Bench Mccoy.....
-
God damn there some effing idiots on this board. Bench McCoy lol. Good lord, have you ever done anything other than fantasy football? This isn't Madden.
Like I said...they should bench him before he gets killed....I'm sure I've forgotten more about football than you'll ever know....loser.
Like I said...they should bench him before he gets killed....I'm sure I've forgotten more about football than you'll ever know....loser.
you call me a loser. its simple. you talk a little shit, I talk a little shit. Im not really too bothered by anything on here. just shooting the breeze and talking. aall in good fun for me. You dont just bench a QB because he's seeing pressure or getting hit alot. You leave him in to work through his progressions and win the game. If the Browns would have pulled McCoy when you said they should have, it would have made no sense. Thats why they left him in the game. Its like they know something you dont.
-
Can we complain about McCoy when we DON'T win.
Can we complain about McCoy when we DON'T win.
thank you
-
Obvious douchebag is obvious.
Colts not the best, but he's the best we got.
Which sucks.
-
I have a hard time believing Wallace is worse than noodles. System familiarity, experience reading defenses, much better arm....
This offenses is hard to watch
I have a hard time believing Wallace is worse than noodles. System familiarity, experience reading defenses, much better arm....
This offenses is hard to watch
Everyone already knows Wallace is a career backup. Let colt prove whether he is the guy, or another backup. I like colt, I personally hate Rat Turdmur.
-
I just think they're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Colt proved he was a capable QB last year in Daboll's shit system.
Now we get new people in and a new system and Colt looks awful week after week. I mean, use your heads...it's not a brainbuster. Colt, no matter what it looks like on paper, isnt a fit for this offensive system.
He was a winner in high school and college in the Spread. Not in the WCO. In the WCO, he's a loser.
-
I just think they're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Colt proved he was a capable QB last year in Daboll's shit system.
Now we get new people in and a new system and Colt looks awful week after week. I mean, use your heads...it's not a brainbuster. Colt, no matter what it looks like on paper, isnt a fit for this offensive system.
He was a winner in high school and college in the Spread. Not in the WCO. In the WCO, he's a loser.
He was a winner in high school and college in the Spread. Not in the WCO. In the WCO, he's a loser.
Yet he managed to win today.
That scramble by him for the long first down @ 7 mins left in the game was brilliant and probably saved the game.
As much as folks want to hate on him, there's no quit in that kid. He's out there battling and not blaming it on anyone else when he'd be more than justified in doing so.
Oh, and just so we're clear, Colt is on pace for a 2/1 TD/INT ratio this season. Obviously, see how it plays out and all, but he's not doing as awful as people want to claim, especially considering the problems with the O-line, lack of receivers, and absolutely no running game. Hardesty couldn't break 100 yards on 30+ carries? L.O.L.
-
If I've said it once i've said it a hundred times. Colt isn't the next Manning, and idk if he has a future as an NFL starting QB. But there's ABSOLUTELY O% percent chance with the refusal to slide protection for the blitz and frankly the worst offensive play-calling I've seen in by the browns in 6-7 years for Colt to succeed. I also mean this seriously when i say even Manning would have limited success under this He's making his progressions just fine, but when 3 guys are running routes being covered by 7-8 guys, there's no chance you can complete passes. I actually think half of Colts passes is an understanding that the play isn't there and throwing it away to be honest. Shurmer is in way over his head with both responsibilities. The coach is about 80% more to blame for that garbage offense than the players.
-
Did he look as bad on TV as he did in person? He missed Jordan Cameron running down field wide open a couple time's. There were alot of big plays down field to be had but he never see's them. He locks onto his primary receiver and if he's not open he panic's. I don't see play calling as the problem at all, its the execution that's killing us. If guys are open (and they are) its the QB's job to find them. On a positive note though, how bout that D. Seattle was inside the 10 with first down and we stop them 3 consecutive plays until a personal foul penalty and they get a first down inside the 5. Then we hold them to a field goal, that was awesome.
-
Did he look as bad on TV as he did in person? He missed Jordan Cameron running down field wide open a couple time's. There were alot of big plays down field to be had but he never see's them. He locks onto his primary receiver and if he's not open he panic's. I don't see play calling as the problem at all, its the execution that's killing us. If guys are open (and they are) its the QB's job to find them. On a positive note though, how bout that D. Seattle was inside the 10 with first down and we stop them 3 consecutive plays until a personal foul penalty and they get a first down inside the 5. Then we hold them to a field goal, that was awesome.
Did he look as bad on TV as he did in person? He missed Jordan Cameron running down field wide open a couple time's. There were alot of big plays down field to be had but he never see's them. He locks onto his primary receiver and if he's not open he panic's. I don't see play calling as the problem at all, its the execution that's killing us. If guys are open (and they are) its the QB's job to find them. On a positive note though, how bout that D. Seattle was inside the 10 with first down and we stop them 3 consecutive plays until a personal foul penalty and they get a first down inside the 5. Then we hold them to a field goal, that was awesome.
I'm not just flat-calling you wrong so don't take it that way, but I couldn't disagree with you more about guys being open. Sure guys were and Colt found them then, but that was maybe 30% of the throws. the other 70% was the same garbage play calling where the CB would press and the LB was there to help in the middle.
-
Im not saying there was guys open every play, there never is. But there were alot of play's that could'a been made that weren't. Being at the game, you get to see the whole field and not just the guy he's throwing to. Many time's he had guy's wide open and doesn't bother to go through the progression to see it and throws to his first read that is double covered.
-
overall he looked better...
one play that stood out to me. 3rd and 7 i think, cribbs and little run doublt slants to mccoys left. cribbs is 3 yards ahead of little and wide open, little has blanket coverage and just makes a flat out great catch and run to get the extra yards for the 1st.
the int to moore? when he gonna learn he cant beat double coverage by underthrowing his receivers....
still, a little progress is better than none.
-
If I've said it once i've said it a hundred times. Colt isn't the next Manning, and idk if he has a future as an NFL starting QB. But there's ABSOLUTELY O% percent chance with the refusal to slide protection for the blitz and frankly the worst offensive play-calling I've seen in by the browns in 6-7 years for Colt to succeed. I also mean this seriously when i say even Manning would have limited success under this He's making his progressions just fine, but when 3 guys are running routes being covered by 7-8 guys, there's no chance you can complete passes. I actually think half of Colts passes is an understanding that the play isn't there and throwing it away to be honest. Shurmer is in way over his head with both responsibilities. The coach is about 80% more to blame for that garbage offense than the players.
If I've said it once i've said it a hundred times. Colt isn't the next Manning, and idk if he has a future as an NFL starting QB. But there's ABSOLUTELY O% percent chance with the refusal to slide protection for the blitz and frankly the worst offensive play-calling I've seen in by the browns in 6-7 years for Colt to succeed. I also mean this seriously when i say even Manning would have limited success under this He's making his progressions just fine, but when 3 guys are running routes being covered by 7-8 guys, there's no chance you can complete passes. I actually think half of Colts passes is an understanding that the play isn't there and throwing it away to be honest. Shurmer is in way over his head with both responsibilities. The coach is about 80% more to blame for that garbage offense than the players.
Now....this is exactly how I see it. You could put Peyton Manning, Drew Brees, Joe Montana back there, and you would get the same crap. This is not Mccoy's fault.
-
Not going to judge him 14 games into his career playing for a team well into their second stretch to be in the top three for an all decade worst team
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login