48,000 Murdered since 911
-
Sorry bro, 100% wrong (unless I lost something is translation, lol). Whole campaign strategies are based around the Latino vote.
"At one time, I think Hispanics were viewed by the people who were running campaigns as a little bit of a distraction, a little bit of a nuisance," says Jose Villarreal, a San Antonio lawyer and Clinton supporter who was a top adviser to Democrats Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004. "Now the community is like an IPO. Everybody wants to invest in it."
And
Florida Sen. Mel Martinez, general chairman of the Republican National Committee, says there is time for the eventual GOP nominee to recover among Hispanic voters next year — and that doing so is becoming increasingly critical. Hispanics represented 1 in 8 U.S. residents in 2000 but are projected to be 1 in 4 by 2050.
Martinez, a Cuban émigré, says Republicans can't win the White House with today's level of Hispanic support. "It would be in my view virtually impossible," he says.
Yeah, you're mixing up two different things. John wanted to know if Democrats wanted more Latinos in the country. I said it doesn't matter to people what race the immigrants are. Democrats don't sit around dreaming of more Latinos in the country. Plus, Republicans are certainly free to compete for those votes as well. They're just not very good at convincing minority groups that they've got their best interests in mind. Because they usually don't.
I think the fact that campaigns are geared towards certain segments of the population is so obvious and unremarkable it's hardly worth pointing out.
They're just not very good at convincing minority groups that they've got their best interests in mind. Because they usually don't.
Yep.
The uncle that lets kids drink beer stay up late and read his playboys is always the most popular relative.
WSS
-
Sorry bro, 100% wrong (unless I lost something is translation, lol). Whole campaign strategies are based around the Latino vote.
"At one time, I think Hispanics were viewed by the people who were running campaigns as a little bit of a distraction, a little bit of a nuisance," says Jose Villarreal, a San Antonio lawyer and Clinton supporter who was a top adviser to Democrats Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004. "Now the community is like an IPO. Everybody wants to invest in it."
And
Florida Sen. Mel Martinez, general chairman of the Republican National Committee, says there is time for the eventual GOP nominee to recover among Hispanic voters next year — and that doing so is becoming increasingly critical. Hispanics represented 1 in 8 U.S. residents in 2000 but are projected to be 1 in 4 by 2050.
Martinez, a Cuban émigré, says Republicans can't win the White House with today's level of Hispanic support. "It would be in my view virtually impossible," he says.
Yeah, you're mixing up two different things. John wanted to know if Democrats wanted more Latinos in the country. I said it doesn't matter to people what race the immigrants are. Democrats don't sit around dreaming of more Latinos in the country. Plus, Republicans are certainly free to compete for those votes as well. They're just not very good at convincing minority groups that they've got their best interests in mind. Because they usually don't.
I think the fact that campaigns are geared towards certain segments of the population is so obvious and unremarkable it's hardly worth pointing out.
I think the fact that campaigns are geared towards certain segments of the population is so obvious and unremarkable it's hardly worth pointing out.
Same old Heck. Smug as ever. Do you know you do that? Cause if you do I feel sorry for you and your friend.
Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12 -
They're just not very good at convincing minority groups that they've got their best interests in mind. Because they usually don't.
Yep.
The uncle that lets kids drink beer stay up late and read his playboys is always the most popular relative.
WSS
Yep.
The uncle that lets kids drink beer stay up late and read his playboys is always the most popular relative.
WSS
Gee, I had no idea you'd say something like this.
What they need is some stern talking to, huh? Maybe the ol' bootstraps lecture. That'll set them straight.
-
I think the fact that campaigns are geared towards certain segments of the population is so obvious and unremarkable it's hardly worth pointing out.
Same old Heck. Smug as ever. Do you know you do that? Cause if you do I feel sorry for you and your friend.
Same old Heck. Smug as ever. Do you know you do that? Cause if you do I feel sorry for you and your friend.
Oh, grow up, you f'ing baby.
-
Yep.
The uncle that lets kids drink beer stay up late and read his playboys is always the most popular relative.
WSS
Gee, I had no idea you'd say something like this.
