Skip to content

Green Bay & New Orleans

The Browns Board
31 14 1.7k
  • Amazing. I'm in two fantasy leagues, one here, and one - a friend's - on ESPN...

    and I picked first in both. Very amazing. Excellent offensive game to watch.

    I picked Rodgers in both leagues, forgoing the bigtime rb's....

    I was hoping for even another TD throwing the ball in the last ten minutes, to Driver, but it didn't happen. GGG

  • I still can't believe the final play of that game.... up the middle with Ingram??

  • I still can't believe the final play of that game.... up the middle with Ingram??

    @hx214 said:

    I still can't believe the final play of that game.... up the middle with Ingram??

    Not like it really matters. They probably wanted to see what Ingram could do at the goal line in a gametime situation. If he scores or someone else scores they still lose. Coaches aren't coaching for the fantasy football base.

  • @hx214 said:

    I still can't believe the final play of that game.... up the middle with Ingram??

    Not like it really matters. They probably wanted to see what Ingram could do at the goal line in a gametime situation. If he scores or someone else scores they still lose. Coaches aren't coaching for the fantasy football base.

    Homotron said:

    Not like it really matters. They probably wanted to see what Ingram could do at the goal line in a gametime situation. If he scores or someone else scores they still lose. Coaches aren't coaching for the fantasy football base.

    Uh, did you watch the game? If they scored there they are down by 2, which means if they convert on the 2pt try they go into OT. really seems like you didn't.

    they should have passed or went in shotgun or something, it was the last play of the game(unless OT of course), so running it up the gut on 1st and goal was much less likely to work than a pass would have.

    either way great exciting opening game. both the teams look primed for an NFC championship game. I won't be surprised at all if the Packers repeat, nor will I be surprised if the Saints win it all either.

  • Homotron said:

    Not like it really matters. They probably wanted to see what Ingram could do at the goal line in a gametime situation. If he scores or someone else scores they still lose. Coaches aren't coaching for the fantasy football base.

    Uh, did you watch the game? If they scored there they are down by 2, which means if they convert on the 2pt try they go into OT. really seems like you didn't.

    they should have passed or went in shotgun or something, it was the last play of the game(unless OT of course), so running it up the gut on 1st and goal was much less likely to work than a pass would have.

    either way great exciting opening game. both the teams look primed for an NFC championship game. I won't be surprised at all if the Packers repeat, nor will I be surprised if the Saints win it all either.

    @beefjerky said:

    Uh, did you watch the game? If they scored there they are down by 2, which means if they convert on the 2pt try they go into OT. really seems like you didn't.

    they should have passed or went in shotgun or something, it was the last play of the game(unless OT of course), so running it up the gut on 1st and goal was much less likely to work than a pass would have.

    either way great exciting opening game. both the teams look primed for an NFC championship game. I won't be surprised at all if the Packers repeat, nor will I be surprised if the Saints win it all either.

    Yes I watched the game and when they took that run with Ingram there was less than 3 seconds left on the clock. Throwing a pass or taking a run is going to wipe the clock no matter what. GAME OVER. You might as well try Ingram in a game time situation at the goal line against a great defensive front.

    EDIT: Nevermind. I'm a dip sh.it. I guess they figured Ingram is an Ox and he'd force his way in there, especially with their offensive line. Definitely a interesting call and probably the wrong call.

  • Homotron said:

    If he scores or someone else scores they still lose.

    All that needs to be said to invalidate everything you just said in an attempt to save face. You also worded it as if it were garbage time points "fantasy football base".

    Man up and admit you didn't watch it or were wrong.

  • Homotron said:

    If he scores or someone else scores they still lose.

    All that needs to be said to invalidate everything you just said in an attempt to save face. You also worded it as if it were garbage time points "fantasy football base".

    Man up and admit you didn't watch it or were wrong.

    @beefjerky said:

    All that needs to be said to invalidate everything you just said in an attempt to save face. You also worded it as if it were garbage time points "fantasy football base".

    Man up and admit you didn't watch it or were wrong.

    See edit. I watched the whole game. I for whatever reason thought they were down by more than 8. I still can't say I hate Ingram with Jahari Evans leading the way at the goal line. Especially considering the pass rush the Packers were getting all game. I guess they figured that because Ingram is so strong he'd bully his way in there but clearly he didn't. There isn't a lot of ground to cover for those LB's and their really fast cb's. It's a hell of a lot more difficult to score passing or throwing that close to the goal line, especially against a top defensive front. Gamble failed.

  • If I'm on the one yard line and I just watched my QB march down the field for 80 yards in 50 seconds I'd have to be sure he has the ball in his hands for the last play of the game.... Didn't seem to have trouble passing the ball into the endzone from the 3 yard line on the previous drive...

    Raji pretty much had the middle on lock down...Power I up the middle with a rook into the teeth of the defense is about the last thing I was expecting. Maybe that's why they did it? Or maybe they took a play out of Daboll's playbook..

