The Untold Story Of Gun Confiscation
-
Yeah I love drawing conclusions and generalizations too...
Those were all NRA videos right? They started off with an innocent old lady. I wouldn't take all the facts given in those videos at face value. It doesn't make sense to only get info from the obviously biased side that you agree with.
Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.
Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon
-
I never did know what the hell you mean by neurosurgeon.
If I did make a mistake, big deal. That's why you are never wrong in your eyes?
Seriously, when have you ever been right? I link to a lot of stuff that I didn't create.
You just make inane, thoughtless comments and challenges...without even trying to make sense,
and without ever trying to understand an issue, or one side that has been presented.
All you have is excuses. Not workin.
-
Yeah I love drawing conclusions and generalizations too...
Those were all NRA videos right? They started off with an innocent old lady. I wouldn't take all the facts given in those videos at face value. It doesn't make sense to only get info from the obviously biased side that you agree with.
Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.
Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon
Yeah I love drawing conclusions and generalizations too...
Those were all NRA videos right? They started off with an innocent old lady. I wouldn't take all the facts given in those videos at face value. It doesn't make sense to only get info from the obviously biased side that you agree with.
Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.
Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon
you can't take the real time footage of a woman's house being stormed and her being tackled at face value? please explain to me why. let me know what bias is being shown here other than your own willful ignorance, just so you can disagree and claim it biased.
-
I am assuming the rest of it is. The fact they led with the poor, innocent old lady should say enough. The fact is she pulled a gun on the police. Guns are big equalizer so if I was the cop my instinct would be to get that gun out of her hands too.
Why they were in the house I forget. Maybe that part was uncalled for, idk. I'll have to watch it again.
-
I never did know what the hell you mean by neurosurgeon.
If I did make a mistake, big deal. That's why you are never wrong in your eyes?
Seriously, when have you ever been right? I link to a lot of stuff that I didn't create.
You just make inane, thoughtless comments and challenges...without even trying to make sense,
and without ever trying to understand an issue, or one side that has been presented.
All you have is excuses. Not workin.
I never did know what the hell you mean by neurosurgeon.
If I did make a mistake, big deal. That's why you are never wrong in your eyes?
Seriously, when have you ever been right? I link to a lot of stuff that I didn't create.
You just make inane, thoughtless comments and challenges...without even trying to make sense,
and without ever trying to understand an issue, or one side that has been presented.
All you have is excuses. Not workin.
You went on and on about how this actual neurosurgeon from this conference called into like Becks radio show and said all these things about how bad Obama care is and all the things it will do to ruin America. You thought this was the best evidence ever.
Turned out this guy was a fraud and wasn't a neurosurgeon. Them you kinda just avoided the thread until it disappeared.
I'm not surprised you think my points don't make much sense. I use science and reason and legit, academic sources and studies. You quote right wing blogs, reference the Bible and rant about how Obama is an evil Muslim trying to destroy america. I could see how my points seem strange to someone like you.
When have I ever been right? Let's start with pretty much the entire global warming thread. Pretty much everything you posted that you thought was a real argument was turn apart by vapor, heck or me. You thought you had real scientific evidence but there was always some giant hole on the data or the technique or something.
-
Bunker you're a moron.
Don't be afraid of what you don't understand.
I realize that a lot of things, but you can do it
-
You went on and on about how this actual neurosurgeon from this conference called into like Becks radio show and said all these things about how bad Obama care is and all the things it will do to ruin America. You thought this was the best evidence ever.
Turned out this guy was a fraud and wasn't a neurosurgeon. Them you kinda just avoided the thread until it disappeared.
******************************************************
Baloney. You kept whining and challenging me to provide links to support my opinion, as in, I was the only one who thought that. I provided a bunch of links more than once,
but you ignored them, apparently. And you started claiming that the surgeon wasn't a surgeon and never did explain why. We've posted
maybe a hundred articles about why it's bad. But you are a coward, and ignored all but one, and I never saw you explain why you isolated on just one.