What they need is some stern talking to, huh? Maybe the ol' bootstraps lecture. That'll set them straight.
Gee, I had no idea you'd say something like this.
What they need is some stern talking to, huh? Maybe the ol' bootstraps lecture. That'll set them straight.
Nah like you say, Heck, it's someone else's fault.
Get the pitchforks and torches.
I wonder if anybody feels insulted by those of you who feel they actually are inferior and incapable of competing.
Think so?
WSS
-
Same old Heck. Smug as ever. Do you know you do that? Cause if you do I feel sorry for you and your friend.
Oh, grow up, you f'ing baby.
Oh, grow up, you f'ing baby.
Heck strikes again. Being a smug fag is being grown up, lol. What a loser. You can't even discuss an issue without putting someone down, sounds like playground tactics to me. Too funny. Good stuff thanks for the laugh.
-
Gee, I had no idea you'd say something like this.
What they need is some stern talking to, huh? Maybe the ol' bootstraps lecture. That'll set them straight.
Nah like you say, Heck, it's someone else's fault.
Get the pitchforks and torches.
I wonder if anybody feels insulted by those of you who feel they actually are inferior and incapable of competing.
Think so?
WSS
Nah like you say, Heck, it's someone else's fault.
Get the pitchforks and torches.
I wonder if anybody feels insulted by those of you who feel they actually are inferior and incapable of competing.
Think so?
WSS
I think less and less of your intellect every single day.
Who makes their fingers type that?
-
Oh, grow up, you f'ing baby.
Heck strikes again. Being a smug fag is being grown up, lol. What a loser. You can't even discuss an issue without putting someone down, sounds like playground tactics to me. Too funny. Good stuff thanks for the laugh.
Heck strikes again. Being a smug fag is being grown up, lol. What a loser. You can't even discuss an issue without putting someone down, sounds like playground tactics to me. Too funny. Good stuff thanks for the laugh.
That was a joke, Kosar.
-
Nah like you say, Heck, it's someone else's fault.
Get the pitchforks and torches.
I wonder if anybody feels insulted by those of you who feel they actually are inferior and incapable of competing.
Think so?
WSS
I think less and less of your intellect every single day.
Who makes their fingers type that?
I think less and less of your intellect every single day.
Who makes their fingers type that?
Answer:
The guy who's smarter than the one who typed this:
" What they need is some stern talking to, huh? Maybe the ol' bootstraps lecture. That'll set them straight."
Go ahead.
Tell me what the Democrats do to promote minorities on an equal basis.
WSS
-
Heck strikes again. Being a smug fag is being grown up, lol. What a loser. You can't even discuss an issue without putting someone down, sounds like playground tactics to me. Too funny. Good stuff thanks for the laugh.
That was a joke, Kosar.
That was a joke, Kosar.
Yea you're about as funny as Cal.
-
I think less and less of your intellect every single day.
Who makes their fingers type that?
Answer:
The guy who's smarter than the one who typed this:
" What they need is some stern talking to, huh? Maybe the ol' bootstraps lecture. That'll set them straight."
Go ahead.
Tell me what the Democrats do to promote minorities on an equal basis.
WSS
Answer:
The guy who's smarter than the one who typed this:
" What they need is some stern talking to, huh? Maybe the ol' bootstraps lecture. That'll set them straight."
Go ahead.
Tell me what the Democrats do to promote minorities on an equal basis.
WSS
Steve, like we talked about many times before, your views on race relations and policy are stuck in the early 80s.
Somewhere between the cartoon of racist Republicans who yearn for the days of segregation and the cartoon of guilt-ridden Democrats who wake up in the morning looking to give minorities handouts so they can buy their votes and make everyone beholden to their government lies this huge spectrum called reality.
Let's try to live in that part, shall we?
For instance, we could talk about education reform, No Child Left Behind, Pell Grants, student loans, college admissions, community colleges, policing, drug policy and sentencing reform, Head Start, and a whole host of other programs whose overriding goal is to provide American citizens with some level of equal opportunity and safety.
