Total Qbr(Mccoy And Anderson)
-
Total QBR is a completely different system to rate quarterbacks, and here's the scale:
75-100 Excellent Quarterback
60-75 Good Quarterback
50-60 Average Quarterback
0-35 Poor Quarterback
McCoy ranked in the 50s and was rated as average. Anderson was ranked poorly and in the late 20s in 2008. (On an interesting note, Anderson's rare supposedly good game against Giants in 2008 wasn't even that good. He ranked average that game with a rating of 56.5)
-
I don't think there's enough data on McCoy to support any rating at this point in time...
He played only due to injuries to the other QB's last year and then got injured himself.....
IMO the book is still out on him.... Anderson has enough data in his resume to form conclusive ratings and truthfully his rating is about where I'd slot him just from observing him play... I'm glad we have Colt instead of Anderson...
Peace
T.Dawg
-
Total QBR is a completely different system to rate quarterbacks, and here's the scale:
75-100 Excellent Quarterback
60-75 Good Quarterback
50-60 Average Quarterback
0-35 Poor Quarterback
McCoy ranked in the 50s and was rated as average. Anderson was ranked poorly and in the late 20s in 2008. (On an interesting note, Anderson's rare supposedly good game against Giants in 2008 wasn't even that good. He ranked average that game with a rating of 56.5)
Total QBR is a completely different system to rate quarterbacks, and here's the scale:
75-100 Excellent Quarterback
60-75 Good Quarterback
50-60 Average Quarterback
0-35 Poor Quarterback
McCoy ranked in the 50s and was rated as average. Anderson was ranked poorly and in the late 20s in 2008. (On an interesting note, Anderson's rare supposedly good game against Giants in 2008 wasn't even that good. He ranked average that game with a rating of 56.5)
Question: where are the rankings per this rating system for all the QBs in the league.
Also, have they gone back and applied this system to all the QBs in history? They have done this for the "Passer rating" statistic:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htm
"Old time" QBs don't fare that well under the "passer rating" system, because, I believe, it is biased toward the game as played more recently. Does this "Total QBR" even the playing field?
-
I find it interesting that Colt was higher than Sam Bradford. It is encouraging to see him score this high as a rookie.
also, what are you if you score 35-49??
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login