You are being LITTLE JOHNNIE WOODPECKER again. See? I gave you a huge chance recently, and now you've shown to everybody else that
you got nothin, you are a coward, and you constantly talk out of your backside.
Guess what that makes you? It makes you an mz the pussy the pussy clone of sorts.
*****************************************************
I'm not surprised you think my points don't make much sense. I use science and reason and legit, academic sources and studies. You quote right wing blogs, reference the Bible and rant about how Obama is an evil Muslim trying to destroy america. I could see how my points seem strange to someone like you.
*****************************************************
Where's your "science" in constantly calling other people "moron" ??? You are Little Johnny Woodpeckerhead alright. I knew Little johnny, and
you post like you are his more ignorant "other brother Daryl."
****************************************************
When have I ever been right? Let's start with pretty much the entire global warming thread. Pretty much everything you posted that you thought was a real argument was turn apart by vapor, heck or me. You thought you had real scientific evidence but there was always some giant hole on the data or the technique or something.
*******************************************************
Dream on, and nobody else on this board wants to know how you play with your little hockey stick...graph.
Dang, you keep misusing words and spewing strange off the wall statements like you aren't mentally right, or grew up all alone
in some bathroom in some deserted factory in Leningrad. Ask anybody. It's written all over your posts, Pouty Poopy Little Johnny Woodpecker.
Even Heck is ashamed of you. You make no sense, can't do your own net searches, and you reek of fermented elderberries.
-
Bunker said:
i realized a long time ago that you are nothing more than a little pot smokin fag, did u know that 1 in 5 scientists have openly stated that they are dope heads, those are the ones that have come forward with it. maybe u need to attend a da meeting and get cleaned up cuz yur not making any sense at all.
put down the bong boy
look personal attacks do not help your view. if warnings are going to be given out for language then they should apply to this as well.
-
Bunker said:
i realized a long time ago that you are nothing more than a little pot smokin fag, did u know that 1 in 5 scientists have openly stated that they are dope heads, those are the ones that have come forward with it. maybe u need to attend a da meeting and get cleaned up cuz yur not making any sense at all.
put down the bong boy
look personal attacks do not help your view. if warnings are going to be given out for language then they should apply to this as well.
look personal attacks do not help your view. if warnings are going to be given out for language then they should apply to this as well.
The person launching those attacks would have to have a viewpoint that disagrees with out glorious mod T to get hit with a sanction
and Bunker, I don't smoke.
-
No, that's not it at all.
There is a difference between being provoked into responding in kind,
and directly attacking someone with a personal slur that is completely unwarranted.
Like someone breaking into your car, and shoots you, and you shoot them back.
The crime is in the intitial shooting. The second shot in return fire is perfectly justified,
as in, self defense.
Little Johnny Woodpecker launches personal attacks continually, for no reason, other than
he just doesn't like other people having opinions he doesn't like. Typical would be controlling liberal.
-
You went on and on about how this actual neurosurgeon from this conference called into like Becks radio show and said all these things about how bad Obama care is and all the things it will do to ruin America. You thought this was the best evidence ever.
Turned out this guy was a fraud and wasn't a neurosurgeon. Them you kinda just avoided the thread until it disappeared.
******************************************************
Baloney. You kept whining and challenging me to provide links to support my opinion, as in, I was the only one who thought that. I provided a bunch of links more than once,
but you ignored them, apparently. And you started claiming that the surgeon wasn't a surgeon and never did explain why. We've posted
maybe a hundred articles about why it's bad. But you are a coward, and ignored all but one, and I never saw you explain why you isolated on just one.
You are being LITTLE JOHNNIE WOODPECKER again. See? I gave you a huge chance recently, and now you've shown to everybody else that
you got nothin, you are a coward, and you constantly talk out of your backside.
Guess what that makes you? It makes you an mz the pussy the pussy clone of sorts.
*****************************************************
I'm not surprised you think my points don't make much sense. I use science and reason and legit, academic sources and studies. You quote right wing blogs, reference the Bible and rant about how Obama is an evil Muslim trying to destroy america. I could see how my points seem strange to someone like you.
