You brahs aware the Bucs are gonna stomp that ass out on Sunday?
-
25 pages ?
Holy Shit .... seems more like this thread was about BoobsAndButts !
25 pages ?
Holy Shit .... seems more like this thread was about BoobsAndButts !
It is, of a different sort.
-
Bucs are gonna stomp your asses on sunday!! Bucs win 24-6! i will be back to confirm a bucs win.
-
Formerly Stone said:
This thread is what this forum stands for! Bitter, bickering, hate filled, frustration!What you see here folks is a variant of what they call "psychological transference". You see it means that a person who possesses certain traits, particularly negative traits has a tendency to see all his own worst traits in other things and other objects. Thus, Stone, a bitter, hate filled, frustrated individual imposes those characteristics on the object of his scorn....the Browns, Browns fans, this board, his mother-in-law, his children, his boss, whomever. It is irrelevent that they actually possess those traits; it is only relevent that he has those traits and superimposes them on others. Thus, that is the dynamic at work here. A spirited, even congenial debate between 2 sets of fan bases to him becomes a bickering hate filled event. Not because it is, but because he wants it to be. Possibly because of his personal relationship which are unfullfilling to him or fraught with tension, or because of some event that occurred in his childhood. His home life as a child may have been filled with bickering or hatred. This is only speculation. It is not for me to say. I would suggest he address it with his therapist.
-
Formerly Stone said:
This thread is what this forum stands for! Bitter, bickering, hate filled, frustration!What you see here folks is a variant of what they call "psychological transference". You see it means that a person who possesses certain traits, particularly negative traits has a tendency to see all his own worst traits in other things and other objects. Thus, Stone, a bitter, hate filled, frustrated individual imposes those characteristics on the object of his scorn....the Browns, Browns fans, this board, his mother-in-law, his children, his boss, whomever. It is irrelevent that they actually possess those traits; it is only relevent that he has those traits and superimposes them on others. Thus, that is the dynamic at work here. A spirited, even congenial debate between 2 sets of fan bases to him becomes a bickering hate filled event. Not because it is, but because he wants it to be. Possibly because of his personal relationship which are unfullfilling to him or fraught with tension, or because of some event that occurred in his childhood. His home life as a child may have been filled with bickering or hatred. This is only speculation. It is not for me to say. I would suggest he address it with his therapist.
What you see here folks is a variant of what they call "psychological transference". You see it means that a person who possesses certain traits, particularly negative traits has a tendency to see all his own worst traits in other things and other objects. Thus, Stone, a bitter, hate filled, frustrated individual imposes those characteristics on the object of his scorn....the Browns, Browns fans, this board, his mother-in-law, his children, his boss, whomever. It is irrelevent that they actually possess those traits; it is only relevent that he has those traits and superimposes them on others. Thus, that is the dynamic at work here. A spirited, even congenial debate between 2 sets of fan bases to him becomes a bickering hate filled event. Not because it is, but because he wants it to be. Possibly because of his personal relationship which are unfullfilling to him or fraught with tension, or because of some event that occurred in his childhood. His home life as a child may have been filled with bickering or hatred. This is only speculation. It is not for me to say. I would suggest he address it with his therapist.
-
What you see here folks is a variant of what they call "psychological transference". You see it means that a person who possesses certain traits, particularly negative traits has a tendency to see all his own worst traits in other things and other objects. Thus, Stone, a bitter, hate filled, frustrated individual imposes those characteristics on the object of his scorn....the Browns, Browns fans, this board, his mother-in-law, his children, his boss, whomever. It is irrelevent that they actually possess those traits; it is only relevent that he has those traits and superimposes them on others. Thus, that is the dynamic at work here. A spirited, even congenial debate between 2 sets of fan bases to him becomes a bickering hate filled event. Not because it is, but because he wants it to be. Possibly because of his personal relationship which are unfullfilling to him or fraught with tension, or because of some event that occurred in his childhood. His home life as a child may have been filled with bickering or hatred. This is only speculation. It is not for me to say. I would suggest he address it with his therapist.
