Another Global Warming Expose
-
Fox News last night. 9:00 - 10:00 PM.
As Cal likes to say, the bark is falling off the tree.
It is INCREDIBLE how these politcoscientists have altered, doctored and, in other ways coerced people into fabricating data. The peer review process is a complete mess and world class climatologists challenge the faulty and unrepresentitive data that these 'conclusions of doom' are based on.
Now - more than ever - do I dismiss Global Warming alarmists as a bunch of determined kooks - but kooks in the end. Vicious, but kooks.
-
-
A meteorologist replies
“A new American attitude on the environment” (Dec. 10 essay) is a cruel joke on the American people.
Lisa Jackson bases her actions on the so-called “consensus” global warmers toss around. Their consensus is bought and paid for with billions of dollars in research grants from the U.S. and other governments.
Give me a few billion dollars and I’ll drum up a consensus of 2,500 people to support most any hypothesis. And that’s all anthropogenic global warming is — a hypothesis that has yet to be proved. None of their wild predictions have come true. Oceans are only rising at 1.7 millimeters per year. Temperatures, which warmed from 1978 to 1998, have leveled off and trended down since.
If you want to get the straight story from a top scientist, try professor Richard Lindzen at MIT. Jackson is just another bureaucrat and her actions are a thinly veiled play for power and control.
Calling carbon dioxide a pollutant shows how uninformed she is about true science. Perhaps she and others would be better informed if top independent scientists weren’t prevented from publishing their research by the small group running the global warming show. This was illustrated in the “Climategate” e-mails.
Carbon dioxide is a clean, clear gas necessary for plant growth and life on earth. Of 100,000 molecules of air, only one molecule of CO2 is due to man.
Water vapor is a much more prevalent greenhouse gas and is included in climate models — boosting their predictions of warming. But, they ignore clouds and precipitation, which negate that warming. Climate models also ignore the effect of solar variations and great ocean oscillations such as El Nino, La Nina, and ENSO.
Climate models can’t even predict what is happening now (cooling). With the sun in a quiet phase, the cooling may continue.
In any case, warming and cooling cycles have been occurring throughout history, something they tried to cover up by shamelessly fudging data to wipe out Medieval warming from 900-1300 and the little ice age in the 16th to 18th centuries. This was done by Michael Mann for the IPCC in an attempt to trumpet the lie that our recent warming was the greatest in 2,000 years. This fabrication was discovered by Canadian researcher Steve McIntyre. This is just one of the data manipulations that have been discovered. Almost all of the data sets have been contaminated by this.
They violated every rule of ethical science and are a disgrace, needlessly costing the nation billions of dollars. It galls me that the major media gives them a pass.
James Macdonald
South Windsor
The writer is a retired chief meteorologist for Travelers Weather Service and WFSB-TV.
-
A meteorologist replies
“A new American attitude on the environment” (Dec. 10 essay) is a cruel joke on the American people.
Lisa Jackson bases her actions on the so-called “consensus” global warmers toss around. Their consensus is bought and paid for with billions of dollars in research grants from the U.S. and other governments.
Give me a few billion dollars and I’ll drum up a consensus of 2,500 people to support most any hypothesis. And that’s all anthropogenic global warming is — a hypothesis that has yet to be proved. None of their wild predictions have come true. Oceans are only rising at 1.7 millimeters per year. Temperatures, which warmed from 1978 to 1998, have leveled off and trended down since.
If you want to get the straight story from a top scientist, try professor Richard Lindzen at MIT. Jackson is just another bureaucrat and her actions are a thinly veiled play for power and control.
Calling carbon dioxide a pollutant shows how uninformed she is about true science. Perhaps she and others would be better informed if top independent scientists weren’t prevented from publishing their research by the small group running the global warming show. This was illustrated in the “Climategate” e-mails.
Carbon dioxide is a clean, clear gas necessary for plant growth and life on earth. Of 100,000 molecules of air, only one molecule of CO2 is due to man.
