Underwhelmed
-
Who wanted Hillis? Hmmm?
And Heckert made it happen. Look who took out Hillis in the first game vs TB. We didn't do much without him did we? So instead of sticking with the guy and giving him some confidence, you bench him in the first game. Mangini mishandled a lot of players on game day (or making them inactive.)
But sure, I give props to Eric for getting Heckert to grab him. +1 to Mangini.
And Heckert made it happen. Look who took out Hillis in the first game vs TB. We didn't do much without him did we? So instead of sticking with the guy and giving him some confidence, you bench him in the first game. Mangini mishandled a lot of players on game day (or making them inactive.)
But sure, I give props to Eric for getting Heckert to grab him. +1 to Mangini.
Holy bloody hell, you spin EVERYTHING into a negative with Mangini dont you? do something personally against you or something? LOL! How about how much BETTER this team has been with penalties, points allowed, started Colt after healthy didnt he? How many backup QBs can come in and win in the NFL by the way?
-
And Heckert made it happen. Look who took out Hillis in the first game vs TB. We didn't do much without him did we? So instead of sticking with the guy and giving him some confidence, you bench him in the first game. Mangini mishandled a lot of players on game day (or making them inactive.)
But sure, I give props to Eric for getting Heckert to grab him. +1 to Mangini.
Holy bloody hell, you spin EVERYTHING into a negative with Mangini dont you? do something personally against you or something? LOL! How about how much BETTER this team has been with penalties, points allowed, started Colt after healthy didnt he? How many backup QBs can come in and win in the NFL by the way?
Holy bloody hell, you spin EVERYTHING into a negative with Mangini dont you?
Mangini just got axed by his 2nd organization in his 2nd season - again. There is a lot of negatives.
Sure, none of this is his fault.
-
Holy bloody hell, you spin EVERYTHING into a negative with Mangini dont you?
Mangini just got axed by his 2nd organization in his 2nd season - again. There is a lot of negatives.
Sure, none of this is his fault.
Mangini just got axed by his 2nd organization in his 2nd season - again. There is a lot of negatives.
Sure, none of this is his fault.
First, he was after his 3rd season with the Jets.....second, fired means everything was his fault? HA! No wonder Browns fans are confused.......
I love the Browns, but the fans CAN BE the dumbest in the NFL sometimes. Not all, but some of you.
-
This is all about Holmgren instituting his philosophy and style of play on the team, assisted by people he knows and trusts. I think he gave Mangini and his assistants a chance, but felt like they were not going to get there fast enough (or ever). If any of us was hired to do a job and we gave the people who were on board before we came a chance and, after a year or so, felt (1) we could bring in our own team and (2) our own team had a better shot at getting us to the end goal, we'd all do the same. This isn't E-Harmony, it's the NFL and you either win or you go bye-bye. New boss, new team of coaches.
It's gonna happen, rather than fret and worry and gripe, why not let things unfold and support the folks that get put in place. You can always grumble about the past, but that doesn't do a thing for the future. Embrace the change and hope for the best. Lord knows if these new guys fail we are all great at complaining and saying "I told you so".
The one and only time losing is acceptable is when it involves your virginity. -
This is all about Holmgren instituting his philosophy and style of play on the team, assisted by people he knows and trusts. I think he gave Mangini and his assistants a chance, but felt like they were not going to get there fast enough (or ever). If any of us was hired to do a job and we gave the people who were on board before we came a chance and, after a year or so, felt (1) we could bring in our own team and (2) our own team had a better shot at getting us to the end goal, we'd all do the same. This isn't E-Harmony, it's the NFL and you either win or you go bye-bye. New boss, new team of coaches.
It's gonna happen, rather than fret and worry and gripe, why not let things unfold and support the folks that get put in place. You can always grumble about the past, but that doesn't do a thing for the future. Embrace the change and hope for the best. Lord knows if these new guys fail we are all great at complaining and saying "I told you so".
This is all about Holmgren instituting his philosophy and style of play on the team, assisted by people he knows and trusts. I think he gave Mangini and his assistants a chance, but felt like they were not going to get there fast enough (or ever). If any of us was hired to do a job and we gave the people who were on board before we came a chance and, after a year or so, felt (1) we could bring in our own team and (2) our own team had a better shot at getting us to the end goal, we'd all do the same. This isn't E-Harmony, it's the NFL and you either win or you go bye-bye. New boss, new team of coaches.
