Skip to content

Rglll Disses Cleveland

The Browns Board
35 23 2.8k
  • i know it's bleacher report, but it sounds real enough to me:

    My link

    RG3 belongs in washington. isn't that the city where the mayor was busted smoking crack with a couple of hookers and they reelected him anyways? HA HA HA HA

    and for all those who love baylor. maybe we can convince this guy to play wr.

    @miktoxic said:

    i know it's bleacher report, but it sounds real enough to me:

    My link

    RG3 belongs in washington. isn't that the city where the mayor was busted smoking crack with a couple of hookers and they reelected him anyways? HA HA HA HA

    and for all those who love baylor. maybe we can convince this guy to play wr.

    I don't believe that for a second.

    Come on man...

  • Well according to this he didn't really dig at Cleveland the city more like the Browns and it's hard to disagree that they're taking at best, an unexciting, at worst a moronic path here. I really hope Heckert knows what he's doing. Sure, I've heard people say 'Oh, Dude, It's Cleveland, like that's some problem. To that I would say "But Dude, it's Buffalo, or Detroit or Milwaukee (Green Bay) or Minnesota or Pittsburgh, or indianapolis. Despite what some Steeler fans on here will say, All those places are only as good as Cleveland. No better, no worse. Pittsburgh the city sucks just as bad, and is just as cool in it's own respect as I feel Cleveland is. There's nothing awesome and nothing really horrible. The difference is here in Cleveland the Browns are considered a perennial joke. Lebron leaving also tarnished the city's image. If the Browns were awesome Cleveland wouldn't be a butt of jokes anymore. If Green Bay were terrible do you think that city would get any love at all? Please. In the 80s even though the browns were ultimately losers, there was no dismissals like that from players, at least not that I know of.

  • I heard the same thing in 92.3 ... And the disinterest was not because it is the City of Cleveland or anything like that. It has more to do with this regime. Agents are not comfortable with MH and Shurmur and co do not seem like they are interested in winning any time soon.

  • Of course they're not interested in winning anytime soon or the near future. Look at the product on the field. Look at the coaches... Opie boy Spermur and Pedo Man Childress. Who the hell really wants to come play for this team?

  • It is getting really fucking hard to keep cheering for this steaming pile of browns shit

  • Before some of you start making Browns fans look oh so brilliant with your RGIII bashing

    maybe read the link and see if you can find where RGIII is quoted as ripping on Cleveland

  • "One agent told our own Matt Miller during the combine that “no one” wants to go to Cleveland because the perception is that the Browns aren’t “building to win.”"

    "I have a tough time reconciling that statement with the fact that Mike Holmgren is now in charge in Cleveland. Holmgren is one of the fiercest competitors I’ve ever met, and the idea that he “doesn't want to win” seems far-fetched at best and downright absurd at worst. However, then you look at moves like the hiring of Brad Childress as offensive coordinator, and you start to wonder. (Childress is represented by Bob LaMonte, Holmgren’s agent.)

    Pat Shurmur was hired for his offensive acumen and for the good work he did with a rookie Sam Bradford. Now, Holmgren brings Childress on board, a guy whose offensive system has been dubbed “Day One Install” around the league due to its simplicity? What the team should be doing is finding some offensive talent to help Colt McCoy succeed, not bringing in washed-up coaches as a favor to LaMonte.

    Griffin may not be walking into the greatest situation in Washington, but looking at the state of things in Cleveland, it’s not hard to see why he wanted nothing to do with the Browns."

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1114235-could-cleveland-browns-lb-scott-fujita-be-subject-to-bountygate-punishment#/articles/1113587-rg3-glad-the-cleveland-browns-didnt-move-up-to-get-him

    This sheds some light on the state of affairs in Berea. And perhaps on our lack of FA success. As I said in another thread, we're seeing many signs of bad management. You don't need an NFL degree to spot it. And I don't care what people say, unless someone starts kicking Holmgren's ass and starts questioning his stupid decisions (hopefully recommendations before they become decisions) things are going to get really bad and ugly. He needs to be held accountable this year!

  • "One agent told our own Matt Miller during the combine that “no one” wants to go to Cleveland because the perception is that the Browns aren’t “building to win.”"

