Who Do You Got? First Pick #6 Overall
-
Surprized by the Peterson votes, i wouldnt mind him as well if Green is gone...I also like Von Miller alot and think he is going to be great at the next level...I absouletly love the idea of a trade down if Green is gone and we can acquire more picks, i just hope we dont do what Mangini did when we trade back and dont have anything to show for it, i think Heckert is alot smarter than that
-
Who would crap their pants if we drafted Cam Newton?
-
Everyone. I would be so xxxxing pissed.
-
I just have this feeling now that if we address WR, we don't do it with the first pick. Holmgren talked in his latest press interview that everyone is talking about us needing a "blazer" at WR and that our current guys are not as slow as people lead on and that there is not much speed in the draft anyway. I think this means he doesn't take Green who ran a 4.45, which is about what Robo and MoMass ran. I also just have this feeling that he really doesn't like any of the top guys on the D-Line due to them being one year wonders and what not. I honestly feel like H&H's goal is to trade back a few spots and either take Jones (one of the fastest WR's in the draft running at 4.39) or they take a guy like Cameron Jordan or J.J. Watt who are plays that have had multiple years of production and good senior bowls.
I ended up picking Peterson for our pick at 6 because I feel like he is the only player we would take at 6, possible Miller, but even then I think we trade back.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
I just have this feeling now that if we address WR, we don't do it with the first pick. Holmgren talked in his latest press interview that everyone is talking about us needing a "blazer" at WR and that our current guys are not as slow as people lead on and that there is not much speed in the draft anyway. I think this means he doesn't take Green who ran a 4.45, which is about what Robo and MoMass ran. I also just have this feeling that he really doesn't like any of the top guys on the D-Line due to them being one year wonders and what not. I honestly feel like H&H's goal is to trade back a few spots and either take Jones (one of the fastest WR's in the draft running at 4.39) or they take a guy like Cameron Jordan or J.J. Watt who are plays that have had multiple years of production and good senior bowls.
I ended up picking Peterson for our pick at 6 because I feel like he is the only player we would take at 6, possible Miller, but even then I think we trade back.
If Green is there, He will be a Brown.
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
I just have this feeling now that if we address WR, we don't do it with the first pick. Holmgren talked in his latest press interview that everyone is talking about us needing a "blazer" at WR and that our current guys are not as slow as people lead on and that there is not much speed in the draft anyway. I think this means he doesn't take Green who ran a 4.45, which is about what Robo and MoMass ran. I also just have this feeling that he really doesn't like any of the top guys on the D-Line due to them being one year wonders and what not. I honestly feel like H&H's goal is to trade back a few spots and either take Jones (one of the fastest WR's in the draft running at 4.39) or they take a guy like Cameron Jordan or J.J. Watt who are plays that have had multiple years of production and good senior bowls.
I ended up picking Peterson for our pick at 6 because I feel like he is the only player we would take at 6, possible Miller, but even then I think we trade back.
If Green is there, He will be a Brown.
If Green is there, He will be a Brown.
I'm just going off my gut, I wouldn't be mad in the slightest if we drafted him.
-
I just have this feeling now that if we address WR, we don't do it with the first pick. Holmgren talked in his latest press interview that everyone is talking about us needing a "blazer" at WR and that our current guys are not as slow as people lead on and that there is not much speed in the draft anyway. I think this means he doesn't take Green who ran a 4.45, which is about what Robo and MoMass ran. I also just have this feeling that he really doesn't like any of the top guys on the D-Line due to them being one year wonders and what not. I honestly feel like H&H's goal is to trade back a few spots and either take Jones (one of the fastest WR's in the draft running at 4.39) or they take a guy like Cameron Jordan or J.J. Watt who are plays that have had multiple years of production and good senior bowls.
I ended up picking Peterson for our pick at 6 because I feel like he is the only player we would take at 6, possible Miller, but even then I think we trade back.
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
I just have this feeling now that if we address WR, we don't do it with the first pick. Holmgren talked in his latest press interview that everyone is talking about us needing a "blazer" at WR and that our current guys are not as slow as people lead on and that there is not much speed in the draft anyway.
predraft talk 101: presidents, gms and hcs say the darndest things prior to the draft. it's all by design to confuse the other teams and not show their hand.
-
This poll included guys that were not likely to be there when the Browns pick.
I chose Fairly because he was one of the choices, though I doubt he will fall to the Browns at #6.
-
Hillis-iz-Boss said:
I just have this feeling now that if we address WR, we don't do it with the first pick. Holmgren talked in his latest press interview that everyone is talking about us needing a "blazer" at WR and that our current guys are not as slow as people lead on and that there is not much speed in the draft anyway.
predraft talk 101: presidents, gms and hcs say the darndest things prior to the draft. it's all by design to confuse the other teams and not show their hand.
predraft talk 101: presidents, gms and hcs say the darndest things prior to the draft. it's all by design to confuse the other teams and not show their hand.
You could have saved us the time by calling it a smokescreen
-
This poll included guys that were not likely to be there when the Browns pick.
I chose Fairly because he was one of the choices, though I doubt he will fall to the Browns at #6.
This poll included guys that were not likely to be there when the Browns pick.
I chose Fairly because he was one of the choices, though I doubt he will fall to the Browns at #6.
I'm not sure. Its actually beginning to look like Fairley could very well be there at the 6.
I dont really care, he's the better player vs. Dareus at DT anyways.
-
predraft talk 101: presidents, gms and hcs say the darndest things prior to the draft. it's all by design to confuse the other teams and not show their hand.
You could have saved us the time by calling it a smokescreen
You could have saved us the time by calling it a smokescreen
but i wanted to be more creative than that lol.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login