Could DA end up with the worst QB rating EVER in a season
-
I only favor DA because I feel he distributes the ball better, gives us a deep threat, and the offense seems to not necessarily be better with him in, but let's say it opens more up for area's such as our running game. It helps our O-line that he has a quick release and gets rid of the ball faster.
I can't help thinking about just how bad every aspect of our team was after week #2 or #3. DA may go down as the worst QB rating in the World, but that team after week #2 & #3 was the worst 'TEAM' I have ever seen in the NFL, and I've seen some bad ones in this decade.
NOTE: I think the QB rating is kind of gay. I prefer to watch the games and get a feel.
NOTE 2: I'm not going to mention dropped passes here (opps... snap!)
I only favor DA because I feel he distributes the ball better, gives us a deep threat, and the offense seems to not necessarily be better with him in, but let's say it opens more up for area's such as our running game. It helps our O-line that he has a quick release and gets rid of the ball faster.
I can't help thinking about just how bad every aspect of our team was after week #2 or #3. DA may go down as the worst QB rating in the World, but that team after week #2 & #3 was the worst 'TEAM' I have ever seen in the NFL, and I've seen some bad ones in this decade.
NOTE: I think the QB rating is kind of gay. I prefer to watch the games and get a feel.
NOTE 2: I'm not going to mention dropped passes here (opps... snap!)
Ate, seriously? Distributes the ball better? If the opposing team is included, I guess you're right.
Could it POSSIBLY be that our opposition in the first 3 games was much tougher than our last 3?
Your bias is frustrating to say the least.
-
I only favor DA because I feel he distributes the ball better, gives us a deep threat, and the offense seems to not necessarily be better with him in, but let's say it opens more up for area's such as our running game. It helps our O-line that he has a quick release and gets rid of the ball faster.
I can't help thinking about just how bad every aspect of our team was after week #2 or #3. DA may go down as the worst QB rating in the World, but that team after week #2 & #3 was the worst 'TEAM' I have ever seen in the NFL, and I've seen some bad ones in this decade.
NOTE: I think the QB rating is kind of gay. I prefer to watch the games and get a feel.
NOTE 2: I'm not going to mention dropped passes here (opps... snap!)
Ate, seriously? Distributes the ball better? If the opposing team is included, I guess you're right.
Could it POSSIBLY be that our opposition in the first 3 games was much tougher than our last 3?
Your bias is frustrating to say the least.
Ate, seriously? Distributes the ball better? If the opposing team is included, I guess you're right.
Could it POSSIBLY be that our opposition in the first 3 games was much tougher than our last 3?
Your bias is frustrating to say the least.
I don't know if we will see a stat that supports my theory that he distributes it better, but let me re-phrase it. He makes attemps more/different throws. For one, he might have only thrown it down field once per game, but he's thrown/attempted it down field at lesat once per game.
Yes the competition was better when perhaps BQ was in. I'm sure someone may parade out passing attacks levied on any team we've faced this season, but I like Anderson in there still.
I'm sorry, I really ain't a Brady Quinn basher, I just got tired of waiting for him to do something. He was boring as hell. I do believe/hope he gets another chance.
Go Brady! (big jump, spread, touch toes, land, bounce-up, clap, extend arms up in air ... pump fist )
-
I only favor DA because I feel he distributes the ball better, gives us a deep threat, and the offense seems to not necessarily be better with him in, but let's say it opens more up for area's such as our running game. It helps our O-line that he has a quick release and gets rid of the ball faster.
I can't help thinking about just how bad every aspect of our team was after week #2 or #3. DA may go down as the worst QB rating in the World, but that team after week #2 & #3 was the worst 'TEAM' I have ever seen in the NFL, and I've seen some bad ones in this decade.
NOTE: I think the QB rating is kind of gay. I prefer to watch the games and get a feel.
NOTE 2: I'm not going to mention dropped passes here (opps... snap!)
Ate, seriously? Distributes the ball better? If the opposing team is included, I guess you're right.
Could it POSSIBLY be that our opposition in the first 3 games was much tougher than our last 3?
Your bias is frustrating to say the least.
Ate, seriously? Distributes the ball better? If the opposing team is included, I guess you're right.
Could it POSSIBLY be that our opposition in the first 3 games was much tougher than our last 3?
Your bias is frustrating to say the least.
The same could be said about the first three games last year when DA was recovering from a concussion. The Number 1, 2 and 10 defense in the league (not sure on Dallas). Of course that does not excuse the number of incomplete passes the past two weeks. But if the receivers dropped a normal amount of balls, call it three a game then I think Da completes 10 more passes. Not sure what that would do to his rating.
But if you are just looking at this year, Denver Number 2 (BQ); Pittsburgh 3 (DA); Baltimore 17 (both); Minnesota 18 (BQ) ; Cincy 19 (DA) and Buffalo 21 (DA)
Would say that neither Qb has faced the best defenses in the league thus far. Both have faced a top 3 team and both have faced teams rated 18 to 21. The offense looked horrible the first 3 weeks of the season, and though it has not looked great since it has at least looked like an NFL offense.
Record wise the first three have better records but they don't have better defenses.
In games started this year DA has 2 TDs and 3 interceptions (Has three ints against Baltimore, game not started)
In games start this year BQ has 1 TD (in garbage time) and 3 interceptions
As a starter I guess I just don't see how DA throws more to the other team than BQ. And EVEN if you throw in the 3 ints against Baltimore he is still throwing ints to TDs at the same rate as BQ.