BucsNBiceps said:
Settle down there Berubesbucs. You are a troll, and not too good of a one I might add.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
I told you, it is not in my nature to be merciful:
-
BucsNBiceps said:
Settle down there Berubesbucs. You are a troll, and not too good of a one I might add.
Settle down there Berubesbucs. You are a troll, and not too good of a one I might add.
Its OK, DieHard. Buckybicep already gladly admitted that any conversation above a 3rd grade level is beyond the realm of his comprehension. He is actually alright and a bit funny. The disturbing person was the "Bromeister" who apparently willingly posted a video of himself sucker punching a chick like he was proud of it. I asked him to confirm that that was not really himself in that shot. He didn't deny that it was him.
-
Bucs are going to put the Brownies in the Walls of Jericho on Sunday, and reinforce the notion that you are, still, in fact, the BROWNS:
Indeed, we are:
member of the class of 2007.
Pro Football Hall of Famers
Inducted No. Player name Tenure Position(s)
1965 60, 14 Otto Graham 1946–1955 Quarterback
1967 — Paul Brown 1946–1962 Head coach
1968 76, 36 Marion Motley 1946–1953 Fullback
1971 32 Jim Brown 1957–1965 Fullback
1974 46, 76 Lou Groza 1946–1959
1961–1967 Offensive tackle
Placekicker
1975 56, 86 Dante Lavelli 1946–1956 Wide receiver
1976 53, 80 Len Ford 1950–1957 Defensive end
1977 30, 45, 60 Bill Willis 1946–1953 Middle guard
Offensive guard
1981 77 Willie Davis† 1958–1959 Defensive end
1982 83 Doug Atkins† 1953–1954 Defensive end
1983 49 Bobby Mitchell 1958–1961 Wide receiver
Halfback
1983 42 Paul Warfield 1964–1969
1976–1977 Wide receiver
1984 74 Mike McCormack 1954–1962 Offensive tackle
1985 22, 52 Frank Gatski 1946–1956 Offensive center
1987 18 Len Dawson† 1960–1961 Quarterback
1994 44 Leroy Kelly 1964–1973 Running back
1995 72 Henry Jordan† 1957–1958 Defensive tackle
1998 29 Tommy McDonald† 1968 Wide receiver
1999 82 Ozzie Newsome 1978–1990 Tight end
2003 64 Joe DeLamielleure 1980–1984 Offensive guard
2007 66 Gene Hickerson 1958–1960
1962–1973 Offensive guard
† Performance with Browns incidental to induction
Indeed we are:
Franchise NFL Championships AFL Championships AAFC Championships Super Bowls Total†
Green Bay Packers 11 3 12
Chicago Bears 8 1 9
Cleveland Browns 4 4[6] 8
New York Giants 4 3 7
Bucs are going to put the Brownies in the Walls of Jericho on Sunday, and reinforce the notion that you are, still, in fact, the BROWNS:
Indeed, we are:
member of the class of 2007.
