You brahs aware the Bucs are gonna stomp that ass out on Sunday?
-
BucsNBiceps said:
You're a tool.
And that's not worthless name calling. That's just an observation.
The Browns won't win 70-0, the Bucs won't win 68-2.
But, in all honesty, I'd be surprised if we weren't the favorite. No matter what your opinion, fact of the matter is that Jake Delhomme will be looked at as a superior QB than Josh Freeman for a while. I'm not showing bias, I'm stating fact. Delhomme has been to a Super Bowl, has had back to back to back 3,000 yard passing seasons, holds an NFL Super Bowl record, is the all time passing leader for the Panthers, and has thrown for at least 3,000 yards every season he's started 16 games. What Josh Freeman needs to do is put together a winning season to even be considered as a superior QB.
Once again, none of that is bias. I'm not a big Jake fan. I'm just stating the obvious.
And save all that "blah, blah, he threw 18 INTs last season" bullshit for someone who gives a shit. One instance does not make it a habit. It's just the exception that proves the rule.
We'll see what happens on Sunday. It's not like we have any influence on the situation anyway.
You're a tool.
And that's not worthless name calling. That's just an observation.
The Browns won't win 70-0, the Bucs won't win 68-2.
But, in all honesty, I'd be surprised if we weren't the favorite. No matter what your opinion, fact of the matter is that Jake Delhomme will be looked at as a superior QB than Josh Freeman for a while. I'm not showing bias, I'm stating fact. Delhomme has been to a Super Bowl, has had back to back to back 3,000 yard passing seasons, holds an NFL Super Bowl record, is the all time passing leader for the Panthers, and has thrown for at least 3,000 yards every season he's started 16 games. What Josh Freeman needs to do is put together a winning season to even be considered as a superior QB.
Once again, none of that is bias. I'm not a big Jake fan. I'm just stating the obvious.
And save all that "blah, blah, he threw 18 INTs last season" bullshit for someone who gives a shit. One instance does not make it a habit. It's just the exception that proves the rule.
We'll see what happens on Sunday. It's not like we have any influence on the situation anyway.
Put down your walker and stop living in the past, bro. Last year Freeman's QB rating was higher than Delhomme's.
-
You're a tool.
And that's not worthless name calling. That's just an observation.
The Browns won't win 70-0, the Bucs won't win 68-2.
But, in all honesty, I'd be surprised if we weren't the favorite. No matter what your opinion, fact of the matter is that Jake Delhomme will be looked at as a superior QB than Josh Freeman for a while. I'm not showing bias, I'm stating fact. Delhomme has been to a Super Bowl, has had back to back to back 3,000 yard passing seasons, holds an NFL Super Bowl record, is the all time passing leader for the Panthers, and has thrown for at least 3,000 yards every season he's started 16 games. What Josh Freeman needs to do is put together a winning season to even be considered as a superior QB.
Once again, none of that is bias. I'm not a big Jake fan. I'm just stating the obvious.
And save all that "blah, blah, he threw 18 INTs last season" bullshit for someone who gives a shit. One instance does not make it a habit. It's just the exception that proves the rule.
We'll see what happens on Sunday. It's not like we have any influence on the situation anyway.
Put down your walker and stop living in the past, bro. Last year Freeman's QB rating was higher than Delhomme's.
Put down your walker and stop living in the past, bro. Last year Freeman's QB rating was higher than Delhomme's.
Isn't last year also the past?
And Brady Quinn's was higher that Freeman's. Look where that got Quinn. Same place I expect Freeman to be, buried on the bench.
If you're going to try and make a point, make one that doesn't suck.
-
yeah maybe next time you can find a video of a woman getting knocked out face first onto. the street. not this phony shite
-
Put down your walker and stop living in the past, bro. Last year Freeman's QB rating was higher than Delhomme's.
Isn't last year also the past?
And Brady Quinn's was higher that Freeman's. Look where that got Quinn. Same place I expect Freeman to be, buried on the bench.
If you're going to try and make a point, make one that doesn't suck.
