Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Daboll or McDaniels?

Daboll or McDaniels?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
34 Posts 15 Posters 2.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S shepwrite

    You turn a couple of those close losses early in the season into wins and then McCoy leads the Browns to a win in Buffalo, we're 8-5, pure and simple. It's on Delhomme in my book. Weirdest signing since I started watching football.

    miktoxic miktoxicM
    • 13k Posts
    • 1k Reputation
    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @shepwrite said:

    You turn a couple of those close losses early in the season into wins and then McCoy leads the Browns to a win in Buffalo, we're 8-5, pure and simple. It's on Delhomme in my book. Weirdest signing since I started watching football.

    is it on delhomme or mangini? one minute it's about the coach, the next it's about the qb. i know delhomme sucks. i think everyone is in agreement with that.

    the other teams with new coaches......... let's see how they do with our schedule and our talent.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • miktoxicM miktoxic

      @shepwrite said:

      You turn a couple of those close losses early in the season into wins and then McCoy leads the Browns to a win in Buffalo, we're 8-5, pure and simple. It's on Delhomme in my book. Weirdest signing since I started watching football.

      is it on delhomme or mangini? one minute it's about the coach, the next it's about the qb. i know delhomme sucks. i think everyone is in agreement with that.

      the other teams with new coaches......... let's see how they do with our schedule and our talent.

      shepwrite S
      • 814 Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      S shepwrite wrote on last edited by
      #26

      @miktoxic said:

      is it on delhomme or mangini? one minute it's about the coach, the next it's about the qb. i know delhomme sucks. i think everyone is in agreement with that.

      the other teams with new coaches......... let's see how they do with our schedule and our talent.

      I don't think Mangini is a bad coach. He's one of those guys who should stay away from the offense, though. When I talk about whether he'll be back, it isn't a hate or love thing. I wouldn't cry either way, assuming we're getting rid of Daboll.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • WRREBEL WRREBELW
        • 2k Posts
        • 87 Reputation
        WRREBELW WRREBEL wrote on last edited by
        #27

        Paper or plastic?

        miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • ITHIKAI ITHIKA

          Mcdaniels is bright no doubt and one of the best minds in the NFL with the Offense, but the guy has major issues and im not sure will be able to conform. I sere Daboll getting fired as well and would welcome Mcdaniels if he understands his place. Otherwise it may be a safer move to hire Zorn as the new OC and steal him from the Ravens where he is the QB coach. We give him a raise and make him the OC. Zorn is probable the logical fit after working with Holmgren for many years in Seattle and knowing the WC offense.

          Thaak ThaakT
          • 1k Posts
          • 26 Reputation
          ThaakT Thaak wrote on last edited by
          #28

          @ithika said:

          Mcdaniels is bright no doubt and one of the best minds in the NFL with the Offense, but the guy has major issues and im not sure will be able to conform. I sere Daboll getting fired as well and would welcome Mcdaniels if he understands his place. Otherwise it may be a safer move to hire Zorn as the new OC and steal him from the Ravens where he is the QB coach. We give him a raise and make him the OC. Zorn is probable the logical fit after working with Holmgren for many years in Seattle and knowing the WC offense.

          Only problem with that, if he is still under contract with the Ravens, they don't have to let him interview for a coordinator position. The only upward-moving position that this can happen with is HC

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • WRREBELW WRREBEL

            Paper or plastic?

            miktoxic miktoxicM
            • 13k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
            #29

            @wrrebel said:

            Paper or plastic?

            richard or dick?

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • DestinFunk DestinFunkD
              • 291 Posts
              • 0 Reputation
              DestinFunkD DestinFunk wrote on last edited by
              #30

              Is it because he is going to be paid millions to not coach people do not mention Childress as a possible OC?

              ~Silence is boring!
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • BROWNandORANGE B
                • 496 Posts
                • 1 Reputation
                B BROWNandORANGE wrote on last edited by
                #31

                McDaniels > Daboll

                Let's see, would you rather have an OC with 2 Super Bowl rings (McDaniels) or an OC that runs plays like Madden (Daboll)?

                McDaniels has proved he is a dominant and successful offensive coordinator, Daboll has proved he is a shithead.

                cddbrownsC 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • B BROWNandORANGE

                  McDaniels > Daboll

                  Let's see, would you rather have an OC with 2 Super Bowl rings (McDaniels) or an OC that runs plays like Madden (Daboll)?

                  McDaniels has proved he is a dominant and successful offensive coordinator, Daboll has proved he is a shithead.

                  cddbrowns cddbrownsC
                  • 136 Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  cddbrownsC cddbrowns wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  Colt12 said:

                  McDaniels > Daboll

                  Let's see, would you rather have an OC with 2 Super Bowl rings (McDaniels) or an OC that runs plays like Madden (Daboll)?

                  McDaniels has proved he is a dominant and successful offensive coordinator, Daboll has proved he is a shithead.

                  BUT (<-- big but) will he play Hillis? Obvious he doesnt like him...

                  If at first you dont succeed, skydiving is not for you.
                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • cddbrownsC cddbrowns

                    Colt12 said:

                    McDaniels > Daboll

                    Let's see, would you rather have an OC with 2 Super Bowl rings (McDaniels) or an OC that runs plays like Madden (Daboll)?

                    McDaniels has proved he is a dominant and successful offensive coordinator, Daboll has proved he is a shithead.

                    BUT (<-- big but) will he play Hillis? Obvious he doesnt like him...

                    BROWNandORANGE B
                    • 496 Posts
                    • 1 Reputation
                    B BROWNandORANGE wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    @cddbrowns said:

                    BUT (<-- big but) will he play Hillis? Obvious he doesnt like him...

                    yes that is a good question. If we do in fact decide to bring McDaniels in as the new OC, Mangini needs to step up and say "Hillis is my guy and he will be the starting RB."

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Hawgdawg H
                      • 21 Posts
                      • 0 Reputation
                      H Hawgdawg wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      I find it very hard to recognize much intelligence in McDaniels with all of the idiotic stuff he pulled in Denver. And he didn't show any imaginative innovations there either. The Broncos are much the worse for his time there. Don't believe all that stuff about his being able to create quarterbacks from nothing. He wanted to trade for Quinn when he got rid of Cutler. He finally got him, but he wasn't able to create a quarterback out of him. And he wasn't able to create a qb out of Tebow, either.

                      I have read some stuff that Kubiak will go back to Denver as HC. That would be a good move for all concerned, but it would take him out of the running for OC in Cleveland.

                      IF the Browns are going to get another OC next year, I hope they go after someone who is a winner. There will be enough coaching staffs turning over after the season that there should be some really good candidates available.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Theme
                      • System
                      • Light
                      • Dark
                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Forums
                      • Recent
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Donate