Skip to content

The Truth About The Left - And Most All Lib

Political Discussion
22 9 1.6k
  • Trayvon was a thief. Broke into houses. Doped up, whatever upped. He was obviously casing houses for another break-in.

    He calls his girlfriend to ask her again which house is empty because she knows a girl whose family is out of town at a funeral.

    He sees Zimmerman following him. He hides. Zimmerman can no longer see him, so he gets out of his truck to look around a bit.

    Dirtbag druggie thief homeboy circles around a garage, and realizes that Zimmerman has his description, and was calling the police.

    Before Zimmerman can complete his call and give his description away, Trayvon criminal completes his circle around a garage,

    and goes after Zimmerman at his back while he is getting back into his truck - to kill him to keep him from giving

    the police his description, because this street is his breaking and entering and stealing goldmine.

    But Zimmerman has a gun, and sadly ends up shooting the would be killer while he is still able.

    Trayvon the gangbanger didn't win the fight - he just sneak attacked Zimmerman from behind, while he

    was vulnerable, and defenseless. And, Zimmerman, realizing that this sicko is trying to end his life to keep

    his identity a secret - had no choice but to shoot. The facts are far more in my story than Hecks.

    I like mine.

  • TravonTM is a registered trademark. His mother did that. Why?

  • Where are the facts in your story cal?

  • I've lost all my sympathy for trayvon but having marijuana in your system does not make you a dangerous high felon. It's not crack, or pcp.

  • TravonTM is a registered trademark. His mother did that. Why?

    @lady-z said:

    TravonTM is a registered trademark. His mother did that. Why?

    *******************************

    Money. Entitlement to auto lotto winnings because she's black. Or something.😠

  • TravonTM is a registered trademark. His mother did that. Why?

    @lady-z said:

    TravonTM is a registered trademark. His mother did that. Why?

    In a blatant cash grab of course.

  • Why should TravonTM Mama be the only one to cash in?

    Designed by an evil conservative, for evil conservatives. I got mine.

    I luv agitprop.

    shittleshirt http://evilconservat...product/2704708

    "We're just that fuggin' heartless and cruel.

    On the upside, the shirt does feature Obama, Sharpton, Jackson, Hell the whole crew is depicted. get yours today!"

    Click on image for larger image.

    post-16898-0-05966400-1337440357_thumb.jpg

  • Where are the facts in your story cal?

    @mld-woody said:

    Where are the facts in your story cal?

    Hmm

    I must have missed the hard core factual reporting in your version woody....

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    Where are the facts in your story cal?

    Hmm

    I must have missed the hard core factual reporting in your version woody....

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Hmm

    I must have missed the hard core factual reporting in your version woody....

    WSS

    I'm not trying to push my version as the one true version. I also don't make a lot of certainties. I'm mostly just pointing out that Zimmerman followed Martin when police told him not to, fact. He was out with a loaded gun, fact. He killed Martin, fact.

    Still, I think Cal would have a hard time proving anything in his story. Especially if he is a member of the Retard camp. That think "trace amounts of pot" means crazy, unstable druggy crackhead.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Hmm

    I must have missed the hard core factual reporting in your version woody....

    WSS

    I'm not trying to push my version as the one true version. I also don't make a lot of certainties. I'm mostly just pointing out that Zimmerman followed Martin when police told him not to, fact. He was out with a loaded gun, fact. He killed Martin, fact.

    Still, I think Cal would have a hard time proving anything in his story. Especially if he is a member of the Retard camp. That think "trace amounts of pot" means crazy, unstable druggy crackhead.

    @mld-woody said:

    I'm not trying to push my version as the one true version. I also don't make a lot of certainties. I'm mostly just pointing out that Zimmerman followed Martin when police told him not to, fact. He was out with a loaded gun, fact. He killed Martin, fact.

    Still, I think Cal would have a hard time proving anything in his story. Especially if he is a member of the Retard camp. That think "trace amounts of pot" means crazy, unstable druggy crackhead.

    2 out of 3. First the dispatcher, not an officer, never told him to stop following, just that we don't need you to do that.

    But yes zimmerman had a gun and martin is dead.

    But we have no idea who confronted who.

    I would wonder why, if zimmerman were actually brandishing his weapon, there would have been a fight at all?

    It doesn't stand to reason that martin would attack zimmerman if the gun had been drawn does it?

    Or that zimmerman would attack martin without drawing his weapon?

    1 thing we do you know is that the police heard the story believed it and let zimmerman go.

    And remember it's not illegal to follow someone so if martin attack because of that, it was at least a poor decision.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    I'm not trying to push my version as the one true version. I also don't make a lot of certainties. I'm mostly just pointing out that Zimmerman followed Martin when police told him not to, fact. He was out with a loaded gun, fact. He killed Martin, fact.

    Still, I think Cal would have a hard time proving anything in his story. Especially if he is a member of the Retard camp. That think "trace amounts of pot" means crazy, unstable druggy crackhead.

    2 out of 3. First the dispatcher, not an officer, never told him to stop following, just that we don't need you to do that.

    But yes zimmerman had a gun and martin is dead.

    But we have no idea who confronted who.

    I would wonder why, if zimmerman were actually brandishing his weapon, there would have been a fight at all?

    It doesn't stand to reason that martin would attack zimmerman if the gun had been drawn does it?

    Or that zimmerman would attack martin without drawing his weapon?

    1 thing we do you know is that the police heard the story believed it and let zimmerman go.

    And remember it's not illegal to follow someone so if martin attack because of that, it was at least a poor decision.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    2 out of 3. First the dispatcher, not an officer, never told him to stop following, just that we don't need you to do that.

    But yes zimmerman had a gun and martin is dead.

    But we have no idea who confronted who.

    I would wonder why, if zimmerman were actually brandishing his weapon, there would have been a fight at all?

    It doesn't stand to reason that martin would attack zimmerman if the gun had been drawn does it?

    Or that zimmerman would attack martin without drawing his weapon?

    1 thing we do you know is that the police heard the story believed it and let zimmerman go.

    And remember it's not illegal to follow someone so if martin attack because of that, it was at least a poor decision.

    WSS

    All reasonable points. I'm just happy you're not calling him a druggy gang banger.