Isn't last year also the past?
And Brady Quinn's was higher that Freeman's. Look where that got Quinn. Same place I expect Freeman to be, buried on the bench.
If you're going to try and make a point, make one that doesn't suck.
-
BucsNBiceps said:
You're a tool.
And that's not worthless name calling. That's just an observation.
The Browns won't win 70-0, the Bucs won't win 68-2.
But, in all honesty, I'd be surprised if we weren't the favorite. No matter what your opinion, fact of the matter is that Jake Delhomme will be looked at as a superior QB than Josh Freeman for a while. I'm not showing bias, I'm stating fact. Delhomme has been to a Super Bowl, has had back to back to back 3,000 yard passing seasons, holds an NFL Super Bowl record, is the all time passing leader for the Panthers, and has thrown for at least 3,000 yards every season he's started 16 games. What Josh Freeman needs to do is put together a winning season to even be considered as a superior QB.
Once again, none of that is bias. I'm not a big Jake fan. I'm just stating the obvious.
And save all that "blah, blah, he threw 18 INTs last season" bullshit for someone who gives a shit. One instance does not make it a habit. It's just the exception that proves the rule.
We'll see what happens on Sunday. It's not like we have any influence on the situation anyway.
You're a tool.
And that's not worthless name calling. That's just an observation.
The Browns won't win 70-0, the Bucs won't win 68-2.
But, in all honesty, I'd be surprised if we weren't the favorite. No matter what your opinion, fact of the matter is that Jake Delhomme will be looked at as a superior QB than Josh Freeman for a while. I'm not showing bias, I'm stating fact. Delhomme has been to a Super Bowl, has had back to back to back 3,000 yard passing seasons, holds an NFL Super Bowl record, is the all time passing leader for the Panthers, and has thrown for at least 3,000 yards every season he's started 16 games. What Josh Freeman needs to do is put together a winning season to even be considered as a superior QB.
Once again, none of that is bias. I'm not a big Jake fan. I'm just stating the obvious.
And save all that "blah, blah, he threw 18 INTs last season" bullshit for someone who gives a shit. One instance does not make it a habit. It's just the exception that proves the rule.
We'll see what happens on Sunday. It's not like we have any influence on the situation anyway.
Hope you have an absorbent pair of undies on... Bucs ARE in fact favorites.
http://www.footballlocks.com/nfl_point_spreads.shtml
Anyway... Nowhere did I say Freeman was much better than Delhomme. I simply said Delhomme held his team back for the last few years and anyone that's familiar with the Panthers knows it.
It's obvious you're too stupid to read what we're saying, or you're just in denial. Either way... Delhomme is trash, and you will soon see it first hand. I still can't believe so many of you think this guy is your Kurt Warner.
Bucs will finish with a better record than the Browns this year.
I'll come back to confirm that in January as well.
-
You're a tool.
And that's not worthless name calling. That's just an observation.
The Browns won't win 70-0, the Bucs won't win 68-2.
But, in all honesty, I'd be surprised if we weren't the favorite. No matter what your opinion, fact of the matter is that Jake Delhomme will be looked at as a superior QB than Josh Freeman for a while. I'm not showing bias, I'm stating fact. Delhomme has been to a Super Bowl, has had back to back to back 3,000 yard passing seasons, holds an NFL Super Bowl record, is the all time passing leader for the Panthers, and has thrown for at least 3,000 yards every season he's started 16 games. What Josh Freeman needs to do is put together a winning season to even be considered as a superior QB.
Once again, none of that is bias. I'm not a big Jake fan. I'm just stating the obvious.
And save all that "blah, blah, he threw 18 INTs last season" bullshit for someone who gives a shit. One instance does not make it a habit. It's just the exception that proves the rule.
We'll see what happens on Sunday. It's not like we have any influence on the situation anyway.
Hope you have an absorbent pair of undies on... Bucs ARE in fact favorites.
http://www.footballlocks.com/nfl_point_spreads.shtml
Anyway... Nowhere did I say Freeman was much better than Delhomme. I simply said Delhomme held his team back for the last few years and anyone that's familiar with the Panthers knows it.
