Browns Already in the West Coast?
-
He is probably referring to the number of short balls the Browns throw vs a morre downfield approach.
-
Our version of the west coast is to Holgrem's as bologna is to steak. If we are indead running the west coast, it has Daboll's shit smeared all over it. Our hodge podge O can't do shit. I would prefer a full west coast system. At least then our WR's would be better used in drag and slant patterns over the crap they are having them do now.
-
I don't like belichek, over rated coach..
We shoud run the oop d ooop
I doubt anyone will agree with me, but as I already posted I would pass first on New England. If there was ever a week to bring out the West Coast (or "hybrid") offense, this would be it, especially if McCoy is starting. He got a lot of experience in Texas with a version of that offense. Keep those Patriots running all over the field with short stuff and the runs will be there...not to mention the occassional long ball.
However, IF we can effectively run the ball on the Patriots that works too. Let's just win.

-
Our version of the west coast is to Holgrem's as bologna is to steak. If we are indead running the west coast, it has Daboll's shit smeared all over it. Our hodge podge O can't do shit. I would prefer a full west coast system. At least then our WR's would be better used in drag and slant patterns over the crap they are having them do now.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Our version of the west coast is to Holgrem's as bologna is to steak. If we are indead running the west coast, it has Daboll's shit smeared all over it. Our hodge podge O can't do shit. I would prefer a full west coast system. At least then our WR's would be better used in drag and slant patterns over the crap they are having them do now.Our offense has some elements of the WCO but its a very dumbed down version that focuses on run first and passing only to survive the drive..
The passing game lacks intelligent design and often reduces and restricts the WRs role and overall relevance imo...
As for billy boy i like him almost as much as i like dabs..
-
-
I'm not a big they don't have the talent guy but if the Browns are going to a full WCO I'd say they don't have the talent for that yet. I think thats why we see what looks like Daboll's simpleton offense sometimes. There are a few missing peices that are needed to run a good WCO.
They've got a Rathman in Hillis need a Craig
They've got a Young in Colt
They've got a Cross in Mack
They've got a Jones in Watson
They've got a Sapolu in Thomas
That being said, THEY NEED A RICE AND TAYLOR!!!!!!!!!!!
p.s. Ward can be Lott! I thought Eric Wright would be Eric Wright but he's had some issues.
-
I'm not a big they don't have the talent guy but if the Browns are going to a full WCO I'd say they don't have the talent for that yet. I think thats why we see what looks like Daboll's simpleton offense sometimes. There are a few missing peices that are needed to run a good WCO.
They've got a Rathman in Hillis need a Craig
They've got a Young in Colt
They've got a Cross in Mack
They've got a Jones in Watson
They've got a Sapolu in Thomas
That being said, THEY NEED A RICE AND TAYLOR!!!!!!!!!!!
p.s. Ward can be Lott! I thought Eric Wright would be Eric Wright but he's had some issues.
I'm not a big they don't have the talent guy but if the Browns are going to a full WCO I'd say they don't have the talent for that yet. I think thats why we see what looks like Daboll's simpleton offense sometimes. There are a few missing peices that are needed to run a good WCO.
They've got a Rathman in Hillis need a Craig
They've got a Young in Colt
They've got a Cross in Mack
They've got a Jones in Watson
They've got a Sapolu in Thomas
That being said, THEY NEED A RICE AND TAYLOR!!!!!!!!!!!
p.s. Ward can be Lott! I thought Eric Wright would be Eric Wright but he's had some issues.
So? Maybe Joe Haden can be Eric Wright, and Eric Wright can be Derek Wrong?
-
I'm not a big they don't have the talent guy but if the Browns are going to a full WCO I'd say they don't have the talent for that yet. I think thats why we see what looks like Daboll's simpleton offense sometimes. There are a few missing peices that are needed to run a good WCO.
They've got a Rathman in Hillis need a Craig
They've got a Young in Colt
They've got a Cross in Mack
They've got a Jones in Watson
They've got a Sapolu in Thomas
That being said, THEY NEED A RICE AND TAYLOR!!!!!!!!!!!
p.s. Ward can be Lott! I thought Eric Wright would be Eric Wright but he's had some issues.
So? Maybe Joe Haden can be Eric Wright, and Eric Wright can be Derek Wrong?
So? Maybe Joe Haden can be Eric Wright, and Eric Wright can be Derek Wrong?
Good one!