It's gonna happen, rather than fret and worry and gripe, why not let things unfold and support the folks that get put in place. You can always grumble about the past, but that doesn't do a thing for the future. Embrace the change and hope for the best. Lord knows if these new guys fail we are all great at complaining and saying "I told you so".
Bottom line, FIRE MANGINI! BRING IN A PROVEN HEAD COACH LIKE GRUDEN! OH, I MEAN SHURMUR! HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!
-
...and if Shurmur gets us to the playoffs, Holmgren was right.....I wouldn't care if Carrot Top came in to coach if he got us to have the best record in the division.
-
...and if Shurmur gets us to the playoffs, Holmgren was right.....I wouldn't care if Carrot Top came in to coach if he got us to have the best record in the division.
...and if Shurmur gets us to the playoffs, Holmgren was right.....I wouldn't care if Carrot Top came in to coach if he got us to have the best record in the division.
Odds that Shurmur getting us to the playoffs next year are WAY less than the odds that Mangini would have. This was ego, plain and simple.
If at first you dont succeed, skydiving is not for you. -
For folks in Mangini's corner, if our record is a lot better next year it will be because we had a much easier schedule. We'll never be able to get all of us to agree on much other than the Browns are the greatest NFL team ever, Pittsburgh fans suck donkey dangles, and WRREBEL really did sleep with Gruden.
The one and only time losing is acceptable is when it involves your virginity. -
For folks in Mangini's corner, if our record is a lot better next year it will be because we had a much easier schedule. We'll never be able to get all of us to agree on much other than the Browns are the greatest NFL team ever, Pittsburgh fans suck donkey dangles, and WRREBEL really did sleep with Gruden.
For folks in Mangini's corner, if our record is a lot better next year it will be because we had a much easier schedule. We'll never be able to get all of us to agree on much other than the Browns are the greatest NFL team ever, Pittsburgh fans suck donkey dangles, and WRREBEL really did sleep with Gruden.
Wow. Talk about stacking the deck. If we lose a lot is it Mangini's fault? Or is this all Bill Clinton's fault, too?
-
For folks in Mangini's corner, if our record is a lot better next year it will be because we had a much easier schedule. We'll never be able to get all of us to agree on much other than the Browns are the greatest NFL team ever, Pittsburgh fans suck donkey dangles, and WRREBEL really did sleep with Gruden.
Wow. Talk about stacking the deck. If we lose a lot is it Mangini's fault? Or is this all Bill Clinton's fault, too?
Wow. Talk about stacking the deck. If we lose a lot is it Mangini's fault? Or is this all Bill Clinton's fault, too?
Did you know Bush caused the brown spot in my back yard? Wasnt the dog, it was Bush pissing by the tree........
-
How do we know the next coach isn't better than Mangini? John Harbaugh and Mike Smith weren't sexy picks, but they look pretty damn smart now. The coach that's "better than Mangini" is the coach that tops his 5-11 high water mark, period. Not that tough.
This is Holmgren's team. The sense at OBR is exactly what I've been saying, that he's absolutely going to do things his way with people who run his systems and he won't be "hands off" in any way, shape or form. He won't take on the 15 hour days of a head coach but he'll be pulling all the strings. Considering Mangini is NEVER mentioned in the same breath with Holmgren, well... that's a HUGE upgrade.
That means two guys make sense: Shurmur and Mornhinweg... and the latter hasn't been interviewed. There's also Mike Sherman getting some light play, but I think Holmgren likes that Shurmur is "fresh" and only 45, and won't object to being mentored. I also expect our new DC to be a bit sage, like John Fox, to help support Shurmur.
I'm totally down with all of this. I think everybody else will be pretty soon. I love Heckert at GM and I like the idea of Holmgren finally making the Browns HIS team.
Thank you, Mrs. Holmgren!
Thank you, Mrs. Holmgren!
That... was funny. Said like Chelsea Handler. Which is who I really am.
-
For folks in Mangini's corner, if our record is a lot better next year it will be because we had a much easier schedule. We'll never be able to get all of us to agree on much other than the Browns are the greatest NFL team ever, Pittsburgh fans suck donkey dangles, and WRREBEL really did sleep with Gruden.