But you don't. You prefer the cartoons, like the ones you've typed on the rest of the page. And you've identified the real problem - liberals like me think blacks are inferior, and between that and the guilt and the desire to buy votes, that's why give them all that government cheese.
Welcome to 1980. I believe Taxi is on TV. If you'll excuse me.
-
I guess Heck can't come up with anything that the Dems do or have done to promote minorities
on an equal basis.
Heck doesn't have a clue, but in libbie land, that means they have all the clues....
they just can't read them, and don't know where they are.
Clueless Mr. Jellybeans, that's Heck right there.
Oh, btw:
Yea you're about as funny as Cal. Kosar
-
Answer:
The guy who's smarter than the one who typed this:
" What they need is some stern talking to, huh? Maybe the ol' bootstraps lecture. That'll set them straight."
Go ahead.
Tell me what the Democrats do to promote minorities on an equal basis.
WSS
Steve, like we talked about many times before, your views on race relations and policy are stuck in the early 80s.
Somewhere between the cartoon of racist Republicans who yearn for the days of segregation and the cartoon of guilt-ridden Democrats who wake up in the morning looking to give minorities handouts so they can buy their votes and make everyone beholden to their government lies this huge spectrum called reality.
Let's try to live in that part, shall we?
For instance, we could talk about education reform, No Child Left Behind, Pell Grants, student loans, college admissions, community colleges, policing, drug policy and sentencing reform, Head Start, and a whole host of other programs whose overriding goal is to provide American citizens with some level of equal opportunity and safety.
But you don't. You prefer the cartoons, like the ones you've typed on the rest of the page. And you've identified the real problem - liberals like me think blacks are inferior, and between that and the guilt and the desire to buy votes, that's why give them all that government cheese.
Welcome to 1980. I believe Taxi is on TV. If you'll excuse me.
And you've identified the real problem - liberals like me think blacks are inferior, and between that and the guilt and the desire to buy votes, that's why give them all that government cheese.
Finally an honest answer.
-
For instance, we could talk about education reform, No Child Left Behind, Pell Grants, student loans, college admissions, community colleges, policing, drug policy and sentencing reform, Head Start, and a whole host of other programs whose overriding goal is to provide American citizens with some level of equal opportunity and safety.
But you don't.
No I don't.
Because none of those things should be based on skin color.
And thet's exactly where your point fails.
When you use them as bribes for a particular group you are, in fact, racist in the true sense of the word.
When you promote tem as an attempt to repair the unfairness from "those other people" you encourage
If you say certain racial groups need extra help then you are in fact saying they are inferior in some way.
Real "racism" needs you to think one group is different based on race alone.
I don't think that.
Oh I'm sure there might be small differences but cultural and environmental circumstances override them.
It's the us v them you use everyday Heck that I think is bullshit.
Somebody doesn't want illegal immigration he must be a racist.
"Look Hispanics, these guys who want to obey the law hate you!!!
Vote for us."
That's what sucks Heck, and you know it.
WSS
-
For instance, we could talk about education reform, No Child Left Behind, Pell Grants, student loans, college admissions, community colleges, policing, drug policy and sentencing reform, Head Start, and a whole host of other programs whose overriding goal is to provide American citizens with some level of equal opportunity and safety.
But you don't.
No I don't.
Because none of those things should be based on skin color.
And thet's exactly where your point fails.
When you use them as bribes for a particular group you are, in fact, racist in the true sense of the word.
When you promote tem as an attempt to repair the unfairness from "those other people" you encourage
If you say certain racial groups need extra help then you are in fact saying they are inferior in some way.
Real "racism" needs you to think one group is different based on race alone.
I don't think that.
Oh I'm sure there might be small differences but cultural and environmental circumstances override them.
It's the us v them you use everyday Heck that I think is bullshit.
Somebody doesn't want illegal immigration he must be a racist.
"Look Hispanics, these guys who want to obey the law hate you!!!
Vote for us."
That's what sucks Heck, and you know it.
WSS
For instance, we could talk about education reform, No Child Left Behind, Pell Grants, student loans, college admissions, community colleges, policing, drug policy and sentencing reform, Head Start, and a whole host of other programs whose overriding goal is to provide American citizens with some level of equal opportunity and safety.