    "I have a tough time reconciling that statement with the fact that Mike Holmgren is now in charge in Cleveland. Holmgren is one of the fiercest competitors I’ve ever met, and the idea that he “doesn't want to win” seems far-fetched at best and downright absurd at worst. However, then you look at moves like the hiring of Brad Childress as offensive coordinator, and you start to wonder. (Childress is represented by Bob LaMonte, Holmgren’s agent.)

    Pat Shurmur was hired for his offensive acumen and for the good work he did with a rookie Sam Bradford. Now, Holmgren brings Childress on board, a guy whose offensive system has been dubbed “Day One Install” around the league due to its simplicity? What the team should be doing is finding some offensive talent to help Colt McCoy succeed, not bringing in washed-up coaches as a favor to LaMonte.

    Griffin may not be walking into the greatest situation in Washington, but looking at the state of things in Cleveland, it’s not hard to see why he wanted nothing to do with the Browns."

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1114235-could-cleveland-browns-lb-scott-fujita-be-subject-to-bountygate-punishment#/articles/1113587-rg3-glad-the-cleveland-browns-didnt-move-up-to-get-him

    This sheds some light on the state of affairs in Berea. And perhaps on our lack of FA success. As I said in another thread, we're seeing many signs of bad management. You don't need an NFL degree to spot it. And I don't care what people say, unless someone starts kicking Holmgren's ass and starts questioning his stupid decisions (hopefully recommendations before they become decisions) things are going to get really bad and ugly. He needs to be held accountable this year!

    @frenchie said:

    "One agent told our own Matt Miller during the combine that “no one” wants to go to Cleveland because the perception is that the Browns aren’t “building to win.”"

    "I have a tough time reconciling that statement with the fact that Mike Holmgren is now in charge in Cleveland. Holmgren is one of the fiercest competitors I’ve ever met, and the idea that he “doesn't want to win” seems far-fetched at best and downright absurd at worst. However, then you look at moves like the hiring of Brad Childress as offensive coordinator, and you start to wonder. (Childress is represented by Bob LaMonte, Holmgren’s agent.)

    Pat Shurmur was hired for his offensive acumen and for the good work he did with a rookie Sam Bradford. Now, Holmgren brings Childress on board, a guy whose offensive system has been dubbed “Day One Install” around the league due to its simplicity? What the team should be doing is finding some offensive talent to help Colt McCoy succeed, not bringing in washed-up coaches as a favor to LaMonte.

    Griffin may not be walking into the greatest situation in Washington, but looking at the state of things in Cleveland, it’s not hard to see why he wanted nothing to do with the Browns."

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1114235-could-cleveland-browns-lb-scott-fujita-be-subject-to-bountygate-punishment#/articles/1113587-rg3-glad-the-cleveland-browns-didnt-move-up-to-get-him

    This sheds some light on the state of affairs in Berea. And perhaps on our lack of FA success. As I said in another thread, we're seeing many signs of bad management. You don't need an NFL degree to spot it. And I don't care what people say, unless someone starts kicking Holmgren's ass and starts questioning his stupid decisions (hopefully recommendations before they become decisions) things are going to get really bad and ugly. He needs to be held accountable this year!

    Jesus this trash again! The "source" of this article was from a redskins fan forum and the whole qouted agent thing from Matt Millen is trash as well. Some second teir writer from BL isn't someone I would believe.

  • Browns building to win ??? Not since 1986.

    .. and Holmgren shows no signs of life.

  • @frenchie said:

    "One agent told our own Matt Miller during the combine that “no one” wants to go to Cleveland because the perception is that the Browns aren’t “building to win.”"

    "I have a tough time reconciling that statement with the fact that Mike Holmgren is now in charge in Cleveland. Holmgren is one of the fiercest competitors I’ve ever met, and the idea that he “doesn't want to win” seems far-fetched at best and downright absurd at worst. However, then you look at moves like the hiring of Brad Childress as offensive coordinator, and you start to wonder. (Childress is represented by Bob LaMonte, Holmgren’s agent.)

    Pat Shurmur was hired for his offensive acumen and for the good work he did with a rookie Sam Bradford. Now, Holmgren brings Childress on board, a guy whose offensive system has been dubbed “Day One Install” around the league due to its simplicity? What the team should be doing is finding some offensive talent to help Colt McCoy succeed, not bringing in washed-up coaches as a favor to LaMonte.

