First Big Name Attached To Browns *trade*
-
@mike-h said:
No, that is speculation. A media person hearing "rumblings" is a media person stirring the pot.
The only reason it becomes a rumor is because of people's inability to differentiate the two.
It is an unlikely speculation.
A media person hearing "rumblings" is at the very least a media person STARTING a rumor in order to stir the pot and make a story. It is said media person saying "hey this is what I heard." Rumor. Speculation and opinion are what we have all been doing on this board. Speculating on what the Browns might give up to get him, opinion on if the trade would be worth it or not. Is this too hard for you to rap your head around?
-
Shut up, girls.
-
Shut up, girls.
Shut up, girls.
Sexists
-
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Wouldn't be a bad move at all, The guy is shifty and tough. Certainly more proven than a new rookie and the pick cost to us is not that huge.
Decent idea.
First, let me disclose that I'm a Texan fan.
Second, I would like your OPINION on whether Tate is worth swapping first round picks, your 4th for our 26th. You would get a tough and effective runner who has already adjusted to NFL speed and thus is less risky than a draftee. Then you still keep a first round pick to use for other needs which don't require a 4th pick. For us, it puts us in position to draft Blackman to fill a need for a #2 receiver and potential replacement for #1 when Andre Johnson retires or slows down.
This is SPECULATION, not a rumor.
Thank you for your time.
-
i'd probly do it. if our FO is even considering TR at #4, then tate would still be the better option. there's still many good players at 26....
you'd probly have to throw in a prospect or 2 tho....see julio jones trade last year.
-
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Wouldn't be a bad move at all, The guy is shifty and tough. Certainly more proven than a new rookie and the pick cost to us is not that huge.
Decent idea.
First, let me disclose that I'm a Texan fan.
Second, I would like your OPINION on whether Tate is worth swapping first round picks, your 4th for our 26th. You would get a tough and effective runner who has already adjusted to NFL speed and thus is less risky than a draftee. Then you still keep a first round pick to use for other needs which don't require a 4th pick. For us, it puts us in position to draft Blackman to fill a need for a #2 receiver and potential replacement for #1 when Andre Johnson retires or slows down.
This is SPECULATION, not a rumor.
Thank you for your time.
First, let me disclose that I'm a Texan fan.
Second, I would like your OPINION on whether Tate is worth swapping first round picks, your 4th for our 26th. You would get a tough and effective runner who has already adjusted to NFL speed and thus is less risky than a draftee. Then you still keep a first round pick to use for other needs which don't require a 4th pick. For us, it puts us in position to draft Blackman to fill a need for a #2 receiver and potential replacement for #1 when Andre Johnson retires or slows down.
This is SPECULATION, not a rumor.
Thank you for your time.
Hey Mike 🥷
-
No way id do it. Now i might consider it if you had a top 12 pick, but 4 to 26 is too far for me. Nice thinkin tho.
-
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Wouldn't be a bad move at all, The guy is shifty and tough. Certainly more proven than a new rookie and the pick cost to us is not that huge.
Decent idea.
First, let me disclose that I'm a Texan fan.
Second, I would like your OPINION on whether Tate is worth swapping first round picks, your 4th for our 26th. You would get a tough and effective runner who has already adjusted to NFL speed and thus is less risky than a draftee. Then you still keep a first round pick to use for other needs which don't require a 4th pick. For us, it puts us in position to draft Blackman to fill a need for a #2 receiver and potential replacement for #1 when Andre Johnson retires or slows down.
This is SPECULATION, not a rumor.
Thank you for your time.
First, let me disclose that I'm a Texan fan.
Second, I would like your OPINION on whether Tate is worth swapping first round picks, your 4th for our 26th. You would get a tough and effective runner who has already adjusted to NFL speed and thus is less risky than a draftee. Then you still keep a first round pick to use for other needs which don't require a 4th pick. For us, it puts us in position to draft Blackman to fill a need for a #2 receiver and potential replacement for #1 when Andre Johnson retires or slows down.
This is SPECULATION, not a rumor.
Thank you for your time.
A 3rd round pick, 4th round pick (the Falcons pick) and swap the 22 for the 26. You guys have invested a ton in Foster- you won't re-sign Tate- you know that and other teams know that. So in this scenario you get two picks and a some movement in the first round. You'll get nothing in a few years.
-
Ben Tate would be the cost for Houston to move from 26 to 22. 4 isn't in the discussion.
-
Ben Tate would be the cost for Houston to move from 26 to 22. 4 isn't in the discussion.
Ben Tate would be the cost for Houston to move from 26 to 22. 4 isn't in the discussion.
26 to 22 isn't worth the punter. Tate is solid. If it's not enough for 26 to 4 then fine, but don't get insulting.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login