*****************************************************
Where's your "science" in constantly calling other people "moron" ??? You are Little Johnny Woodpeckerhead alright. I knew Little johnny, and
you post like you are his more ignorant "other brother Daryl."
****************************************************
When have I ever been right? Let's start with pretty much the entire global warming thread. Pretty much everything you posted that you thought was a real argument was turn apart by vapor, heck or me. You thought you had real scientific evidence but there was always some giant hole on the data or the technique or something.
*******************************************************
Dream on, and nobody else on this board wants to know how you play with your little hockey stick...graph.
Dang, you keep misusing words and spewing strange off the wall statements like you aren't mentally right, or grew up all alone
in some bathroom in some deserted factory in Leningrad. Ask anybody. It's written all over your posts, Pouty Poopy Little Johnny Woodpecker.
Even Heck is ashamed of you. You make no sense, can't do your own net searches, and you reek of fermented elderberries.
You went on and on about how this actual neurosurgeon from this conference called into like Becks radio show and said all these things about how bad Obama care is and all the things it will do to ruin America. You thought this was the best evidence ever.
Turned out this guy was a fraud and wasn't a neurosurgeon. Them you kinda just avoided the thread until it disappeared.
******************************************************
Baloney. You kept whining and challenging me to provide links to support my opinion, as in, I was the only one who thought that. I provided a bunch of links more than once,
but you ignored them, apparently. And you started claiming that the surgeon wasn't a surgeon and never did explain why. We've posted
maybe a hundred articles about why it's bad. But you are a coward, and ignored all but one, and I never saw you explain why you isolated on just one.
You are being LITTLE JOHNNIE WOODPECKER again. See? I gave you a huge chance recently, and now you've shown to everybody else that
you got nothin, you are a coward, and you constantly talk out of your backside.
Guess what that makes you? It makes you an mz the pussy the pussy the pussy the pussy the pussy clone of sorts.
*****************************************************
Let's look into this, shall we?
Here is your post from that board
So, any non-denominational church is not exempted. That make any sense to you?
There are many, many independent churches. It's just a step in the direction Obamao wants to go.
After it's passed, it will be " well, it's okay, because it's already in place for so and so".
Nudges. It's how leftists work to move an entire society into submission without overwhelming resistance.
Here's just two quick examples of why your "false information" about death panels... is false instead.
********************
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/obama-death-panels-medicare/2010/12/26/id/381043
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2811781/posts
Mark Levin Show: Death Panels Will Be A Reality With Obamacare [Youtube video]
Youtube ^ | November 22, 2011 | Mark Levin Show via Youtube
Posted on Wednesday, November 23, 2011 11:21:54 PM by No One Special
A neurosurgeon, vetted by Levin's staff, calls Mark and talks about what he knows about Obamacare Death Panels. From 11/22/11
Here is my response
....
So I watched that second video, and these are the first comments I saw "Not a real surgeon" "Fake" "Hoax", etc. This is already not looking good for you, but I looked into it more. I went to AANS.org and found an official statement about this interview
http://www.aans.org/pdf/AANS_News/Mark_Levin_Statement_FINAL.PDF
There ya go. If you are going to use sources to make your point, at least make sure they are real.... how very Fox News of you
By the way, the posts on that freerepublic forum are hilarious. It reads like a bunch of old people being afraid because a black family moved into their neighborhood lol.
So there you go Cal. I think you are getting old, your memory is going.
That guy was identified as not being a real neurosurgeon...
You also never brought this point up again in your one more post in that thread. I think you realized how Retarded you looked, and didn't want to try to dig out of that hole.
-
I never saw that, Woody, My bad. But seriously, everybody who has ever been on the board knows I've posted a lot of stuff, a bunch of links.
You dwell on one, where apparently? this guy was a fake, whatever.
That is why every single link and source and information that proves you wrong about stuff, doesn't exist?
Makes everything else go away?
That's stupid. Now, can we please get BACK TO THE SUBJECT OF THE THREAD ??????????????
Or are you Heck's "roommate" and you will change every thread subject just because you can?
