Skip to content

OK WORST BANDS OR ARTISTS EVER

Barber Shop Talk
31 20 3.0k
  • @kosar_for_president said:

    Believe me, as a musician I understand your point. I respect guitarists like Joe Satriani for their abilities, but I would rather get my toe nails out rather then listen to him.

    Amen.... I would rather listen to almost anything than stuff like Satriani, Vai, Malmsteen... it's like elevator music with cheesy over-processed guitar shredding over the top of it.

    shit said:

    Amen.... I would rather listen to almost anything than stuff like Satriani, Vai, Malmsteen... it's like elevator music with cheesy over-processed guitar shredding over the top of it.

    I'm sure your favorite artists are George Michael and Boy George, right mz the pussy? 😆

  • My Top 3 "worst Ever" bands/artists...

    1) Jackson 5

    2) Rap music in general

    3) Motley Crue

  • The ones that I hate are:

    Jonas Brothers

    Hannah Montana

    Naked Brothers Band

    Soulja Boy

  • 1. britney spears- do i even have to say why?

    2. sex pistols- bad vocals and whining crap

    3. bad company- all of there songs sound the same and are about the same thing.

    my list for the most overrated bands are:

    1. u2- they win grammy's every time another crap album comes out and for what reason? they are completely average in every way. at least the stones developed rock and roll a little more.

    2. pink floyd- i like have a cigar and comfortably numb but other than that it's not that good.

    3. the rolling stones- completely average in every way.

  • 1. britney spears- do i even have to say why?

    2. sex pistols- bad vocals and whining crap

    3. bad company- all of there songs sound the same and are about the same thing.

    my list for the most overrated bands are:

    1. u2- they win grammy's every time another crap album comes out and for what reason? they are completely average in every way. at least the stones developed rock and roll a little more.

    2. pink floyd- i like have a cigar and comfortably numb but other than that it's not that good.

    3. the rolling stones- completely average in every way.

    @clevelandfanforlife said:

    my list for the most overrated bands are:

    1. u2- they win grammy's every time another crap album comes out and for what reason? they are completely average in every way. at least the stones developed rock and roll a little more.

    2. pink floyd- i like have a cigar and comfortably numb but other than that it's not that good.

    3. the rolling stones- completely average in every way.

    i will have to disagree with u on 2 and 3. 2 and 3 played a huge part in shaping up the history of music and influencing people. They also innovated and dared to come up with different songs and sounds and vocal with it without caring for the ratings or the fans. Whether we find that music boring or crappy right now at that time they were original, innovative and provided people with the new tune that every body were curious for. Right now almost every song we hear sounds like we have heard that tune somewhere. The uniqueness is gone ...

  • @clevelandfanforlife said:

    my list for the most overrated bands are:

    1. u2- they win grammy's every time another crap album comes out and for what reason? they are completely average in every way. at least the stones developed rock and roll a little more.

    2. pink floyd- i like have a cigar and comfortably numb but other than that it's not that good.

    3. the rolling stones- completely average in every way.

    i will have to disagree with u on 2 and 3. 2 and 3 played a huge part in shaping up the history of music and influencing people. They also innovated and dared to come up with different songs and sounds and vocal with it without caring for the ratings or the fans. Whether we find that music boring or crappy right now at that time they were original, innovative and provided people with the new tune that every body were curious for. Right now almost every song we hear sounds like we have heard that tune somewhere. The uniqueness is gone ...

    @brownindian said:

    i will have to disagree with u on 2 and 3. 2 and 3 played a huge part in shaping up the history of music and influencing people. They also innovated and dared to come up with different songs and sounds and vocal with it without caring for the ratings or the fans. Whether we find that music boring or crappy right now at that time they were original, innovative and provided people with the new tune that every body were curious for. Right now almost every song we hear sounds like we have heard that tune somewhere. The uniqueness is gone ...

    i agree that they were influential, but i think there music is overrated. everyone knows the stones are average in every way. you can't really argue with that. they further advanced what the beatles set up, but there is no doubt that zeppelin and clapton can play circles around them there is nothing special about there abilities. floyd at least had good musicians, however i don't like their sound. it's probably because i've never smoked weed and just don't understand the whole mello rock thing.

  • @brownindian said:

    i will have to disagree with u on 2 and 3. 2 and 3 played a huge part in shaping up the history of music and influencing people. They also innovated and dared to come up with different songs and sounds and vocal with it without caring for the ratings or the fans. Whether we find that music boring or crappy right now at that time they were original, innovative and provided people with the new tune that every body were curious for. Right now almost every song we hear sounds like we have heard that tune somewhere. The uniqueness is gone ...

    i agree that they were influential, but i think there music is overrated. everyone knows the stones are average in every way. you can't really argue with that. they further advanced what the beatles set up, but there is no doubt that zeppelin and clapton can play circles around them there is nothing special about there abilities. floyd at least had good musicians, however i don't like their sound. it's probably because i've never smoked weed and just don't understand the whole mello rock thing.

    @clevelandfanforlife said:

    i agree that they were influential, but i think there music is overrated. everyone knows the stones are average in every way. you can't really argue with that. they further advanced what the beatles set up, but there is no doubt that zeppelin and clapton can play circles around them there is nothing special about there abilities. floyd at least had good musicians, however i don't like their sound. it's probably because i've never smoked weed and just don't understand the whole mello rock thing.

    Pink Floyd 'Animals" album is one of my all-time favorites. They also came to the old "world series of rock" at Cleveland Stadium on that tour...that was the first time I ever smelled weed. It seemed like everybody was smoking it (I was only 11 at the time).

  • All country music (with a one or two song exception), and anything spewed out by the Disney channel.

    Jonas Brothers for a 10 year-old girl? Sure. For my 38 year-old co-worker? NO.

  • Bands like aerosmith, and most of the big hair bands were punks and poseurs. It was more about strutting and posing. Jockin' off Zepplin.

    The Archies were pretty god awful and there was a band called the Birminghams, I think. They did" Kind of a drag". My friend and I once had a fight over me calling them queers.

    Capt. and tenielle (sp) Tony Orlando and Dawn.

    Annie Lennox scares the hell out of me! She doesn't blink!

    There's probably a ton of others.

  • AEROSMITH BY FAR!!!!!!!!!!!!! How that freak Steven Tyler hasn't died from a drug overdose is beyond me. Guys like Jim Morisson, Keith Moon, Jon Bonham, Bon Scott, and Jim Hendrix die from drugs and alcohol and yet Steven Tyler lives. It's just not fair.