Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Draft Status

Draft Status

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
22 Posts 15 Posters 1.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Aloysius ?
    • Posts
    • 0 Reputation
    ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Ha. They could actually use another wide receiver, considering how they traded Roy Williams to Dallas (that trade looks incredible for them, by the way).

    I was hoping Seattle would win today so that both they and Oakland would be behind us in the draft order. Both teams could use a true #1 receiver. We probably could use that to get a ton of picks out of Crazy Al.

    But now I'm guessing that Seattle will take Crabtree, unless they go LT or absolutely fall in love with Taylor Mays.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • JewDago J
      • 837 Posts
      • 0 Reputation
      J JewDago wrote on last edited by
      #8

      mays is definitely looking like an option for them. their new HC, jim mora, jr., is a former DB coach and one of their current safeties is brian russell, who's been looking like the player we expected him to be when we released him.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • PlaygroundLegend PlaygroundLegendP
        • 927 Posts
        • 4 Reputation
        PlaygroundLegendP PlaygroundLegend wrote on last edited by
        #9

        I think we should trade down to picks 7-12 and get an additional 2nd round pick

        ? P 2 Replies Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Earle E
          • 181 Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          E Earle wrote on last edited by
          #10

          we need a linebacker first and overall

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • PlaygroundLegendP PlaygroundLegend

            I think we should trade down to picks 7-12 and get an additional 2nd round pick

            mz. ?
            • Posts
            • 0 Reputation
            ? mz. wrote on last edited by
            #11

            @playgroundlegend said:

            I think we should trade down to picks 7-12 and get an additional 2nd round pick

            I was thinking the very same thing.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • ? Guest

              @playgroundlegend said:

              I think we should trade down to picks 7-12 and get an additional 2nd round pick

              I was thinking the very same thing.

              BigBrownsFan B
              • 534 Posts
              • 6 Reputation
              B BigBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
              #12

              mz. said:

              I was thinking the very same thing.

              Not a bad idea. Trade Derek Anderson to the Jets for their 3rd round pick in 2009 and a 4th in 2010, since it looks like Favre might hang it up. Since the Lions need a WR, trade Edwards back to Michigan where he belongs for the Lions 3rd Round pick in 2009 and 2010. Then, take the two third round picks in 2009, trade them to get back into the bottom of Round 1. We trade down a bit in the 7 to 10 range, grab Aaron Curry or Mauluga and then grab Shon Greene in the bottom of the first round as well.

              Then go get ourselves a WR in the 2nd or sign someone like Anquin Boldin.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • J JewDago

                mays is definitely looking like an option for them. their new HC, jim mora, jr., is a former DB coach and one of their current safeties is brian russell, who's been looking like the player we expected him to be when we released him.

                Aloysius ?
                • Posts
                • 0 Reputation
                ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @jewdago said:

                mays is definitely looking like an option for them. their new HC, jim mora, jr., is a former DB coach and one of their current safeties is brian russell, who's been looking like the player we expected him to be when we released him.

                Another interesting scenario for them would be if Sam Bradford declares and Detroit passes on him, either because they've signed Cassel or because they want a guy who can start right away (Bradford's age (21) may be a concern to some teams).

                Given that Hasselbeck is aging and is only under contract for two more seasons, do the Seahawks take Bradford and let him sit on the sidelines for a year or two? Mora may want to fill more immediate needs, but I could see him going after a young QB who will give him a shot at long-term success, something Michael Vick screwed him out of in Atlanta.

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Earle E
                  • 181 Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  E Earle wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Mora jr. has the pedigree to get the job done if needed, his problems in atlanta stemmed from Vick.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • ? Guest

                    @jewdago said:

                    mays is definitely looking like an option for them. their new HC, jim mora, jr., is a former DB coach and one of their current safeties is brian russell, who's been looking like the player we expected him to be when we released him.

                    Another interesting scenario for them would be if Sam Bradford declares and Detroit passes on him, either because they've signed Cassel or because they want a guy who can start right away (Bradford's age (21) may be a concern to some teams).

                    Given that Hasselbeck is aging and is only under contract for two more seasons, do the Seahawks take Bradford and let him sit on the sidelines for a year or two? Mora may want to fill more immediate needs, but I could see him going after a young QB who will give him a shot at long-term success, something Michael Vick screwed him out of in Atlanta.

                    dencyguy D
                    • 481 Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    D dencyguy wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Aloysius said:

                    Another interesting scenario for them would be if Sam Bradford declares and Detroit passes on him, either because they've signed Cassel or because they want a guy who can start right away (Bradford's age (21) may be a concern to some teams).

                    Given that Hasselbeck is aging and is only under contract for two more seasons, do the Seahawks take Bradford and let him sit on the sidelines for a year or two? Mora may want to fill more immediate needs, but I could see him going after a young QB who will give him a shot at long-term success, something Michael Vick screwed him out of in Atlanta.

