Skip to content

The Untold Story Of Gun Confiscation

Locked Political Discussion
30 4 968

  • He will only go after guns during his second term or last term in office.
  • Don't miss this one, about forcible gun control - the breaking into homes, just to take guns.

    With the treaty Obamao wants?

    Go look at the twisted pistol monument in the front of the UN.

    That's Obamao's ticket. Registration required, then turn the registration over to the UN.

    Bypassing our Constitution.

    Don't think we're in serious trouble?

    Of course we are. We are headed that direction because of Obamao, Holder, and all the worms in the Democratic party

    that want a new form of gov control... so they can stay in control.

    Best to pray that the day never comes, when this stuff goes on full force in our America.

    Seems we're headed toward economic collapse, racial anger and violence across our country,

    and way too much power and intimidation from our own gov while Obamao is in office.

    Registration is confiscation and intimidation, and enslavement.

    Read history, or make sure you watch the video about Canada. They are warning us.

  • THEY TOOK EERR JOBS!

    I mean guns

  • THEY TOOK EERR JOBS!

    I mean guns

    @mld-woody said:

    THEY TOOK EERR JOBS!

    I mean guns

    What an amazingly insightful post about the dilemna of police unlawfully and unconstitutionally taking away the rights of its citizens and our ability to defend ourselves against rogue law agencies and those who would do us harm. I would have never thought of it that way without your astute observations on the matter.

    Thank you sincerely.

  • @mld-woody said:

    THEY TOOK EERR JOBS!

    I mean guns

    What an amazingly insightful post about the dilemna of police unlawfully and unconstitutionally taking away the rights of its citizens and our ability to defend ourselves against rogue law agencies and those who would do us harm. I would have never thought of it that way without your astute observations on the matter.

    Thank you sincerely.

    @nunboy said:

    What an amazingly insightful post about the dilemna of police unlawfully and unconstitutionally taking away the rights of its citizens and our ability to defend ourselves against rogue law agencies and those who would do us harm. I would have never thought of it that way without your astute observations on the matter.

    Thank you sincerely.

    You're welcome.

    I stand by my insulting of their ridiculous ramblings just as prevalent as their ridiculous ramblings themselves.

    Try reading some of Bunkers posts if these are the kind of posts you like.

  • "completely irrevelant" <> "over the top"

  • @nunboy said:

    What an amazingly insightful post about the dilemna of police unlawfully and unconstitutionally taking away the rights of its citizens and our ability to defend ourselves against rogue law agencies and those who would do us harm. I would have never thought of it that way without your astute observations on the matter.

    Thank you sincerely.

    You're welcome.

    I stand by my insulting of their ridiculous ramblings just as prevalent as their ridiculous ramblings themselves.

    Try reading some of Bunkers posts if these are the kind of posts you like.

    @mld-woody said:

    You're welcome.

    I stand by my insulting of their ridiculous ramblings just as prevalent as their ridiculous ramblings themselves.

    Try reading some of Bunkers posts if these are the kind of posts you like.

    What does what Bunker types in other threads have to do with these? Don't you find it disturbing that these cops just barged into peoples houses and started taking their possessions like an armed burglary. no you post a dismissive nonsense link. If you are so concerned about others nonsense ramblings make a coherent point if all they can do is be insulting and make nonsense statements simply walk away, point proven they don't have a point. you win the argument simple debate team stuff.

    So with all of that said Does the sight of that old lady getting tackled in her own home leave you with a good taste in your mouth? Do you feel that you should have a way to defend yourself against people like that?

  • I'll be honest, never watched.

  • I'll be honest, never watched.

    @mld-woody said:

    I'll be honest, never watched.

    of course you didn't because I don't think anyone could watch it and come away as callous as you did. How can you make a comment on a video when you are willfully ignorant of its content? why even bother making a statement if you won't bother to understand it? an old woman is in her house in New Orleans after Katrina when cops kick in her door and corner her in her kitchen, tackle her and take her only means of protecting herself away, simply because she had it. watch the first video then comment.

  • I watched that part. Don't pull a gun a the police...

  • I watched that part. Don't pull a gun a the police...

    @mld-woody said:

    I watched that part. Don't pull a gun a the police...

    yeah that whole no unreasonable search and seizure thing in that quaint old document that founds our country says otherwise but hey you know just comply with the jackbooted thug crashing through your door. never mind its obvious that you have no desire to defend yourself and are more than willing to give up your rights and liberties for a false safety that does not exist.

    I don't know why I even bother with those who are so willing to give up their rights and the rights of others to those that are in power no matter how corrupt. I have the right to defend myself and I will not let you take it from me. apparently to some it is more noble to die under a boot than to die defending yourself.

  • some college kids lick professor's boots for grades.

    I guess they are used to it.

    Commenting on a video you didn't watch, just to ....

    that just is a waste of everybody's time.

  • Yeah I love drawing conclusions and generalizations too...

    Those were all NRA videos right? They started off with an innocent old lady. I wouldn't take all the facts given in those videos at face value. It doesn't make sense to only get info from the obviously biased side that you agree with.

    Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.

    Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon

  • I never did know what the hell you mean by neurosurgeon.

