Skip to content

What Would Piss You Off Most?

The Browns Board
74 45 3.5k
  • How can anyone be pissed with claiborne at 4?

  • I'll be disappointed with Claiborne at 4. We desperately need skill position players that are studs and if we blow that chance for Claiborne it will suck. But the other side of the coin is that Claiborne along with Haden and Ward would be an EXCEPTIONAL secondary. Top 3 in the league for sure. I COULDN'T ever fully hate it we got Claiborne, but like I said, I'd be disappointed that we didn't snag Richardson, Blackmon, or even to a lesser extent Floyd.

  • I'll be disappointed with Claiborne at 4. We desperately need skill position players that are studs and if we blow that chance for Claiborne it will suck. But the other side of the coin is that Claiborne along with Haden and Ward would be an EXCEPTIONAL secondary. Top 3 in the league for sure. I COULDN'T ever fully hate it we got Claiborne, but like I said, I'd be disappointed that we didn't snag Richardson, Blackmon, or even to a lesser extent Floyd.

    @hunt-daddy said:

    I'll be disappointed with Claiborne at 4. We desperately need skill position players that are studs and if we blow that chance for Claiborne it will suck. But the other side of the coin is that Claiborne along with Haden and Ward would be an EXCEPTIONAL secondary. Top 3 in the league for sure. I COULDN'T ever fully hate it we got Claiborne, but like I said, I'd be disappointed that we didn't snag Richardson, Blackmon, or even to a lesser extent Floyd.

    well then how about claiborn @4 and martin (RB) @22?

  • I want an OLB by pick #37, or I'll be pissed.

    We are too damn slow on the edge, and desperately need LB help.

  • What would piss me off the most is either drafting Tannehill with the #4 instead of Richardson, Blackmon, or Claiborne who are the only real options for the pick. What would piss me off as equally is taking Weeden any sooner than the 3rd or 4th if we DIDN'T draft Blackmon. I think the only way for Weeden to be relatively successful he will need his college #1 WR to go with him (it would also increase Blackmons production as well). I could live with Blackmon by himself but not Weeden by himself.

  • 1. Taking ANY QB before round 4!

    2. Trading back and not getting any of Kalil, Blackmon, Claiborne, Richardson, or Floyd.

    3. Taking Hill over Wright at 22.

  • too many player based list items...

  • Drafting Tannehill or Claiborne at 4

    Drafting Weeden earlier than the 4th round

    Not getting a difference maker at RB WR and RT

    @albinorhino40 said:

    Drafting Tannehill or Claiborne at 4

    Drafting Weeden earlier than the 4th round

    Not getting a difference maker at RB WR and RT

    +1

  • I have strong opinions on this one...

    1. Drafting Tannehill at 3, 4, 7 or even 22.

    2. Trading our #4 overall

    Like the idea of trading the #22 back though.

    3. Drafting Claiborne at 4. He's not Patrick Peterson.

    4. Selecting a WR at 22- after Floyd you can interchange WRs rated in the 3-10 range. Meaning a team will likely draft a 3rd round Wr and he will probably out produce a guy like Wright.

    5. Taking Weeden at 22 or moving into the first round to take him. I think Weeden is solid, but I'd rather have Wilson in Round 4 and I think he will be just as good as Weeden.

  • 1. Drafting Tannehill or Weeden before the 4th round

    2. Not drafting Richardson at #4

    3. Drafting Adams before the 3rd round

    4. Not drafting RB, WR, OT, OLB with first 4 picks

  • I have strong opinions on this one...

    1. Drafting Tannehill at 3, 4, 7 or even 22.

    2. Trading our #4 overall

    Like the idea of trading the #22 back though.

    3. Drafting Claiborne at 4. He's not Patrick Peterson.

    4. Selecting a WR at 22- after Floyd you can interchange WRs rated in the 3-10 range. Meaning a team will likely draft a 3rd round Wr and he will probably out produce a guy like Wright.

    5. Taking Weeden at 22 or moving into the first round to take him. I think Weeden is solid, but I'd rather have Wilson in Round 4 and I think he will be just as good as Weeden.

    @sdbrownsfan said:

    Drafting Claiborne at 4. He's not Patrick Peterson.

    yeah. he's better.

  • Here's one you all will love. I was shuffling through the mocks on WalterFootball.com, and the third mock on there today had the stupidest picks I have heard yet...possibly ever. Here are his first three picks for the Browns...

    1A - Ryan Tannehill

    1B - Kendall Wright

    2 - Brandon Weeden

    I am hoping that he was seriously high or completely plastered when he posted that mock. Nobody can really be that dumb can they?

  • What would piss me off the most is, Colt stays as our starter and he sucks again for another year!

  • Taking a QB ar 4 22 37 or at all would /wrist. Why would i want a 5th best QB in a draft as a rookie.

  • Taking a QB ar 4 22 37 or at all would /wrist. Why would i want a 5th best QB in a draft as a rookie.

    @represent said:

    Taking a QB ar 4 22 37 or at all would /wrist. Why would i want a 5th best QB in a draft as a rookie.

    Oh, I dunno. Ask the Bengals?

  • @represent said:

    Taking a QB ar 4 22 37 or at all would /wrist. Why would i want a 5th best QB in a draft as a rookie.

    Oh, I dunno. Ask the Bengals?

    @vaportrail said:

    Oh, I dunno. Ask the Bengals?

    Like saying ask every team who finds a diamond in the rough... are you willing to roll the dice again on those later selections

    2010 3 RD 85 selection Colt McCoy QB

    2007 1st RD 22 selection Brady Quinn QB

    2005 3 RD 67 selection Charlie Frye QB

    2004 4 RD 106 selection Luke McCown QB

    How about i Just ask the Cleveland Browns Vapor. I have no Interest in trying the 5th best or later projected QB because picks Like Tom Brady aren't an everyday luxury hit in the NFL and neither is taking the projected best BUT AT LEAST YOU HAD THE BALLS to select the best fucking rated QB.

  • Moving down more than 4 spots

  • If someone traded up to 3 to take Richardson it would poss me off. Don't let someone snake us again FO

  • If someone traded up to 3 to take Richardson it would poss me off. Don't let someone snake us again FO

    @clevelandfanforlife said:

    If someone traded up to 3 to take Richardson it would poss me off. Don't let someone snake us again FO

    I have an eerie feeling it's happening as we speak.

    We held all the cards this offseason. Problem is ... we're still holding them.

    Zombo

  • PoeticG mentioning Trent Richardson ONE MORE TIME!!!