Skip to content

My second favorite team won BIG Tonight

The Browns Board
52 18 3.0k
  • @bunsofsteel08 said:

    Yes indeed... Fantastic explanation as to How the Browns Accomplished the Victory. Saints were the Better Team yesterday... No Doubt.

    The group in here is hilarious. It's the mouth breathers of the Browns board. All in for a little powwow. The only reason any of the "intelligent" posters will now get involved is because I'm in here talking sh.it and boosting board activity. You should thank me. Mr. T, Calowhatever and Feartheroo!. You guys should start a space exploration firm. I heard if you fill a 2 liter of a carbonated beverage of your choice with mentos is it? that it will build up some back pressure and fire through the air. Buy a bunch of those, a couple of pallets and a box of twinkies for the hunger pains. Bunch of twinks.

    Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
    #40

    Homotron said:

    The group in here is hilarious. It's the mouth breathers of the Browns board. All in for a little powwow. The only reason any of the "intelligent" posters will now get involved is because I'm in here talking sh.it and boosting board activity. You should thank me. Mr. T, Calowhatever and Feartheroo!. You guys should start a space exploration firm. I heard if you fill a 2 liter of a carbonated beverage of your choice with mentos is it? that it will build up some back pressure and fire through the air. Buy a bunch of those, a couple of pallets and a box of twinkies for the hunger pains. Bunch of twinks.

    It is funny a guy named Homo is calling someone a twink.

    The fact still remains the same.

    Nobody likes you and your team SucKs!

    Now call out and have your mom fetch you some more meatloaf loser.

  • @mr.-t said:

    They just are not as good as you think. They play like a bunch of street thugs, and like any thug; time on the streets is limited before someone comes and cleans your clock.

    Seriously, if they worked as hard on the fundementals of the game as they do trying to punk or hurt another player they just might become world champions.

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz... Not Sure yet WHO will Be Champions. Steelers Still in Mix . Unless you`re a Bitter Whiner like You Mrs. T.

    Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
    #41

    @bunsofsteel08 said:

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz... Not Sure yet WHO will Be Champions. Steelers Still in Mix . Unless you`re a Bitter Whiner like You Mrs. T.

    Is that all you got?

    This is starting to be a gay tag team between Bunsofsteel and Homotron. I believ both of you need professional help. Maybe that STD you caught is effecting your brain.

  • @feartheroo said:

    You somehow feel the need to say that after every time I post. The funny thing is I'm sure most people around here would like to see you go away. You talked trash because McCoy had a poor game against the Saints, but guess what...he still did better than Raplisburger and got a win. Was it not McCoy's first start against the Saints? Was it not his first start at the Superdome? I think it's funny your excuses don't make any sense. Just deal with it we embarassed the Saints and you lost to them! Go hide just like every other Steelers fan does, and then come out of the closet again after you beat the Bengals by 1 pt next week. Probably be another game of illegal hits and referee miscalls...you really should go back to posting less.

    You really are xxxxing Retarded. Go back to that post and find where I "talked trash" A statement was made in that thread boy genius and that statement was "The Saints were Massacred by the Browns and McCoy" My response and it was very clear was that I'm not saying McCoy hasn't been solid but rather had absolutely nothing to do with the Browns winning that football game which was/is the truth. I also don't hide, never have, never will and I talk circle around you each time you try and get cute. You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed dude and the illegal hits calls and ref miscalls is amusing. It's only EVER the Steelers that get the occasional call and several people this week have been fined as a result of the ridiculous NFL rule. You're a moron.

    F FearTheRoo wrote on last edited by
    #42

    Homotron said:

    You really are xxxxing Retarded. Go back to that post and find where I "talked trash" A statement was made in that thread boy genius and that statement was "The Saints were Massacred by the Browns and McCoy" My response and it was very clear was that I'm not saying McCoy hasn't been solid but rather had absolutely nothing to do with the Browns winning that football game which was/is the truth. I also don't hide, never have, never will and I talk circle around you each time you try and get cute. You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed dude and the illegal hits calls and ref miscalls is amusing. It's only EVER the Steelers that get the occasional call and several people this week have been fined as a result of the ridiculous NFL rule. You're a moron.

