Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Anyone Else Disappointed We Didnt Grab Rueben Randle

Anyone Else Disappointed We Didnt Grab Rueben Randle

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
9 Posts 6 Posters 435 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TRU STatus TRU STatusT
    • 51 Posts
    • 2 Reputation
    TRU STatusT TRU STatus wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Is anyone else disappointed in the fact we did not jump the 6 or 7 spots to grab this guy before the end of 2nd round before the giants. I think we could have gave up some minimal picks for this and I was just disappointed when we did not go grab him.

    **************************************************************** I don't care who the QB is as long as we are WINNING!!!!!!! 0-0 Start fresh and go from there!!! Dan
    VagitronV 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • TRU STatusT TRU STatus

      Is anyone else disappointed in the fact we did not jump the 6 or 7 spots to grab this guy before the end of 2nd round before the giants. I think we could have gave up some minimal picks for this and I was just disappointed when we did not go grab him.

      Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 4k Posts
      • 301 Reputation
      VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @tru-status said:

      Is anyone else disappointed in the fact we did not jump the 6 or 7 spots to grab this guy before the end of 2nd round before the giants. I think we could have gave up some minimal picks for this and I was just disappointed when we did not go grab him.

      Supposedly he had some relatively serious work ethic problems and it's why he fell as far as he did.

      AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • choco chocoC
        • 4k Posts
        • 352 Reputation
        chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Nope

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Louisville Slugger Louisville SluggerL
          • 706 Posts
          • 95 Reputation
          Louisville SluggerL Louisville Slugger wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I would rather we got mcnutt, childs, or hilton. Almost any wide reciever would have been better than the hughes pick

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Canton Mike Canton MikeC
            • 4k Posts
            • 2k Reputation
            Canton MikeC Canton Mike wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Nope!

            Mike

            IN DORSEY I TRUST
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Harry Buffalo Harry BuffaloH
              • 3k Posts
              • 241 Reputation
              Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo wrote on last edited by
              #6

              No I thought this kid was a early 3rd round pick so he fell about where I thought he would. I thought Sanu was a much better option but Bengals got him and apparently he wasn't on our radar in the 3rd anyway.

              Ruining threads since 1897.
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • choco chocoC
                • 4k Posts
                • 352 Reputation
                chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
                #7

                yeah! reach on a receiver! much, much better idea than reaching for a DT!!

                Harry BuffaloH 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • chocoC choco

                  yeah! reach on a receiver! much, much better idea than reaching for a DT!!

                  Harry Buffalo Harry BuffaloH
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 241 Reputation
                  Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @choco said:

                  yeah! reach on a receiver! much, much better idea than reaching for a DT!!

                  I'd much rather have a speedster like Benjamin in the 4th than a Robo copy in the late 2nd.

                  Ruining threads since 1897.
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • choco chocoC
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 352 Reputation
                    chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    me too.....the 3rd round and latter is such a gamble anyway....people act like scouting after the first round is an exact science.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply

                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                    With your input, this post could be even better đź’—

                    Register Login
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Theme
                    • System
                    • Light
                    • Dark
                    The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                    The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Forums
                    • Recent
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Donate