I am going to agree with solon, that neither QB is the franchise, but I will go with the coaches in saying that DA at least makes the offense look like it might score. With BQ the only time the offense looked like it might score was against the prevent defense.
-
DA currently has a QB rating of 41 (that's not a typo), 41. The previous consensus worst QB D. Russell is at 51.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tab...;seasonType=REG
I couldn't find the all time worst QB rating for an entire season online (it likely requires something like 150 throws to qualify).
This isn't a BQ verses DA thread, just wondering.
DA currently has a QB rating of 41 (that's not a typo), 41. The previous consensus worst QB D. Russell is at 51.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tab...;seasonType=REG
I couldn't find the all time worst QB rating for an entire season online (it likely requires something like 150 throws to qualify).
This isn't a BQ verses DA thread, just wondering.
He very well could.
At least you all seem to have a sense of humor about it.
-
Worse then jamarcus russel. Enough said and to answer your actual question yes. He may go in the record books as the worst passer ever
-
Problem is picking a "franchise" QB is a hit and miss gamble. You never know who it will be. Lots of great college Quarterbacks bomb in the NFL.
Problem is picking a "franchise" QB is a hit and miss gamble. You never know who it will be. Lots of great college Quarterbacks bomb in the NFL.
SO WHAT? When you hit...you are a playoff team year in and year out...worth the risk everytime!
-
Problem is picking a "franchise" QB is a hit and miss gamble. You never know who it will be. Lots of great college Quarterbacks bomb in the NFL.
SO WHAT? When you hit...you are a playoff team year in and year out...worth the risk everytime!
SO WHAT? When you hit...you are a playoff team year in and year out...worth the risk everytime!
So, if we chose Sanchez, we would be a playoff team year in and year out? Bullshit. My point is you don't know. It's a gamble. And without other players who were also great, we would still have a great Quarterback being sacked, chased all over the field and humiliated every play.
-
He could.....passer rating is over hyped.
Lot's goes in to passer rating. Blocking, Running, and catching are three externals that come to mind.
-
SO WHAT? When you hit...you are a playoff team year in and year out...worth the risk everytime!
So, if we chose Sanchez, we would be a playoff team year in and year out? Bullshit. My point is you don't know. It's a gamble. And without other players who were also great, we would still have a great Quarterback being sacked, chased all over the field and humiliated every play.
So, if we chose Sanchez, we would be a playoff team year in and year out? Bullshit. My point is you don't know. It's a gamble. And without other players who were also great, we would still have a great Quarterback being sacked, chased all over the field and humiliated every play.
Don't know if sanchez is a hit yet...do you? I do know, rothlis, flacco, ryan, eli and rivers are "hits"
-
I would like to add that it is perfectly fine to discuss QB's here. It's the way that they are discussed that has been the problem in the past. Stick to the subject and not attack the messenger and play nice boys-n-girls.
That Brady Quinn Homo forum is trying so hard not to talk about QB's that their assholes are puckered shut so much so that they are ready to explode.
It's ok TheBrownsBoard members, just use your head. If your coming here with a past vendetta, I'd think again about hitting reply.
Bring some info and/or opinion about either side, not just flame.
this QB talk ain't the life or death of the Browns or Browns fans for that matter. Be brothers, be nice.
Lead by example.
Good Luck.
Thanks.
I would like to add that it is perfectly fine to discuss QB's here. It's the way that they are discussed that has been the problem in the past. Stick to the subject and not attack the messenger and play nice boys-n-girls.
That Brady Quinn Homo forum is trying so hard not to talk about QB's that their assholes are puckered shut so much so that they are ready to explode.
From what I can tell, both boards are talking about the QB situation. However, the other one is putting a lot more focus on scouting potential franchise QB's.
For a comparison, this board's Jake Locker thread includes 17 posts. The one on the 'That Brady Quinn Homo Forum' has 103 post (and once I get back to it, will have 104).
This isn't to say that one board's better than the other. Just that a lot of people here seem to be priding themselves on a QB discussion that, if they don't start focusing on the college QB's now, won't be all that substantive once the discussion shifts to who should be the Browns' next QB.
-
with our recievers i dont blame him, beisides momass there is NO upside with any of the browns recievers ........
-
He could.....passer rating is over hyped.
Lot's goes in to passer rating. Blocking, Running, and catching are three externals that come to mind.
He could.....passer rating is over hyped.
Lot's goes in to passer rating. Blocking, Running, and catching are three externals that come to mind.
Not to mention that little thing called "passing."
-
So, if we chose Sanchez, we would be a playoff team year in and year out? Bullshit. My point is you don't know. It's a gamble. And without other players who were also great, we would still have a great Quarterback being sacked, chased all over the field and humiliated every play.
Don't know if sanchez is a hit yet...do you? I do know, rothlis, flacco, ryan, eli and rivers are "hits"
-
Not to mention that little thing called "passing."
No doubt......but passing is dependent on many other aspects of the game/
-
Here it is so far ...
http://www.nfl.com/fantasy/rankings/qb
DA is not as bad as many think from the report, but he is bad for us.
-
with our recievers i dont blame him, beisides momass there is NO upside with any of the browns recievers ........
with our recievers i dont blame him, beisides momass there is NO upside with any of the browns recievers ........
Think it is too early to tell on robo.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login