It's obvious you're too stupid to read what we're saying, or you're just in denial. Either way... Delhomme is trash, and you will soon see it first hand. I still can't believe so many of you think this guy is your Kurt Warner.
Bucs will finish with a better record than the Browns this year.
I'll come back to confirm that in January as well.
BucsNBiceps said:
Hope you have an absorbent pair of undies on... Bucs ARE in fact favorites.http://www.footballlocks.com/nfl_point_spreads.shtml
Anyway... Nowhere did I say Freeman was much better than Delhomme. I simply said Delhomme held his team back for the last few years and anyone that's familiar with the Panthers knows it.
It's obvious you're too stupid to read what we're saying, or you're just in denial. Either way... Delhomme is trash, and you will soon see it first hand. I still can't believe so many of you think this guy is your Kurt Warner.
Bucs will finish with a better record than the Browns this year.
I'll come back to confirm that in January as well.
I'm very surprised to read that. Oh well, all I can say is that the lines have a habit of changing right before kickoff.
I live in South Carolina, most of my friends are die hard Carolina fans, and I've been to more Panthers games than Browns games. I'd say I'm pretty familiar with the Panthers. And I've made the same argument you're currently making numerous times. I've constantly been under the impression that Delhomme never was the QB needed in Carolina, he just doesn't have the deep ball accuracy for it.
Any QB with a rocket arm could have gone into Carolina and handed the ball off to any one of their numerous skilled backs they've had for the past 10 years. And then, just to break the monotony, they could heave a bomb up to Steve Smith, or even Muhsin Muhammed.
What the "Ragin Cajun" is, however, is a pretty accurate short passer. That's what he was in college, but he's never really been used in that offense in the pros. There's a long story behind why I think this is the case, but I don't want to get into that now.
But now Jake is in a west coast offense, with a remarkably solid offensive line. I'm not saying he'll have himself a Pro Bowl season, but I don't see a repeat performance of last season. Our offense is going to be the traditional "run to set up the pass". As long as Jake doesn't fumble handoffs, nobody will be calling for his head.
In closing, I believe it's pretty obvious I do know what I'm talking about, and I'm not "too stupid to read what [you're] saying". In fact, I read it, understood it, and provided you with a counterpoint.
Don't assume, it makes you look like a cocksucker.
Personally, I think you're just butthurt that our QB has raped the Bucs for so long, and Rock Morris has yet to find a solution.
-
Isn't last year also the past?
And Brady Quinn's was higher that Freeman's. Look where that got Quinn. Same place I expect Freeman to be, buried on the bench.
If you're going to try and make a point, make one that doesn't suck.
Nice response. Once again, come back when you have something useful to add.
-
BucsNBiceps said:
Hope you have an absorbent pair of undies on... Bucs ARE in fact favorites.http://www.footballlocks.com/nfl_point_spreads.shtml
Anyway... Nowhere did I say Freeman was much better than Delhomme. I simply said Delhomme held his team back for the last few years and anyone that's familiar with the Panthers knows it.
It's obvious you're too stupid to read what we're saying, or you're just in denial. Either way... Delhomme is trash, and you will soon see it first hand. I still can't believe so many of you think this guy is your Kurt Warner.
Bucs will finish with a better record than the Browns this year.
I'll come back to confirm that in January as well.
I'm very surprised to read that. Oh well, all I can say is that the lines have a habit of changing right before kickoff.
I live in South Carolina, most of my friends are die hard Carolina fans, and I've been to more Panthers games than Browns games. I'd say I'm pretty familiar with the Panthers. And I've made the same argument you're currently making numerous times. I've constantly been under the impression that Delhomme never was the QB needed in Carolina, he just doesn't have the deep ball accuracy for it.
Any QB with a rocket arm could have gone into Carolina and handed the ball off to any one of their numerous skilled backs they've had for the past 10 years. And then, just to break the monotony, they could heave a bomb up to Steve Smith, or even Muhsin Muhammed.
