My final ? butkicking of the fraud of mmglobalwarming
-
Bump. Still waiting for legit response by the opposition......
-
I guess the undisputable truth has them muted.
Watch, like I said before, they only speak up, when they can diss a source,
belittle a person or point, or manufacture some argument in defense of their ideology.
well, they can't say these scientists are just journalists, nor that they have no higher education,
nor are they scientists in the wrong disciplines, nor can they bash the source.
So, they keep quiet.
You watch - they will come back later, and defiantly insist that all scientists know that
man made global warming is real.
then we'll have to post this stuff again. Their spin is SO over - lost ALL legitimacy. We were right all along, and they can't handle it.
If they can't bash it, they bail on it.
so much for their "serious conversation" on issues they do ardently desire. bah.
I am interested in the TRUTH, whatever it is.
-
cal.......
again these are scientist...... yes they have published studies because that is what they do but they are not publishing anything yet backing up their OPINIONS which as skeptical scientist they should do.
seriously you could have found dissenting OPINIONS on literally every theory..... 700....... represents viirtually 1% of the opinions of the WORLDS accumulated scientists.
You keep taking PR pieces and opinion pieces as some sort of gotcha moment or somehow these opinions turn into data..... it does not.
-
cal opinions ARE NOT STUDIES......
let it go..... you dont have the science or the DATA just opinions which is all your side has. It really is a stupid exercise to debate the "facts". You either buy into responsible behavior or you dont, if you believe that pumping toxins and poisons into a interconnected biome will not have an adverse effect there is not an argument to be made.
This same crap and tactics happened with the Ozone depletion and hole problem.....your side was wrong, this happened with Tobacco...... your side was wrong............ your side imho is wrong again on this issue.
at this point this is not a debate but a PR war........ If you want to be part of the flat earth club go ahead. I am not going to waste my time trying to reach someone who literally buys in to the same reasoning and logic.
Funny how we dont hear about the Ozone hole debate anymore from your side............. with good reason...... the chemical companies stopped spending money........ just like the tobacco companies...........
-
Sev, SEV !
You are saying that those scientists did no studies? That they discount the phoney, manipulated studies? Whatever.
You didn't read the entire article, Mr. denier man. Check this out from the article:
"The rise in skeptical scientists are responding not only to an increase in dire “predictions” of climate change, but also a steady stream of peer-reviewed studies, analyses, real world data, and inconvenient developments have further cast doubts on the claims of man-made global warming fear activists. The latest peer-reviewed study in Geophysical Research Letters is being touted as a development that “could turn the climate change world upside down.” The study finds that the “Earth is undergoing natural climate shift.” The March 15, 2009 article in WISN.com details the research of Dr. Anastasios Tsonis of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. “We realized a lot of changes in the past century from warmer to cooler and then back to warmer were all natural," Tsonis said. “I don't think we can say much about what the humans are doing,” he added."
You couldn't have read the article, Sev. This is an exact quote from it. Go look it up. @@
The FACT is, man made global warming is bogus. It is a FACT that deliberate cherry picking and hiding of data was done to manipulate public opinion...
and more than one scientist has seen the desire to support this bogus claim, or be chastized, censored or defunded for not "playing ball".
You are even TOTALLY SOAKED IN EGYPT, Sev, about the "no studies" thing.
Truth is, the man made global warming is a bogus cause, politically motivated, intentionally defrauding millions of people.
But your side won't listen to any studies that disprove your assertions.
Like the study that shows that there are many thousands of polar bears now than the hundreds from years ago.
We post a study, it gets the silent treatment, and the subject comes up again later, with the same lame bogus claims.
Our side? Tobacco? Is that like saying your side was wrong to support the health benefits of using asbestos in buildings? or something to that effect?
You make stuff up, to put a whole "side" on the defensive?
And, your side lied, manipulated, and conned millions of people and many entire governments in a blatant fraud.
Let me know how many scientific studies Al Gore conducted to support his conclusions.
For crying out loud, Sev, your side says the annointed brilliant prosident didn't think there were 57 states in the U.S.,
and would never say "corpse-man".
And, your side is claiming all of 99% of scientists in the world, think that man made global warming is a fact?
The baloney has hit the fan, Sev. All the pieces of baloney just haven't hit ground yet. Some of them are still
floating through the air in your sides' heads. @@
-
cal..... you do realize that study was an abstract use of a math right? synchronized chaos is difficult to grasp for anyone let alone the general public.........
that study is an interesting way to look at the statistics of warming/cooling trends......... its not the bombshell you were looking for. Like I said jumping on a pr piece from literally anywhere is not a gotcha moment.
-
You see my point yet, Steve?
Anyway, all I want is for someone to tell me what the hell "All soaked in Egypt" means.
-
You see my point yet, Steve?
Anyway, all I want is for someone to tell me what the hell "All soaked in Egypt" means.
You see my point yet, Steve?
Anyway, all I want is for someone to tell me what the hell "All soaked in Egypt" means.
Actually I read your piece in the other thread.
I will get to that; just busy right now.
WSS
-
No problem. Studio work is far more important and productive than this. And I'm not itching for another fight. I just thought this thread was a pretty good example of what I'm talking about. But it's also a rather extreme case. I'll happily admit that.
But what do I know. I'm soaked in Egypt.
-
This thread is one of three, Sev. I just don't understand, seriously, how you can completely ignore
climategate, and the studies that are causing scientists great angst about the whole political movement
that is called global warming.
The lack of valid science, which has been absolutely proven, to back up man made global warming, has
changed it from "the debate is over" and Shep's famous "virtually ALL scientists know it to be true".
These are experts in their field, Sev. They say it is bogus.
But, you can diss their studies all you want, but you won't diss the UN study based on a report by a hiker student?
You can ignore all of climate gate, but you won't accept any OTHER scientists' opinions to the contrary?
That is just political, Sev, imho. I am not locked into being against global warming caused by us.
I'm just sure the heyl not going to buy it, until it's proven to me.
See, I'm not trying to get you and Heck on board with the "man made global warming is a crock" train.
Seriously - I'm just trying to show you guys that your "global fact" is not fact at all. I can keep posting articles
forever, and you guys just ignore them, or dismiss them. So far, that's the way you lefties always do.
I caught hell for not believing in the validity of the claims and found fault with studies buoying your side.
so, paybacks are a Michelle Obamoa. @@ At worst, the two sides are a truce, neither side can
prove absolutely. But we never said "virtually all scientists" are on our side, we never said we have to
stop being civilized and pay energy taxes out the wazoo because of our side. We never pleaded for support
for our political candidates because of our side of the global warming fiasco.
Your side did. That's all I'm sayin.
And, I've been waiting for somebody to ask about "All soaked in Egypt"
It means you are drenched in DeNILE. (denial, for you lefties !)
-
How do you get from "Denial isn't just a river in Egypt" to the idea that people in denial are actually in the river?
One is a play on words, the other is...
Never mind.
-
Yep. You are soaked, soaked, soaked. GGG
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login