Roethlisberger possibly in trouble once again
-
He's going to serve his full suspension. Steelers are doomed this season, and probably for many seasons to come.
Raven said:
He's going to serve his full suspension. Steelers are doomed this season, and probably for many seasons to come.Even though you are a ratbird fan, I totally agree with you.
-
Raven said:
He's going to serve his full suspension. Steelers are doomed this season, and probably for many seasons to come.Even though you are a ratbird fan, I totally agree with you.
Even though you are a ratbird fan, I totally agree with you.
They're just done. I wanted to sign up here early so I can watch you guys punish the Squealer trolls as they hold the divisions floor down. That's about all they'll be good for.
-
why do you guys argue with the "homo", it's obvious that Pittsburgh will always be better than Cleveland.
This is how it goes, Steelers fans like to bring up their 6 super bowls, which is fine but when we bring up the 8? championships they say the past doesn't matter. Okay thats fine too, but we beat the steelers in the last meeting, so these steelers fan bring up their past winning streak. But hey aren't you the same guys that said the past doesn't matter? So which is it?
why do you guys argue with the "homo", it's obvious that Pittsburgh will always be better than Cleveland.
This is how it goes, Steelers fans like to bring up their 6 super bowls, which is fine but when we bring up the 8? championships they say the past doesn't matter. Okay thats fine too, but we beat the steelers in the last meeting, so these steelers fan bring up their past winning streak. But hey aren't you the same guys that said the past doesn't matter? So which is it?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzz......................
-
He's going to serve his full suspension. Steelers are doomed this season, and probably for many seasons to come.
Raven said:
He's going to serve his full suspension. Steelers are doomed this season, and probably for many seasons to come.He will serve 4 games..NOT 6. Our team may very well struggle mightily ... But dont count them out, its not over till its over.
-
If you knew the answer, why did you feel the need to ask the question?
If someone actually answered the question they may come to the realization that beating the Steelers once since Big Ben was drafted isn't reason to dance around. The so called "demise" of the Steeler organization amuses me. I'm the reality. Pittsburgh will be in the playoffs and everyone on this message board will be eating crow. Although at this point it has to be a staple food item. Every season it's ridiculously lofty expectations met with a harsh reality. A reality someday the Browns may turn upside down but for now enjoy your top 10 draft pick for at least the next two seasons.
Rorbotron said:
I'm the reality. Pittsburgh will be in the playoffs and everyone on this message board will be eating crow.
How do you like your crow? If everyone on this message board will be eating crow, you will be one of us dining on crow since you are one of us on this board. But since you will be taking one for the Gripper, you shouldn't mind the meal.
When you are talking about the NFL's policy regarding personal behavior, how many times does BR's name have to come up for being in wrong places at wrong times? We're not talking about courts and juries.
This golf course incident really appears rather stupid. BR had better learn, however, that his behavior is under scrutiney now like never before and he had better avoid the apparance of impropriety and he had better make sure his friends do, too,
-
Even though you are a ratbird fan, I totally agree with you.
They're just done. I wanted to sign up here early so I can watch you guys punish the Squealer trolls as they hold the divisions floor down. That's about all they'll be good for.
Raven said:
They're just done. I wanted to sign up here early so I can watch you guys punish the Squealer trolls as they hold the divisions floor down. That's about all they'll be good for.Well if you're in for a penny you are in for a # You won't win many friends coming here from baltiwhore
NewEraDawg -
Hawg,
I'm not a Browns fan and Big Ben was not the one seen taking a leak on the golf course. It was a alumni from the University of Miami that was golfing with Ben. I also doubt anyone in the foursome believed the individual in question would be seen nor did anyone believe if seen it would be a HUGE deal. The sad thing is it wouldn't have made it to the media at all had Pittsburgh Fans local to the course not contacted the media themselves. Apparently they are in the "lost all respect" for Big Ben camp. In case you weren't aware there are two camps in the city of Pittsburgh, those that support Ben and those that aren't at the moment.
Oh and I've laughed out several times in this thread, specifically when Raven introduced himself. Don't be surprised if your beloved Rat Birds lose that game without Big Ben. You nearly lost last year with Dixon under center AND WOULD have lost if Arians and Co. allowed him to play on the edge more that game. Playing on the edge he threw for a TD and ran for another. I'm going to laugh my ass off when it goes down because Chicken little will be flying a hot air balloon over both cities and I'll be on this board and a Rat Bird board to bask in the aftermath. Pittsburgh will once again have a top 5 defense and if the first 4 games can be survived a run DEEP into the playoffs. It's going to be priceless.