What the "Ragin Cajun" is, however, is a pretty accurate short passer. That's what he was in college, but he's never really been used in that offense in the pros. There's a long story behind why I think this is the case, but I don't want to get into that now.
But now Jake is in a west coast offense, with a remarkably solid offensive line. I'm not saying he'll have himself a Pro Bowl season, but I don't see a repeat performance of last season. Our offense is going to be the traditional "run to set up the pass". As long as Jake doesn't fumble handoffs, nobody will be calling for his head.
In closing, I believe it's pretty obvious I do know what I'm talking about, and I'm not "too stupid to read what [you're] saying". In fact, I read it, understood it, and provided you with a counterpoint.
Don't assume, it makes you look like a cocksucker.
Personally, I think you're just butthurt that our QB has raped the Bucs for so long, and Rock Morris has yet to find a solution.
I'm very surprised to read that. Oh well, all I can say is that the lines have a habit of changing right before kickoff.
I live in South Carolina, most of my friends are die hard Carolina fans, and I've been to more Panthers games than Browns games. I'd say I'm pretty familiar with the Panthers. And I've made the same argument you're currently making numerous times. I've constantly been under the impression that Delhomme never was the QB needed in Carolina, he just doesn't have the deep ball accuracy for it.
Any QB with a rocket arm could have gone into Carolina and handed the ball off to any one of their numerous skilled backs they've had for the past 10 years. And then, just to break the monotony, they could heave a bomb up to Steve Smith, or even Muhsin Muhammed.
What the "Ragin Cajun" is, however, is a pretty accurate short passer. That's what he was in college, but he's never really been used in that offense in the pros. There's a long story behind why I think this is the case, but I don't want to get into that now.
But now Jake is in a west coast offense, with a remarkably solid offensive line. I'm not saying he'll have himself a Pro Bowl season, but I don't see a repeat performance of last season. Our offense is going to be the traditional "run to set up the pass". As long as Jake doesn't fumble handoffs, nobody will be calling for his head.
In closing, I believe it's pretty obvious I do know what I'm talking about, and I'm not "too stupid to read what [you're] saying". In fact, I read it, understood it, and provided you with a counterpoint.
Don't assume, it makes you look like a cocksucker.
Personally, I think you're just butthurt that our QB has raped the Bucs for so long, and Rock Morris has yet to find a solution.
Good points and I respect your opinion on why you think Delhomme will succeed.
Honestly, after this week, I couldn't care less what he does. (with the exception of the weeks you play our divisional pals)... I was just letting you know what to expect, and it appears you are well aware of the danger Delhomme brings.
Also, I did point out in another thread (that people conveniently stopped posting after I did so) that Delhomme hasn't been that good against the Bucs... Numerous INT's in most games, etc... It's easy to win games when you have Williams and Stewart back there running against a defense that ...can't stop the run.
As long as you guys can run the ball, you'll be alright throughout the year. If it comes down to relying on Delhomme to win a game for you... good luck.
Respect from the bicep
-
I'm very surprised to read that. Oh well, all I can say is that the lines have a habit of changing right before kickoff.
I live in South Carolina, most of my friends are die hard Carolina fans, and I've been to more Panthers games than Browns games. I'd say I'm pretty familiar with the Panthers. And I've made the same argument you're currently making numerous times. I've constantly been under the impression that Delhomme never was the QB needed in Carolina, he just doesn't have the deep ball accuracy for it.
Any QB with a rocket arm could have gone into Carolina and handed the ball off to any one of their numerous skilled backs they've had for the past 10 years. And then, just to break the monotony, they could heave a bomb up to Steve Smith, or even Muhsin Muhammed.
What the "Ragin Cajun" is, however, is a pretty accurate short passer. That's what he was in college, but he's never really been used in that offense in the pros. There's a long story behind why I think this is the case, but I don't want to get into that now.
But now Jake is in a west coast offense, with a remarkably solid offensive line. I'm not saying he'll have himself a Pro Bowl season, but I don't see a repeat performance of last season. Our offense is going to be the traditional "run to set up the pass". As long as Jake doesn't fumble handoffs, nobody will be calling for his head.