Water vapor is a much more prevalent greenhouse gas and is included in climate models — boosting their predictions of warming. But, they ignore clouds and precipitation, which negate that warming. Climate models also ignore the effect of solar variations and great ocean oscillations such as El Nino, La Nina, and ENSO.
Climate models can’t even predict what is happening now (cooling). With the sun in a quiet phase, the cooling may continue.
In any case, warming and cooling cycles have been occurring throughout history, something they tried to cover up by shamelessly fudging data to wipe out Medieval warming from 900-1300 and the little ice age in the 16th to 18th centuries. This was done by Michael Mann for the IPCC in an attempt to trumpet the lie that our recent warming was the greatest in 2,000 years. This fabrication was discovered by Canadian researcher Steve McIntyre. This is just one of the data manipulations that have been discovered. Almost all of the data sets have been contaminated by this.
They violated every rule of ethical science and are a disgrace, needlessly costing the nation billions of dollars. It galls me that the major media gives them a pass.
James Macdonald
South Windsor
The writer is a retired chief meteorologist for Travelers Weather Service and WFSB-TV.
A meteorologist replies
“A new American attitude on the environment” (Dec. 10 essay) is a cruel joke on the American people.
Lisa Jackson bases her actions on the so-called “consensus” global warmers toss around. Their consensus is bought and paid for with billions of dollars in research grants from the U.S. and other governments.
Give me a few billion dollars and I’ll drum up a consensus of 2,500 people to support most any hypothesis. And that’s all anthropogenic global warming is — a hypothesis that has yet to be proved. None of their wild predictions have come true. Oceans are only rising at 1.7 millimeters per year. Temperatures, which warmed from 1978 to 1998, have leveled off and trended down since.
If you want to get the straight story from a top scientist, try professor Richard Lindzen at MIT. Jackson is just another bureaucrat and her actions are a thinly veiled play for power and control.
Calling carbon dioxide a pollutant shows how uninformed she is about true science. Perhaps she and others would be better informed if top independent scientists weren’t prevented from publishing their research by the small group running the global warming show. This was illustrated in the “Climategate” e-mails.
Carbon dioxide is a clean, clear gas necessary for plant growth and life on earth. Of 100,000 molecules of air, only one molecule of CO2 is due to man.
Water vapor is a much more prevalent greenhouse gas and is included in climate models — boosting their predictions of warming. But, they ignore clouds and precipitation, which negate that warming. Climate models also ignore the effect of solar variations and great ocean oscillations such as El Nino, La Nina, and ENSO.
Climate models can’t even predict what is happening now (cooling). With the sun in a quiet phase, the cooling may continue.
In any case, warming and cooling cycles have been occurring throughout history, something they tried to cover up by shamelessly fudging data to wipe out Medieval warming from 900-1300 and the little ice age in the 16th to 18th centuries. This was done by Michael Mann for the IPCC in an attempt to trumpet the lie that our recent warming was the greatest in 2,000 years. This fabrication was discovered by Canadian researcher Steve McIntyre. This is just one of the data manipulations that have been discovered. Almost all of the data sets have been contaminated by this.
They violated every rule of ethical science and are a disgrace, needlessly costing the nation billions of dollars. It galls me that the major media gives them a pass.
James Macdonald
South Windsor
The writer is a retired chief meteorologist for Travelers Weather Service and WFSB-TV.
Wow, that sums it up perfectly.
-
Gee wizz, what about the peer review groups?
-
Gee wizz, what about the peer review groups?
Gee wizz, what about the peer review groups?
There were editors and collaborators, K, not scientists looking for the truth.
"God is great. Beer is good. People are crazy." -
Gee wizz, what about the peer review groups?
There were editors and collaborators, K, not scientists looking for the truth.
There were editors and collaborators, K, not scientists looking for the truth.
AS revealed by the leaked emails, the scientists looking for the truth were shut out of the peer review groups that verified and of the MMGW malarkey.
-
Gee wizz, what about the peer review groups?