-
Raven said:
They're just done. I wanted to sign up here early so I can watch you guys punish the Squealer trolls as they hold the divisions floor down. That's about all they'll be good for.Well if you're in for a penny you are in for a # You won't win many friends coming here from baltiwhore
Well if you're in for a penny you are in for a # You won't win many friends coming here from baltiwhore
You're hatred is certainly to be respected and I applaud it. I figured I'd see a "gang up on the Steeler fan" show but I'm glad to see your hate is all encompassing and that's how it should be. Mr. Raven is a total d-bag for thinking he was going to roll up in here and get some love because he joined in on the bash session. I personally can't wait to watch Boldin and Flacco get pasted on the regular.
Oh and fvck you both. Just trying to keep with the theme.
-
I am a equal opportunity hater . but the edge goes to squeeler pukes like you and your tweety-bird fans.
-
I am a equal opportunity hater . but the edge goes to squeeler pukes like you and your tweety-bird fans.
I am a equal opportunity hater . but the edge goes to squeeler pukes like you and your tweety-bird fans.
Haters gonna hate and you SHOULD hate me and the Steeler fan base more. I can also respect the hate but I'm not only here trolling and you continue to cry so I'll continue to stick around.
-
Homotron is gay . That is why his name is such . He used to be in the closet until the "semen scented farts " run him out .
-
Homotron is gay . That is why his name is such . He used to be in the closet until the "semen scented farts " run him out .
Homotron is gay . That is why his name is such . He used to be in the closet until the "semen scented farts " run him out .
Man how long did it take you to formulate that gem. Horrible sentence structure and everything. I didn't realize recess let out so early, I'll get you you're carton of milk and a warm cookie so you can piece together a few more kiddie insults. No you can't use the monkey bars.
-
what you want............good grammer or good taste ?
NewEraDawg -
Might as well add to the hate fest. While I strongly dislike the Steelers and Ravens, I think the edge goes to the Steelers. I mean really, how many Ravens fans are there in NE Ohio? I think I may have met two or three, and they are originally from Maryland anyway. Steelers fans however; are quite numerous in this region.
Can't stand the Bengals either.
-
what you want............good grammer or good taste ?
what you want............good grammer or good taste ?
Seeing as you provide neither you'll have to go back to the drawing board and come up with something.
-
why do you guys argue with the "homo", it's obvious that Pittsburgh will always be better than Cleveland.
This is how it goes, Steelers fans like to bring up their 6 super bowls, which is fine but when we bring up the 8? championships they say the past doesn't matter. Okay thats fine too, but we beat the steelers in the last meeting, so these steelers fan bring up their past winning streak. But hey aren't you the same guys that said the past doesn't matter? So which is it?
No one (except the Browns) bring up wins from the pre-Super Bowl era. Packers fans don't act all mighty becuase what they did before the Super Bowl exsisted. No one is saying what what happened before the Super Bowl doesn't count, but if you try to compare those championships to the Super Bowl, you are going to get some laughs.
No one (except the Browns) bring up wins from the pre-Super Bowl era. Packers fans don't act all mighty becuase what they did before the Super Bowl exsisted. No one is saying what what happened before the Super Bowl doesn't count, but if you try to compare those championships to the Super Bowl, you are going to get some laughs.
No one brings up wins from the post Super Bowl era except Steeler fans. Steeler Super Bowl victories are no more nor less important than Browns pre-Super Bowl victories.
And you are dead double dumbass wrong about Packer fans. My wife's family if from Wisconsin. My father in law is a Packer fan, and my wife's other friends and family are Packer fans...and if they aren't talking about Brett Favre, they are talking about their 12 titles going all the way back to the 20s. THEY don't distinguish pre/post Super Bowl at all. One of my wife's oldest family friends lives right in Green Bay. In fact, it is probably ONLY Steeler fans who take the position you do..
-
No one (except the Browns) bring up wins from the pre-Super Bowl era. Packers fans don't act all mighty becuase what they did before the Super Bowl exsisted. No one is saying what what happened before the Super Bowl doesn't count, but if you try to compare those championships to the Super Bowl, you are going to get some laughs.
No one brings up wins from the post Super Bowl era except Steeler fans. Steeler Super Bowl victories are no more nor less important than Browns pre-Super Bowl victories.
And you are dead double dumbass wrong about Packer fans. My wife's family if from Wisconsin. My father in law is a Packer fan, and my wife's other friends and family are Packer fans...and if they aren't talking about Brett Favre, they are talking about their 12 titles going all the way back to the 20s. THEY don't distinguish pre/post Super Bowl at all. One of my wife's oldest family friends lives right in Green Bay. In fact, it is probably ONLY Steeler fans who take the position you do..
No one brings up wins from the post Super Bowl era except Steeler fans. Steeler Super Bowl victories are no more nor less important than Browns pre-Super Bowl victories.
