Skip to content

No Compensatory Picks for the Browns, here is the list

The Browns Board
5 5 928
  • So the Browns unfortunately didn't receive any compensatory picks this year but here is who did:

    This is the breakdown of the compensatory picks by round and team.

    http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/1...w;pageContainer

    Round 3

    Cincinnati -- 96th overall

    Tennessee -- 97

    Atlanta -- 98

    Round 4

    Cincinnati -- 131

    Round 5

    Pittsburgh -- 164

    Atlanta -- 165

    Pittsburgh -- 166

    Minnesota -- 167

    San Diego -- 168

    Green Bay -- 169

    Round 6

    Carolina -- 202

    Jacksonville -- 203

    Carolina -- 204

    New England -- 205

    San Francisco -- 206

    Tennessee -- 207

    Round 7

    Indianapolis -- 240

    Tennessee -- 241

    Pittsburgh -- 242

    Philadelphia -- 243

    Philadelphia -- 244

    Seattle -- 245

    Indianapolis -- 246

    New England -- 247

    New England -- 248

    Carolina -- 249

    New England -- 250

    Oakland -- 251

    Miami -- 252

    Tampa Bay -- 253

    St. Louis -- 254

    Detroit -- 255

  • So much for that fella who was bound and determined to count two picks for Davis and Jones before the compensatory picks had even been declared. I read an interesting article here that explains compensatory picks really well. Because we got more value in free agents coming in, than we got going out, we got squadoosh in compensatory picks.

  • wow...i couldn't have been more wrong.

    "It should be noted that the contract value used in the equation does not include some parts of the contract, and that the contract information reported in the media is often incorrect."

    being an engineer, i've seen some pretty messed up formulas.

  • Just the way it works. When you don't have much demand for players on your roster...or FA who were on your roster, you aren't getting many extra picks.

    Shouldn't be surprising.

  • shouldn't they throw us a bone just for pitty's sake?