But you don't.
No I don't.
Because none of those things should be based on skin color.
And thet's exactly where your point fails.
When you use them as bribes for a particular group you are, in fact, racist in the true sense of the word.
When you promote tem as an attempt to repair the unfairness from "those other people" you encourage
If you say certain racial groups need extra help then you are in fact saying they are inferior in some way.
Real "racism" needs you to think one group is different based on race alone.
I don't think that.
Oh I'm sure there might be small differences but cultural and environmental circumstances override them.
It's the us v them you use everyday Heck that I think is bullshit.
Somebody doesn't want illegal immigration he must be a racist.
"Look Hispanics, these guys who want to obey the law hate you!!!
Vote for us."
That's what sucks Heck, and you know it.
WSS
Do you realize how completely dishonest and misleading everything you write is?
Once again, none of this is what I think, or what any liberal I know thinks. It's just what you imagine they think. And oh, how angry these ideas you create in your head make you.
It's sort of hysterical how I list a bunch of programs that exist, at least in part, to help ensure opportunities for people who are economically disadvantaged, or kids who, by no fault of their own, grow up in high crime area, or areas with shitty schools, or can't afford college, and you instantly go back to the "bribe" nonsense, and how this is all racist, and us vs. them, because it's targeting people of a certain color. Even though I didn't mention targeting people of a certain color, and those programs have nothing to do with color. You just imagine that they do - and they don't - and then you ran with that. It's just laughable.
None of the programs I mentioned are targeted to specific minority groups other than the economically disadvantaged. Which ones are you suggesting are racist bribes? Pell Grants? Head Start? Community colleges?
What the hell are you talking about?
Then you make up something about how, in the eyes of liberals, someone who doesn't want illegal immigration must be a racist. And then you try and pretend that you don't view people differently because of their race, also laughable. You've written far too many things to try to pass that one off now, my friend.
-
For instance, we could talk about education reform, No Child Left Behind, Pell Grants, student loans, college admissions, community colleges, policing, drug policy and sentencing reform, Head Start, and a whole host of other programs whose overriding goal is to provide American citizens with some level of equal opportunity and safety.
But you don't.
No I don't.
Because none of those things should be based on skin color.
And thet's exactly where your point fails.
When you use them as bribes for a particular group you are, in fact, racist in the true sense of the word.
When you promote tem as an attempt to repair the unfairness from "those other people" you encourage
If you say certain racial groups need extra help then you are in fact saying they are inferior in some way.
Real "racism" needs you to think one group is different based on race alone.
I don't think that.
Oh I'm sure there might be small differences but cultural and environmental circumstances override them.
It's the us v them you use everyday Heck that I think is bullshit.
Somebody doesn't want illegal immigration he must be a racist.
"Look Hispanics, these guys who want to obey the law hate you!!!
Vote for us."
That's what sucks Heck, and you know it.
WSS
Do you realize how completely dishonest and misleading everything you write is?
Once again, none of this is what I think, or what any liberal I know thinks. It's just what you imagine they think. And oh, how angry these ideas you create in your head make you.
It's sort of hysterical how I list a bunch of programs that exist, at least in part, to help ensure opportunities for people who are economically disadvantaged, or kids who, by no fault of their own, grow up in high crime area, or areas with shitty schools, or can't afford college, and you instantly go back to the "bribe" nonsense, and how this is all racist, and us vs. them, because it's targeting people of a certain color. Even though I didn't mention targeting people of a certain color, and those programs have nothing to do with color. You just imagine that they do - and they don't - and then you ran with that. It's just laughable.
None of the programs I mentioned are targeted to specific minority groups other than the economically disadvantaged. Which ones are you suggesting are racist bribes? Pell Grants? Head Start? Community colleges?
What the hell are you talking about?
Then you make up something about how, in the eyes of liberals, someone who doesn't want illegal immigration must be a racist. And then you try and pretend that you don't view people differently because of their race, also laughable. You've written far too many things to try to pass that one off now, my friend.