In closing, I believe it's pretty obvious I do know what I'm talking about, and I'm not "too stupid to read what [you're] saying". In fact, I read it, understood it, and provided you with a counterpoint.
Don't assume, it makes you look like a cocksucker.
Personally, I think you're just butthurt that our QB has raped the Bucs for so long, and Rock Morris has yet to find a solution.
Good points and I respect your opinion on why you think Delhomme will succeed.
Honestly, after this week, I couldn't care less what he does. (with the exception of the weeks you play our divisional pals)... I was just letting you know what to expect, and it appears you are well aware of the danger Delhomme brings.
Also, I did point out in another thread (that people conveniently stopped posting after I did so) that Delhomme hasn't been that good against the Bucs... Numerous INT's in most games, etc... It's easy to win games when you have Williams and Stewart back there running against a defense that ...can't stop the run.
As long as you guys can run the ball, you'll be alright throughout the year. If it comes down to relying on Delhomme to win a game for you... good luck.
Respect from the bicep
BucsNBiceps said:
Good points and I respect your opinion on why you think Delhomme will succeed.Honestly, after this week, I couldn't care less what he does. (with the exception of the weeks you play our divisional pals)... I was just letting you know what to expect, and it appears you are well aware of the danger Delhomme brings.
Also, I did point out in another thread (that people conveniently stopped posting after I did so) that Delhomme hasn't been that good against the Bucs... Numerous INT's in most games, etc... It's easy to win games when you have Williams and Stewart back there running against a defense that ...can't stop the run.
As long as you guys can run the ball, you'll be alright throughout the year. If it comes down to relying on Delhomme to win a game for you... good luck.
Respect from the bicep
Thank you, and the same to you.
Honestly, I'm interested in Freeman's career, because he's so damn large. I love prototypical QB's. I loved Ben Roethlisberger in college, and was depressed for 3 years when he went to the Steelers.
Good luck in the upcoming season.
Respect for the bicep
-
BucsNBiceps said:
Good points and I respect your opinion on why you think Delhomme will succeed.Honestly, after this week, I couldn't care less what he does. (with the exception of the weeks you play our divisional pals)... I was just letting you know what to expect, and it appears you are well aware of the danger Delhomme brings.
Also, I did point out in another thread (that people conveniently stopped posting after I did so) that Delhomme hasn't been that good against the Bucs... Numerous INT's in most games, etc... It's easy to win games when you have Williams and Stewart back there running against a defense that ...can't stop the run.
As long as you guys can run the ball, you'll be alright throughout the year. If it comes down to relying on Delhomme to win a game for you... good luck.
Respect from the bicep
Thank you, and the same to you.
Honestly, I'm interested in Freeman's career, because he's so damn large. I love prototypical QB's. I loved Ben Roethlisberger in college, and was depressed for 3 years when he went to the Steelers.
Good luck in the upcoming season.
Respect for the bicep
Thank you, and the same to you.
Honestly, I'm interested in Freeman's career, because he's so damn large. I love prototypical QB's. I loved Ben Roethlisberger in college, and was depressed for 3 years when he went to the Steelers.
Good luck in the upcoming season.
Respect for the bicep
Yeah a lot of people are comparing Freeman to Roethlisberger. Last year he showed flashes, especially in his first game as a starter where he lead the team on a late game drive to throw the game winning pass on a 4th down from the 10 yard line or so.
He has made some amazing plays so far... Most of us are really looking forward to seeing how he's progressed with a full off season to prepare as the starter.
-
I'm very surprised to read that. Oh well, all I can say is that the lines have a habit of changing right before kickoff.
I live in South Carolina, most of my friends are die hard Carolina fans, and I've been to more Panthers games than Browns games. I'd say I'm pretty familiar with the Panthers. And I've made the same argument you're currently making numerous times. I've constantly been under the impression that Delhomme never was the QB needed in Carolina, he just doesn't have the deep ball accuracy for it.
