Top Players By Grade
-
Here is a link to NFL.com which has its own scouting service rank each player by a numerical grade from like 20-100.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2012/tracker/by-name#dt-tabs:dt-by-grade
A few notes and surprises:
A. I guess Luck's grade of 97.0 is like the highest in some 20 years.
B. Blackmon and Richards have the same exact grade
C. David DeCastro, though an OG has the 6th highest grade in this draft
D. Jonathan Martin is ranked 22d. If Browns get him with the 22d pick it might be a perfect value pick.
-
Just to correct some of you logic... But if Martin is ranked 22nd and the Browns take him at 22, that's not a value pick. That's the correct pick. If he was ranked 10th and they got him at 22, then that's a value pick. Good stuff though.
-
And Randle and Hill are tied at #28 with a score of 86.0 so either of those would definitely be a value pick at #37
#4 Richardson, #22 Martin and #37 Randle or Hill would make me very happy.
-
Just to correct some of you logic... But if Martin is ranked 22nd and the Browns take him at 22, that's not a value pick. That's the correct pick. If he was ranked 10th and they got him at 22, then that's a value pick. Good stuff though.
Just to correct some of you logic... But if Martin is ranked 22nd and the Browns take him at 22, that's not a value pick. That's the correct pick. If he was ranked 10th and they got him at 22, then that's a value pick. Good stuff though.
OK, yes, I may have said "good" meaning "correct". Not a reach at least, per these grades.
-
If we got Richardson, J. Martin, and S. Hill I would assume the world was coming to an end. That just looks too good to be true.
-
If we got Richardson, J. Martin, and S. Hill I would assume the world was coming to an end. That just looks too good to be true.
If we got Richardson, J. Martin, and S. Hill I would assume the world was coming to an end. That just looks too good to be true.
I would prefer Randle to Hill. He seems to be a better fit for the WCO. Hill seems like a deep threat we will not be able to utilize
-
I like Martin.....I think we go Richardson, Martin 1-2.
2nd round we g0 receiver....maybe Sanu....Hill may drop to that spot.
I think a RT is high on the list. Even higher if we go back in round 1, and I don't see any way we take Blackmon over Richardson.
My reasoning is this. Richardson might be the top back of any back in the last 10 years. That could be challenged, I agree, but he is up there with any and all.
Blackmon might possibly be a 2nd round pick in some receiver classes over the last 10 years. He may be the best this year, but he isn't a #4 overall pick. I'd take a lot of players before I'd take him.
-
I don't think Blackmon would ever be a 2nd round pick...
I realize the guy isn't Megatron but come on...
-
Fair enough.....my point is he isn't worth the 4th selection.
-
Some would argue that taking a Draft's 3rd best QB at #4 is fine given that the top 2 went 1-2...
I wouldn't... but some would...
Question is, "How much of the ratings drop-off from RG to Tannehill is attributable to inexperience; his thin resume?" Physically he's close on the measurable. I'm guessing the same is true of the Wunderlich.
Point is when we have no idea how the final rating is derived, it's hard to figure how far a ten-point gap should drop draft position.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login