Pro Football Hall of Famers
Inducted No. Player name Tenure Position(s)
1965 60, 14 Otto Graham 1946–1955 Quarterback
1967 — Paul Brown 1946–1962 Head coach
1968 76, 36 Marion Motley 1946–1953 Fullback
1971 32 Jim Brown 1957–1965 Fullback
1974 46, 76 Lou Groza 1946–1959
1961–1967 Offensive tackle
Placekicker
1975 56, 86 Dante Lavelli 1946–1956 Wide receiver
1976 53, 80 Len Ford 1950–1957 Defensive end
1977 30, 45, 60 Bill Willis 1946–1953 Middle guard
Offensive guard
1981 77 Willie Davis† 1958–1959 Defensive end
1982 83 Doug Atkins† 1953–1954 Defensive end
1983 49 Bobby Mitchell 1958–1961 Wide receiver
Halfback
1983 42 Paul Warfield 1964–1969
1976–1977 Wide receiver
1984 74 Mike McCormack 1954–1962 Offensive tackle
1985 22, 52 Frank Gatski 1946–1956 Offensive center
1987 18 Len Dawson† 1960–1961 Quarterback
1994 44 Leroy Kelly 1964–1973 Running back
1995 72 Henry Jordan† 1957–1958 Defensive tackle
1998 29 Tommy McDonald† 1968 Wide receiver
1999 82 Ozzie Newsome 1978–1990 Tight end
2003 64 Joe DeLamielleure 1980–1984 Offensive guard
2007 66 Gene Hickerson 1958–1960
1962–1973 Offensive guard
† Performance with Browns incidental to induction
Indeed we are:
Franchise NFL Championships AFL Championships AAFC Championships Super Bowls Total†
Green Bay Packers 11 3 12
Chicago Bears 8 1 9
Cleveland Browns 4 4[6] 8
New York Giants 4 3 7
Baltimore Ravens indeed have a great history.
-
Bucs are going to put the Brownies in the Walls of Jericho on Sunday, and reinforce the notion that you are, still, in fact, the BROWNS:
Indeed, we are:
member of the class of 2007.
Pro Football Hall of Famers
Inducted No. Player name Tenure Position(s)
1965 60, 14 Otto Graham 1946–1955 Quarterback
1967 — Paul Brown 1946–1962 Head coach
1968 76, 36 Marion Motley 1946–1953 Fullback
1971 32 Jim Brown 1957–1965 Fullback
1974 46, 76 Lou Groza 1946–1959
1961–1967 Offensive tackle
Placekicker
1975 56, 86 Dante Lavelli 1946–1956 Wide receiver
1976 53, 80 Len Ford 1950–1957 Defensive end
1977 30, 45, 60 Bill Willis 1946–1953 Middle guard
Offensive guard
1981 77 Willie Davis† 1958–1959 Defensive end
1982 83 Doug Atkins† 1953–1954 Defensive end
1983 49 Bobby Mitchell 1958–1961 Wide receiver
Halfback
1983 42 Paul Warfield 1964–1969
1976–1977 Wide receiver
1984 74 Mike McCormack 1954–1962 Offensive tackle
1985 22, 52 Frank Gatski 1946–1956 Offensive center
1987 18 Len Dawson† 1960–1961 Quarterback
1994 44 Leroy Kelly 1964–1973 Running back
1995 72 Henry Jordan† 1957–1958 Defensive tackle
1998 29 Tommy McDonald† 1968 Wide receiver
1999 82 Ozzie Newsome 1978–1990 Tight end
2003 64 Joe DeLamielleure 1980–1984 Offensive guard
2007 66 Gene Hickerson 1958–1960
1962–1973 Offensive guard
† Performance with Browns incidental to induction
Indeed we are:
Franchise NFL Championships AFL Championships AAFC Championships Super Bowls Total†
Green Bay Packers 11 3 12
Chicago Bears 8 1 9
Cleveland Browns 4 4[6] 8
New York Giants 4 3 7
Baltimore Ravens indeed have a great history.
Baltimore Ravens indeed have a great history.
Another ignorant Bucs fan.
-
Settle down there Berubesbucs. You are a troll, and not too good of a one I might add.
Its OK, DieHard. Buckybicep already gladly admitted that any conversation above a 3rd grade level is beyond the realm of his comprehension. He is actually alright and a bit funny. The disturbing person was the "Bromeister" who apparently willingly posted a video of himself sucker punching a chick like he was proud of it. I asked him to confirm that that was not really himself in that shot. He didn't deny that it was him.
Its OK, DieHard. Buckybicep already gladly admitted that any conversation above a 3rd grade level is beyond the realm of his comprehension. He is actually alright and a bit funny. The disturbing person was the "Bromeister" who apparently willingly posted a video of himself sucker punching a chick like he was proud of it. I asked him to confirm that that was not really himself in that shot. He didn't deny that it was him.