-
Our version of the west coast is to Holgrem's as bologna is to steak. If we are indead running the west coast, it has Daboll's shit smeared all over it. Our hodge podge O can't do shit. I would prefer a full west coast system. At least then our WR's would be better used in drag and slant patterns over the crap they are having them do now.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Our version of the west coast is to Holgrem's as bologna is to steak. If we are indead running the west coast, it has Daboll's shit smeared all over it. Our hodge podge O can't do shit. I would prefer a full west coast system. At least then our WR's would be better used in drag and slant patterns over the crap they are having them do now.I should know better than to bet the farm... but I'm betting the farm we have a WCO OC next year whether it's Holmgren or Gruden coaching the team, and I'm getting the sense it'll be one or the other. A full day later, Holmgren is making no effort to squelch anything he said yesterday, including that he might not be wearing a suit next year.
I think we'll draft a big, physical YAC receiver in round one and McCoy, Massoquoi, Stuckey, Moore, Watson, and Hillis should all pop champagne the second we do.
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Our version of the west coast is to Holgrem's as bologna is to steak. If we are indead running the west coast, it has Daboll's shit smeared all over it. Our hodge podge O can't do shit. I would prefer a full west coast system. At least then our WR's would be better used in drag and slant patterns over the crap they are having them do now.I should know better than to bet the farm... but I'm betting the farm we have a WCO OC next year whether it's Holmgren or Gruden coaching the team, and I'm getting the sense it'll be one or the other. A full day later, Holmgren is making no effort to squelch anything he said yesterday, including that he might not be wearing a suit next year.
I think we'll draft a big, physical YAC receiver in round one and McCoy, Massoquoi, Stuckey, Moore, Watson, and Hillis should all pop champagne the second we do.
I should know better than to bet the farm... but I'm betting the farm we have a WCO OC next year whether it's Holmgren or Gruden coaching the team, and I'm getting the sense it'll be one or the other. A full day later, Holmgren is making no effort to squelch anything he said yesterday, including that he might not be wearing a suit next year.
I think we'll draft a big, physical YAC receiver in round one and McCoy, Massoquoi, Stuckey, Moore, Watson, and Hillis should all pop champagne the second we do.
Sounds good to me. Gruden, Holmgren (Mangini) whatever Like I've said before aside from Mangini you can trace those guys back to Paul Brown. I'm starting to think Mangini can become the guy. I haven't been sold on him in the past. If he can add Holgren's knowledge to the what he's learned from the Parcell school he comes from it could work. This all lends to the theory I've had for a while that there are two truly successful coaching trees in the NFL. The Parcells tree and the Walsh tree.
-
This is Belichick stirring the pot. He wants to get under the skin of Mangini and also stir up controversery here in Cleveland that Mike Holmgren is involved and wants to coach again and blah blah blah. The only thing west coast about this offense is the fact that our receivers suck and we throw short because they are never open down the field. Belichick hates Mangini and wants to cause problems.
-
This is Belichick stirring the pot. He wants to get under the skin of Mangini and also stir up controversery here in Cleveland that Mike Holmgren is involved and wants to coach again and blah blah blah. The only thing west coast about this offense is the fact that our receivers suck and we throw short because they are never open down the field. Belichick hates Mangini and wants to cause problems.
This is Belichick stirring the pot. He wants to get under the skin of Mangini and also stir up controversery here in Cleveland that Mike Holmgren is involved and wants to coach again and blah blah blah. The only thing west coast about this offense is the fact that our receivers suck and we throw short because they are never open down the field. Belichick hates Mangini and wants to cause problems.
Ding ding ding! We have a winner Mangini and belichick will do anything and say anything to get on each others nerves.
The chances of Mangini losing his job after this season is slim to none, it wouldn't make any sense to pull the plug after the season.
-
Firing Mangini and hiring Holmgren would be very, very, very, very, very stupid. Will have to get all new players to fit his system, then in 2-3 years he'll retire and will have to hire another coach and get players to fit their system. The team is on the verge of being very good, why would we want to start over? IMO there's not a coach in the league the would have this team playing better than Mangini has, and Im pretty disappointed that Holmgren didn't express more confidence in his head coach.
What exactly is a WCO? We throw to the RB's and TE's alot but does that make it a WCO? New England does the same thing. Does the need for our shorter QB's having to roll out institute WCO? I like to think its the Cleveland Browns offense, you take different elements you like from different scheme's and you make it your own. I guess every team runs the WCO....in some aspect....right????
