Rare, But Important Demonstration of Intestinal Fortitude

[smalls1129]

@vaportrail said:

I think you're being to literal with the words. By definition (at least my definition of God, all powerful, all knowing, all present) if there IS a GOD then there is only ONE GOD. It is a logical fallacy think multiple Gods could exist with the definition I laid out.

So do you believe that there is an omnipresent, omniscient, all-good God that is watching over us and has the power to intervene?

I am basing my definition of God on philosophy not religion. You're in college right, go ask any philosophy prof for a standard definition of God and this is roughly what they will tell you. If there be multiple Gods then logically there'd be none. Unless you're just projected human characteristics on A GOD, in which case you're merely defining a demi-God. I guess that was a long winded way to say Yes to your question. That is what I believe. Also, the reason it is only a belief and not a 'KNOW' is b/c I do not have the power to even image infinity that alone understand infinite concepts. I believe it was Locke who coined the term immensity of knowledge, which is one mans ability to handle infinite concepts. In other words immensity would differ from man to man b/c each person has his own limit of understanding.

All it is saying is that I am real and to worship others is to worship a falsehood.

What makes all the others a falsehood? What makes this one god, the true one?

Not sure where you got the text for the 2nd but I have always known it to be do not create false idols to worship...which makes sense to me. Sort of like the way we prop celebrities as Idols. If there be a God, it would make sense to warn against "fake" idols that will appear to misguide the "spiritual". And, to me, this one does not negate religions such as the pagan or the eastern religions b/c their focus in on nature which I see as a different side to the same coin.

What makes YHWH any less false than any of the other things that lead to idolatry?

I wouldn't argue that Yaweh is false at all. In fact I DO believe Yaweh to be the same God as in the Bible. The energy, man, concept was just referred to by a different name.

Your examples against 5 and 6 are kinda idiotic. There are extreme circumstances always, and notice it say murder not kill.

There are less extreme circumstances where I can see parents not being worthy of unconditional honor. What if they just don't give a shit about their kids, why should you have to feel guilty to respect them if they can't respect you? And yes, this translation that I picked out says "murder," you can find many others that say "kill." Regardless, if you killed someone because they were fond of receiving blowjobs, what would that make you? A murderer. The god of the old testament destroyed two whole cities for that reason, that makes him a murderer in my book. You can't come up with a set of universal laws for every possible situation, it just isn't feasible.

My point was there are situations where even the most religious (not zealot either think little old lady with her Rosemary) would strike violence to preserve their self. And this is in noway contradictory to my interpretations of the scriptures.

And to not covet is absolutely a goal to work on as a human. Coveting is the road to jealousy and while hard to achieve I believe we would all be better in a world with out jealousy.

You shouldn't feel guilty for wanting something or someone.

Perhaps you shouldn't feel guilty for wanting something but you should feel guilty for pinning over someone else's possessions and/or good fortune. Coveting is not simply seeing something and saying gee that would be nice. Coveting is actually stewing over and planning a way to take one's good fortune away from them purely out of the jealousy that they have it and you don't.

Main Entry: cov·et

Pronunciation: \ˈkə-vət\

Function: verb

Etymology: Middle English coveiten, from Anglo-French coveiter, from Vulgar Latin *cupidietare, from Latin cupiditat-, cupiditas desire, from cupidus desirous, from cupere to desire

Date: 14th century

transitive verb

1 : to wish for earnestly <covet an award>

2 : to desire (what belongs to another) inordinately or culpably

intransitive verb

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/covet

[VaporTrail]

I am basing my definition of God on philosophy not religion. You're in college right, go ask any philosophy prof for a standard definition of God and this is roughly what they will tell you. If there be multiple Gods then logically there'd be none. Unless you're just projected human characteristics on A GOD, in which case you're merely defining a demi-God.

Well, I guess that's what happens when I make assumptions. But this multiple-god thing being logically equal to none? Never heard that before, and I'll admit, I've only taken an intro to philosophy course. But I will look into this. d<_< Any links you could provide would be helpful.

I guess that was a long winded way to say Yes to your question. That is what I believe. Also, the reason it is only a belief and not a 'KNOW' is b/c I do not have the power to even image infinity that alone understand infinite concepts. I believe it was Locke who coined the term immensity of knowledge, which is one mans ability to handle infinite concepts. In other words immensity would differ from man to man b/c each person has his own limit of understanding.

Very well, me assuming again.

I wouldn't argue that Yaweh is false at all. In fact I DO believe Yaweh to be the same God as in the Bible. The energy, man, concept was just referred to by a different name.

Yahweh IS the god in the bible. I was asking why he couldn't be just as false as any other god before him.

Perhaps you shouldn't feel guilty for wanting something but you should feel guilty for pinning over someone else's possessions and/or good fortune. Coveting is not simply seeing something and saying gee that would be nice. Coveting is actually stewing over and planning a way to take one's good fortune away from them purely out of the jealousy that they have it and you don't.

Does that definition actually include planning to take it? Bleh, we're arguing semantics. Anywho, your points are valid, and I'll give you that seven the Ten Commandments do make sense as a starting point.

[Westside Steve]

I don't understand why an atheist is the least-trusted type of individual in America, moreso than blacks, gays, or Muslims.

They just seem like bigger assholes.

I mean if one's faith makes him feel more grounded even though it differs from someone elses I don't so much care.

But atheists only exist out of spite and bitterness toward people of faith.

No other reason.

Religious beliefs were born thousands of years ago for a society that is vastly different than our own, they were used to explain things that people could not understand, they were used to control large groups of ignorant people.

Now we have the Democrat party to serve that purpose.

WSS

[heckofajobbrownie]

Hahahaha. You're on a roll this morning.

My kid is being weaned off breastfeeding and even he's not this cranky.