He decked her because she was flirting with his boy friend.
-
Bucs are going to put the Brownies in the Walls of Jericho on Sunday, and reinforce the notion that you are, still, in fact, the BROWNS:
Indeed, we are:
member of the class of 2007.
Pro Football Hall of Famers
Inducted No. Player name Tenure Position(s)
1965 60, 14 Otto Graham 1946–1955 Quarterback
1967 — Paul Brown 1946–1962 Head coach
1968 76, 36 Marion Motley 1946–1953 Fullback
1971 32 Jim Brown 1957–1965 Fullback
1974 46, 76 Lou Groza 1946–1959
1961–1967 Offensive tackle
Placekicker
1975 56, 86 Dante Lavelli 1946–1956 Wide receiver
1976 53, 80 Len Ford 1950–1957 Defensive end
1977 30, 45, 60 Bill Willis 1946–1953 Middle guard
Offensive guard
1981 77 Willie Davis† 1958–1959 Defensive end
1982 83 Doug Atkins† 1953–1954 Defensive end
1983 49 Bobby Mitchell 1958–1961 Wide receiver
Halfback
1983 42 Paul Warfield 1964–1969
1976–1977 Wide receiver
1984 74 Mike McCormack 1954–1962 Offensive tackle
1985 22, 52 Frank Gatski 1946–1956 Offensive center
1987 18 Len Dawson† 1960–1961 Quarterback
1994 44 Leroy Kelly 1964–1973 Running back
1995 72 Henry Jordan† 1957–1958 Defensive tackle
1998 29 Tommy McDonald† 1968 Wide receiver
1999 82 Ozzie Newsome 1978–1990 Tight end
2003 64 Joe DeLamielleure 1980–1984 Offensive guard
2007 66 Gene Hickerson 1958–1960
1962–1973 Offensive guard
† Performance with Browns incidental to induction
Indeed we are:
Franchise NFL Championships AFL Championships AAFC Championships Super Bowls Total†
Green Bay Packers 11 3 12
Chicago Bears 8 1 9
Cleveland Browns 4 4[6] 8
New York Giants 4 3 7
Baltimore Ravens indeed have a great history.
Baltimore Ravens indeed have a great history.
I'll bet you $100.00 that you won't find this information anywhere associated with the Baltimore Ravens.
You want to put your money where my dick is? i.e. your mouth?
-
Bucs 35 Browns 13.
Delhomme will suck against Bucs defense like he did for the last two seasons. Too bad, he does not have the Panther's O-line, 2 uber talented RBs and an All-Pro receiver to carry him.
Pass offense : Bucs
Rush offense : Browns
Overall offense: Bucs
Run defense : Browns
Pass defense : Bucs
Overall defense : Bucs
STs: Push
Bucs 35 Browns 13.
Delhomme will suck against Bucs defense like he did for the last two seasons. Too bad, he does not have the Panther's O-line, 2 uber talented RBs and an All-Pro receiver to carry him.
Pass offense : Bucs
oh yeah? with your starting corner out and the Browns solid running game/dominant O-Line to keep the pass Defense honest? doubt it. Don't forget Freeman is also injured don't forget that
Rush offense : Browns
Overall offense: Bucs wrong
Run defense : Browns
Pass defense : Bucs can't really argue this, yet. We have 2 very promising rookies starting though, and I know how much you trolls like to put stock in unproven rookies.
Overall defense : Bucspush
STs: PushLOL. Our coverage teams are excellent. Our kicking game is excellent. Our return game is the best in the league. And you call this a push? LOL
I hope you are prepared to be disappointed when you watch this game on tv....errr I mean listen to it on the radio! pathetic fan base.
YOU JUST GOT CURLED!
