What Would Piss You Off Most?
-
selecting a qb period would piss me off.
having the FO influenced by fan pressure would piss me off.
not taking claiborn at 4 would piss me off.
-
taking kalil @ 4 would piss me off. I don't want tannehill at 4, but I could be proven wrong on picking him and he could turn out to be a stud. However, I do know that picking an offensive tackle is not going to score touchdowns for us. Therefore, no to kalil. Even if he is a stud, I would rather take a stop-gap RT and a playmaker at #4
-
any of these players before the 4th round would upset me, ok Blackmon and Wright prior to 2nd round.
Tannehill
Weeden
Blackmon
Wright
Adams
Hill
Chase
-
First and foremost - Tannehill
Otherwise other picks that would piss me off would be
4 - Claiborne
22 - Adams/Weedon
37 - Adams
-
Taking Tannehill early...
Too much moving around and not taking best talent...
Reaching for anyone....
Oh, and taking a weak, pot-smoking Mike Adams with second or third pick.
-
Not drafting Trent Richardson or Justin Blackmon would piss me off.
The worst scenario though would be Tannehill at 4 and a RT at 22. Another season of 0 offensive playmakers would be very fun to watch. I couldn't imagine. I'd cancel Sunday Ticket so I didn't have to watch that monstrosity every week.
-
trading up to 3 to pick Tannehill
-
Three things that would piss me off:
1- Taking someone besides Trich at 4.
2- Trading down from the fourth pick(I'm okay with trading down @ 22).
3- Selecting a QB before the 5th round is a wasted pick.
As long as we take Richardson, they could really do anything with the rest of the draft and I'd be a happy man...
Personally, I'd trade every pick and we've got to make sure we ended up with Trent Richardson, Justing Blackmon and the best Offensive RT in the Draft... I'd even set it up where I'd use the comp. picks to select whomever they wanted with them...
Could we do that? Since we cannot trade those picks that were awarded to us, could we pick those guys for another team that wanted them then trade them to that team after they've signed with us?
-
-
I think for me it would just me trading down heavy again in the draft. 3-4 spots may actually be really smart but the top ten guys are all fantastic this year. We can't have another year of that IMO
Agreed. I think a trade down to 8 is the most I'd do. Plenty of play makers there (cough cough Michael Floyd cough)
Most? Hard to choose between:
- Taking a QB before the 5th Rnd.
- Taking a WR between Blackmon/ Floyd and Rnd 3.
- Taking a CB between Claiborne and Rnd 5.
But if I had to choose one, it'd be the QB thing... unless of course Luck fell to #4...
Agreed. I think a trade down to 8 is the most I'd do. Plenty of play makers there (cough cough Michael Floyd cough)
Floyd at 8 wouldn't piss me off either... but the lower we went and still got him, the more I would be pleased...
Also a trade down and then back up scenario is plausible in my mind.
selecting a qb period would piss me off.
having the FO influenced by fan pressure would piss me off.
not taking claiborn at 4 would piss me off.
Thus setting a record for applying then decrying then applying fan pressure...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 - Taking a QB before the 5th Rnd.
-
1. Taking ANY QB with our First Round Picks would piss me off.
2. Trading out of top 15 would piss me off.
3. Taking Kalil @ #4 would piss me off.
1. Taking ANY QB with our First Round Picks would piss me off.
2. Trading out of top 15 would piss me off.
3. Taking Kalil @ #4 would piss me off.
^^ This, and not taking a receiver with one of our first round picks.
-
I'm convinced, that I will be po'd, if the Browns don't draft a dynamic IMPACT player with all of their first four picks.
Although, the one exception is with the #37 pick. I think that's Wheeden, and pouty face Seneca Wallace can be cut, after
stewing on the sidelines while being the #3 qb on the roster. So, not replacing Seneca as the #2 qb would get me po'd.
And, taking Wright in the first two rounds would get me po'd.
Drafting lazy bum Adams, would be a disaster in any round.
Not drafting Bobby Massie, or
I'm actually thinkin it could be Blackmon, Martin, Wheeden and Swartz.
I WILL be po'd if I am still this confused AFTER the Browns draft. Make that PO'd.
*
Meanwhile:
***************************
According to Pro Football Weekly, Baylor WR Kendall Wright is "parked in the third round"
on a number of teams' draft boards after an unimpressive offseason.
There were rumors of an offseason weight gain for Wright, and his forty time at the Combine was slower than anticipated.