    If I did make a mistake, big deal. That's why you are never wrong in your eyes?

    Seriously, when have you ever been right? I link to a lot of stuff that I didn't create.

    You just make inane, thoughtless comments and challenges...without even trying to make sense,

    and without ever trying to understand an issue, or one side that has been presented.

    All you have is excuses. Not workin.

  • Yeah I love drawing conclusions and generalizations too...

    Those were all NRA videos right? They started off with an innocent old lady. I wouldn't take all the facts given in those videos at face value. It doesn't make sense to only get info from the obviously biased side that you agree with.

    Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.

    Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon

    @mld-woody said:

    Yeah I love drawing conclusions and generalizations too...

    Those were all NRA videos right? They started off with an innocent old lady. I wouldn't take all the facts given in those videos at face value. It doesn't make sense to only get info from the obviously biased side that you agree with.

    Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.

    Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon

    you can't take the real time footage of a woman's house being stormed and her being tackled at face value? please explain to me why. let me know what bias is being shown here other than your own willful ignorance, just so you can disagree and claim it biased.

  • I am assuming the rest of it is. The fact they led with the poor, innocent old lady should say enough. The fact is she pulled a gun on the police. Guns are big equalizer so if I was the cop my instinct would be to get that gun out of her hands too.

    Why they were in the house I forget. Maybe that part was uncalled for, idk. I'll have to watch it again.

  • I never did know what the hell you mean by neurosurgeon.

    If I did make a mistake, big deal. That's why you are never wrong in your eyes?

    Seriously, when have you ever been right? I link to a lot of stuff that I didn't create.

    You just make inane, thoughtless comments and challenges...without even trying to make sense,

    and without ever trying to understand an issue, or one side that has been presented.

    All you have is excuses. Not workin.

    @calfoxwc said:

    I never did know what the hell you mean by neurosurgeon.

    If I did make a mistake, big deal. That's why you are never wrong in your eyes?

    Seriously, when have you ever been right? I link to a lot of stuff that I didn't create.

    You just make inane, thoughtless comments and challenges...without even trying to make sense,

    and without ever trying to understand an issue, or one side that has been presented.

    All you have is excuses. Not workin.

    You went on and on about how this actual neurosurgeon from this conference called into like Becks radio show and said all these things about how bad Obama care is and all the things it will do to ruin America. You thought this was the best evidence ever.

    Turned out this guy was a fraud and wasn't a neurosurgeon. Them you kinda just avoided the thread until it disappeared.

    I'm not surprised you think my points don't make much sense. I use science and reason and legit, academic sources and studies. You quote right wing blogs, reference the Bible and rant about how Obama is an evil Muslim trying to destroy america. I could see how my points seem strange to someone like you.

    When have I ever been right? Let's start with pretty much the entire global warming thread. Pretty much everything you posted that you thought was a real argument was turn apart by vapor, heck or me. You thought you had real scientific evidence but there was always some giant hole on the data or the technique or something.

  • Bunker you're a moron.

    Don't be afraid of what you don't understand.

    I realize that a lot of things, but you can do it

  • You went on and on about how this actual neurosurgeon from this conference called into like Becks radio show and said all these things about how bad Obama care is and all the things it will do to ruin America. You thought this was the best evidence ever.

    Turned out this guy was a fraud and wasn't a neurosurgeon. Them you kinda just avoided the thread until it disappeared.

    ******************************************************

    Baloney. You kept whining and challenging me to provide links to support my opinion, as in, I was the only one who thought that. I provided a bunch of links more than once,

    but you ignored them, apparently. And you started claiming that the surgeon wasn't a surgeon and never did explain why. We've posted

    maybe a hundred articles about why it's bad. But you are a coward, and ignored all but one, and I never saw you explain why you isolated on just one.

    You are being LITTLE JOHNNIE WOODPECKER again. See? I gave you a huge chance recently, and now you've shown to everybody else that

    you got nothin, you are a coward, and you constantly talk out of your backside.

    Guess what that makes you? It makes you an mz the pussy the pussy clone of sorts.

    *****************************************************

    I'm not surprised you think my points don't make much sense. I use science and reason and legit, academic sources and studies. You quote right wing blogs, reference the Bible and rant about how Obama is an evil Muslim trying to destroy america. I could see how my points seem strange to someone like you.

    *****************************************************

    Where's your "science" in constantly calling other people "moron" ??? You are Little Johnny Woodpeckerhead alright. I knew Little johnny, and

    you post like you are his more ignorant "other brother Daryl."

    ****************************************************

    When have I ever been right? Let's start with pretty much the entire global warming thread. Pretty much everything you posted that you thought was a real argument was turn apart by vapor, heck or me. You thought you had real scientific evidence but there was always some giant hole on the data or the technique or something.

    *******************************************************

    Dream on, and nobody else on this board wants to know how you play with your little hockey stick...graph.

    Dang, you keep misusing words and spewing strange off the wall statements like you aren't mentally right, or grew up all alone

    in some bathroom in some deserted factory in Leningrad. Ask anybody. It's written all over your posts, Pouty Poopy Little Johnny Woodpecker.

    Even Heck is ashamed of you. You make no sense, can't do your own net searches, and you reek of fermented elderberries.