"It's a shock to everybody on this team"
-
\ said:
At least he didn't say, "I've never been on a team that benched a Pro-Bowl Quarterback."He had some choice stuff earlier too. He's not going to insult Browns fans on this board like an idiot for his own agenda.
-
\ said:
Okay Lums, now you're just trolling, clean it up and stop acting like a complete ass or your posts will continue to disappear. Play your games, but enough of the "Browns fans root to lose and the QB to fail" bullshit.Your act is beyond old and tired, you have become stupid Pitt fan.
I've DEBATED putting him & the other DA (only) supporters on the IGNORE/FOE list like the other Trolls that wish the Browns to FAIL!
-
\ said:
\ said:
Fraley is confident Quinn will be ready to step into the spotlight."He's young, so you don't know what to expect but he has worked hard and he'll be ready," Fraley said. "Derek and the other quarterbacks are always together, 24-7. Brady is always prepared because as a backup you are always one play away. He's been doing it the whole season.
"I know Brady has been waiting for his turn and I'm not sure this is the way he envisioned getting it. We're going to play hard for whoever is back there, and now it's Brady."
Now this is what is called the "standard answer"
You homos who've tried to say that Fraley's statement "it's a shock" is a standard answer are lost in a Naked Brady Quinn dream like Mike Golic......You can be my hero baby to the tune of Enrique Iglesias
'You homos'???? Are you twelve sir?
-
You guys really have to get over your fascination with the #2 QB.
Isn't that what you've been saying for 26 games, Lums?
-
\ said:
You guys really have to get over your fascination with the #2 QB.
Owned.
That one left a mark.
Somebodies ass is really sore right now.
-
I never post in these Lumbergh threads. I 've never understood how he gained such a foothold here. He plays the same note over and over and it's boring. I can see where it might have been entertaining at first but now it's like hitting the badminton birdie back over the net for the 77,000th time.
Doug
-
\ said:
I never post in these Lumbergh threads. I 've never understood how he gained such a foothold here. He plays the same note over and over and it's boring. I can see where it might have been entertaining at first but now it's like hitting the badminton birdie back over the net for the 77,000th time.Doug
Once again I could not agree with you more
Leaving to pick up the folks to vote....hope I do not have to wait 4000 hours
-
\ said:
\ said:
its no shock to me lummy dummy///we all saw it comming///except maybe you.......and the rest of the team. Did you read the quote?
Hank is a TEAM player, what did you expect him to say?
"Well it was no suprise he couldn't avoid rushers with that Lumms guy hanging in between his legs. We all say how bad Dumb Ass was doing and couldn't wait for the change."
-
I hope you all enjoyed this trip down memory lane ..... this thread is going to be closed because we don't expect anyone to come back and say, "Gee, I guess I could have handled myself a bit better", naaa, we just expect the same smart-ass remarks.
I just hope you all took a real good look at this thread though. How a group of people, chimmed in with a couple of Steeler fans, can gang-bang one guy (maybe two ... even a 3rd) all because of a quote supporting a Browns QB
You should be ashamed, and Mod's I hope you start gaining the balls to bounce some of these guys out of here that have been here for several years now and contributed heavily in souring this thread, 100's of threads like it, and this once proud forum.
EDIT: Keep in mind that once this thread was brought to light that some members deleted their comments from the thread, perhaps out of embarrassment.
-
I hope you all enjoyed this trip down memory lane ..... this thread is going to be closed because we don't expect anyone to come back and say, "Gee, I guess I could have handled myself a bit better", naaa, we just expect the same smart-ass remarks.
I just hope you all took a real good look at this thread though. How a group of people, chimmed in with a couple of Steeler fans, can gang-bang one guy (maybe two ... even a 3rd) all because of a quote supporting a Browns QB
You should be ashamed, and Mod's I hope you start gaining the balls to bounce some of these guys out of here that have been here for several years now and contributed heavily in souring this thread, 100's of threads like it, and this once proud forum.
EDIT: Keep in mind that once this thread was brought to light that some members deleted their comments from the thread, perhaps out of embarrassment.
TAKEN FROM THIS THREAD: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=460
I hope you all enjoyed this trip down memory lane ..... this thread is going to be closed because we don't expect anyone to come back and say, "Gee, I guess I could have handled myself a bit better", naaa, we just expect the same smart-ass remarks.
I just hope you all took a real good look at this thread though. How a group of people, chimmed in with a couple of Steeler fans, can gang-bang one guy (maybe two ... even a 3rd) all because of a quote supporting a Browns QB
You should be ashamed, and Mod's I hope you start gaining the balls to bounce some of these guys out of here that have been here for several years now and contributed heavily in souring this thread, 100's of threads like it, and this once proud forum.
EDIT: Keep in mind that once this thread was brought to light that some members deleted their comments from the thread, perhaps out of embarrassment.
Admin, or Stan or whomever: I take issue with the ressurected thread and it's purpose. If you need me to clean up the title of this thread from being a bit smart-assy, I can do so - just let me know.
My objection with the ressurected thread is as follows:
I do believe that this is as far back as you archive posts, so I wont stir up some conspiracy type BS regarding that. But this thread, for your reprimanding purposes, is taken way out of context. Lumberg dug his own grave way before the date of this post. And was doing so on a consistent basis with the off-color comments regarding a member of the Browns sexuality, and implicating that of a large portion of the teams fanbase. This post was in response to the switch at QB made last season under Crennel's watch. Yes, I admit (even though I took no part in it) that Lum's OP was on-topic, and legitimate, but there was about 18 months of steam that was released when the switch happened. Lum happened to be the guy cranking the valve tighter & tighter, and when the gasket blew, he was right in the way and got popped in the mouth. Put in that perspective/context - I think the new antagonists of the thread (as the tables had turned) were rather tame.