    Griffin may not be walking into the greatest situation in Washington, but looking at the state of things in Cleveland, it’s not hard to see why he wanted nothing to do with the Browns."

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1114235-could-cleveland-browns-lb-scott-fujita-be-subject-to-bountygate-punishment#/articles/1113587-rg3-glad-the-cleveland-browns-didnt-move-up-to-get-him

    This sheds some light on the state of affairs in Berea. And perhaps on our lack of FA success. As I said in another thread, we're seeing many signs of bad management. You don't need an NFL degree to spot it. And I don't care what people say, unless someone starts kicking Holmgren's ass and starts questioning his stupid decisions (hopefully recommendations before they become decisions) things are going to get really bad and ugly. He needs to be held accountable this year!

    Jesus this trash again! The "source" of this article was from a redskins fan forum and the whole qouted agent thing from Matt Millen is trash as well. Some second teir writer from BL isn't someone I would believe.

    @harry-buffalo said:

    Jesus this trash again! The "source" of this article was from a redskins fan forum and the whole qouted agent thing from Matt Millen is trash as well. Some second teir writer from BL isn't someone I would believe.

    Bleacher Report should not be allowed as a reputable link. It looks official, but it is drive by fans. It would be like ESPN using thoughts from here...."Ballpeen reports this to be the case" .

    Let's at least try to post stuff that has SOME credibility. That site has none. It's like the football version of The Globe who every week in the supermarket line is pushing "Exclusive photos of aliens having sex with neighborhood pets" .

    Geesh

  • He didn't rip Clevaland....that is the spin of others.

    He said he was happy it looks like he will be in DC. There is a big difference, and really, what is the guy supposed to say " I was really hoping to land in Cleveland"???

    Let's be real.

    And to be real, I am a Clevelander. I always will be, but I won't live there again. It isn't that great of a place, though I would live there over D.C.

    You can't rip the guy as a way to say "See, I told you so".

    Sorry. It won't work.

  • @king-ghoolie-lives said:

    As opposed to building to lose?

    You know, for the people who keep throwing negative shit out about Cleveland, they need to STFU.

    It's funny how once a team begins winning, nobody ever talks about all the hardship years.

    Lets be honest here, Did Belichik know Brady would be so great? Ah, no he didn't. HOw do I know? Well, if he know how Good Brady was, he would have not risked waiting until round 6 to get him.

    Bill B, and i like the guy, caught a lucky break, he got that diamond in the rough. More of them are out there. How do you find them? Simple, have more draft pics than the other guy, Play the odds. If you take enough good young guys, your odds of a few home runs go up.

    SO you make your best guess and away you go.

    Screw RG3.

    Exactly. At this level, the margin of talent is razor thin. There are diamonds to be found, just as there are first round busts to be had. RG3 is not and never was going to be the guy to pull us from the trenches. It's going to take more than one guy, in all honesty. Load up in draft picks and get a few steals, that's the Belichick way.

  • He didn't rip Clevaland....that is the spin of others.

    He said he was happy it looks like he will be in DC. There is a big difference, and really, what is the guy supposed to say " I was really hoping to land in Cleveland"???

    Let's be real.

    And to be real, I am a Clevelander. I always will be, but I won't live there again. It isn't that great of a place, though I would live there over D.C.

    You can't rip the guy as a way to say "See, I told you so".

    Sorry. It won't work.

    @ballpeen said:

    He didn't rip Clevaland....that is the spin of others.

    He said he was happy it looks like he will be in DC. There is a big difference, and really, what is the guy supposed to say " I was really hoping to land in Cleveland"???

    Let's be real.

    And to be real, I am a Clevelander. I always will be, but I won't live there again. It isn't that great of a place, though I would live there over D.C.

    You can't rip the guy as a way to say "See, I told you so".

    Sorry. It won't work.

    No, you're not. Cleveland is as good as anywhere else. It's not new york, or California but its as good as a hundred more cities in the us. Fuck ya if you don't think so. We don't need you repping it.

  • I've actually been agreeing with Ghoolie lately. It's a bit scary, but a refreshing change of pace. I enjoy it.

    RGIII would have been a nice pick up... if he was there at 4. Trading what the Redskins traded is WAAAYY too much. If RGIII isn't worth it, the 'skins are quite fucked until 2015.