    You realize that no one around here likes you, right? I couldn't care less what you have to say to me or anyone else around here. Yes, Colt didn't win the game for us, but he didn't lose it like Raplisberger did.

    A real class act dude. I like how you result to insulting people, shows how intelligent those steelers fans really are. The Steelers lost, deal with it and go hide in the hills with all those Pirates and Panther fans haha

  • Homotron said:

    You night in and night out remain one of the most ridiculous individuals on this message board. We've won the Super Bowl twice this decade. Pittsburgh is ALL ABOUT fundamentals. The defense specifically. Heath Miller holds on to the ball we keep the momentum and likely score on that possession. We then maintain that momentum and likely win the game. Can't win em all but you'll always be a xxxxing moron. I was trying to keep quiet here for a while but sh.it it doesn't take the mouth breathers long to get out the soap box. It's pathetic if I'm being honest. Do you think members on Pittsburgh boards are starting threads about the Browns losing? xxxx no. The Ravens? Occasionally but the Browns? Absolutely not. It's usually a footnote and nothing more. You'll forever be a moron. Nice job.

    Like I said elsewhere, your game is merely a carbon copy of many of the Browns game: " If ______ holds onto the ball we keep the momentum and likely score on that possession. We maintain momentum and likely win the game"

    This goes for the game against KC, Tampa, Atlanta, Baltimore, even Pittsburgh to some extent.

    Based upon your theory, the Browns could just as easily be 5-2 rather than 2-5.

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @the-gipper said:

    Like I said elsewhere, your game is merely a carbon copy of many of the Browns game: " If ______ holds onto the ball we keep the momentum and likely score on that possession. We maintain momentum and likely win the game"

    This goes for the game against KC, Tampa, Atlanta, Baltimore, even Pittsburgh to some extent.

    Based upon your theory, the Browns could just as easily be 5-2 rather than 2-5.

    So we're lumping last year in to this year based on the Browns game? You got walloped this year despite McCoy playing a solid game. Pittsburgh has lost twice this season and what I'm saying isn't incorrect. We had a ton of momentum on that drive. Heath almost never fumbles the ball and he did. You'd think with your attempts at being analytical you would have also considered the fact that I gave credit where credit was do to the Saints for playing a tough game. The first 4 games of the season we were without Ben, or did you forget that already? The Browns have certainly been hanging in and I never come down hard on anything Browns this season unless someone specifically made it about Browns/Steelers which seems to be all the time. Football is a game of inches so find where I've ever said anything about the Browns narrow victories or losses. I can say you some time though and tell you, you wont. Pick and choose your arguments gip because you effectively wasted your time above.

  • Homotron said:

    You really are xxxxing Retarded. Go back to that post and find where I "talked trash" A statement was made in that thread boy genius and that statement was "The Saints were Massacred by the Browns and McCoy" My response and it was very clear was that I'm not saying McCoy hasn't been solid but rather had absolutely nothing to do with the Browns winning that football game which was/is the truth. I also don't hide, never have, never will and I talk circle around you each time you try and get cute. You aren't the sharpest tool in the shed dude and the illegal hits calls and ref miscalls is amusing. It's only EVER the Steelers that get the occasional call and several people this week have been fined as a result of the ridiculous NFL rule. You're a moron.

    You realize that no one around here likes you, right? I couldn't care less what you have to say to me or anyone else around here. Yes, Colt didn't win the game for us, but he didn't lose it like Raplisberger did.

    A real class act dude. I like how you result to insulting people, shows how intelligent those steelers fans really are. The Steelers lost, deal with it and go hide in the hills with all those Pirates and Panther fans haha

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #44

    @feartheroo said:

    You realize that no one around here likes you, right? I couldn't care less what you have to say to me or anyone else around here. Yes, Colt didn't win the game for us, but he didn't lose it like Raplisberger did.