-
Formerly Stone said:
This thread is what this forum stands for! Bitter, bickering, hate filled, frustration!What you see here folks is a variant of what they call "psychological transference". You see it means that a person who possesses certain traits, particularly negative traits has a tendency to see all his own worst traits in other things and other objects. Thus, Stone, a bitter, hate filled, frustrated individual imposes those characteristics on the object of his scorn....the Browns, Browns fans, this board, his mother-in-law, his children, his boss, whomever. It is irrelevent that they actually possess those traits; it is only relevent that he has those traits and superimposes them on others. Thus, that is the dynamic at work here. A spirited, even congenial debate between 2 sets of fan bases to him becomes a bickering hate filled event. Not because it is, but because he wants it to be. Possibly because of his personal relationship which are unfullfilling to him or fraught with tension, or because of some event that occurred in his childhood. His home life as a child may have been filled with bickering or hatred. This is only speculation. It is not for me to say. I would suggest he address it with his therapist.
What you see here folks is a variant of what they call "psychological transference". You see it means that a person who possesses certain traits, particularly negative traits has a tendency to see all his own worst traits in other things and other objects. Thus, Stone, a bitter, hate filled, frustrated individual imposes those characteristics on the object of his scorn....the Browns, Browns fans, this board, his mother-in-law, his children, his boss, whomever. It is irrelevent that they actually possess those traits; it is only relevent that he has those traits and superimposes them on others. Thus, that is the dynamic at work here. A spirited, even congenial debate between 2 sets of fan bases to him becomes a bickering hate filled event. Not because it is, but because he wants it to be. Possibly because of his personal relationship which are unfullfilling to him or fraught with tension, or because of some event that occurred in his childhood. His home life as a child may have been filled with bickering or hatred. This is only speculation. It is not for me to say. I would suggest he address it with his therapist.
Esquire, would it be asking to much if in the future you would double space your eloquent yet articulat diatribes for those of us here whose eyes are beginning to falter due to old age or other maladies?
Most of your posts are well thought out and presented in a clearly designed format. Prehaps, if you were to change your writing style, the important issues mired deep in nonsensical diatribe would rise
to the top allowing those (who before would only sniff and run) to stay and attempt to make sense of your outpourings no matter how contrived.
I have also included a link that will clearly show a relation between your writings and your favorite Led Zeppelin tune.....Just throwing it out there
-
What you see here folks is a variant of what they call "psychological transference". You see it means that a person who possesses certain traits, particularly negative traits has a tendency to see all his own worst traits in other things and other objects. Thus, Stone, a bitter, hate filled, frustrated individual imposes those characteristics on the object of his scorn....the Browns, Browns fans, this board, his mother-in-law, his children, his boss, whomever. It is irrelevent that they actually possess those traits; it is only relevent that he has those traits and superimposes them on others. Thus, that is the dynamic at work here. A spirited, even congenial debate between 2 sets of fan bases to him becomes a bickering hate filled event. Not because it is, but because he wants it to be. Possibly because of his personal relationship which are unfullfilling to him or fraught with tension, or because of some event that occurred in his childhood. His home life as a child may have been filled with bickering or hatred. This is only speculation. It is not for me to say. I would suggest he address it with his therapist.
Esquire, would it be asking to much if in the future you would double space your eloquent yet articulat diatribes for those of us here whose eyes are beginning to falter due to old age or other maladies?
Most of your posts are well thought out and presented in a clearly designed format. Prehaps, if you were to change your writing style, the important issues mired deep in nonsensical diatribe would rise
to the top allowing those (who before would only sniff and run) to stay and attempt to make sense of your outpourings no matter how contrived.
I have also included a link that will clearly show a relation between your writings and your favorite Led Zeppelin tune.....Just throwing it out there
Esquire, would it be asking to much if in the future you would double space your eloquent yet articulat diatribes for those of us here whose eyes are beginning to falter due to old age or other maladies?
Most of your posts are well thought out and presented in a clearly designed format. Prehaps, if you were to change your writing style, the important issues mired deep in nonsensical diatribe would rise
to the top allowing those (who before would only sniff and run) to stay and attempt to make sense of your outpourings no matter how contrived.