Any QB with a rocket arm could have gone into Carolina and handed the ball off to any one of their numerous skilled backs they've had for the past 10 years. And then, just to break the monotony, they could heave a bomb up to Steve Smith, or even Muhsin Muhammed.
What the "Ragin Cajun" is, however, is a pretty accurate short passer. That's what he was in college, but he's never really been used in that offense in the pros. There's a long story behind why I think this is the case, but I don't want to get into that now.
But now Jake is in a west coast offense, with a remarkably solid offensive line. I'm not saying he'll have himself a Pro Bowl season, but I don't see a repeat performance of last season. Our offense is going to be the traditional "run to set up the pass". As long as Jake doesn't fumble handoffs, nobody will be calling for his head.
In closing, I believe it's pretty obvious I do know what I'm talking about, and I'm not "too stupid to read what [you're] saying". In fact, I read it, understood it, and provided you with a counterpoint.
Don't assume, it makes you look like a cocksucker.
Personally, I think you're just butthurt that our QB has raped the Bucs for so long, and Rock Morris has yet to find a solution.
Good points and I respect your opinion on why you think Delhomme will succeed.
Honestly, after this week, I couldn't care less what he does. (with the exception of the weeks you play our divisional pals)... I was just letting you know what to expect, and it appears you are well aware of the danger Delhomme brings.
Also, I did point out in another thread (that people conveniently stopped posting after I did so) that Delhomme hasn't been that good against the Bucs... Numerous INT's in most games, etc... It's easy to win games when you have Williams and Stewart back there running against a defense that ...can't stop the run.
As long as you guys can run the ball, you'll be alright throughout the year. If it comes down to relying on Delhomme to win a game for you... good luck.
Respect from the bicep
BucsNBiceps said:
Good points and I respect your opinion on why you think Delhomme will succeed.Honestly, after this week, I couldn't care less what he does. (with the exception of the weeks you play our divisional pals)... I was just letting you know what to expect, and it appears you are well aware of the danger Delhomme brings.
Also, I did point out in another thread (that people conveniently stopped posting after I did so) that Delhomme hasn't been that good against the Bucs... Numerous INT's in most games, etc... It's easy to win games when you have Williams and Stewart back there running against a defense that ...can't stop the run.
As long as you guys can run the ball, you'll be alright throughout the year. If it comes down to relying on Delhomme to win a game for you... good luck.
Respect from the bicep
At 3-13 last year, pretty much everyone has been good against the bucs...brah.
-
BucsNBiceps said:
Good points and I respect your opinion on why you think Delhomme will succeed.Honestly, after this week, I couldn't care less what he does. (with the exception of the weeks you play our divisional pals)... I was just letting you know what to expect, and it appears you are well aware of the danger Delhomme brings.
Also, I did point out in another thread (that people conveniently stopped posting after I did so) that Delhomme hasn't been that good against the Bucs... Numerous INT's in most games, etc... It's easy to win games when you have Williams and Stewart back there running against a defense that ...can't stop the run.
As long as you guys can run the ball, you'll be alright throughout the year. If it comes down to relying on Delhomme to win a game for you... good luck.
Respect from the bicep
At 3-13 last year, pretty much everyone has been good against the bucs...brah.
At 3-13 last year, pretty much everyone has been good against the bucs...brah.
This is my board... my thread... and I'll be the one doing the trolling here.
-
Jake freaking Delhomme. And gave away Anderson, and Quinn. It's okay Browns fans, I feel for you. We USED to make crappy moves all the time, misevaluate and never develop players, too. We let Steve Young go for a few bucks. We almost share a kindred spirit in that regard. I'm so glad we are turning the corner, and not stuck with Jake freaking Delhomme.
Jake freaking Delhomme. And gave away Anderson, and Quinn. It's okay Browns fans, I feel for you. We USED to make crappy moves all the time, misevaluate and never develop players, too. We let Steve Young go for a few bucks. We almost share a kindred spirit in that regard. I'm so glad we are turning the corner, and not stuck with Jake freaking Delhomme.