There were editors and collaborators, K, not scientists looking for the truth.
There were editors and collaborators, K, not scientists looking for the truth.
I know I'm joking. Remember that Ed Begley video in here, he had no explaination other then, "Look at the peer review evidence".
-
Really?, there are hundreds of different studies from tons of different fields that have been published by hundreds of different universities and scientific agencies....... the source material is so large i could bog this entire section down from just the domestic universities published studies in muliple science journals, magazines, other publication etc...
That really wont matter to the opposing "CONSERVative" position.... you are going to fit any sensationlism into any narrative regardless that the AP just went and fact checked the "email scandal" and found that it did NOTHING in the context of the overwhelming information from every scientific agency,every major university in the world, every industrialized nation etc....
I mean seriously? The same INDEPENDENT and than REPLICATED peer review overseen by universities and science agencies world wide is the same testing and methodology for virtually every major science application you use daily...... suddenly it is a faulty system...
Ok than you should not take any more presciption medication, see any medical doctor, dont use that microwave, forget the safety of the internal combustion motor, our solar system revolves around the earth not some fireball in the sky......., a MRI that must be magic... forgo cell phones because the sounds cant be based off of radio frequencies......
I always like it when people position a argument by attacking the methodology of peer reveiw and publication of scientific data and studies...... gravity does not exist.... its magic....... no evolution is just a "theory" sure.... those dog breeds happened from "god" not from human selective breeding or EVOLVING dogs....... crazy...... vaccines? no those are evil little spirits not weakened viruses....... maybe we should not send people with the flu anywhere except to a exorcist..... lol really you guys are seriously attacking literally the smartest people on the earth...... makes perfect sense.......
Yes the NSA i am sure only classified global warming as a national threat because they think the data is faulty also...... sure those guys are notoriously dumb.....
-
Sev,
"gravity doesn't exist" so anyone who doubts man made global warming, in light of the fraud, and the intentionally
slanted cherry picking of data, are wrong?
Just how do you seriously go about believing that ?
ONE freakin tree ring that DOES correspond to this vast doofsliberal-winged conspiracy means ALL the rest
of the trees in that Siberian forest don't matter?
WHAT?
You do better when you try to be honest and come up with some legit responses.
-
Sev,
"gravity doesn't exist" so anyone who doubts man made global warming, in light of the fraud, and the intentionally
slanted cherry picking of data, are wrong?
Just how do you seriously go about believing that ?
ONE freakin tree ring that DOES correspond to this vast doofsliberal-winged conspiracy means ALL the rest
of the trees in that Siberian forest don't matter?
WHAT?
You do better when you try to be honest and come up with some legit responses.
Sev,
"gravity doesn't exist" so anyone who doubts man made global warming, in light of the fraud, and the intentionally
slanted cherry picking of data, are wrong?
Just how do you seriously go about believing that ?
ONE freakin tree ring that DOES correspond to this vast doofsliberal-winged conspiracy means ALL the rest
of the trees in that Siberian forest don't matter?
WHAT?
You do better when you try to be honest and come up with some legit responses.
cal did you read the AP study and review on the emailgate? slanting information and cherry picking are wrong..... like i said you take one sensationlist type story as your basis of disproving all of the THOUSANDS OF DIFFERENT FINDING FROM EVERY MAJOR SCIENTIFIC FIELD verified independently from literally every major university in the world an every major scientific organization?
seriously? Since that south korean geneticist committed fraud and altered his data and findings the entire genetic cloning fields other studies and findings are now discounted....... that guy cherry picked and altered data and than published it..... that whole field must not exist anymore and the mountain load of advancements and findings are all false now........... sure
-
Sev,
"gravity doesn't exist" so anyone who doubts man made global warming, in light of the fraud, and the intentionally
slanted cherry picking of data, are wrong?
Just how do you seriously go about believing that ?
ONE freakin tree ring that DOES correspond to this vast doofsliberal-winged conspiracy means ALL the rest
of the trees in that Siberian forest don't matter?
