoring can exceed a bad snap on a punt by Buffalo. Those were the winning 2 points last time. DA's compliments were for throwing the ball to the wrong area code so frequently that he couldn't get intercepted. Hey, at least he kept his passes out of Canada right? God bless ya! Have fun rooting against Cleveland tonight.

    - Tom F.

    I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
  • OconReconO OconRecon

    Since our last snow game was against Buffalo, and resulted in a Browns win 8-0, here were DA's stats:

    Completions: 9

    Attempts: 24

    Completion Pct: 37.5%

    Yards: 137

    Average: 5.7

    TD Passes: 0

    Interceptions: 0

    Sacks: 1

    Sack Yards: 7

    QB rating: 57.1

    Rushings Attempts: 1

    Rushing Yards: 0

    Rushing Avg.: 0

    Rushing TD's: 0

    Really a pretty good game under snowy conditions. No fumbles and no interceptions goes a long way in a low scoring bad weather game, especially since Jamal had 163 yards rushing.

    http://tinyurl.com/Jamal-in-the-snow

    @oconrecon said:

    Since our last snow game was against Buffalo, and resulted in a Browns win 8-0, here were DA's stats:

    Completions: 9

    Attempts: 24

    Completion Pct: 37.5%

    Yards: 137

    that's over 15 yards per completion. AKA.... going vertical.

    BTW, BQ couldn't crack 10 yds per completion on a balmy evening vs a hobbling Denver D who had 5 starters out, 1 day to prepare, and a 2 time-zone plane ride.

  • LumberghL Lumbergh

    @oconrecon said:

    Since our last snow game was against Buffalo, and resulted in a Browns win 8-0, here were DA's stats:

    Completions: 9

    Attempts: 24

    Completion Pct: 37.5%

    Yards: 137

    that's over 15 yards per completion. AKA.... going vertical.

    BTW, BQ couldn't crack 10 yds per completion on a balmy evening vs a hobbling Denver D who had 5 starters out, 1 day to prepare, and a 2 time-zone plane ride.

    @lumbergh said:

    that's over 15 yards per completion. AKA.... going vertical.

    BTW, BQ couldn't crack 10 yds per completion on a balmy evening vs a hobbling Denver D who had 5 starters out, 1 day to prepare, and a 2 time-zone plane ride.

    And it is quite obvious that DA won't be cracking anything other than the crack of his ass riding pine!!! AKA "Backup!!!"

  • OconReconO OconRecon

    Since our last snow game was against Buffalo, and resulted in a Browns win 8-0, here were DA's stats:

    Completions: 9

    Attempts: 24

    Completion Pct: 37.5%

    Yards: 137

    Average: 5.7

    TD Passes: 0

    Interceptions: 0

    Sacks: 1

    Sack Yards: 7

    QB rating: 57.1

    Rushings Attempts: 1

    Rushing Yards: 0

    Rushing Avg.: 0

    Rushing TD's: 0

    Really a pretty good game under snowy conditions. No fumbles and no interceptions goes a long way in a low scoring bad weather game, especially since Jamal had 163 yards rushing.

    http://tinyurl.com/Jamal-in-the-snow

    @oconrecon said:

    Completions: 9

    Attempts: 24

    Completion Pct: 37.5%

    Yards: 137

    TD Passes: 0

    Interceptions: 0

    Sacks: 1

    QB rating: 57.1

    http://tinyurl.com/Jamal-in-the-snow

    Just as an apples to apples comparison, Trent Edwards (a TRUE ROOKIE) had the following stats in the same game:

    Completions: 13

    Attempts: 33

    Completion Pct: 39.4% (better than DA)

    Yards: 124 (just 13 less than DA)

    TD: 0

    INT: 0

    Sacks: 0 (better than DA)

    QB Rating: 50.6 (in the same ballpark)

    So, what are we giving DA kudos for in this game....outplaying a ROOKIE in his 7th start?

    Anyway, who cares. The fact is DA is on the bench...the weather is NOT going to be this bad...and we are the underdog big time this go round!

  • ATENEARSA ATENEARS

    @legacy-fan said:

    I guess all we can hope for is another 2-0 win, right? 🤔

    A 2-0 win is better than going 23-of-35 for 239yrds in a loss ... with or without a 4th quarter TD Drive.

    @atenears said:

    A 2-0 win is better than going 23-of-35 for 239yrds in a loss ... with or without a 4th quarter TD Drive.

    You mean like the 2nd Baltimore game? 😉

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
  • ATENEARSA ATENEARS

    I gotta laugh at the girlie-boys we have here. They bitch, moan and whine about Lums, but can't stop keeping Anderson out there in the limelight as fuel for Lums.

    You girlieboys don't have Lum's on ignore, you have the rest of the aspects of the team on ignore, including the defense and running game.

    @atenears said:

    You girlieboys don't have Lum's on ignore, you have the rest of the aspects of the team on ignore, including the defense and running game.

    Guess you don't read all the other threads on the board 😉😒

    You know, all those threads you, Lum, and Sev don't dare post in. The ones on D, running game, and coaching.

  • @jadbf said:

    You mean these threads?

    Oh and the other thing all these threads have in common? Not one post by you or any of the others who whine that we don't discuss the other problems with the team enough.

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=696

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=865

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=918

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=883

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=899

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=901

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=834

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=829

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=820

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=825

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=788

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=778

    And I'm not going to let up on this either. And if you're next whine will be that yeah we're discussing these things now that Quinn is starting, Well with all the bouncing from board to board, it would be hard for me to go find the threads as easily as this. But you KNOW they were there.

    Damn. You Got Served!

Log in to reply