FWIW, I've seen every one of Quinn and Anderson's plays as Browns. Jake has looked like Joe Freaking Montana by comparison in the preseason.
Quinn is doing so great in Denver he's holding the clipboard for Kyle Orton- and the Cardinal fans are about to find out what Browns fans have known for years- DA is supremely inaccurate with that cannon attached to his body. Like a career 52% completion rate.
-
lol get real the only thing that is going to get hot down there is the temperature
Somewhere in this 18 page nuthugging fest you guys have put on for me, I put up the games I thought we could win and the games I thought we'd lose. It came up to about 7-9 wins.
The cupcake teams we play are as follows...
Seahawks
Redskins
Rams
Cardinals (not a cupcake, but not shit either without Warner)
Lions
Browns
That's 6 games right there that we should win.
Division games are never guaranteed one way or another (unless .. I guess... if you're the Browns) and our division almost always splits games.
So is 7 wins really that far fetched? Take off your Brown colored glasses before you answer that one
BucsNBiceps said:
Somewhere in this 18 page nuthugging fest you guys have put on for me, I put up the games I thought we could win and the games I thought we'd lose. It came up to about 7-9 wins.The cupcake teams we play are as follows...
Seahawks
Redskins
Rams
Cardinals (not a cupcake, but not shit either without Warner)
Lions
Browns
That's 6 games right there that we should win.
Division games are never guaranteed one way or another (unless .. I guess... if you're the Browns) and our division almost always splits games.
So is 7 wins really that far fetched? Take off your Brown colored glasses before you answer that one
Yeah, my brother in law is a Lions fan, we played 'em in preseason, and I'd suggest you take the Lions off your Cupcake list. Stafford is the real deal, Calvin Johnson is far better than any WR you have- and don't give me shit about Williams until he's played in a real game that actually counts, and Suh will be living in Tampa's backfield making your O-line look like a sieve.
-
BucsNBiceps said:
This is my board... my thread... and I'll be the one doing the trolling here.Well I hope you realize some of us are a HIGHER POWER around here than a rather amusing troll- you'd fit right in with the clueless Hilltuckians who already have the (overrated) Bengals penciled in for the SB- and I daresay you're seriously overrating the Yucks. You're playing against the house. And the house rules are- heads I win, tails you lose. I don't know how fast you can type, but the party's over @ 5PM Sunday.
-
Jake freaking Delhomme. And gave away Anderson, and Quinn. It's okay Browns fans, I feel for you. We USED to make crappy moves all the time, misevaluate and never develop players, too. We let Steve Young go for a few bucks. We almost share a kindred spirit in that regard. I'm so glad we are turning the corner, and not stuck with Jake freaking Delhomme.
FWIW, I've seen every one of Quinn and Anderson's plays as Browns. Jake has looked like Joe Freaking Montana by comparison in the preseason.
Quinn is doing so great in Denver he's holding the clipboard for Kyle Orton- and the Cardinal fans are about to find out what Browns fans have known for years- DA is supremely inaccurate with that cannon attached to his body. Like a career 52% completion rate.
FWIW, I've seen every one of Quinn and Anderson's plays as Browns. Jake has looked like Joe Freaking Montana by comparison in the preseason.
Quinn is doing so great in Denver he's holding the clipboard for Kyle Orton- and the Cardinal fans are about to find out what Browns fans have known for years- DA is supremely inaccurate with that cannon attached to his body. Like a career 52% completion rate.
I guess 2007 was just a fluke for Anderson. 29td's and 19int's. Not bad for a scrub. The kid was on Sportscenter every weekend. I thought he was one of the best QB's around. You all must be right and I'm wrong. Having playmakers doesn't matter for a QB.....
Player Rec Yds Yds/Rec Long TD
Kellen Winslow 82 1,106 13.5 49 5
Braylon Edwards 80 1,289 16.1 78 16
Joe Jurevicius 50 614 12.3 50 3
You are right, I concede. You are much better off with Robiskie and Massoquoi, and whoever the other scrub WR you have is. After all, you are Browns fans....
