It's Official !
-
Jesus some of you are pessimistic. I felt the same after week one. But there is tremendous upside in the first two games.
1) A defense that can get stops and force turnovers
2) Competing, and even scoring touchdowns. Something that we could hardly do last year, until the end but those were struggling teams we played, and at a meaningless time for most of them.
3) We are one or 2 offense play makers away from being offensively sound.
What i think we should do is ask the Patriots owner and Belicheck for tips on drafting offensive players
-
NO halftime adjustments once again. MoMass and Robo aren't fast enough to get separation.
Playing the style they do, the Browns can't afford to make mistakes and expect to win.
[/quote
That's it exactly !! Simply the Browns have to play an almost perfect game to beat anyone.
They lack ANY team speed. Mass and Robo can't seperate from any DBs and even if they do
they don't have a good enough QB to get them the ball.They threw 2 or 3 long balls to Robo and
the DB was inside his shirt on every one of them.
The defense is adequate but just average. The DBs are decent except for Elam but they have NO
pass rush to speak of and the LBs are painfully sloooooooow.
KC stacked the box today with sometimes 10 guys. You cannot run against that. Until the Browns
develop a deep threat this season is lost.
-
And the "WOW" moment hits 15 years after the fact.
Look on the bright side. The Steelers keep on winning. At least yinz have something worth bitching about.
Regards....
... an'at
-
And the "WOW" moment hits 15 years after the fact.
Look on the bright side. The Steelers keep on winning. At least yinz have something worth bitching about.
Regards....
... an'at
Fook you yinzer...
And the "WOW" moment hits 15 years after the fact.
Look on the bright side. The Steelers keep on winning. At least yinz have something worth bitching about.
Regards....
... an'at
-
Tampa Bay and Kansas City are both 2-0, Chiefs beat us and San Diego and Bucs beat us and Carolina. Maybe our perceived easy first two games isn't as perceived.
I got more excitement watching the lady 3 rows in front of me in a drunken coma with her head in her lap the entire game than I did watching our offense
Give Hillis the ball and start getting James Davis involved, Harrison's killing us right now
-
Tampa Bay and Kansas City are both 2-0, Chiefs beat us and San Diego and Bucs beat us and Carolina. Maybe our perceived easy first two games isn't as perceived.
I got more excitement watching the lady 3 rows in front of me in a drunken coma with her head in her lap the entire game than I did watching our offense
Give Hillis the ball and start getting James Davis involved, Harrison's killing us right now
Tampa Bay and Kansas City are both 2-0, Chiefs beat us and San Diego and Bucs beat us and Carolina. Maybe our perceived easy first two games isn't as perceived.
I got more excitement watching the lady 3 rows in front of me in a drunken coma with her head in her lap the entire game than I did watching our offense
Give Hillis the ball and start getting James Davis involved, Harrison's killing us right now
Agreed.
Observing someone in the act of autocunnilingus is far more entertaining than watching a stains game.
Regards...
... an'at
.
-
Anyone still think the Vincent Jackson trade attempt is a bad idea ? Im not that excited even if we pursue it, but it seems like FA's are the only way we can inject some meaning into this season unless we are aiming high for the draft.
Anyone still think the Vincent Jackson trade attempt is a bad idea ? Im not that excited even if we pursue it, but it seems like FA's are the only way we can inject some meaning into this season unless we are aiming high for the draft.
I think it would be a terrible idea. We need a lot of help on offense and to tie up that much money in a guy without anyone to throw it to him is not the way to get better.
Seneca Wallace is NOT the answer, despite what some posters are saying. I don't think we have a franchise QB on the roster and until we get one look for the offense to be average at best (although with an average offense we would be 2-0 right now).
-
I vote for 55 yards in the 2nd half.
that just isnt going to get it done...
Maybe. Especially since all we needed was a field goal to win it.
But I would still say the pick that resulted in the only TD for KC. Poor decisions by Browns QB's has become the norm.
If Wallace is such a great athlete, why didn't he tuck and run some?
-
I vote for 55 yards in the 2nd half.
that just isnt going to get it done...
Maybe. Especially since all we needed was a field goal to win it.
But I would still say the pick that resulted in the only TD for KC. Poor decisions by Browns QB's has become the norm.
If Wallace is such a great athlete, why didn't he tuck and run some?
Maybe. Especially since all we needed was a field goal to win it.
But I would still say the pick that resulted in the only TD for KC. Poor decisions by Browns QB's has become the norm.
If Wallace is such a great athlete, why didn't he tuck and run some?
Obviously the int that resulted in a TD is a problem however, we still had the lead at halftime once again despite that mistake and just like last week, we did nothing at all in the 2nd half.
We have to do something in the 2nd half on offense if we are going to win. The defense can only do so much. Both weeks it was the same problem.
-
mikeyP72 said:
Pick 6 cost us the game?An INT. return for a TD cost us both games. Without those I think the Browns are 2-0.
Even if the Int. took place, allowing them to be returned is what cost as if they had been tackle, it is highly possible/probably that both the Bucs and Chiefs DO NOT score TDs afterwards. If they were held to a FG, the Browns win those games.
-
mikeyP72 said:
Pick 6 cost us the game?An INT. return for a TD cost us both games. Without those I think the Browns are 2-0.
Even if the Int. took place, allowing them to be returned is what cost as if they had been tackle, it is highly possible/probably that both the Bucs and Chiefs DO NOT score TDs afterwards. If they were held to a FG, the Browns win those games.
An INT. return for a TD cost us both games. Without those I think the Browns are 2-0.
Even if the Int. took place, allowing them to be returned is what cost as if they had been tackle, it is highly possible/probably that both the Bucs and Chiefs DO NOT score TDs afterwards. If they were held to a FG, the Browns win those games.
Interceptions are part of the game. No QB is perfect. We can what if until the cows come home. It's pro football... those who make the least mistakes usually win. A ton of games are won by 3 or less points. Just the way it is.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login