Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. When have we last seen this?

When have we last seen this?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
7 Posts 7 Posters 1.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Canton Mike Canton MikeC
    • 4k Posts
    • 2k Reputation
    Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by
    #1

    From Jon Herrmann...

    Cleveland Browns: A+

    98621219

    First Pick: Joe Haden

    Best Pick: Joe Haden

    Worst Pick: Carlton Mitchell

    Best Value: Colt McCoy

    I loved the Browns draft. The team had a lot of needs and did a good job of addressing them. They got a great corner in the first round, a good safety in the second and one of the steals of the draft with Colt McCoy falling into their laps in the third.

    The only pick I didn't like was Mitchell with Briscoe still on the board (if you haven't figured it out, I really like Briscoe). The Browns are a team that is definitely on the way up now. Look out for this team on the rise.

    The other grade I saw was a B.

    I love this draft & it looks like I'm not alone.

    GOOD JOB & HATS OFF to all who made it possible.

    Mike

    IN DORSEY I TRUST
    1 Reply Last reply
    ❤
    Quote Reply
    • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 9k Posts
      • 2k Reputation
      ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
      #2

      A fast scan of 2-3 sites this morning showed the lowest a B+ and the others A, and A-.

      The general consensus is we had a good draft.

      If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
      E 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • ballpeenB ballpeen

        A fast scan of 2-3 sites this morning showed the lowest a B+ and the others A, and A-.

        The general consensus is we had a good draft.

        Earl34 E
        • 1k Posts
        • 11 Reputation
        E Earl34 wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @ballpeen said:

        A fast scan of 2-3 sites this morning showed the lowest a B+ and the others A, and A-.

        The general consensus is we had a good draft.

        peen, I saw a "C" somewhere but I think that the grades are so subjective. To me, this draft made sense. OK, perhaps the particular players can be debated (Haden vs. Wilson, for instance) but the overall approach and benefit to the team made a lot of logical sense. We didn't panic (see Jacksonville or Denver). I would consider it a success. The rest is up to the guys in the building.

        ElbamboozlerE 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • blowe B
          • 2k Posts
          • 127 Reputation
          B blowe wrote on last edited by
          #4

          ESPN gave us a C, but its well known that ESPN hates everything having to do with Cleveland.

          "The purpose of the military is to kill people and break things " - mike huckabee
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • E Earl34

            @ballpeen said:

            A fast scan of 2-3 sites this morning showed the lowest a B+ and the others A, and A-.

            The general consensus is we had a good draft.

            peen, I saw a "C" somewhere but I think that the grades are so subjective. To me, this draft made sense. OK, perhaps the particular players can be debated (Haden vs. Wilson, for instance) but the overall approach and benefit to the team made a lot of logical sense. We didn't panic (see Jacksonville or Denver). I would consider it a success. The rest is up to the guys in the building.

            Elbamboozler ElbamboozlerE
            • 32 Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            ElbamboozlerE Elbamboozler wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @earl34 said:

            peen, I saw a "C" somewhere but I think that the grades are so subjective. To me, this draft made sense. OK, perhaps the particular players can be debated (Haden vs. Wilson, for instance) but the overall approach and benefit to the team made a lot of logical sense. We didn't panic (see Jacksonville or Denver). I would consider it a success. The rest is up to the guys in the building.

            http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/04/25/2010-nf...-final-verdict/

            Her is one that said we had a C+ draft

            When in doubt burn it with fire its the best way.
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Unsympathetic U Reacting Well Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 4k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The reason that moron gave us a C is because he decided we "should" pick a QB.. therefore all those picks with McCoy still on the board were "bad," even though Ward and Hardesty are talented players who fill legitimate needs on our roster. Note that after McCoy was taken, the guy didn't re-evaluate his earlier analyses .. because apparently the Browns couldn't possibly have a clue what they're doing.

              Draft is an A- at minimum.. the first good one we've had since Ozzie Newsome left town.

              The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • BrownIndian BrownIndianB
                • 2k Posts
                • 39 Reputation
                BrownIndianB BrownIndian wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Bleacher Report news are often written by people like you and me who only get our information from the internet or TV. While they contain interesting articles they are not an actual site for information like Yahoo or ESPN.

                You can get your own account by going to http://bleacherreport.com/signup and write your own articles.

                1 Reply Last reply
                ❤
                Quote Reply

                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                Register Login
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                Theme
                • System
                • Light
                • Dark
                The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Forums
                • Recent
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Donate