Which QB Should the Browns Choose?
-
I think there is an awful lot of homerism on Pike, I watched some Cinci games and he didn't look accurate at all. I think he was pulled in the bowl game for the backup QB. I say skip him, I'd take Tebow in the 2 round or lower if we are going to take a QB at all. He was one of the most winningest QB's in college football history. So what if you don't like his throwing style, I'm a much bigger fan of winning, and that kid wins, period.
I guess is Bradford or McCoy or Clausen are still around in the 2nd round, I'd jump on one of them, or possibly package up a 2nd and 3rd to move up at the end of the first to pick up one. Either way, Holgrem knows more football then anyone on this board, so even though I question his latest moves, as a season-ticket holder, I have to trust he knows what he's doing. If that means Jevon Snead at #7, I've got to support it.
-
i think the most important position(s) issue on the team is the defensive backfield. use our #7 to get haden or berry. then, if you have to, bundle some picks to move up some notches from our next pick to land the qb you like. i say stay pat if you can and see who's there without moving. hopefully lefevour and pike will be there. don't know too much about the other guys in this lower rung but i do know trading up is a bad idea and so is using our 7th on a qb.
-
I would go for Bradford, then use management judgement on Pike and Lefevour(if it is round three), then Claussen or McCoy , and then Tebow if mgt thinks he can become a real QB.
Daryl Clark is not franchise QB material
-
i think the most important position(s) issue on the team is the defensive backfield. use our #7 to get haden or berry. then, if you have to, bundle some picks to move up some notches from our next pick to land the qb you like. i say stay pat if you can and see who's there without moving. hopefully lefevour and pike will be there. don't know too much about the other guys in this lower rung but i do know trading up is a bad idea and so is using our 7th on a qb.
i think the most important position(s) issue on the team is the defensive backfield. use our #7 to get haden or berry. then, if you have to, bundle some picks to move up some notches from our next pick to land the qb you like. i say stay pat if you can and see who's there without moving. hopefully lefevour and pike will be there. don't know too much about the other guys in this lower rung but i do know trading up is a bad idea and so is using our 7th on a qb.
I guess your logo is Otto Graham???
Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes -
Bradford
-
We really need to address LB, DB, or WR in the 1st and 2nd. I like Tony Pike in the 3rd. Big kid, big arm and he is a guy who can see the field and the game. He'll be a good value pick in the 3rd. With Pool and Wimbley gone and no real threat to catch the ball aside from Watson (sorry Stuckey) I feel those are our big needs. I've often thought Berry might give Rob Ryan some "gambling" room in secondary although I know safeties usually don't go that high. But he's a football player that can be a game changer much like Polamalu has been for Lebeau and the Steelers.
We really need to address LB, DB, or WR in the 1st and 2nd. I like Tony Pike in the 3rd. Big kid, big arm and he is a guy who can see the field and the game. He'll be a good value pick in the 3rd. With Pool and Wimbley gone and no real threat to catch the ball aside from Watson (sorry Stuckey) I feel those are our big needs. I've often thought Berry might give Rob Ryan some "gambling" room in secondary although I know safeties usually don't go that high. But he's a football player that can be a game changer much like Polamalu has been for Lebeau and the Steelers.
I agree wich chew. If we have a first rate defense, and a first rate offensive line, and a first rate running game, and first rate receivers we could throw just about any mook in there at QB and be a SB contender.
That is what the Redskins did when they had Mark Rypien QB them to a SB title. It is what Tampa did when Brad Johnson QBed their Super Bowl winner, it is what the Ravens did the year they won (they didn't even turn to Dilfer until the middle of the season), and that is what the Steelers did when they had a raw 2d year guy take them to a title.
And some Super Bowl losers had their share of mooks: Rex Grossman? Rich Gannon? Chris Chandler? Jake Delhomme!!!!
-
Colt McCoy.
Cooler name.
Irish guy.
Tebow is too easy to change to Teabag or Teblow.
WSS
Colt McCoy.
Cooler name.
Irish guy.
Tebow is too easy to change to Teabag or Teblow.
WSS
Right. We should pick our QBs the way my wife picks her favorite horse in the Kentucky Derby. By its name.
-
nmills said:
1st choice-Tony Pike2nd choice- Daryl Clark
i like these two picks
Daryl Clark is a very underrated qb
-
i think the most important position(s) issue on the team is the defensive backfield. use our #7 to get haden or berry. then, if you have to, bundle some picks to move up some notches from our next pick to land the qb you like. i say stay pat if you can and see who's there without moving. hopefully lefevour and pike will be there. don't know too much about the other guys in this lower rung but i do know trading up is a bad idea and so is using our 7th on a qb.
I guess your logo is Otto Graham???
I guess your logo is Otto Graham???
Go ahead Rich- you want to tell me which of the qbs from draft class of 2010 has HOF potential?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login