I'd be willing to bet you that DAnderson has a MUCH better year in Arizona with some actual playmakers to work with then ya boyeeeee' Delhomme with the WR's you have. Where are all the threads calling your sorry GM out for not acquiring any good WR talent? Look at how he left Seattle. Your winning combo is Jake Delhomme and Mike Holmgren? And the same sorry WR's from last year that couldn't get open? And you fans are buying into this? Or just stuck with it?
-
FWIW, I've seen every one of Quinn and Anderson's plays as Browns. Jake has looked like Joe Freaking Montana by comparison in the preseason.
Quinn is doing so great in Denver he's holding the clipboard for Kyle Orton- and the Cardinal fans are about to find out what Browns fans have known for years- DA is supremely inaccurate with that cannon attached to his body. Like a career 52% completion rate.
I guess 2007 was just a fluke for Anderson. 29td's and 19int's. Not bad for a scrub. The kid was on Sportscenter every weekend. I thought he was one of the best QB's around. You all must be right and I'm wrong. Having playmakers doesn't matter for a QB.....
Player Rec Yds Yds/Rec Long TD
Kellen Winslow 82 1,106 13.5 49 5
Braylon Edwards 80 1,289 16.1 78 16
Joe Jurevicius 50 614 12.3 50 3
You are right, I concede. You are much better off with Robiskie and Massoquoi, and whoever the other scrub WR you have is. After all, you are Browns fans....
I'd be willing to bet you that DAnderson has a MUCH better year in Arizona with some actual playmakers to work with then ya boyeeeee' Delhomme with the WR's you have. Where are all the threads calling your sorry GM out for not acquiring any good WR talent? Look at how he left Seattle. Your winning combo is Jake Delhomme and Mike Holmgren? And the same sorry WR's from last year that couldn't get open? And you fans are buying into this? Or just stuck with it?
I guess 2007 was just a fluke for Anderson. 29td's and 19int's. Not bad for a scrub. The kid was on Sportscenter every weekend. I thought he was one of the best QB's around. You all must be right and I'm wrong. Having playmakers doesn't matter for a QB.....
Player Rec Yds Yds/Rec Long TD
Kellen Winslow 82 1,106 13.5 49 5
Braylon Edwards 80 1,289 16.1 78 16
Joe Jurevicius 50 614 12.3 50 3
You are right, I concede. You are much better off with Robiskie and Massoquoi, and whoever the other scrub WR you have is. After all, you are Browns fans....
I'd be willing to bet you that DAnderson has a MUCH better year in Arizona with some actual playmakers to work with then ya boyeeeee' Delhomme with the WR's you have. Where are all the threads calling your sorry GM out for not acquiring any good WR talent? Look at how he left Seattle. Your winning combo is Jake Delhomme and Mike Holmgren? And the same sorry WR's from last year that couldn't get open? And you fans are buying into this? Or just stuck with it?
+1 to the post above..
And when the game was on the line and we needed to win, he choked, EVERY TIME. We missed the playoffs because he was too busy slinging the ball to the opposing team.
-
Heres your BucsNBiceps fella
tell us how you really feel.
from pewterpirate
Quote from: Boid Fink on Today at 03:38:02 AM
His all time record against the BUcs is 9-2. He has a VERY high completion rate against us (roughly 60 percent). He has 15 TDs thrown on the Cover 2 in Tampa. His best outing as a QB was against the Bucs.
He bothers me. He beats Tampa, in spite of, around, in front of, backwards, forwards, with the help of,whatever you want.
This is a big advantage for the Browns. The lack of pass rush bothers me even more. If I were a betting man, in a straight up call it, I would put money on the Browns.
But the love of my Bucs says they will somehow pull it off. But that is the illogical side of me.
I cant argue that. Gonna be a close game, first to 17 points is gonna win it.
His username is boid fink on the tampa site.
-
im sorry. i really dont think that guy is a bucs fan. i just cant take him seriously. i think its someone pullin our leg.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login