I have also included a link that will clearly show a relation between your writings and your favorite Led Zepplin tune.....Just throwing it out there
I did do it like you did once where I made every sentence a paragraph. Not sure that was the right way though.
Though, on occasion I do "Ramble On" I don't think this was one of those occasions. It was more of a formatting issue perhaps than a content issue. Besides, I prefer to think of myself in an even more vintage light like this:
-
BucsNBiceps said:
Settle down there Berubesbucs. You are a troll, and not too good of a one I might add.
Settle down there Berubesbucs. You are a troll, and not too good of a one I might add.
25 pages, 493 posts, and 7336 views say otherwise..
-
Settle down there Berubesbucs. You are a troll, and not too good of a one I might add.
25 pages, 493 posts, and 7336 views say otherwise..
BucsNBiceps said:
25 pages, 493 posts, and 7336 views say otherwise..I would say that is more attributable to the subject matter than to your adroitness.
Sorry if that's over your head:
-
BucsNBiceps said:
25 pages, 493 posts, and 7336 views say otherwise..I would say that is more attributable to the subject matter than to your adroitness.
Sorry if that's over your head:
I would say that is more attributable to the subject matter than to your adroitness.
Sorry if that's over your head:
Yet you continue to post- Sorry if that is over your head:
-
Bucs 35 Browns 13.
Delhomme will suck against Bucs defense like he did for the last two seasons. Too bad, he does not have the Panther's O-line, 2 uber talented RBs and an All-Pro receiver to carry him.
Pass offense : Bucs
oh yeah? with your starting corner out and the Browns solid running game/dominant O-Line to keep the pass Defense honest? doubt it. Don't forget Freeman is also injured don't forget that
Rush offense : Browns
Overall offense: Bucs wrong
Run defense : Browns
Pass defense : Bucs can't really argue this, yet. We have 2 very promising rookies starting though, and I know how much you trolls like to put stock in unproven rookies.
Overall defense : Bucspush
STs: PushLOL. Our coverage teams are excellent. Our kicking game is excellent. Our return game is the best in the league. And you call this a push? LOL
I hope you are prepared to be disappointed when you watch this game on tv....errr I mean listen to it on the radio! pathetic fan base.
YOU JUST GOT CURLED!
oh yeah? with your starting corner out and the Browns solid running game/dominant O-Line to keep the pass Defense honest? doubt it. Don't forget Freeman is also injured don't forget that
Pass defense : Bucs can't really argue this, yet. We have 2 very promising rookies starting though, and I know how much you trolls like to put stock in unproven rookies.
STs: PushLOL. Our coverage teams are excellent. Our kicking game is excellent. Our return game is the best in the league. And you call this a push? LOL
Yes our starting corner is out, but we have the other starter (Ronde). Please enlighten me which receiver on your team should I be concerned about? Massaquoi is a decent talent, but no burner, sure Talib will be missed, but not by much. And who is throwing the ball anyways? Jake? LOL, you guys will be disappointed. You will be asking for Seneca or Colt to start from week 5-6. Freeman was injured, he has recovered. He is a strong armed QB and can extend the field unlike Delhomme. Your run game is good, but not as good as the Panthers run game last year. You now have the QB that held Panthers running game back btw.
STs is a push. If you look at ST rankings from last season, you will see that Bucs have been as good as the Browns in both return game as well as coverage. Check your facts before you LOL brownie.
-
oh yeah? with your starting corner out and the Browns solid running game/dominant O-Line to keep the pass Defense honest? doubt it. Don't forget Freeman is also injured don't forget that
Pass defense : Bucs can't really argue this, yet. We have 2 very promising rookies starting though, and I know how much you trolls like to put stock in unproven rookies.