It's sort of hysterical how I list a bunch of programs that exist, at least in part, to help ensure opportunities for people who are economically disadvantaged, or kids who, by no fault of their own, grow up in high crime area, or areas with shitty schools, or can't afford college, ......................
But, in many - if not most instances - the juice ain't worth the squeeze.
Anybody ever do a CBO on these programs?
-
I guess Heck can't come up with anything that the Dems do or have done to promote minorities
on an equal basis.
Heck doesn't have a clue, but in libbie land, that means they have all the clues....
they just can't read them, and don't know where they are.
Clueless Mr. Jellybeans, that's Heck right there.
Oh, btw:
Yea you're about as funny as Cal. Kosar
-
It's sort of hysterical how I list a bunch of programs that exist, at least in part, to help ensure opportunities for people who are economically disadvantaged, or kids who, by no fault of their own, grow up in high crime area, or areas with shitty schools, or can't afford college, ......................
But, in many - if not most instances - the juice ain't worth the squeeze.
Anybody ever do a CBO on these programs?
But, in many - if not most instances - the juice ain't worth the squeeze.
Anybody ever do a CBO on these programs?
What are you basing this on? Pell Grants don't help people afford college? Student loans? What are you talking about? Crime prevention programs don't work? Gang task forces don't work? Of course there are programs that don't give you any bang for the buck - D.A.R.E is a great example. But to sit from where you are and say, "Most of this stuff doesn't work" is just lazy. It'd be more accurate to say that you don't like the idea of them. But you really don't know whether all those things I listed work well enough to justify their expenditure, do you, John? That would require a lot of study, rather than a blanket ideological statement.
You'd have to do work like this. And this work doesn't suggest that none of these programs work. In fact, it's exactly the kind of approach you're asking for. For instance, according to most of the research, the most successful programs for kids are well-designed early education and intervention programs, because they've found that once a kid is behind in elementary school, it's really, really hard to get them to catch up. That's where you get the most bang for your buck.
Why make college loans more affordable, and Pell Grants more available? Because a college education means roughly a million dollars more in earnings over a lifetime than a typical high school grad. If you're looking to improve wealth and lower inequality, you want people who should go to college and want to go to college be able to afford to go to college. You shouldn't be stuck simply because you were born into a poor family, or because your parent(s) was/were laid off and the market tanked right when you were supposed to enroll.
These are the real issues government deals with. This is what is actually discussed in policy circles - getting your bang for your buck. What works, what doesn't. How do you address the problems of structural inequality? How do you address the problems of the urban poor?
Or we can reduce them to stupid "racist handouts for lazy people to buy votes" arguments like the ones Steve likes to push, which are just arguments born out of political and cultural resentments. They're not really relevant, unless we're running a talk radio show.
And the CBO scores the costs of every bill that affects the budget. They don't tell you whether or not they think it's worth it because those are value judgments. And Congress and the people who vote for them make those.
-
For instance, we could talk about education reform, No Child Left Behind, Pell Grants, student loans, college admissions, community colleges, policing, drug policy and sentencing reform, Head Start, and a whole host of other programs whose overriding goal is to provide American citizens with some level of equal opportunity and safety.
But you don't.
No I don't.
Because none of those things should be based on skin color.
And thet's exactly where your point fails.
When you use them as bribes for a particular group you are, in fact, racist in the true sense of the word.
When you promote tem as an attempt to repair the unfairness from "those other people" you encourage
If you say certain racial groups need extra help then you are in fact saying they are inferior in some way.
Real "racism" needs you to think one group is different based on race alone.
I don't think that.
Oh I'm sure there might be small differences but cultural and environmental circumstances override them.
It's the us v them you use everyday Heck that I think is bullshit.
Somebody doesn't want illegal immigration he must be a racist.
"Look Hispanics, these guys who want to obey the law hate you!!!
Vote for us."
That's what sucks Heck, and you know it.
WSS
Do you realize how completely dishonest and misleading everything you write is?
Once again, none of this is what I think, or what any liberal I know thinks. It's just what you imagine they think. And oh, how angry these ideas you create in your head make you.