Again, I'm not denying that there havent been worse displays of sportsmanship when it comes to dealing with Lumberg, but you cant pull one of his very few legitimate posts and use it as the defining example of his behavior on this forum. That's a cheap way out. However, I think the point of your thread should be taken to heart, but I think you can understand that some people felt Lumberg had it coming. This season didn't help matters when you & Z jumped in on the fun.
Those are my pennies.
-
I must second Legacy fans notion.
Lums was dissing people waaay before that post, since waay before that everyone was a BQ fag and a card carrrying member of BQ nation! He deserved whatever shit he got, plus, he isnt really a browns fan, he is a derek anderson fan. For all we know the guy owns a seahawks jersey!
Just as the board was getting back to normal
-
I'm just glad I had the judgement back then to not participate in the ressurected thread at the time.
Its really spot on as I have no idea why people reacted so negatively to Lum at that time.
-
I'm just glad I had the judgement back then to not participate in the ressurected thread at the time.
Its really spot on as I have no idea why people reacted so negatively to Lum at that time.
-
TAKEN FROM THIS THREAD: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=460
I hope you all enjoyed this trip down memory lane ..... this thread is going to be closed because we don't expect anyone to come back and say, "Gee, I guess I could have handled myself a bit better", naaa, we just expect the same smart-ass remarks.
I just hope you all took a real good look at this thread though. How a group of people, chimmed in with a couple of Steeler fans, can gang-bang one guy (maybe two ... even a 3rd) all because of a quote supporting a Browns QB
You should be ashamed, and Mod's I hope you start gaining the balls to bounce some of these guys out of here that have been here for several years now and contributed heavily in souring this thread, 100's of threads like it, and this once proud forum.
EDIT: Keep in mind that once this thread was brought to light that some members deleted their comments from the thread, perhaps out of embarrassment.
Admin, or Stan or whomever: I take issue with the ressurected thread and it's purpose. If you need me to clean up the title of this thread from being a bit smart-assy, I can do so - just let me know.
My objection with the ressurected thread is as follows:
I do believe that this is as far back as you archive posts, so I wont stir up some conspiracy type BS regarding that. But this thread, for your reprimanding purposes, is taken way out of context. Lumberg dug his own grave way before the date of this post. And was doing so on a consistent basis with the off-color comments regarding a member of the Browns sexuality, and implicating that of a large portion of the teams fanbase. This post was in response to the switch at QB made last season under Crennel's watch. Yes, I admit (even though I took no part in it) that Lum's OP was on-topic, and legitimate, but there was about 18 months of steam that was released when the switch happened. Lum happened to be the guy cranking the valve tighter & tighter, and when the gasket blew, he was right in the way and got popped in the mouth. Put in that perspective/context - I think the new antagonists of the thread (as the tables had turned) were rather tame.
Again, I'm not denying that there havent been worse displays of sportsmanship when it comes to dealing with Lumberg, but you cant pull one of his very few legitimate posts and use it as the defining example of his behavior on this forum. That's a cheap way out. However, I think the point of your thread should be taken to heart, but I think you can understand that some people felt Lumberg had it coming. This season didn't help matters when you & Z jumped in on the fun.
Those are my pennies.
But this thread, for your reprimanding purposes, is taken way out of context. Lumberg dug his own grave way before the date of this post. And was doing so on a consistent basis with the off-color comments regarding a member of the Browns sexuality, and implicating that of a large portion of the teams fanbase.
THANK YOU, buddy.
-
Where'd the Z "vent-only-here" thread go btw? Seemed to have disappeared right when the Lum-was-abused thread popped up.
-
@shepwrite said:
Dear God, this is getting vomitous. Who woulda thought way back when that an Oregon State troll would win Ate's heart?I'm not sure that's its his heart that was won.
-
@shepwrite said:
Dear God, this is getting vomitous. Who woulda thought way back when that an Oregon State troll would win Ate's heart?The heart wants what the heart wants. Who are we to argue?
-
First we start the thread saying we'll clean up, then you decide to get a 'one last shot in' to stir the pot AGAIN.
Things have calmed down and mostly everyone is being civil with some decent discussions.
Then this thread just happens to be 'dug up' and conveniently locked after 'admin' (Stan I assume) does the final word thing. Why not dig up the other 800 threads that have gone to shit because Lumbergh showed up in them and started being a dickhead.
We should be ashamed? Boo xxxxing hoo.
Maybe the shame should be on whomever decided to let Lumbergh carry on as long as he did and turn everything into a zoo. Anyone with any sort of objective eye could see what Lumbergh was doing, and the QB contention and hatred of Lum had been going on since way before that because he had been posting the same shit he always has 'brady fags', etc, etc, etc. It's not like he started out decent; he's always been an asshole.
-
I post on this board alot and I must have missed what everyone is so upset about, and where did the thanks button go?
-
Sweet Jesus. I just saw that thread being dug up. WTF?!!?!?!?!?!?
Everyone in this thread has it dead right.
Not to mention that's a thread from the middle of the 2008 season, w/ Lum already ragging on Quinn, having previously shown he's a tool, and not supporting the QB change (you know, the matra of we are Browns fans, we should support the QB). Not to mention our own board owner being a chode in that thread. Yeah, great example of why people should feel bad about Lums
That's a prime example of board members rallying against a troll, a troll supported by management.Straight up more childish behavior to even drag that thing up. And dumb ass thought process to use it as an example of anything.
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login