Republican Hypocrisy
-
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_overh...iring_insurance
I mean seriously..... they got the cross state exchanges, the mandate for responsibility, No public option.... funny really how much hate the right wing has to ignore their own ideas......
-
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_overh...iring_insurance
I mean seriously..... they got the cross state exchanges, the mandate for responsibility, No public option.... funny really how much hate the right wing has to ignore their own ideas......
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_overh...iring_insurance
I mean seriously..... they got the cross state exchanges, the mandate for responsibility, No public option.... funny really how much hate the right wing has to ignore their own ideas......
Wise up Sev.
They did NOT get cross state regulation.
The insurco doesn't want it and Nancy kept it out.
With that they'd really need to compete.
The mandate was Hillarys that hypocrite Obama campaigned aganist.
And you guys barely passed it as it was and wouldn't have with the PO.
So spare us the "you got everything you wanted" snowjob.
Lucky for you Stupak's morals are window dressing.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_overh...iring_insurance
I mean seriously..... they got the cross state exchanges, the mandate for responsibility, No public option.... funny really how much hate the right wing has to ignore their own ideas......
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_overh...iring_insurance
I mean seriously..... they got the cross state exchanges, the mandate for responsibility, No public option.... funny really how much hate the right wing has to ignore their own ideas......
Just when I though you couldn't be more of a pompous ahole. You prove me wrong again.
-
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_overh...iring_insurance
I mean seriously..... they got the cross state exchanges, the mandate for responsibility, No public option.... funny really how much hate the right wing has to ignore their own ideas......
Wise up Sev.
They did NOT get cross state regulation.
The insurco doesn't want it and Nancy kept it out.
With that they'd really need to compete.
The mandate was Hillarys that hypocrite Obama campaigned aganist.
And you guys barely passed it as it was and wouldn't have with the PO.
So spare us the "you got everything you wanted" snowjob.
Lucky for you Stupak's morals are window dressing.
WSS
Wise up Sev.
They did NOT get cross state regulation.
The insurco doesn't want it and Nancy kept it out.
With that they'd really need to compete.
The mandate was Hillarys that hypocrite Obama campaigned aganist.
And you guys barely passed it as it was and wouldn't have with the PO.
So spare us the "you got everything you wanted" snowjob.
Lucky for you Stupak's morals are window dressing.
WSS
you meant EXCHANGES... right
-
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_health_overh...iring_insurance
I mean seriously..... they got the cross state exchanges, the mandate for responsibility, No public option.... funny really how much hate the right wing has to ignore their own ideas......
Just when I though you couldn't be more of a pompous ahole. You prove me wrong again.
Just when I though you couldn't be more of a pompous ahole. You prove me wrong again.
from you that child like name calling really hurts my self esteem....... I will be crying all night.
-
Wise up Sev.
They did NOT get cross state regulation.
The insurco doesn't want it and Nancy kept it out.
With that they'd really need to compete.
The mandate was Hillarys that hypocrite Obama campaigned aganist.
And you guys barely passed it as it was and wouldn't have with the PO.
So spare us the "you got everything you wanted" snowjob.
Lucky for you Stupak's morals are window dressing.
WSS
you meant EXCHANGES... right
you meant EXCHANGES... right
No professor.
I meant (maybe I was unclear) that the insurcos are still and will still be regulated state by state.
That means they really don't have to compete on a meaningful basis.
But I'm sure that every rose colored forcast will come to pass just as promiosed.
But for all the screeching over contributions lobbyists and graft it does look like they paid off for the Dems.
WSS
-
I thought the mandate was Mitt Romney's idea from Massachusetts.
-
What's really funny is how similar this bill is to the "alternative" Republicans+Heritage Foundation et al. pushed to Clinton's HC reform efforts in 1992. But 18 years later, the political discourse has been pushed so far to the right that a center-right policy is considered "socialist" by a sizable portion of the voting public.
-
I thought the mandate was Mitt Romney's idea from Massachusetts.
I thought the mandate was Mitt Romney's idea from Massachusetts.
It is.
I supported it and still do.
But I realize it isn't going to reduce the cost or improve service much.
WSS
-
I thought the mandate was Mitt Romney's idea from Massachusetts.
It is.
I supported it and still do.
But I realize it isn't going to reduce the cost or improve service much.
WSS
It is.
I supported it and still do.
But I realize it isn't going to reduce the cost or improve service much.
WSS
The point of the mandate isn't improving service, it's to provide universal coverage (which in turn reduces costs in the long term). Of course, this cost reduction is much more effective when you either have competition (think public option, national-level exchanges, etc) or strict regulation (like the Dutch system where everything is private but premiums are capped at a very low rate and subsidized by the govt). But thanks to the slobbering idiots we have in Washington, we only got one part of what was needed. As it is in bare-bones form, you could construe it as a handout to private insurance companies.
-
It is.
I supported it and still do.
But I realize it isn't going to reduce the cost or improve service much.
WSS
The point of the mandate isn't improving service, it's to provide universal coverage (which in turn reduces costs in the long term). Of course, this cost reduction is much more effective when you either have competition (think public option, national-level exchanges, etc) or strict regulation (like the Dutch system where everything is private but premiums are capped at a very low rate and subsidized by the govt). But thanks to the slobbering idiots we have in Washington, we only got one part of what was needed. As it is in bare-bones form, you could construe it as a handout to private insurance companies.
The point of the mandate isn't improving service, it's to provide universal coverage (which in turn reduces costs in the long term). Of course, this cost reduction is much more effective when you either have competition (think public option, national-level exchanges, etc) or strict regulation (like the Dutch system where everything is private but premiums are capped at a very low rate and subsidized by the govt). But thanks to the slobbering idiots we have in Washington, we only got one part of what was needed. As it is in bare-bones form, you could construe it as a handout to private insurance companies.
Right, so, once again, the young, healthy people who are trying to get by without insurance for whatever reason are forced to pay for those who make a substantial amount of claims.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login