So, now we have the 6th or 7th pick in the draft...
-
This is my big board for the browns
1. Ndamukong Suh
2. Gerald McCoy
3. Eric Berry
4. Rolando McClain
5. Joe Haden
6. Derrick Morgan
Defense, Defense, Defense
-
You cannot accurately assess who is going to be there at this point. There's always some fringe freak athlete that pops out in the combine and wows everyone. Suh or Berry could very well be there when we pick. Look at Curry last year. Everyone thought he'd be first overall for the longest time, fell to fifth(?).
-
You cannot accurately assess who is going to be there at this point. There's always some fringe freak athlete that pops out in the combine and wows everyone. Suh or Berry could very well be there when we pick. Look at Curry last year. Everyone thought he'd be first overall for the longest time, fell to fifth(?).
You cannot accurately assess who is going to be there at this point. There's always some fringe freak athlete that pops out in the combine and wows everyone. Suh or Berry could very well be there when we pick. Look at Curry last year. Everyone thought he'd be first overall for the longest time, fell to fifth(?).
No doubt, but you might as well get accustomed to it for the next 4 months because there is going to be endless discussion.
For me, serious discussions happen once the draft order is establish, and the day past the day college players have to announce their intent.
I agree...it is hard to talk draft until you know who is going to be in the draft.
But...to stay in the spirit of the thread, I would give one of the OT serious consideration as well as Haden.
It's hard to complain about a stud O-lineman or a stud corner.
It may not be the sexy pick as someone used to say, but then again, sexy doesn't usually win in the NFL.
-
You cannot accurately assess who is going to be there at this point. There's always some fringe freak athlete that pops out in the combine and wows everyone. Suh or Berry could very well be there when we pick. Look at Curry last year. Everyone thought he'd be first overall for the longest time, fell to fifth(?).
No doubt, but you might as well get accustomed to it for the next 4 months because there is going to be endless discussion.
For me, serious discussions happen once the draft order is establish, and the day past the day college players have to announce their intent.
I agree...it is hard to talk draft until you know who is going to be in the draft.
But...to stay in the spirit of the thread, I would give one of the OT serious consideration as well as Haden.
It's hard to complain about a stud O-lineman or a stud corner.
It may not be the sexy pick as someone used to say, but then again, sexy doesn't usually win in the NFL.
-
Oakland, Seattle and Cleveland all ended the season at 5-11. If the tiebreak is (and I believe it is) Strength of Schedule, with the worst Strength of Schedule getting the better pick, then it will be
8. Oakland w/ .523 (doesn't matter if Jets or Cincinatti wins, as Oakland played them both)
7. Cleveland w/ .516 (if Cincinatti wins) or .508 (if Cincinatti loses).
6. Seattle w/ .473
So assume Cleveland picks at #7.
If McCoy is there, take him, otherwise best DB or OT available. Okung would be my pick if McCoy is not there.
-
Oakland, Seattle and Cleveland all ended the season at 5-11. If the tiebreak is (and I believe it is) Strength of Schedule, with the worst Strength of Schedule getting the better pick, then it will be
8. Oakland w/ .523 (doesn't matter if Jets or Cincinatti wins, as Oakland played them both)
7. Cleveland w/ .516 (if Cincinatti wins) or .508 (if Cincinatti loses).
6. Seattle w/ .473
So assume Cleveland picks at #7.
If McCoy is there, take him, otherwise best DB or OT available. Okung would be my pick if McCoy is not there.
Oakland, Seattle and Cleveland all ended the season at 5-11. If the tiebreak is (and I believe it is) Strength of Schedule, with the worst Strength of Schedule getting the better pick, then it will be
8. Oakland w/ .523 (doesn't matter if Jets or Cincinatti wins, as Oakland played them both)
7. Cleveland w/ .516 (if Cincinatti wins) or .508 (if Cincinatti loses).
6. Seattle w/ .473
So assume Cleveland picks at #7.
If McCoy is there, take him, otherwise best DB or OT available. Okung would be my pick if McCoy is not there.
Since we beat Oakland, wouldn't that take precedence over SOS? Hence, we would have the 8th pick.
Suh and Berry are both gone here. I like Rolando McClain. We need a stud LB.
-
Oakland, Seattle and Cleveland all ended the season at 5-11. If the tiebreak is (and I believe it is) Strength of Schedule, with the worst Strength of Schedule getting the better pick, then it will be
8. Oakland w/ .523 (doesn't matter if Jets or Cincinatti wins, as Oakland played them both)
7. Cleveland w/ .516 (if Cincinatti wins) or .508 (if Cincinatti loses).
6. Seattle w/ .473
So assume Cleveland picks at #7.