And you are dead double dumbass wrong about Packer fans. My wife's family if from Wisconsin. My father in law is a Packer fan, and my wife's other friends and family are Packer fans...and if they aren't talking about Brett Favre, they are talking about their 12 titles going all the way back to the 20s. THEY don't distinguish pre/post Super Bowl at all. One of my wife's oldest family friends lives right in Green Bay. In fact, it is probably ONLY Steeler fans who take the position you do.
.yeah, except the 9'ers, the Cowboys, the Patriots.............u know............teams that actually have won multiple superbowls.
yeah, they talk about post super bowl era wins here and there.
oh, and GB's fanbase gets a pass for 2 reasons. reason #1. the browns won all their championships in a league that only has one other surviving team that competed in that league.....the 49'ers. so the only people you can pull those cracker jack titles out on is san fran fans. #2 GB fans don't (no matter what u say, i have family in the GB area who are lifelong packer fans) tout their pre SB championships in the same league as winning a SB.......they don't even try to compare them, they just look upon them both with the same amount of fondness. fondness.......not equality. they aren't stupid and they know a lombardi is a lot harder to come by.
that's why you have however many titles you have in your defuct league and none of the SB victories.
different calliber of competition.
with all i've heard about Big Ben being a rapist and i go to a online sex offender registry and look up cleveland and Pittsburgh and what do i find? cleveland has a CRAP load more sex offenders (and expecially child molesters) than Pittsburgh.......over 4X as many over all. 2055 of them to Pittsburgh's 421. www.familywatchdog.us better never hear one of you date raping, can't get a woman with my tiny peep unless i hold her down, child molesting hypocrits say anything else about Ben. -
No one brings up wins from the post Super Bowl era except Steeler fans. Steeler Super Bowl victories are no more nor less important than Browns pre-Super Bowl victories.
And you are dead double dumbass wrong about Packer fans. My wife's family if from Wisconsin. My father in law is a Packer fan, and my wife's other friends and family are Packer fans...and if they aren't talking about Brett Favre, they are talking about their 12 titles going all the way back to the 20s. THEY don't distinguish pre/post Super Bowl at all. One of my wife's oldest family friends lives right in Green Bay. In fact, it is probably ONLY Steeler fans who take the position you do.
.yeah, except the 9'ers, the Cowboys, the Patriots.............u know............teams that actually have won multiple superbowls.
yeah, they talk about post super bowl era wins here and there.
oh, and GB's fanbase gets a pass for 2 reasons. reason #1. the browns won all their championships in a league that only has one other surviving team that competed in that league.....the 49'ers. so the only people you can pull those cracker jack titles out on is san fran fans. #2 GB fans don't (no matter what u say, i have family in the GB area who are lifelong packer fans) tout their pre SB championships in the same league as winning a SB.......they don't even try to compare them, they just look upon them both with the same amount of fondness. fondness.......not equality. they aren't stupid and they know a lombardi is a lot harder to come by.
that's why you have however many titles you have in your defuct league and none of the SB victories.
different calliber of competition.
Nafreleets said:
yeah, except the 9'ers, the Cowboys, the Patriots.............u know............teams that actually have won multiple superbowls.Well, those teams never won a title of any kind before there was a Super Bowl. They, like the Steelers have nothing else to "talk" about. Take the Bears, Giants, Colts, etc. etc., teams who have won both post and pre 1966. Those fans don't differentiate. And that includes the Packer fans despite what you say below.
yeah, they talk about post super bowl era wins here and there.
oh, and GB's fanbase gets a pass for 2 reasons.
I am not giving the Green Bay fanbase a pass for any bogus reason that you come up with just so you can support your delusion.
reason #1. the browns won all their championships in a league that only has one other surviving team that competed in that league.....the 49'ers. so the only people you can pull those cracker jack titles out on is san fran fans.
WTF does this have to do with Green Bay fans? The Browns won 4 titles in a league that merged with the NFL. YOU don't get to discredit it just because your prejudice is at play here. NO ONE gives a shit about you chasing your tail on this argument. The Browns also won 4 titles in the NFL. I suppose that league is bogus too.
Face it, the only reason you argue for discounting those titles if because the Browns won some and the Steelers didn't win diddly. That is the complete sum and substance of your argument, if you can even call it that.
#2 GB fans don't (no matter what u say, i have family in the GB area who are lifelong packer fans) tout their pre SB championships in the same league as winning a SB.......they don't even try to compare them, they just look upon them both with the same amount of fondness. fondness.......not equality. they aren't stupid and they know a lombardi is a lot harder to come by.
No matter what you say, you are wrong about GB fans. They don't compare them, they do compare them both with fondness and equality. I would be glad to take you to a Packer board for verification of this. Or to Green Bay.
And, by the way: a SB trophy may not in fact be harder to come by. Why? Because right now 37.5% of the teams in the NFL are invited to play in the tournament. When the Browns were winning their titles only 9% of the teams were invited to the tournament. You can't win a title if you can't play for it. Under the old rules, half the time the Steelers may not have even been invited to participate.
that's why you have however many titles you have in your defuct league and none of the SB victories.
different calliber of competition.