    A real class act dude. I like how you result to insulting people, shows how intelligent those steelers fans really are. The Steelers lost, deal with it and go hide in the hills with all those Pirates and Panther fans haha

    Lol why would they? I'm a Steeler fan. Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few. As far as your concerned you're a Browns fan on a Browns board and aren't well liked. You tell me which is worse. And now you're going to play the "class" card? really? In the post above you refer to Roethlisberger as Raplisberger which sounds more like Rapless as in he doesn't have one. Even in your weak attempts to be insulting you fail miserably. Next time try "Rapistberger"

  • @feartheroo said:

    You realize that no one around here likes you, right? I couldn't care less what you have to say to me or anyone else around here. Yes, Colt didn't win the game for us, but he didn't lose it like Raplisberger did.

    A real class act dude. I like how you result to insulting people, shows how intelligent those steelers fans really are. The Steelers lost, deal with it and go hide in the hills with all those Pirates and Panther fans haha

    Lol why would they? I'm a Steeler fan. Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few. As far as your concerned you're a Browns fan on a Browns board and aren't well liked. You tell me which is worse. And now you're going to play the "class" card? really? In the post above you refer to Roethlisberger as Raplisberger which sounds more like Rapless as in he doesn't have one. Even in your weak attempts to be insulting you fail miserably. Next time try "Rapistberger"

    hx214H hx214 wrote on last edited by hx214
    #45

    Homotron said:

    Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few.

    Nope. 😆

  • @the-gipper said:

    Like I said elsewhere, your game is merely a carbon copy of many of the Browns game: " If ______ holds onto the ball we keep the momentum and likely score on that possession. We maintain momentum and likely win the game"

    This goes for the game against KC, Tampa, Atlanta, Baltimore, even Pittsburgh to some extent.

    Based upon your theory, the Browns could just as easily be 5-2 rather than 2-5.

    So we're lumping last year in to this year based on the Browns game? You got walloped this year despite McCoy playing a solid game. Pittsburgh has lost twice this season and what I'm saying isn't incorrect. We had a ton of momentum on that drive. Heath almost never fumbles the ball and he did. You'd think with your attempts at being analytical you would have also considered the fact that I gave credit where credit was do to the Saints for playing a tough game. The first 4 games of the season we were without Ben, or did you forget that already? The Browns have certainly been hanging in and I never come down hard on anything Browns this season unless someone specifically made it about Browns/Steelers which seems to be all the time. Football is a game of inches so find where I've ever said anything about the Browns narrow victories or losses. I can say you some time though and tell you, you wont. Pick and choose your arguments gip because you effectively wasted your time above.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #46

    Homotron said:

    So we're lumping last year in to this year based on the Browns game?

    Who said a word about last year, I am not talking about last year.

    You got walloped this year despite McCoy playing a solid game.

    What looks like a "walloping" was based on two late game turnovers. Going into the 4th quarter that game was close.

    Pittsburgh has lost twice this season and what I'm saying isn't incorrect.

    I don't recall saying that it was incorrect. I was merely comparing that game to several Browns games that ended for us similarly.

    We had a ton of momentum on that drive. Heath almost never fumbles the ball and he did. You'd think with your attempts at being analytical you would have also considered the fact that I gave credit where credit was do to the Saints for playing a tough game.

    Again, I don't recall ever denying that fact.

    The first 4 games of the season we were without Ben, or did you forget that already?

    Not at all. From my point of view though, your team has performed just as well without him as they did with him. If not for the referring fluke in Miami your record with him would be 1-2.

    The Browns have certainly been hanging in and I never come down hard on anything Browns this season unless someone specifically made it about Browns/Steelers which seems to be all the time. Football is a game of inches so find where I've ever said anything about the Browns narrow victories or losses. I can say you some time though and tell you, you wont. Pick and choose your arguments gip because you effectively wasted your time above.

    I waste my time simply by posting on this forum, whether it be to detail certain facts or to play mushmouth with you. So be it.