If McCoy is there, take him, otherwise best DB or OT available. Okung would be my pick if McCoy is not there.
Since we beat Oakland, wouldn't that take precedence over SOS? Hence, we would have the 8th pick.
Suh and Berry are both gone here. I like Rolando McClain. We need a stud LB.
Since we beat Oakland, wouldn't that take precedence over SOS? Hence, we would have the 8th pick.
Suh and Berry are both gone here. I like Rolando McClain. We need a stud LB.
No, they don't consider head to head schedule with the draft order. They do in every other NFL tie break, but not for Draft Order.
I remember a few years ago I asked the same question when Arizona beat Cleveland, ended with the same record, but picked ahead of Cleveland.
-
The Browns will get 5th pick according to this site? BS, 5 teams have a worse record.
-
The Browns will get 5th pick according to this site? BS, 5 teams have a worse record.
The Browns will get 5th pick according to this site? BS, 5 teams have a worse record.
This guy probably wrote this article assuming the Browns would lose. He says that the draft order was "announced" but as far as I'm aware, the NFL doesn't officially "announce" a draft order until the 2010 season officially starts sometime in March. That's when any ties that tie breakers can't break are broken by a coin flip.
-
We won, and that's always a positive, but some possible big time players won't be there at 6 or 7. Who do you think will be there at that pick?
I'm thinking Joe Haden DB or the LB/DE from GTech Morgan...possibly even more youth at WR with Dez Bryant.
-
Per this link: http://www.nepatriotsdraft.com/2009/09/201...raft-order.html
The 2010 NFL Draft Order page is updated every week of the NFL season until the NFL Draft. Ties are broken based on weaker strength of schedule.
2010 NFL Draft 1st Round Order - Updated During Week 17 - With Strength of Schedule Tiebreakers included.
Tiebreakers: Easiest Strength of Schedule picks first. If still tied, then worst division record picks first. If still tied, then worst conference record picks first. If still tied, coin flip decides order.
Picks after #20 will be determined by playoff results.
1. St. Louis (1-15)
2. Detroit (2-14)
3. Tampa Bay (3-13)
4. Washington (4-12)
5. Kansas City (4-12)
6. Seattle (5-11)
7. Cleveland (5-11)
8. Oakland (5-11)
9. Buffalo (6-10)
10. Jacksonville (7-9)
11. Chicago (7-9) (Traded to DEN)
12. Miami (7-9)
13. San Francisco (8-8)
14. Denver (8-8)(Traded to SEA)
15. New York Giants (8-8)
16. Carolina (8-8) (Traded to SF)
17. Tennessee (8-8)
18. Pittsburgh (9-7)
19. Atlanta (9-7)
20. Houston (9-7
-
Oakland, Seattle and Cleveland all ended the season at 5-11. If the tiebreak is (and I believe it is) Strength of Schedule, with the worst Strength of Schedule getting the better pick, then it will be
8. Oakland w/ .523 (doesn't matter if Jets or Cincinatti wins, as Oakland played them both)
7. Cleveland w/ .516 (if Cincinatti wins) or .508 (if Cincinatti loses).
6. Seattle w/ .473
So assume Cleveland picks at #7.
If McCoy is there, take him, otherwise best DB or OT available. Okung would be my pick if McCoy is not there.
If McCoy is there, take him, otherwise best DB or OT available. Okung would be my pick if McCoy is not there.
I doubt Okung will be available at #7. Everyone not named Todd McShay has him as the #1 OT in this year's class, and those guys usually go top 5. If Detroit doesn't take him, Kansas City will.
In my opinion, none of the other OT's are worth a top ten pick, unless you desperately need a left tackle. We can get better value addressing another position.
-
If McCoy is there, take him, otherwise best DB or OT available. Okung would be my pick if McCoy is not there.
I doubt Okung will be available at #7. Everyone not named Todd McShay has him as the #1 OT in this year's class, and those guys usually go top 5. If Detroit doesn't take him, Kansas City will.
In my opinion, none of the other OT's are worth a top ten pick, unless you desperately need a left tackle. We can get better value addressing another position.
I doubt Okung will be available at #7. Everyone not named Todd McShay has him as the #1 OT in this year's class, and those guys usually go top 5. If Detroit doesn't take him, Kansas City will.
In my opinion, none of the other OT's are worth a top ten pick, unless you desperately need a left tackle. We can get better value addressing another position.
Probably so, this isn't a great year for stud linemen..and waiting until rounds 2-3 might be where we get the most bang for the buck.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login