It's sort of hysterical how I list a bunch of programs that exist, at least in part, to help ensure opportunities for people who are economically disadvantaged, or kids who, by no fault of their own, grow up in high crime area, or areas with shitty schools, or can't afford college, and you instantly go back to the "bribe" nonsense, and how this is all racist, and us vs. them, because it's targeting people of a certain color. Even though I didn't mention targeting people of a certain color, and those programs have nothing to do with color. You just imagine that they do - and they don't - and then you ran with that. It's just laughable.
None of the programs I mentioned are targeted to specific minority groups other than the economically disadvantaged. Which ones are you suggesting are racist bribes? Pell Grants? Head Start? Community colleges?
What the hell are you talking about?
Then you make up something about how, in the eyes of liberals, someone who doesn't want illegal immigration must be a racist. And then you try and pretend that you don't view people differently because of their race, also laughable. You've written far too many things to try to pass that one off now, my friend.
It's sort of hysterical how I list a bunch of programs that exist, at least in part, to help ensure opportunities for people who are economically disadvantaged, or kids who, by no fault of their own, grow up in high crime area, or areas with shitty schools, or can't afford college, and you instantly go back to the "bribe" nonsense, and how this is all racist, and us vs. them, because it's targeting people of a certain color. Even though I didn't mention targeting people of a certain color, and those programs have nothing to do with color.
Actually (and you must be too enraged to read clearly) we were talikng about why a minority member might want to be a Democrat.
I asked what the Democrats specifically offered to minorities that the Republicans didn't.
That was the list you gave me.
But you wanna cry because I point out the fact that some specific groups have more problems than others who have also had tough histories, I can't help you.
Or if I make fun of Ebonics which is a habit deserving of ridicule IMO.
(and spare me the "every or all" gag)
WSS
-
For instance, we could talk about education reform, No Child Left Behind, Pell Grants, student loans, college admissions, community colleges, policing, drug policy and sentencing reform, Head Start, and a whole host of other programs whose overriding goal is to provide American citizens with some level of equal opportunity and safety.
But you don't.
No I don't.
Because none of those things should be based on skin color.
And thet's exactly where your point fails.
When you use them as bribes for a particular group you are, in fact, racist in the true sense of the word.
When you promote tem as an attempt to repair the unfairness from "those other people" you encourage
If you say certain racial groups need extra help then you are in fact saying they are inferior in some way.
Real "racism" needs you to think one group is different based on race alone.
I don't think that.
Oh I'm sure there might be small differences but cultural and environmental circumstances override them.
It's the us v them you use everyday Heck that I think is bullshit.
Somebody doesn't want illegal immigration he must be a racist.
"Look Hispanics, these guys who want to obey the law hate you!!!
Vote for us."
That's what sucks Heck, and you know it.
WSS
Do you realize how completely dishonest and misleading everything you write is?
Once again, none of this is what I think, or what any liberal I know thinks. It's just what you imagine they think. And oh, how angry these ideas you create in your head make you.
It's sort of hysterical how I list a bunch of programs that exist, at least in part, to help ensure opportunities for people who are economically disadvantaged, or kids who, by no fault of their own, grow up in high crime area, or areas with shitty schools, or can't afford college, and you instantly go back to the "bribe" nonsense, and how this is all racist, and us vs. them, because it's targeting people of a certain color. Even though I didn't mention targeting people of a certain color, and those programs have nothing to do with color. You just imagine that they do - and they don't - and then you ran with that. It's just laughable.
None of the programs I mentioned are targeted to specific minority groups other than the economically disadvantaged. Which ones are you suggesting are racist bribes? Pell Grants? Head Start? Community colleges?
What the hell are you talking about?
Then you make up something about how, in the eyes of liberals, someone who doesn't want illegal immigration must be a racist. And then you try and pretend that you don't view people differently because of their race, also laughable. You've written far too many things to try to pass that one off now, my friend.
And then you try and pretend that you don't view people differently because of their race, also laughable. You've written far too many things to try to pass that one off now, my friend.
And what did I say that is based on race itself and not culture?
Think hard.
Here's a tip.
Irish people choose to get drunk on St Patrick's day.
It is not bred into them by race.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login