For folks in Mangini's corner, if our record is a lot better next year it will be because we had a much easier schedule. We'll never be able to get all of us to agree on much other than the Browns are the greatest NFL team ever, Pittsburgh fans suck donkey dangles, and WRREBEL really did sleep with Gruden.
Not true at all, at least where I am concerned. If the Browns DO in fact win more, ALONG WITH THE MANY OTHER FACTORS THAT SHOULD GO INTO IT, then I will concede and say "I was wrong and good for Holmgren and Shurmur" If we beat crappy azz teams, but get destroyed by any good team, our stats and others go down, other factors, I will say what I am saying now.
-
You're dreaming if you think Browns fans aren't smarter than that.
You guys are making Mangini out to be much smarter than he is. Take one person out of the equation - Peyton Hillis - and we win 2 games max.
Take the other side of the pendulum, without the 2 fumbles and one pick 6, we're 8 and 8.
Ifs and buts. The one thing I know, record or not, we improved each season with Mangini. Where we improved the most was in the draft tho with Heckert and co. We keep getting some good drafts and we'll be really competitive soon.
Take the other side of the pendulum, without the 2 fumbles and one pick 6, we're 8 and 8.
Ifs and buts. The one thing I know, record or not, we improved each season with Mangini. Where we improved the most was in the draft tho with Heckert and co. We keep getting some good drafts and we'll be really competitive soon.
No, the only thing we know about Mangini is that he was 10-22. That's the bottom line. And we closed weak and disinterested.
-
For folks in Mangini's corner, if our record is a lot better next year it will be because we had a much easier schedule. We'll never be able to get all of us to agree on much other than the Browns are the greatest NFL team ever, Pittsburgh fans suck donkey dangles, and WRREBEL really did sleep with Gruden.
Wow. Talk about stacking the deck. If we lose a lot is it Mangini's fault? Or is this all Bill Clinton's fault, too?
Wow. Talk about stacking the deck. If we lose a lot is it Mangini's fault? Or is this all Bill Clinton's fault, too?
It's helped Obama.
-
This is all about Holmgren instituting his philosophy and style of play on the team, assisted by people he knows and trusts. I think he gave Mangini and his assistants a chance, but felt like they were not going to get there fast enough (or ever). If any of us was hired to do a job and we gave the people who were on board before we came a chance and, after a year or so, felt (1) we could bring in our own team and (2) our own team had a better shot at getting us to the end goal, we'd all do the same. This isn't E-Harmony, it's the NFL and you either win or you go bye-bye. New boss, new team of coaches.
It's gonna happen, rather than fret and worry and gripe, why not let things unfold and support the folks that get put in place. You can always grumble about the past, but that doesn't do a thing for the future. Embrace the change and hope for the best. Lord knows if these new guys fail we are all great at complaining and saying "I told you so".
This is all about Holmgren instituting his philosophy and style of play on the team, assisted by people he knows and trusts. I think he gave Mangini and his assistants a chance, but felt like they were not going to get there fast enough (or ever). If any of us was hired to do a job and we gave the people who were on board before we came a chance and, after a year or so, felt (1) we could bring in our own team and (2) our own team had a better shot at getting us to the end goal, we'd all do the same. This isn't E-Harmony, it's the NFL and you either win or you go bye-bye. New boss, new team of coaches.
It's gonna happen, rather than fret and worry and gripe, why not let things unfold and support the folks that get put in place. You can always grumble about the past, but that doesn't do a thing for the future. Embrace the change and hope for the best. Lord knows if these new guys fail we are all great at complaining and saying "I told you so".
Bam. I was a hell of a lot more excited by Holmgren than Mangini... but the truth is I just want the Browns to win. I'll be bummed/excited by Holmgren's true reign (which begins next season) based on results.
-
...and if Shurmur gets us to the playoffs, Holmgren was right.....I wouldn't care if Carrot Top came in to coach if he got us to have the best record in the division.
Odds that Shurmur getting us to the playoffs next year are WAY less than the odds that Mangini would have. This was ego, plain and simple.
Odds that Shurmur getting us to the playoffs next year are WAY less than the odds that Mangini would have. This was ego, plain and simple.