"Randall Cobb was a lot better," one NFL evaluator said. "Wright is nowhere near as good with the ball in his hands and (Cobb)
lasted 'til the back of the second (round). People are getting snookered (by Wright)." Wright managed only four bench-press reps,
and Pro Football Weekly reports
his body fat was 16 percent. Per PFW, it's "one of the highest percentages for a receiver in the past decade."
Oklahoma State QB Brandon Weeden "gets the vibe" the Browns are interested in him, and "relishes" the thought of competing with Colt McCoy.
"I know Colt had a good year last year, and he's a good football player," Weeden said. "But I'm a competitor, and I want to play as
soon as possible. I'd be excited about the opportunity to come in and compete with him and see how things pan out." The Cleveland Plain Dealer
confirms the Browns have shown "plenty of interest" in the 28-year-old signal caller, and that he will be an option with their second first-round pick
(No. 22).
GM Tom Heckert has previously spoken highly of Weeden. Cleveland could be his most likely landing spot.
-
I'm convinced, that I will be po'd, if the Browns don't draft a dynamic IMPACT player with all of their first four picks.
Although, the one exception is with the #37 pick. I think that's Wheeden, and pouty face Seneca Wallace can be cut, after
stewing on the sidelines while being the #3 qb on the roster. So, not replacing Seneca as the #2 qb would get me po'd.
And, taking Wright in the first two rounds would get me po'd.
Drafting lazy bum Adams, would be a disaster in any round.
Not drafting Bobby Massie, or
I'm actually thinkin it could be Blackmon, Martin, Wheeden and Swartz.
I WILL be po'd if I am still this confused AFTER the Browns draft. Make that PO'd.
*
Meanwhile:
***************************
According to Pro Football Weekly, Baylor WR Kendall Wright is "parked in the third round"
on a number of teams' draft boards after an unimpressive offseason.
There were rumors of an offseason weight gain for Wright, and his forty time at the Combine was slower than anticipated.
"Randall Cobb was a lot better," one NFL evaluator said. "Wright is nowhere near as good with the ball in his hands and (Cobb)
lasted 'til the back of the second (round). People are getting snookered (by Wright)." Wright managed only four bench-press reps,
and Pro Football Weekly reports
his body fat was 16 percent. Per PFW, it's "one of the highest percentages for a receiver in the past decade."
Oklahoma State QB Brandon Weeden "gets the vibe" the Browns are interested in him, and "relishes" the thought of competing with Colt McCoy.
"I know Colt had a good year last year, and he's a good football player," Weeden said. "But I'm a competitor, and I want to play as
soon as possible. I'd be excited about the opportunity to come in and compete with him and see how things pan out." The Cleveland Plain Dealer
confirms the Browns have shown "plenty of interest" in the 28-year-old signal caller, and that he will be an option with their second first-round pick
(No. 22).
GM Tom Heckert has previously spoken highly of Weeden. Cleveland could be his most likely landing spot.
-
@mike-h said:
If one of them were traded I'd still be a Browns fan, what are you trying to say?
You aren't too bright.
Stick to single-dimension, shallow topics like how awesome Trent Richardson's hair is. Insulting people isn't your strong point.
Oh, is that what you thought I was doing, insulting you? Hmmm, if I wanted to insult you I'd just comment on your writing skills... but since that's your livelihood and I'm sure you're working REALLY, REALLY hard to get better at it, I'll just leave that alone.
-
@mike-h said:
If one of them were traded I'd still be a Browns fan, what are you trying to say?
You aren't too bright.
Stick to single-dimension, shallow topics like how awesome Trent Richardson's hair is. Insulting people isn't your strong point.
Oh, is that what you thought I was doing, insulting you? Hmmm, if I wanted to insult you I'd just comment on your writing skills... but since that's your livelihood and I'm sure you're working REALLY, REALLY hard to get better at it, I'll just leave that alone.
Oh, is that what you thought I was doing, insulting you? Hmmm, if I wanted to insult you I'd just comment on your writing skills... but since that's your livelihood and I'm sure you're working REALLY, REALLY hard to get better at it, I'll just leave that alone.
watch it girfriend.
mikeH just got off a destroyer touring the persian gulf going in and out of irag and afghan. i'm sure he learned and now knows enough to squash you like a dirty sand rat.
don't have your mouth write a check that your ass can't cash.
go back to your TR shrine and try not to (but do) burn down your mom's house from the basement up.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login