STs: PushLOL. Our coverage teams are excellent. Our kicking game is excellent. Our return game is the best in the league. And you call this a push? LOL
Yes our starting corner is out, but we have the other starter (Ronde). Please enlighten me which receiver on your team should I be concerned about? Massaquoi is a decent talent, but no burner, sure Talib will be missed, but not by much. And who is throwing the ball anyways? Jake? LOL, you guys will be disappointed. You will be asking for Seneca or Colt to start from week 5-6. Freeman was injured, he has recovered. He is a strong armed QB and can extend the field unlike Delhomme. Your run game is good, but not as good as the Panthers run game last year. You now have the QB that held Panthers running game back btw.
STs is a push. If you look at ST rankings from last season, you will see that Bucs have been as good as the Browns in both return game as well as coverage. Check your facts before you LOL brownie.
Yes our starting corner is out, but we have the other starter (Ronde). Please enlighten me which receiver on your team should I be concerned about? Massaquoi is a decent talent, but no burner, sure Talib will be missed, but not by much. And who is throwing the ball anyways? Jake? LOL, you guys will be disappointed. You will be asking for Seneca or Colt to start from week 5-6. Freeman was injured, he has recovered. He is a strong armed QB and can extend the field unlike Delhomme. Your run game is good, but not as good as the Panthers run game last year. You now have the QB that held Panthers running game back btw.
STs is a push. If you look at ST rankings from last season, you will see that Bucs have been as good as the Browns in both return game as well as coverage. Check your facts before you LOL brownie.
Give it up man... The Delhomme argument goes right over their head.
I remember a few months back when I heard Delhomme was signed by the Browns to be the starter (before I even realized we were playing them week 1, can't remember if schedules had come out yet) I LITERALLY LAUGHED ... I couldn't believe they thought Delhomme was going to be their savior... and it appears Browns fans are brainwashed into thinking Delhomme is a world beater.
Without Steve Smith and J. Stewart and D. Williams, Delhomme is going to have a rough time... and I'll say it AGAIN... you will be BEGGING for Colt or Seneca by midseason, if it even takes that long.
-
oh yeah? with your starting corner out and the Browns solid running game/dominant O-Line to keep the pass Defense honest? doubt it. Don't forget Freeman is also injured don't forget that
Pass defense : Bucs can't really argue this, yet. We have 2 very promising rookies starting though, and I know how much you trolls like to put stock in unproven rookies.
STs: PushLOL. Our coverage teams are excellent. Our kicking game is excellent. Our return game is the best in the league. And you call this a push? LOL
Yes our starting corner is out, but we have the other starter (Ronde). Please enlighten me which receiver on your team should I be concerned about? Massaquoi is a decent talent, but no burner, sure Talib will be missed, but not by much. And who is throwing the ball anyways? Jake? LOL, you guys will be disappointed. You will be asking for Seneca or Colt to start from week 5-6. Freeman was injured, he has recovered. He is a strong armed QB and can extend the field unlike Delhomme. Your run game is good, but not as good as the Panthers run game last year. You now have the QB that held Panthers running game back btw.
STs is a push. If you look at ST rankings from last season, you will see that Bucs have been as good as the Browns in both return game as well as coverage. Check your facts before you LOL brownie.
Yes our starting corner is out, but we have the other starter (Ronde). Please enlighten me which receiver on your team should I be concerned about? Massaquoi is a decent talent, but no burner, sure Talib will be missed, but not by much. And who is throwing the ball anyways? Jake? LOL, you guys will be disappointed. You will be asking for Seneca or Colt to start from week 5-6. Freeman was injured, he has recovered. He is a strong armed QB and can extend the field unlike Delhomme. Your run game is good, but not as good as the Panthers run game last year. You now have the QB that held Panthers running game back btw.
STs is a push. If you look at ST rankings from last season, you will see that Bucs have been as good as the Browns in both return game as well as coverage. Check your facts before you LOL brownie.
The Panthers had the second highest YPC in the NFL last year. How exactly is that holding them back?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login