                    Detroit might be wary of Bradford's age, but they already have the dictionary definition of "placeholder" (Jon Kitna) already on the roster, assuming they can convince him to get over his hurt feelings about the whole IR thing.

                    As for Mora, I dunno. Vick was a lousy QB, but it might help if I could remember anything about his tenure as head coach. He's kind of like Pete Carroll had he not gone to USC--you seem to remember that he used to coach somewhere, but that's about it.

                    Dennis

                    Y 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • D dencyguy

                      Aloysius said:

                      Another interesting scenario for them would be if Sam Bradford declares and Detroit passes on him, either because they've signed Cassel or because they want a guy who can start right away (Bradford's age (21) may be a concern to some teams).

                      Given that Hasselbeck is aging and is only under contract for two more seasons, do the Seahawks take Bradford and let him sit on the sidelines for a year or two? Mora may want to fill more immediate needs, but I could see him going after a young QB who will give him a shot at long-term success, something Michael Vick screwed him out of in Atlanta.

                      Detroit might be wary of Bradford's age, but they already have the dictionary definition of "placeholder" (Jon Kitna) already on the roster, assuming they can convince him to get over his hurt feelings about the whole IR thing.

                      As for Mora, I dunno. Vick was a lousy QB, but it might help if I could remember anything about his tenure as head coach. He's kind of like Pete Carroll had he not gone to USC--you seem to remember that he used to coach somewhere, but that's about it.

                      Dennis

                      YtownBrownsBacker Y
                      • 2k Posts
                      • 0 Reputation
                      Y YtownBrownsBacker wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @dencyguy said:

                      Detroit might be wary of Bradford's age, but they already have the dictionary definition of "placeholder" (Jon Kitna) already on the roster, assuming they can convince him to get over his hurt feelings about the whole IR thing.

                      As for Mora, I dunno. Vick was a lousy QB, but it might help if I could remember anything about his tenure as head coach. He's kind of like Pete Carroll had he not gone to USC--you seem to remember that he used to coach somewhere, but that's about it.

                      Dennis

                      Detriot KC, St Louis, Minn, Jets and Seattle all should be looking QB for next year. Cassell goes to the biggest spender. If Bradford comes out we have a harder time getting something decent for Anderson.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • TRU STatus TRU STatusT
                        • 51 Posts
                        • 2 Reputation
                        TRU STatusT TRU STatus wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        I thought we did not have a 2nd round pick this year because of the cory williams trade. I could be wrong but i did hear that today on WTAM

                        **************************************************************** I don't care who the QB is as long as we are WINNING!!!!!!! 0-0 Start fresh and go from there!!! Dan
                        ballpeenB 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • TRU STatusT TRU STatus

                          I thought we did not have a 2nd round pick this year because of the cory williams trade. I could be wrong but i did hear that today on WTAM

                          ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 9k Posts
                          • 2k Reputation
                          ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by ballpeen
                          #18

                          @tru-status said:

                          I thought we did not have a 2nd round pick this year because of the cory williams trade. I could be wrong but i did hear that today on WTAM

                          Here is a link everybody needs to keep and study for a week(i will test you next week;))

                          With draft season here, we need to know what we have and stop talking what we have and don't have.

                          http://www.draftinsiders.com/node/35

                          If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • PlaygroundLegendP PlaygroundLegend

                            I think we should trade down to picks 7-12 and get an additional 2nd round pick

                            Pumpkin Eater P
                            • 4k Posts
                            • 297 Reputation
                            P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            @playgroundlegend said:

                            I think we should trade down to picks 7-12 and get an additional 2nd round pick

                            me too.

                            :neutral_face:
                            2 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • P Pumpkin Eater

                              @playgroundlegend said:

                              I think we should trade down to picks 7-12 and get an additional 2nd round pick

                              me too.

                              2yy4u 2
                              • 55 Posts
                              • 0 Reputation
                              2 2yy4u wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              @pumpkin-eater said:

                              me too.

                              That's great in theory...but who is gonna trade us?

                              P 1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • 2 2yy4u

                                @pumpkin-eater said:

                                me too.

                                That's great in theory...but who is gonna trade us?

                                Pumpkin Eater P
                                • 4k Posts
                                • 297 Reputation
                                P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                @2yy4u said:

                                That's great in theory...but who is gonna trade us?

                                someone with a presssing need.

                                :neutral_face:
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • KardiacKid26 K
                                  • 140 Posts
                                  • 0 Reputation
                                  K KardiacKid26 wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  Keep our pick at 5. Don't trade. With the 5th overall pick, we'll end up getting one of the two linebackers. In the second round we get a corner or runningback. Hopefully we can get a good exchange for Anderson and/or Winslow. Does anyone know what rounds we do and don't have? I know we traded a 7th for travis daniels and i think a 3rd for Martin Rucker.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  Theme
                                  • System
                                  • Light
                                  • Dark
                                  The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                  The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Forums
                                  • Recent
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Donate