Possibly: the competition back in the old days may in fact have been better.
-
No one brings up wins from the post Super Bowl era except Steeler fans. Steeler Super Bowl victories are no more nor less important than Browns pre-Super Bowl victories.
And you are dead double dumbass wrong about Packer fans. My wife's family if from Wisconsin. My father in law is a Packer fan, and my wife's other friends and family are Packer fans...and if they aren't talking about Brett Favre, they are talking about their 12 titles going all the way back to the 20s. THEY don't distinguish pre/post Super Bowl at all. One of my wife's oldest family friends lives right in Green Bay. In fact, it is probably ONLY Steeler fans who take the position you do.
.yeah, except the 9'ers, the Cowboys, the Patriots.............u know............teams that actually have won multiple superbowls.
yeah, they talk about post super bowl era wins here and there.
oh, and GB's fanbase gets a pass for 2 reasons. reason #1. the browns won all their championships in a league that only has one other surviving team that competed in that league.....the 49'ers. so the only people you can pull those cracker jack titles out on is san fran fans. #2 GB fans don't (no matter what u say, i have family in the GB area who are lifelong packer fans) tout their pre SB championships in the same league as winning a SB.......they don't even try to compare them, they just look upon them both with the same amount of fondness. fondness.......not equality. they aren't stupid and they know a lombardi is a lot harder to come by.
that's why you have however many titles you have in your defuct league and none of the SB victories.
different calliber of competition.
Nafreleets said:
yeah, except the 9'ers, the Cowboys, the Patriots.............u know............teams that actually have won multiple superbowls.yeah, they talk about post super bowl era wins here and there.
oh, and GB's fanbase gets a pass for 2 reasons. reason #1. the browns won all their championships in a league that only has one other surviving team that competed in that league.....the 49'ers. so the only people you can pull those cracker jack titles out on is san fran fans. #2 GB fans don't (no matter what u say, i have family in the GB area who are lifelong packer fans) tout their pre SB championships in the same league as winning a SB.......they don't even try to compare them, they just look upon them both with the same amount of fondness. fondness.......not equality. they aren't stupid and they know a lombardi is a lot harder to come by.
that's why you have however many titles you have in your defuct league and none of the SB victories.
different calliber of competition.
The Browns embarrassed the Steelers for 25 years until Pittsburgh became steroid city. We had a great series record until Modell moved our team and to no surprise we've sucked a fat one since coming back with expansion talent.
-
Nafreleets said:
yeah, except the 9'ers, the Cowboys, the Patriots.............u know............teams that actually have won multiple superbowls.yeah, they talk about post super bowl era wins here and there.
oh, and GB's fanbase gets a pass for 2 reasons. reason #1. the browns won all their championships in a league that only has one other surviving team that competed in that league.....the 49'ers. so the only people you can pull those cracker jack titles out on is san fran fans. #2 GB fans don't (no matter what u say, i have family in the GB area who are lifelong packer fans) tout their pre SB championships in the same league as winning a SB.......they don't even try to compare them, they just look upon them both with the same amount of fondness. fondness.......not equality. they aren't stupid and they know a lombardi is a lot harder to come by.
that's why you have however many titles you have in your defuct league and none of the SB victories.
different calliber of competition.
The Browns embarrassed the Steelers for 25 years until Pittsburgh became steroid city. We had a great series record until Modell moved our team and to no surprise we've sucked a fat one since coming back with expansion talent.
The Browns embarrassed the Steelers for 25 years until Pittsburgh became steroid city. We had a great series record until Modell moved our team and to no surprise we've sucked a fat one since coming back with expansion talent.
You're a little slow aren't you? Even if we do factor in the supposed use of Steroids the Steelers still have more Lombardi's than the now lowly Browns. Funny that no major media outlet, league historian, sports professional places a astericks next to any of the Championships in the 70's. It should also be mentioned that the ONLY people that recognize the pre-super bowl era championships are the exact people I mention above. The day to day football masses that sit in front of the TV every Sunday could CARE LESS about pre-superbowl era wins. It's in no way shape or form a measuring stick for franchise success in this day and age. We live in a world of "what have you done for me lately" and the Browns have done absolutely nothing. Franchises are now marked by the LOMBARDI'S in their trophy case, not NFL Championships all of which occurred well before the refinement of the model athlete and the evolution of the league. Competition improves each and every year and the athletes coming out are bigger, faster, stronger more. Therefore winning a Super Bowl is certainly more challenging than winning a pre-era championship and that much is UNARGUABLE. Period. I guess at the very least Cleveland will always be able to live in the past. We have a couple of Super Bowls this decade to maintain our relevance.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login