-
Firing Mangini and hiring Holmgren would be very, very, very, very, very stupid. Will have to get all new players to fit his system, then in 2-3 years he'll retire and will have to hire another coach and get players to fit their system. The team is on the verge of being very good, why would we want to start over? IMO there's not a coach in the league the would have this team playing better than Mangini has, and Im pretty disappointed that Holmgren didn't express more confidence in his head coach.
What exactly is a WCO? We throw to the RB's and TE's alot but does that make it a WCO? New England does the same thing. Does the need for our shorter QB's having to roll out institute WCO? I like to think its the Cleveland Browns offense, you take different elements you like from different scheme's and you make it your own. I guess every team runs the WCO....in some aspect....right????
Firing Mangini and hiring Holmgren would be very, very, very, very, very stupid. Will have to get all new players to fit his system, then in 2-3 years he'll retire and will have to hire another coach and get players to fit their system. The team is on the verge of being very good, why would we want to start over? IMO there's not a coach in the league the would have this team playing better than Mangini has, and Im pretty disappointed that Holmgren didn't express more confidence in his head coach.
What exactly is a WCO? We throw to the RB's and TE's alot but does that make it a WCO? New England does the same thing. Does the need for our shorter QB's having to roll out institute WCO? I like to think its the Cleveland Browns offense, you take different elements you like from different scheme's and you make it your own. I guess every team runs the WCO....in some aspect....right????
I think you sort of answered your own question: Yes, virtually every offense feels West Coast-ey these days. But the Browns passing offense is again ranked near the bottom in yards and QBR... in a passing league. And in that low-ranked area are a whole lot of teams NOT contending.
Holmgren is one of the kingpins of the WCO and the team he was hired to save doesn't pass the ball at a professional level. It's tough to NOT see how he doesn't exert more control over it in some way. The most logical way is going to a WCO with a WCO coordinator for his WCO-friendly hand-picked QB.
But, like you said... it really doesn't change our personnel all that much, and everybody runs the WCO differently anyway. The Browns have already said they want to combine a WCO passing offense with a power running game. Fortunately, Hillis is also an excellent receiver and we already have the TEs and QB for it.
We're short one big-time #1 WR whatever offense we run. Committing to Holmgren's version of the WCO isn't going to change that. And I doubt we'll change the defense much at all. In fact, Ryan could be asked to stay, especially if the coach comes from within (Holmgren).
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
Our version of the west coast is to Holgrem's as bologna is to steak. If we are indead running the west coast, it has Daboll's shit smeared all over it. Our hodge podge O can't do shit. I would prefer a full west coast system. At least then our WR's would be better used in drag and slant patterns over the crap they are having them do now.I should know better than to bet the farm... but I'm betting the farm we have a WCO OC next year whether it's Holmgren or Gruden coaching the team, and I'm getting the sense it'll be one or the other. A full day later, Holmgren is making no effort to squelch anything he said yesterday, including that he might not be wearing a suit next year.
I think we'll draft a big, physical YAC receiver in round one and McCoy, Massoquoi, Stuckey, Moore, Watson, and Hillis should all pop champagne the second we do.
I should know better than to bet the farm... but I'm betting the farm we have a WCO OC next year whether it's Holmgren or Gruden coaching the team, and I'm getting the sense it'll be one or the other. A full day later, Holmgren is making no effort to squelch anything he said yesterday, including that he might not be wearing a suit next year.
I think we'll draft a big, physical YAC receiver in round one and McCoy, Massoquoi, Stuckey, Moore, Watson, and Hillis should all pop champagne the second we do.
Do you actually own a farm? With cows, pigs, chickens etc.?
-
I should know better than to bet the farm... but I'm betting the farm we have a WCO OC next year whether it's Holmgren or Gruden coaching the team, and I'm getting the sense it'll be one or the other. A full day later, Holmgren is making no effort to squelch anything he said yesterday, including that he might not be wearing a suit next year.
I think we'll draft a big, physical YAC receiver in round one and McCoy, Massoquoi, Stuckey, Moore, Watson, and Hillis should all pop champagne the second we do.
Do you actually own a farm? With cows, pigs, chickens etc.?
Do you actually own a farm? With cows, pigs, chickens etc.?
I've shifted to a rural vibe recently.
-
It's really more like "Wet Toast" offense with Dabol running it. haha
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
