Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. WCO

WCO

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
10 Posts 7 Posters 1.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mopaji mopajiM
    • 1k Posts
    • 0 Reputation
    mopajiM mopaji wrote on last edited by mopaji
    #1

    For those of you who think Holmgren will be going to a WCO I have some news for you. The WCO died with the advent of the 3-4 Defense and LBs running 4.5 40's. You no longer get those mismatches with TEs and RBs out of the backfield. Therefore, a true WCO no longer exists. And it will NEVER work in this division. So, the idea that Holmgren may want to go WCO and so naturally Mangini is gone, is almost impossible. Offenses are all hybrids.

    "Chances are, if you think Jay Leno is funny, I don't care for you as a person" - Peter Griffin
    K Erie DawgE 2 Replies Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • choco chocoC
      • 4k Posts
      • 352 Reputation
      chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
      #2

      hell, daboll may have it in the playbook, we've just not seen it due to a lack of WRs/QB.

      1 Reply Last reply
      ❤
      Quote Reply
      • mopajiM mopaji

        For those of you who think Holmgren will be going to a WCO I have some news for you. The WCO died with the advent of the 3-4 Defense and LBs running 4.5 40's. You no longer get those mismatches with TEs and RBs out of the backfield. Therefore, a true WCO no longer exists. And it will NEVER work in this division. So, the idea that Holmgren may want to go WCO and so naturally Mangini is gone, is almost impossible. Offenses are all hybrids.

        kosar_win K
        • 89 Posts
        • 0 Reputation
        K kosar_win wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @mopaji said:

        The WCO died with the advent of the 3-4 Defense

        You mean the resurrection of the 3-4 Defense. Don't forget that the famed '72 Dolphins used this defensive scheme to go undefeated and win the Super Bowl. It's true that the 3-4 went out of style somewhere in the late 80s or 90s and returned largely because of its flexibility.

        mopajiM 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • K kosar_win

          @mopaji said:

          The WCO died with the advent of the 3-4 Defense

          You mean the resurrection of the 3-4 Defense. Don't forget that the famed '72 Dolphins used this defensive scheme to go undefeated and win the Super Bowl. It's true that the 3-4 went out of style somewhere in the late 80s or 90s and returned largely because of its flexibility.

          mopaji mopajiM
          • 1k Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          mopajiM mopaji wrote on last edited by mopaji
          #4

          @kosar_win said:

          You mean the resurrection of the 3-4 Defense. Don't forget that the famed '72 Dolphins used this defensive scheme to go undefeated and win the Super Bowl. It's true that the 3-4 went out of style somewhere in the late 80s or 90s and returned largely because of its flexibility.

          True Dat!!!! I guess I should have said "when the 3-4 became prevelant in the NFL"

          "Chances are, if you think Jay Leno is funny, I don't care for you as a person" - Peter Griffin
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Gips GipsG
            • 3k Posts
            • 34 Reputation
            GipsG Gips wrote on last edited by
            #5

            If holmgren keeps the genie i think we will see a hybrid offense so to speak one that MH and EM can agree to and hopefully one that will take full advantage of our team strengths and appease the fans...either way we should dump daboll and get an offensive guru at OC...

            We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • mopajiM mopaji

              For those of you who think Holmgren will be going to a WCO I have some news for you. The WCO died with the advent of the 3-4 Defense and LBs running 4.5 40's. You no longer get those mismatches with TEs and RBs out of the backfield. Therefore, a true WCO no longer exists. And it will NEVER work in this division. So, the idea that Holmgren may want to go WCO and so naturally Mangini is gone, is almost impossible. Offenses are all hybrids.

              Erie Dawg Erie DawgE
              • 2k Posts
              • 74 Reputation
              Erie DawgE Erie Dawg wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @mopaji said:

              The WCO died with the advent of the 3-4 Defense and LBs running 4.5 40's. You no longer get those mismatches with TEs and RBs out of the backfield. Therefore, a true WCO no longer exists. And it will NEVER work in this division. Offenses are all hybrids.

              Seems to work beautifully for the eagles and pats, so why say its dead because of the 3-4?

              The basics of the wco uses short, high-percentage passes as the core of a ball-control offense.

              If you actually think about it, lots of teams use this style of offence.

              If you remember the raiders when Rich Gannon ran that offence it was a thing of beauty watching him throw the ball.

              The 3-4 was alive and strong just a few years ago wasn't it?

              So basically every thing you said is BS.

              mopajiM O 2 Replies Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Erie DawgE Erie Dawg

                @mopaji said:

                The WCO died with the advent of the 3-4 Defense and LBs running 4.5 40's. You no longer get those mismatches with TEs and RBs out of the backfield. Therefore, a true WCO no longer exists. And it will NEVER work in this division. Offenses are all hybrids.