[Westside Steve]

@heckofajobbrownie said:

Hahahaha. You're on a roll this morning.

My kid is being weaned off breastfeeding and even he's not this cranky.

Remember, this is the worst time to leave him alone with Uncle Shep.....

WSS

[calfoxwc]

ROF,LMAO !!!

dammit, Steve....I just took a drink of Coke, too.

dammit.

[VaporTrail]

They just seem like bigger assholes.

I mean if one's faith makes him feel more grounded even though it differs from someone elses I don't so much care.

But atheists only exist out of spite and bitterness toward people of faith.

No other reason.

Out of spite? In my case, yes, I definitely feel some spite toward religion, especially Catholicism. However, that's not why I'm an atheist, maybe it's why I'm an outspoken one, but not why I am one. I'm not satisfied with what religion offers. It claims to be the authority on questions that no human has ever had answers for. I can't take it seriously because they claim that they're right and have no evidence to back it up.

Religious beliefs were born thousands of years ago for a society that is vastly different than our own, they were used to explain things that people could not understand, they were used to control large groups of ignorant people.

Now we have the Democrat party to serve that purpose.

That's any kind of political/national party. It serves the same purpose as religion, to control the masses, the only difference is that these parties do things that make a tangible difference in your life, whereas what you do for religion is counted on your next life.

[Chicopee John]

>>..........the only difference is that these parties do things that make a tangible difference in your life, whereas what you do for religion is counted on your next life.>>

Did Mother Theresa make a tangible difference in people's lives? Did Billy Graham? There are many, many examples of lives changed for a belief in God.

You are welcome to your opinions - and thanks for sharing them on this board - but spend some time thinking about what you type and think before you say them (I wish I could put that advice into practice more often).

Also, please don't get caught up in what God says and what religion preaches. You have to learn to separate the wheat from the chaffe.

[osusev]

atheists exist out of spite and bitterness toward peoples faith....... WOW

national academy of science...71% of all members are atheists

Royal Academy of science----91% of all members are atheists

I cant remember the poll from Nature something like 97% of all natural scientists are atheists.......

Steve Atheism exists because we dont accept dogma and plagiarism compiled fables written by unknown authors that would have worshipped a plane because they dont understand the concept of lift.........

We exist because the basic need of intelligent independent thinkers to understand and not just make up stories or use a term like faith to blanket any fear of death or the unknown.

[Kosar_For_President]

@westside-steve said:

They just seem like bigger assholes.

I mean if one's faith makes him feel more grounded even though it differs from someone elses I don't so much care.

But atheists only exist out of spite and bitterness toward people of faith.

No other reason.

LOL, wow. It's actually the opposite. So far, you get the prize for most ignorant comment this month.

Does that apply to Agnostics?

[Chicopee John]

>>Steve Atheism exists because we dont accept dogma and plagiarism compiled fables written by unknown authors that would have worshipped a plane because they dont understand the concept of lift.........

We exist because the basic need of intelligent independent thinkers to understand and not just make up stories or use a term like faith to blanket any fear of death or the unknown.

God Bless you, Sev.

[DieHardBrownsFan]

@vaportrail said:

Or, you can bite me. Call me a child and then tell me that religious beliefs demand respect because they're religious? Piss off. If I want to question others' beliefs, then you'd better believe I'll question others' beliefs.

Don't have a temper tantrum. You're showing your lack of maturity already. You are very dismissive of others beliefs, but rant and rave about your experience with growing up being a catholic. Cry me a frigging river. Life sucks, but people still have faith. I guess you just gave up.

[VaporTrail]

Don't have a temper tantrum. You're showing your lack of maturity already. You are very dismissive of others beliefs, but rant and rave about your experience with growing up being a catholic. Cry me a frigging river. Life sucks, but people still have faith. I guess you just gave up.

No, I didn't just give up. I tried for a long time to reinforce the fact that I was confirmed and that I did believe these things, but I couldn't rectify my beliefs with the world around me. You call me immature because I'm still in college, but I bring up what I believe is a legitimate point, and you call it a rant and a rave because I take offense when you call me a child. Well, I still refuse to respect your beliefs just because they're religious beliefs. Give me a reason to respect them, and I'll give it a good-ole college try. In case you haven't noticed, religious beliefs are on the decline in America. Get used to it.

[calfoxwc]

So, you don't respect Christianity then.

or the Muslim faith, or the Jewish faith, or the Buddist's faith,

etc etc etc.

Meanwhile, we respect your right to not have any.

think about it, Hateful Guy.

[Kosar_For_President]

@diehardbrownsfan said:

Don't have a temper tantrum. You're showing your lack of maturity already. You are very dismissive of others beliefs, but rant and rave about your experience with growing up being a catholic. Cry me a frigging river. Life sucks, but people still have faith. I guess you just gave up.

You mean you need to go to church and take communion to have faith? I've been doing this all wrong. Thank you for showing me the light. I am now not afraid to die. LOL!

[VaporTrail]

@calfoxwc said:

So, you don't respect Christianity then. or the Muslim faith, or the Jewish faith, or the Buddist's faith, etc etc etc. Meanwhile, we respect your right to not have any. think about it, Hateful Guy.

I have little respect for any of the Abrahamic religions. Buddhism not so much. I dislike that all of them, including Buddhism, take mythic stories to be truth, and that they're completely incompatible with each other. According to Islam, you can't see paradise if you accept Christ as the Messiah. According to Christianity, salvation relies on Christ. I dislike the Abrahamic religions because of the intolerance and hate that seethes from their respective organizations. It's just a stupid thing that people claim is solely religious or spiritual, yet they base many of their decisions in this real world, on some cosmic promise. That's why I bother to say something. Religions aren't deserving of respect just because they're religions.