Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Jerome Harrison traded for Mike Bell (Jay Glazer reporting)

Jerome Harrison traded for Mike Bell (Jay Glazer reporting)

The Browns Board
94 40 6.4k
  • P Pumpkin Eater

    @kosar_for_president said:

    Which is more reason why he shouldn't of put the ball on the ground 5 times in 370 plus carries.

    Harrison 4 times in 302 carries. Its a wash, fumble-wise. Not a good argument for or against either player.

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    Harrison 4 times in 302 carries. Its a wash, fumble-wise. Not a good argument for or against either player.

    I'll be the first to take my lumps if he goes for 100 yards. But when I am right, I am right, he will end up costing a game. I've seen him do it many times. At the worst possible time.

    But then again, I will be the first one to come back and say I told you so.

    Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
  • C calfoxwc

    Canton Mike and I were talking last evening... we both wonder where the hell the slant passes are. Is Dabol that dense? MoMass and Robo should sit down and watch a bunch of film of Warfield playing for the Browns. (Dabol should join them)

    The Browns have finally built up their oline, and they can force a successful 3rd and short run anytime they want to.

    the secondary is dramatically improved, linebackers are improved, the oline right side is improved, the entire oline play has been near the top of the NFL, and the rb's are improved...

    I do think robo needs to step up, and MoMass needs to start being more elusive on his routes.....to be used more in the passing game.

    We just need a qb who can see the field more quickly than Wallace does. I thought that was JD, but he got hurt so that's pretty much

    over for a good while. I think Colt can do that.

    A burner blue chippie wr alone would make this team a winner. And, a qb stepping up and taking over and a kick ass safety...

    and the Browns are nearly a complete, playoff bound dominant team I think.

    Not that far away at all. Huge, huge improvement.

    PollyFroggieGirlieMan will get his clock cleaned by Hillis and Bell, and I expect fights to break out when the steelers start getting frustrated

    and start pouting.

    Browns will beat the Steelers. It's Browns-squeelers week. It's going to be a great game.

    I can't wait for my physical therapist to have to present me with a cold Pepsi. GGG

    @calfoxwc said:

    Canton Mike and I were talking last evening... we both wonder where the hell the slant passes are. Is Dabol that dense? MoMass and Robo should sit down and watch a bunch of film of Warfield playing for the Browns. (Dabol should join them)

    IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams.

    Head or Gut?
    Kosar_For_PresidentK ballpeenB 2 Replies
    ❤
  • Mr. TM Mr. T

    @calfoxwc said:

    Canton Mike and I were talking last evening... we both wonder where the hell the slant passes are. Is Dabol that dense? MoMass and Robo should sit down and watch a bunch of film of Warfield playing for the Browns. (Dabol should join them)

    IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams.

    @mr.-t said:

    IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams.

    Amen.

    Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12

  • IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams. T

    ******************************

    Oh, come on. I can't imagine MoMass and Robo saying "farc you, coach, I'm not going over the middle on a slant. That's bs,"

    I'm looking for some short, quick patterns over the middle before int's happen on the many flare outs to the sidelines...

    Canton MikeC 1 Reply
    ❤

  • Anyone thinks we will ever be a Pass First Offense ?

  • Mr. TM Mr. T

    @calfoxwc said:

    Canton Mike and I were talking last evening... we both wonder where the hell the slant passes are. Is Dabol that dense? MoMass and Robo should sit down and watch a bunch of film of Warfield playing for the Browns. (Dabol should join them)

    IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams.

    @mr.-t said:

    IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams.

    I agree....I am to the point I would just forget Robo...go with Stuckey or Mitchell. I say play Moore a lot more....I think he would be great out of the slot.

    If you don't have speed and guys who can get open, then you need guys who have good hands and can catch in traffic, and Moore has displayed that.

    I think Moore could be a star in this league if given the targets. The only way to 80 catches is to have it thrown your way at least 80 times.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
  • ballpeenB ballpeen

    @mr.-t said:

    IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams.

    I agree....I am to the point I would just forget Robo...go with Stuckey or Mitchell. I say play Moore a lot more....I think he would be great out of the slot.

    If you don't have speed and guys who can get open, then you need guys who have good hands and can catch in traffic, and Moore has displayed that.

    I think Moore could be a star in this league if given the targets. The only way to 80 catches is to have it thrown your way at least 80 times.

    @ballpeen said:

    I agree....I am to the point I would just forget Robo...go with Stuckey or Mitchell. I say play Moore a lot more....I think he would be great out of the slot.

    If you don't have speed and guys who can get open, then you need guys who have good hands and can catch in traffic, and Moore has displayed that.

    I think Moore could be a star in this league if given the targets. The only way to 80 catches is to have it thrown your way at least 80 times.

    Peen, I saw Stuckey open a lot last week when I was at the game. Can anyone else who was there corroborate that?

  • E Earl34

    @ballpeen said:

    I agree....I am to the point I would just forget Robo...go with Stuckey or Mitchell. I say play Moore a lot more....I think he would be great out of the slot.

    If you don't have speed and guys who can get open, then you need guys who have good hands and can catch in traffic, and Moore has displayed that.

    I think Moore could be a star in this league if given the targets. The only way to 80 catches is to have it thrown your way at least 80 times.

    Peen, I saw Stuckey open a lot last week when I was at the game. Can anyone else who was there corroborate that?

    @earl34 said:

    Peen, I saw Stuckey open a lot last week when I was at the game. Can anyone else who was there corroborate that?

    I was at the game, but to be honest, at games, I don't watch players, I just watch the ball and sip my beer.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

  • Here is the deal as I see it. Trading Harrison for Bell was a clean out manuever. Harrison has way more upside but must have been making noise. We have no receiving corps and really nothing behind Hillis as a runner thus NO yard threat at rb now. OL is good, McCoy is a qb in training and the D is adequate against the four weak offensive teams played.

    Mangini, Heckert and Holmgren are doing a reasonable job replacing all the garbage Sewage added ............but the lack of skill players make recovery at least a two year proposition

    Offense Wins.......Franchise QB's are the key.............Defense keeps you in the game.........Go Buckeyes
  • C calfoxwc

    IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams. T

    ******************************

    Oh, come on. I can't imagine MoMass and Robo saying "farc you, coach, I'm not going over the middle on a slant. That's bs,"

    I'm looking for some short, quick patterns over the middle before int's happen on the many flare outs to the sidelines...

    @calfoxwc said:

    IMO: First you need a WR who is brave enough to come across the middle, MoMass, & Robiskie dont have large enough onions to perform that task. And they need to protect Cribbs, he takes enough shots on special teams. T

    ******************************

    Oh, come on. I can't imagine MoMass and Robo saying "farc you, coach, I'm not going over the middle on a slant. That's bs,"

    I'm looking for some short, quick patterns over the middle before int's happen on the many flare outs to the sidelines...

    I have NO idea what's going on with Robiskie, but I like Moore...a LOT! I also think Stuckey's starting to show something & calfoxwc & I agree on the quick slant patterns. Those short sideline patterns have ALWAYS scared the hell out of me...Miss that throw a little bit or timing a little off & it's 6 points the other way.

    Mike

    IN DORSEY I TRUST
Log in to reply