                Seems to work beautifully for the eagles and pats, so why say its dead because of the 3-4?

                The basics of the wco uses short, high-percentage passes as the core of a ball-control offense.

                If you actually think about it, lots of teams use this style of offence.

                If you remember the raiders when Rich Gannon ran that offence it was a thing of beauty watching him throw the ball.

                The 3-4 was alive and strong just a few years ago wasn't it?

                So basically every thing you said is BS.

                mopaji mopajiM
                • 1k Posts
                • 0 Reputation
                mopajiM mopaji wrote on last edited by mopaji
                #7

                @erie-dawg said:

                Seems to work beautifully for the eagles and pats, so why say its dead because of the 3-4?

                The basics of the wco uses short, high-percentage passes as the core of a ball-control offense.

                If you actually think about it, lots of teams use this style of offence.

                If you remember the raiders when Rich Gannon ran that offence it was a thing of beauty watching him throw the ball.

                The 3-4 was alive and strong just a few years ago wasn't it?

                So basically every thing you said is BS.

                Absolutely true except neither the Eagles, Pats, or the Raiders run a pure WCO. Philly may be the closest but they are much more vertical than a traditional WCO. My argument was based on people assuming that Mangini and Holmgren cannot coexist because of differences in offensive philosophies. Completely wrong for all of the reasons that I mentioned. There is no such thing as a pure WCO. Every succesful offense uses elements from different systems. Which is why a clash in philosophy will not be a reason to fire the coach. Its just wishful thinking on ESPN's part.

                "Chances are, if you think Jay Leno is funny, I don't care for you as a person" - Peter Griffin
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Erie DawgE Erie Dawg

                  @mopaji said:

                  The WCO died with the advent of the 3-4 Defense and LBs running 4.5 40's. You no longer get those mismatches with TEs and RBs out of the backfield. Therefore, a true WCO no longer exists. And it will NEVER work in this division. Offenses are all hybrids.

                  Seems to work beautifully for the eagles and pats, so why say its dead because of the 3-4?

                  The basics of the wco uses short, high-percentage passes as the core of a ball-control offense.

                  If you actually think about it, lots of teams use this style of offence.

                  If you remember the raiders when Rich Gannon ran that offence it was a thing of beauty watching him throw the ball.

                  The 3-4 was alive and strong just a few years ago wasn't it?

                  So basically every thing you said is BS.

                  osusev O
                  • 1k Posts
                  • 4 Reputation
                  O osusev wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @erie-dawg said:

                  Seems to work beautifully for the eagles and pats, so why say its dead because of the 3-4?

                  The basics of the wco uses short, high-percentage passes as the core of a ball-control offense.

                  If you actually think about it, lots of teams use this style of offence.

                  If you remember the raiders when Rich Gannon ran that offence it was a thing of beauty watching him throw the ball.

                  The 3-4 was alive and strong just a few years ago wasn't it?

                  So basically every thing you said is BS.

                  short efficient passing is important and used by ALL nfl offesive schemes......... That does not mean the pure WCO applies..... You are forgetting the rule adjustments that are slanted toward downfield passing for more scoring have changed offensive schemes along with hybrid defensive players that can cover and stuff the run along with run horizontally just as fast as running backs and recievers.....

                  the short game is predicated now on the threat to pass mid to deep..... offensive schemes now are changed and customized on a game by game basis..... Donavan Mcnabb and Tom Brady can deliver a highly accurate 15-30 yard bullet which loosens up with underneath check downs and short quick passing game.......

                  The other thing we were missing on the ball control side was a consistent run game.. something we lacked in 2008 that we had in 2007 and in the last 2 games we have most definately shown....

                  So no it was not bs...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  ❤
                  Quote Reply
                  • keylime K
                    • 52 Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    K keylime wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    works in Philly, GB, Seattle under Mike, etc. Players make an offense good, not the scheme - but the scheme can maximize the effectiveness of a team's talent.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    ❤
                    Quote Reply
                    • osusev O
                      • 1k Posts
                      • 4 Reputation
                      O osusev wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      I like Charlie weis as a offensive coordinator, IF that happens Brady definately is not going ANYWHERE regardless if the offense burns down around him.... or maybe Charlie and Brady may be the right NFL combination fo us...... I never liked charlie as a head coach but watching a lot of ND games this year where he was running the offense..... I like him in that position.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Theme
                      • System
                      • Light
                      • Dark
                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Forums
                      • Recent
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Donate