Browns helmet logo
-
we don't need no stinkin logo
-
Our helments ARE our logo . we need no other .
-
Our helments ARE our logo . we need no other .
Our helments ARE our logo . we need no other .
Trust me, I agree with you all on that. I was just providing the info on the subject.
-
No logo, no brown pants.
-
Here is the helmet that was proposed for a potential Baltimore expansion team if they got one in the 90s. Of course, they didn't get one, Jacksonville and Carolina did:
-
Here was the proposed helmet for one of the other finalists in the 90s expansion sweepstake that was won by Jax and Carolina, the Memphis Houndogs:
-
Here is the helmet of the other loser in the 90s expansion sweepstakes, the St. Louis Stallions:
-
A proposed helmet for the Redskins. Better or worse than the one they use?:
-
A new one for the Patriots. What do you think:
-
-
A new one for the Patriots. What do you think:
A new one for the Patriots. What do you think:
looks like a captain america helmet haha
-
I'm a traditionalist & much prefer the plain look...they can lose the brown pants too (as already mentioned).
Mike
-
Then, there is this possibility:
Then, there is this possibility:
Haha, I like it.
-
Then, there is this possibility:
Then, there is this possibility:
Its hard to argue having cleveland brown on the side of the browns helm, it also represents the browns fans general lack of enthusiasm..if we had to have a logo this would be it! hehehehe
Im for no logo, no brown pants and generally out of tradition no cheerleaders however i could be swayed and fall victim to the browns getting cheerleaders....
-
Then, there is this possibility:
Then, there is this possibility:
Very nice set up, That is funny stuff. Our helmets look just fine. Thanks for the info.
-
Here is the helmet that was proposed for a potential Baltimore expansion team if they got one in the 90s. Of course, they didn't get one, Jacksonville and Carolina did:
Here is the helmet that was proposed for a potential Baltimore expansion team if they got one in the 90s. Of course, they didn't get one, Jacksonville and Carolina did:
They did get one in the 90's. Wonder why they didn't go with this when they got the Ravens?
-
Here's an interesting site topic on a different forum about Unused Uniforms I think on page 4? or something they show the full uniform for the Bombers and also the unused logo and uniforms for the Jaguars. They were actually taken to court over their original logo, because Ford Motor Company felt it was too close to the logo used for Jaguar cars (which was owned by Ford at the time). Sometimes that site has interesting stuff, but most of those people are a bit overly obsessed with uniforms and they are a bit weird, so try not to spend too much time there haha
-
Here is the helmet that was proposed for a potential Baltimore expansion team if they got one in the 90s. Of course, they didn't get one, Jacksonville and Carolina did:
They did get one in the 90's. Wonder why they didn't go with this when they got the Ravens?
They did get one in the 90's. Wonder why they didn't go with this when they got the Ravens?
I think that when it was decided that Baltimore would get a new franchise, Modell elected to let the fans vote on the name. I think most of them associated "The Bombers" with the failed attempt at expansion, thus they rejected that name.
Plus, I think there may have been some political correctness going on. I think the league wanted to get away from an image of warfare and violence. That is why the NBA got the Washington Bullets to change their name to the Wizards. (That plus,"The Bullets" was associated with The Baltimore Bullets, and they wanted to dissassociate from Baltimore)
-
Here's an interesting site topic on a different forum about Unused Uniforms I think on page 4? or something they show the full uniform for the Bombers and also the unused logo and uniforms for the Jaguars. They were actually taken to court over their original logo, because Ford Motor Company felt it was too close to the logo used for Jaguar cars (which was owned by Ford at the time). Sometimes that site has interesting stuff, but most of those people are a bit overly obsessed with uniforms and they are a bit weird, so try not to spend too much time there haha
Here's an interesting site topic on a different forum about Unused Uniforms I think on page 4? or something they show the full uniform for the Bombers and also the unused logo and uniforms for the Jaguars. They were actually taken to court over their original logo, because Ford Motor Company felt it was too close to the logo used for Jaguar cars (which was owned by Ford at the time). Sometimes that site has interesting stuff, but most of those people are a bit overly obsessed with uniforms and they are a bit weird, so try not to spend too much time there haha
That original Jags logo is much sweeter than the one they use. Too bad these companies are so damn touchy about stupid Shite like that. I would think they would have wanted the association. Or, perhaps they just wanted money and the Jags didn't want to give them money. They should have.
Also, the original Ravens design that Modell stole from the guy that produced it was much sweeter than the one they ended up with. Too bad Modell was such a cheap asshole and didn't just pay the guy for it. It would have been nicer, but instead, he decided to be a cheap turd and steal it and show his true colors.
-
We don't need no stinkin logo
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login