Whoa. That's SERIOUSLY out on a limb, man. Mangini is smarter than Holmgren now? Holy crap, he's becoming the stuff of myth of back to back 5-11 seasons?
Wow.
-
Odds that Shurmur getting us to the playoffs next year are WAY less than the odds that Mangini would have. This was ego, plain and simple.
Whoa. That's SERIOUSLY out on a limb, man. Mangini is smarter than Holmgren now? Holy crap, he's becoming the stuff of myth of back to back 5-11 seasons?
Wow.
Whoa. That's SERIOUSLY out on a limb, man. Mangini is smarter than Holmgren now? Holy crap, he's becoming the stuff of myth of back to back 5-11 seasons?
Wow.
Same thing as saying Mangini would never take the team any further doncha think? I can make outlandish claims too.....and again, not taking considerations into the "back to back 5-11 seasons" is beyond shallow. Just sayin.....
If at first you dont succeed, skydiving is not for you. -
Odds that Shurmur getting us to the playoffs next year are WAY less than the odds that Mangini would have. This was ego, plain and simple.
Whoa. That's SERIOUSLY out on a limb, man. Mangini is smarter than Holmgren now? Holy crap, he's becoming the stuff of myth of back to back 5-11 seasons?
Wow.
Whoa. That's SERIOUSLY out on a limb, man. Mangini is smarter than Holmgren now?
Unless Holmgren is the next coach, that's not the question. The question: Is Mangini smarter than the guy Holmgren brings in next?
I think Mangini did the hard part. Changing the culture in an organization like this is no easy feat. Hacking your way through the QB problems of the last couple of years was no simple task. Whoever comes in next will have an easier time of it.
Woof Woof, Kathy http://cognitivemanifesto.com/ http://www.skadden.com/index.cfm?contentID=49&officeID=9 Bendix ESP -
Whoa. That's SERIOUSLY out on a limb, man. Mangini is smarter than Holmgren now? Holy crap, he's becoming the stuff of myth of back to back 5-11 seasons?
Wow.
Same thing as saying Mangini would never take the team any further doncha think? I can make outlandish claims too.....and again, not taking considerations into the "back to back 5-11 seasons" is beyond shallow. Just sayin.....
Same thing as saying Mangini would never take the team any further doncha think? I can make outlandish claims too.....and again, not taking considerations into the "back to back 5-11 seasons" is beyond shallow. Just sayin.....
now you are glossing over the fact that we went 5-11 back to back.
whether its now 'considerations' or 'reasons' its not that Mangini couldn't take them farther but whats next back to back 6-10 seasons.
hes gone because he didn't win, this team will continue to improve to a certain level provided their drafting continues to improve
if Mangini wins he stays.
At this point Mangini's still gonna get paid and said all the right things on his way out, tough business.
-
For folks in Mangini's corner, if our record is a lot better next year it will be because we had a much easier schedule. We'll never be able to get all of us to agree on much other than the Browns are the greatest NFL team ever, Pittsburgh fans suck donkey dangles, and WRREBEL really did sleep with Gruden.
Not true at all, at least where I am concerned. If the Browns DO in fact win more, ALONG WITH THE MANY OTHER FACTORS THAT SHOULD GO INTO IT, then I will concede and say "I was wrong and good for Holmgren and Shurmur" If we beat crappy azz teams, but get destroyed by any good team, our stats and others go down, other factors, I will say what I am saying now.
Not true at all, at least where I am concerned. If the Browns DO in fact win more, ALONG WITH THE MANY OTHER FACTORS THAT SHOULD GO INTO IT, then I will concede and say "I was wrong and good for Holmgren and Shurmur" If we beat crappy azz teams, but get destroyed by any good team, our stats and others go down, other factors, I will say what I am saying now.
That's more than fair. I think we think agree more than disagree. Using the Mangini logic, the new group has ~2 years to make a big difference and the measure of success should be a consistent winning record year in and year out, understanding that even great teams have a bad year every now and then, but quickly return to their winning ways. That is all I want for the Browns.
The era of slow, methodical forward progress over a number of years really doesn't exist in the NFL any more given parody, economics and fan expecttions. Even if we invest time, money and effort in great players, we won't be able to keep all of them so the real "art" in all of this is to keep a good core, develop younger players and have a knack for filling in the gaps, SUCCESSFULLY, year after year.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login