    We will have 4 first round picks (as of right now) in that time. Hopefully that is what turns us around. We need to think about that for the future. Look at those picks we saved. See who we get. See how they contribute. I hope for once something works in our favor.

  • Here's what I've been saying to everyone about the browns. To me, there's a clear cut formula to be a championship caliber team in the NFL and it rests in three things. First and foremost, draft a franchise QB. Second, draft a front four who is able to pressure the QB consistently without a blitz. Lastly, fill the skills positions with at most 1-2 top round talents and find the rest in later rounds. The way I see it if you believe in what I say, the browns have done one of these pretty successfully which is obviously the defensive line. We're one DE away (Rucker hopefully) from exactly what I'm talking about. I've said all along that I never claim to have even an ounce of knowledge compared to people in the NFL, but I don't see how they see Colt as the signal caller. However, it's obvious at this point he's going to be the guy so I think this draft must address the third part of my equation, finding skill mostly in later rounds with one or two top round talents.

    With that being said, if I were the browns the number 4 slot has to be Richardson or Blackmon, whichever the browns see as higher. The second first round pick should be devoted to BPA NOT at a skill position, and the rest should be searching for those WR's and RB's who can make a difference. I can't say I look forward to seeing another year of Mr. McCoy, but it's all but clear that's going to be the case. Might as well fill the 2nd and third of that criteria than if the Colt experiment fails, go all in for Barkley or whoever shines bright next year.

    What do you guys think?

  • @ballpeen said:

    He didn't rip Clevaland....that is the spin of others.

    He said he was happy it looks like he will be in DC. There is a big difference, and really, what is the guy supposed to say " I was really hoping to land in Cleveland"???

    Let's be real.

    And to be real, I am a Clevelander. I always will be, but I won't live there again. It isn't that great of a place, though I would live there over D.C.

    You can't rip the guy as a way to say "See, I told you so".

    Sorry. It won't work.

    No, you're not. Cleveland is as good as anywhere else. It's not new york, or California but its as good as a hundred more cities in the us. Fuck ya if you don't think so. We don't need you repping it.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    No, you're not. Cleveland is as good as anywhere else. It's not new york, or California but its as good as a hundred more cities in the us. Fuck ya if you don't think so. We don't need you repping it.

    i really don't think that the most of us 'displaced' clevelanders believe that it's the best city even in that state. the fact is that that is where our beloved brown and pumpkin originate, floolillyga and ponsnyercate.

    until then lads...chop. chop

  • @ballpeen said:

    He didn't rip Clevaland....that is the spin of others.

    He said he was happy it looks like he will be in DC. There is a big difference, and really, what is the guy supposed to say " I was really hoping to land in Cleveland"???

    Let's be real.

    And to be real, I am a Clevelander. I always will be, but I won't live there again. It isn't that great of a place, though I would live there over D.C.

    You can't rip the guy as a way to say "See, I told you so".

    Sorry. It won't work.

    No, you're not. Cleveland is as good as anywhere else. It's not new york, or California but its as good as a hundred more cities in the us. Fuck ya if you don't think so. We don't need you repping it.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    No, you're not. Cleveland is as good as anywhere else. It's not new york, or California but its as good as a hundred more cities in the us. Fuck ya if you don't think so. We don't need you repping it.

    I wasn't ripping it. Just telling it like it is.

  • Browns building to win ??? Not since 1986.

    .. and Holmgren shows no signs of life.

    @kosarfan said:

    Browns building to win ??? Not since 1986.

    .. and Holmgren shows no signs of life.

    What did the Browns win in 1986? Oh yeah, they won a whopping 3 playoff games in the 1980's. A decade of dominance in Cleveland...

  • stay classy pittsburgh

  • I've lived all over the world. Japan, Philippines, San Diego, Los Angeles, Albany, NY, Northern VA, etc. Cleveland has its good points and its bad points, like any city from this area (Great Lakes). With the new Convention Center, Casino's and waterfront development coming it should improve. The good points: Cheap cost of living. Not bad traffic (as compared to DC/Chicago/NY/Atlanta, etc). Housing prices are good. Bad points are the weather, crime rate (in the city) and schools (Cleveland not suburbs). Its a matter of taste. When I really retire in about 4 years, I will probably move to Fairborne Ohio (near Dayton). Only because it is right next to Wright Patterson AFB and I can fully utilize my military retirement benefits (unless the Government decides to strip those away).