WHAT?
You do better when you try to be honest and come up with some legit responses.
cal did you read the AP study and review on the emailgate? slanting information and cherry picking are wrong..... like i said you take one sensationlist type story as your basis of disproving all of the THOUSANDS OF DIFFERENT FINDING FROM EVERY MAJOR SCIENTIFIC FIELD verified independently from literally every major university in the world an every major scientific organization?
seriously? Since that south korean geneticist committed fraud and altered his data and findings the entire genetic cloning fields other studies and findings are now discounted....... that guy cherry picked and altered data and than published it..... that whole field must not exist anymore and the mountain load of advancements and findings are all false now........... sure
cal did you read the AP study and review on the emailgate? slanting information and cherry picking are wrong..... like i said you take one sensationlist type story as your basis of disproving all of the THOUSANDS OF DIFFERENT FINDING FROM EVERY MAJOR SCIENTIFIC FIELD verified independently from literally every major university in the world an every major scientific organization?
seriously? Since that south korean geneticist committed fraud and altered his data and findings the entire genetic cloning fields other studies and findings are now discounted....... that guy cherry picked and altered data and than published it..... that whole field must not exist anymore and the mountain load of advancements and findings are all false now........... sure
A ha! Now I understand why you're in such a frenzie!
-
cal did you read the AP study and review on the emailgate? slanting information and cherry picking are wrong..... like i said you take one sensationlist type story as your basis of disproving all of the THOUSANDS OF DIFFERENT FINDING FROM EVERY MAJOR SCIENTIFIC FIELD verified independently from literally every major university in the world an every major scientific organization?
seriously? Since that south korean geneticist committed fraud and altered his data and findings the entire genetic cloning fields other studies and findings are now discounted....... that guy cherry picked and altered data and than published it..... that whole field must not exist anymore and the mountain load of advancements and findings are all false now........... sure
A ha! Now I understand why you're in such a frenzie!
A ha! Now I understand why you're in such a frenzie!
lol
South korea is one of the most highly competitive education societies in the world, and the scientific community/business there is no exception. We have a pretty high rate of teenage suicide because of the pressure from education achievement expectations.
Believe it or not this same fight (though no one is questioning the scientific validity) in South korea. The BIG difference is that this is all about economic viability and increased costs/fallout to go green..... We are going green in industry but at a slow pace...... When your president is former president for Samsung (one of the most powerfule companies in South korea if not the most powerful) well Business first.....
Corruption is rampant in south korean economics and government just like here.
-
A ha! Now I understand why you're in such a frenzie!
lol
South korea is one of the most highly competitive education societies in the world, and the scientific community/business there is no exception. We have a pretty high rate of teenage suicide because of the pressure from education achievement expectations.
Believe it or not this same fight (though no one is questioning the scientific validity) in South korea. The BIG difference is that this is all about economic viability and increased costs/fallout to go green..... We are going green in industry but at a slow pace...... When your president is former president for Samsung (one of the most powerfule companies in South korea if not the most powerful) well Business first.....
Corruption is rampant in south korean economics and government just like here.
-
A ha! Now I understand why you're in such a frenzie!
lol
South korea is one of the most highly competitive education societies in the world, and the scientific community/business there is no exception. We have a pretty high rate of teenage suicide because of the pressure from education achievement expectations.
Believe it or not this same fight (though no one is questioning the scientific validity) in South korea. The BIG difference is that this is all about economic viability and increased costs/fallout to go green..... We are going green in industry but at a slow pace...... When your president is former president for Samsung (one of the most powerfule companies in South korea if not the most powerful) well Business first.....
Corruption is rampant in south korean economics and government just like here.
lol
South korea is one of the most highly competitive education societies in the world, and the scientific community/business there is no exception. We have a pretty high rate of teenage suicide because of the pressure from education achievement expectations.