  • @feartheroo said:

    You realize that no one around here likes you, right? I couldn't care less what you have to say to me or anyone else around here. Yes, Colt didn't win the game for us, but he didn't lose it like Raplisberger did.

    A real class act dude. I like how you result to insulting people, shows how intelligent those steelers fans really are. The Steelers lost, deal with it and go hide in the hills with all those Pirates and Panther fans haha

    Lol why would they? I'm a Steeler fan. Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few. As far as your concerned you're a Browns fan on a Browns board and aren't well liked. You tell me which is worse. And now you're going to play the "class" card? really? In the post above you refer to Roethlisberger as Raplisberger which sounds more like Rapless as in he doesn't have one. Even in your weak attempts to be insulting you fail miserably. Next time try "Rapistberger"

    F FearTheRoo wrote on last edited by
    #47

    Homotron said:

    Lol why would they? I'm a Steeler fan. Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few. As far as your concerned you're a Browns fan on a Browns board and aren't well liked. You tell me which is worse. And now you're going to play the "class" card? really? In the post above you refer to Roethlisberger as Raplisberger which sounds more like Rapless as in he doesn't have one. Even in your weak attempts to be insulting you fail miserably. Next time try "Rapistberger"

    I don't think anyone has a problem with me around here, except for a few of you steelers fans. I'm sure they don't like that I hate the Buckeyes, but other than that I'm sure they like me a whole heck of a lot more than you...keep trying dude, get a life!

  • @feartheroo said:

    You realize that no one around here likes you, right? I couldn't care less what you have to say to me or anyone else around here. Yes, Colt didn't win the game for us, but he didn't lose it like Raplisberger did.

    A real class act dude. I like how you result to insulting people, shows how intelligent those steelers fans really are. The Steelers lost, deal with it and go hide in the hills with all those Pirates and Panther fans haha

    Lol why would they? I'm a Steeler fan. Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few. As far as your concerned you're a Browns fan on a Browns board and aren't well liked. You tell me which is worse. And now you're going to play the "class" card? really? In the post above you refer to Roethlisberger as Raplisberger which sounds more like Rapless as in he doesn't have one. Even in your weak attempts to be insulting you fail miserably. Next time try "Rapistberger"

    Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
    #48

    Homotron said:

    Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few.

    NO.

  • Homotron said:

    Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few.

    NO.

    F FearTheRoo wrote on last edited by FearTheRoo
    #49

    @mr.-t said:

    NO.

    I think he means Bunsofsteel and rich......................4.......................eagle.........................

    .....

    2 is "a few" right? like there are "a few" steelers fans in the World? They only have "a few" good players?

  • Homotron said:

    Although I'd like to think i have the mutual respect of a few.

    Nope. 😆

    VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #50

    @hx214 said:

    Nope. 😆

    Please. It's been confirmed via PM's. Doesn't really matter to me one way or another. I'm not a mouth breather so I don't expect most to enjoy my viewpoints.

  • VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Can't disagree with you Gip, but you're one of the few despite a couple ridiculous view points but I expect that from a Browns fan and vice versa. One of them being that Ben isn't a big deal to the Steelers. It's Ben's team not the defenses and without him we don't have two Super Bowls this decade.

  • Can't disagree with you Gip, but you're one of the few despite a couple ridiculous view points but I expect that from a Browns fan and vice versa. One of them being that Ben isn't a big deal to the Steelers. It's Ben's team not the defenses and without him we don't have two Super Bowls this decade.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Homotron said:

    Can't disagree with you Gip, but you're one of the few despite a couple ridiculous view points but I expect that from a Browns fan and vice versa. One of them being that Ben isn't a big deal to the Steelers. It's Ben's team not the defenses and without him we don't have two Super Bowls this decade.

    I disagree with that. The 2005 SB was won by the Steelers in spite of BR. The 2008, yea, OK, but not '05. Even then I think the Steeler's are still "LeBeau's team" They went 3-1 with scrub QBs because of their defense.