Skip to content

Quinn to St. Louis

The Browns Board
20 16 3.1k
  • I Howard Stern say today on Sirius that lesbians are awesome.

  • I Howard Stern say today on Sirius that lesbians are awesome.

    @bonedawg said:

    I Howard Stern say today on Sirius that lesbians are awesome.

    LOL!!!!

  • its was an espn radio station that was talking about the rumors

  • I Howard Stern say today on Sirius that lesbians are awesome.

    @bonedawg said:

    I Howard Stern say today on Sirius that lesbians are awesome.

    He gets buldgers for lesbians.

  • Well Bulger did go 1-8 last with an impressive 51.6 QB rating in a 17-10 win against Detroit.

    He's also only 32 so he's probably still improving. 😳

  • I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

    I'd rather release Quinn for nothing than get Mr. Buldge in my Pants.

  • I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

    I'd rather release Quinn for nothing than get Mr. Buldge in my Pants.

    @theclevelandsound said:

    I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

    I'd rather release Quinn for nothing than get Mr. Buldge in my Pants.

    but want you want Delhome ROTFLMAO

  • I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

    I'd rather release Quinn for nothing than get Mr. Buldge in my Pants.

    @theclevelandsound said:

    I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

    I'd rather release Quinn for nothing than get Mr. Buldge in my Pants.

    but want you want Delhome ROTFLMAO

  • With the names of the QB's being brought up the last couple of days we might as well draft one and go from there. The names that have been brought up are, over the hill marginal players at best.

  • I would love to have Delhomme or Bulger, both are proven to be capable over a long period of time. Due to some situational circumstances and injuries they haven't been very successful lately, but if we can pick one up on the cheap side I'd be all for it. Either one plus Wallace and we should have some pretty capable QB's along with Quinn or Draft pick

  • St. Louis or Carolina....it would be a good fit.

    HEY RAMS! GIVE US A DRAFT PICK AND THAT CONCUSSED QB OF YOURS AND WE'LL CALL IT EVEN!

  • With the names of the QB's being brought up the last couple of days we might as well draft one and go from there. The names that have been brought up are, over the hill marginal players at best.

    @carsonp said:

    With the names of the QB's being brought up the last couple of days we might as well draft one and go from there. The names that have been brought up are, over the hill marginal players at best.

    We'll draft one no sooner than the 4th round but there is no way he should play this year. And don't expect it to be anyone we've mentioned so far. like LeFevour or Pike. Think somebody like that kid from Troy or someone like that. What Heckert and Co. are trying to do is find a capable vet who the team will respect who can stop the bleeding for a year or two. That's a good plan. It will allow the new guy to develope a little bit before throwing him out there. And hopefullly, we'll have less mistakes from that position and maybe even make a play or two every week. It'll be nice regardless if it's Bulger or Delhomme to have a vet back there telling the guys what to look for on the field. Granted, I don't like either of them but DA and Quinn are gone and Kolb may retire an Eagle. But I'll take a mediocre vet back there for a year or two.

    PS. Clausen scored a 23 on the wunderlic or however you spell it. Bradford scored a 38! I wouldn't be against trading up to get Bradford as long as we have a surplus of 2nd and 3rd round picks to use.

    PSS. Fargas coming to Cleveland for a visit? Does this mean Harrison will be dealt? Maybe for one of those 2nd or 3rd round picks I mentioned above?

  • @theclevelandsound said:

    I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

    I'd rather release Quinn for nothing than get Mr. Buldge in my Pants.

    but want you want Delhome ROTFLMAO

    @athensbuck26 said:

    but want you want Delhome ROTFLMAO

    The difference? Delhomme has had major success in his career.

    Bulger? Not so much.

  • @athensbuck26 said:

    but want you want Delhome ROTFLMAO

    The difference? Delhomme has had major success in his career.

    Bulger? Not so much.

    @theclevelandsound said:

    The difference? Delhomme has had major success in his career.

    Bulger? Not so much.

    Exactly, we are not looking for a legit starter here. We are looking for someone who has experienced success and knows how to handle it to help raise a youngin'.

  • I'm not knocking on Delhomme or anything, because I genuinely like him. But 90% of his career was just throwing the ball up in the air to Steve Smith on a fly route, or handing the ball off to the multitude of good runningbacks Carolina has had.

    I'm not saying he's not a viable starting QB, and I'm not trying to sully his career in any way because he's had a great career. But Matt Moore proved to be a capable replacement, and Matt Moore can't throw a screen to save his life.

    So for the people who are worried about Delhomme coming in to be the starter, don't count on it. It's more than likely he's just going to be coming in for the mentor role, and to push whoever the starting QB is.

  • @athensbuck26 said:

    but want you want Delhome ROTFLMAO

    The difference? Delhomme has had major success in his career.

    Bulger? Not so much.

    @theclevelandsound said:

    The difference? Delhomme has had major success in his career.

    Bulger? Not so much.

    Joe Namath busy?

    WSS

  • Bingo, take one of these bozos for whatever............but go for Smith if you can get him....................and do indeed draft a QB

    boom ten years of garbage dumped at QB..............which bye bye Brady

  • With the names of the QB's being brought up the last couple of days we might as well draft one and go from there. The names that have been brought up are, over the hill marginal players at best.

    @carsonp said:

    With the names of the QB's being brought up the last couple of days we might as well draft one and go from there. The names that have been brought up are, over the hill marginal players at best.

    Absolutely. Better to keep Quinn and see how he does this year.