Believe it or not this same fight (though no one is questioning the scientific validity) in South korea. The BIG difference is that this is all about economic viability and increased costs/fallout to go green..... We are going green in industry but at a slow pace...... When your president is former president for Samsung (one of the most powerfule companies in South korea if not the most powerful) well Business first.....
Corruption is rampant in south korean economics and government just like here.
Maybe its time your nation stops worshipping the state and finds the Lord. Then maybe the teen suicide rate will go down. It sounds as if the whole S. Korean value system has been turned upside down all in the name of greed.
-
yes and no, our healthcare system which the assets are mostly held by for profit corps (like here) is only getting worse. A hyper pro right wing conservative that is backed by military hawks is always a dangerous mix. We dont have the real estate that China or the U.S. has so whatever ground we ruin we really cant go anywhere..... not to mention poisoning the same ground you eat from for immediate profit is not exactly logical.
Short term gains in favor of long term sustainability is not conservative thinking, its childish/selfish....... IF we are thinking about our children and grandchildren than we should definately shift our actions and sacrifice some comfort now for them. IF not than continue on its really pretty simple.
-
lol
South korea is one of the most highly competitive education societies in the world, and the scientific community/business there is no exception. We have a pretty high rate of teenage suicide because of the pressure from education achievement expectations.
Believe it or not this same fight (though no one is questioning the scientific validity) in South korea. The BIG difference is that this is all about economic viability and increased costs/fallout to go green..... We are going green in industry but at a slow pace...... When your president is former president for Samsung (one of the most powerfule companies in South korea if not the most powerful) well Business first.....
Corruption is rampant in south korean economics and government just like here.
Maybe its time your nation stops worshipping the state and finds the Lord. Then maybe the teen suicide rate will go down. It sounds as if the whole S. Korean value system has been turned upside down all in the name of greed.
Maybe its time your nation stops worshipping the state and finds the Lord. Then maybe the teen suicide rate will go down. It sounds as if the whole S. Korean value system has been turned upside down all in the name of greed.
T, we are currently 1 and 2 in math and science rankings in the world, our education competency and graduation rates are above 97%, our economics are booming, we are the most broadband connected country in the world, our people do not 'worship" the state we respect the state. Our culture and family models are vastly more conservative than here....
The educational EXPECTATIONS and social priority on life achievement/sacrifice/service i dont think are "upside down"...... the "lord" /christianity by the way has a pretty strong foothold/invasion of korea for quite some time..... however because the nature of how proficient and wide spread science understanding it keeps a sub 30% foothold. Unlike here 46% or more are athiests, but you will have that with educational priorities. Our morals of family/respect/service/achievement/sacrifice our grounded with our culture for thousands of years.... we are not exactly a young country like this one....... we did not need Christianity and still do not.
-
Time will tell, maybe if you would spend equal time looking into the texts of the bible and studying the history of it, as you do studying science you would feel differently about what you say.
Time will tell, maybe if you would spend equal time looking into the texts of the bible and studying the history of it, as you do studying science you would feel differently about what you say.
T I dont have a problem with some of the moral values that are basic axioms of that religion, however those moral values have been espoused by multiple different religions that well predate christianity and even the hebrew origins. I have studied quite extensively religions because of my basic curiousity and ever evolving need to understand myself and the world I inhabit.
Really I dont have a problem with humans practicing moral behavior based upon whatever system, I just happen to think that Christiniaty is a blatant rip off of the Egyptian and other older religions from the death/rebirth/virginal birth/dieties son sacrificing himself to be "reborn" 3 days later, the winter solstice birth, the three wiseman and the star alignment, spring/easter rebirth, apostles, the odd eating of a flesh and blood facsmilies in the eucharist, pagan witchlike chanting and rituals, a spellbook and stories, robes and orders with a high priest (pope/bishops/pasteurs whatever) hell the pentagon was almost your symbol to represent the religion. It was a cult until constantine married a daughter practicing it and made it the state religion.......
either way i find good people are just good people with or without some system of faith and countries dont need them and definately should not be led by them.....IE the middle east and the middle ages of europe...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login