  • It surely was one of those "well, they figure we will try a bootleg after we act like it's a run right up the gut, so

    we will run it right up the gut and surprise them".... LOL The GB defense guessed right. In a different formation, they could have

    baited them into not going all out to stop that run.

    The Browns would have gotten the TD. GGG

  • Sportscasters are beating that play call to death this morning. Bottom line is that no play ALWAYS works. Had it worked, what would they talk about today? To me, the turning point in this game was Cobb's TD return. He did a "flip", came down on his feet & went the distance. What enabled him to flip was a "shoulder" tackle. Had the tackler wrapped him up, or attempted to, I don't think that's a TD & the outcome may have been different. Oh well, I'm glad the Packers won....I do pull for them UNLESS they're playing the Browns.

    Mike

    ps: Calfoxwc really wanted the Browns to draft Cobb...he looks pretty good, doesn't he?

  • Play call was fine. GB executed NO didn't. If you can't get one yard well then your gonna lose. NO passed on a 3rd and short earlier and it didn't work.

  • Um...there was NO time on the clock for that last play homo....3 secs werevleft on the PI in the endzone. But u watched it tho...lmao

  • What a great game and what a great way to kick off the season.

    2 things about the end of that game:

    How TERRIBLE was that PI call? That was a great play on the ball alone and nothing but the ball

    Second, why would you throw Ingram into that Packers' D on the last play of the game? Brees had been on fire that entire drive and I just had the feeling he would've put it in the утвящтую

    all in all a great game to watch

  • endzone not утвящту lol... damn russian keyboard

  • ps: Calfoxwc really wanted the Browns to draft Cobb...he looks pretty good, doesn't he? Canton Mike

    ******************************

    I really did. Maybe he'll become a FA in a few years. He and Gregg Little would have been a great tandem imho.

    I just don't know who I would have exchanged for Cobb that the Browns DID draft. "sigh"

  • Zombo said:

    No, it didn't matter ... it was just the ballgame. And perhaps homefield advantage in the NFC Championship. whne they are freezing their asses off in Grenn Bay in january they can remember Homotron "Not like it really matters".

    Zombo

    Once again I edited my previous post the night I made it. You're way late to this party SOOO you had to have seen my notation of a ABOVE edit. You just chose not to read it.

  • Zombo said:

    You said it. You believed it at te time. What are so sensitive about? None of thought you were that bright anyway.

    Zombo

    I watched the whole game but I wasn't paying extraordinary attention to the score board on that final drive. I was tied up in a FF trade discussion and watching the game behind my lap top. I thought the Saints were down more than 2 scores. Simple mistake and one that I corrected with a edit and a follow up post. I find it amusing that you even addressed my blunder,CONSIDERING I corrected myself well before you made a post. I don't know that it's my intelligence that needs addressed but rather yours. Pulling at straws.

  • Zombo said:

    You said it. You believed it at te time. What are so sensitive about? None of thought you were that bright anyway.

    Zombo

    I watched the whole game but I wasn't paying extraordinary attention to the score board on that final drive. I was tied up in a FF trade discussion and watching the game behind my lap top. I thought the Saints were down more than 2 scores. Simple mistake and one that I corrected with a edit and a follow up post. I find it amusing that you even addressed my blunder,CONSIDERING I corrected myself well before you made a post. I don't know that it's my intelligence that needs addressed but rather yours. Pulling at straws.

    Homotron said:

    I watched the whole game but I wasn't paying extraordinary attention to the score board on that final drive. I was tied up in a FF trade discussion and watching the game behind my lap top. I thought the Saints were down more than 2 scores. Simple mistake and one that I corrected with a edit and a follow up post. I find it amusing that you even addressed my blunder,CONSIDERING I corrected myself well before you made a post. I don't know that it's my intelligence that needs addressed but rather yours. Pulling at straws.

    He's not pulling at straws. It's just funny that you can't ever admit mistakes. Even though you were corrected by several others, you act like you edited your post right away and were therefore somehow never wrong. Just grow a pair and admit that you were a wrong..

  • What a great game and what a great way to kick off the season.

    2 things about the end of that game:

    How TERRIBLE was that PI call? That was a great play on the ball alone and nothing but the ball

    Second, why would you throw Ingram into that Packers' D on the last play of the game? Brees had been on fire that entire drive and I just had the feeling he would've put it in the утвящтую

    all in all a great game to watch

    @blowe said:

    How TERRIBLE was that PI call? That was a great play on the ball alone and nothing but the ball

    You know what, I forgot to even mention this before...

    I don't even think Hawk touched Sproles as he jumped for the ball. At full speed when it happened I thought for sure it was just a desperation attempt to make sure they didn't score on the play, but after watching the replay I think it was legit and a heck of a play on Hawk's part.

    The only thing I was thinking was if their is something in the rule about going over the back of a receiver to block a pass. Not really sure though.

  • Bringback brownie you're a special kind of dense. I edited my post immediately and admitted at least twice I was wrong. I'm on my phone now waiting for a conert to start so unless someone edited one of my posts for me the guy that mentioned my blunder should know full well I edited the xxxxing thing immediately. Some of you are hilariously unbelieveable.