Or, you are unable to follow any thread subject?
Here: "THE UNTOLD STORY OF GUN CONFISCATION". That's it.
-
Bunker said:
i got a warning also. so what do u want to talk about? you dont see me crying the blues and acting like a puss. you fags wear yur feelings on yu r shirt sleeves like its a badge of honor or sumthin, so are ya sufferin from some unconscious homosexual guilt here?
no you did not get a warning like the other guy did which was a public tongue lashing for all to see. so no it was not treated the same. and apparrently warnings mean nothing because here you are again now calling me a fag. Woody and I were arguing the point of this thread until you and cal came along and started making a circus out of this place. All you are doing is shouting at everyone. You don't even have a point you have just yelled names and bringing up off point crap. I was actually arguing this thread in the favor of the constitution before all of this BS sidetracked this thread into the swamp it is currently in.
So do you have something to bring to the table or are you going to continue to lash out at anything that moves?
-
actually, I was just responding to Little Johnnie Woodpecker's stupid crap, Nunboy.
I was on topic until he said this:
"Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.
Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon"
He's referring to the topic Obamaocare from January, because you were making him
look stupid. Everybody does.
He didn't even WATCH the videos, but commented against what they showed.
He apparently is, so far. You watch, Nunboy, all the libs twist meanings of words,
twists others' statements, completely change subjects, and ridicule every post that makes them
cry "NO FAIR, I'M WRONG, BUT WRONG MEANS I'M RIGHT, SO HAHA"
I've long since figured that I'm not taking the libs crap. Shep, Heck, mz the pussy the pussy, and now Woodpecker were known for snide, nasty
comments directed at me, or T, or Bunker, or Steve, or Diehard, ...., when we weren't even in a freaking thread at all.
When they change the subject, it screws up threads, and it is the same as them running and hiding in a closet
when they are found out to be totally wrong.
-
actually, I was just responding to Little Johnnie Woodpecker's stupid crap, Nunboy.
I was on topic until he said this:
"Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.
Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon"
He's referring to the topic Obamaocare from January, because you were making him
look stupid. Everybody does.
He didn't even WATCH the videos, but commented against what they showed.
He apparently is, so far. You watch, Nunboy, all the libs twist meanings of words,
twists others' statements, completely change subjects, and ridicule every post that makes them
cry "NO FAIR, I'M WRONG, BUT WRONG MEANS I'M RIGHT, SO HAHA"
I've long since figured that I'm not taking the libs crap. Shep, Heck, mz the pussy the pussy, and now Woodpecker were known for snide, nasty
comments directed at me, or T, or Bunker, or Steve, or Diehard, ...., when we weren't even in a freaking thread at all.
When they change the subject, it screws up threads, and it is the same as them running and hiding in a closet
when they are found out to be totally wrong.
actually, I was just responding to Little Johnnie Woodpecker's stupid crap, Nunboy.
I was on topic until he said this:
"Maybe I'll watch the videos later, idk. Let's just say cal and others don't have the best record when it comes to posting legitimate sources.
Hey cal.... Neurosurgeon"
He's referring to the topic Obamaocare from January, because you were making him
look stupid. Everybody does.
He didn't even WATCH the videos, but commented against what they showed.
He apparently is, so far. You watch, Nunboy, all the libs twist meanings of words,
twists others' statements, completely change subjects, and ridicule every post that makes them
cry "NO FAIR, I'M WRONG, BUT WRONG MEANS I'M RIGHT, SO HAHA"
I've long since figured that I'm not taking the libs crap. Shep, Heck, mz the pussy the pussy the pussy, and now Woodpecker were known for snide, nasty
comments directed at me, or T, or Bunker, or Steve, or Diehard, ...., when we weren't even in a freaking thread at all.
When they change the subject, it screws up threads, and it is the same as them running and hiding in a closet
when they are found out to be totally wrong.
Then be the better person and behave as you should, this place looks to have devolved into a preschool fight of "who's dad is bigger". If he brings up the past have him address it in that thread; it is killing this thread and most of the others I am in as well. I do not know the history of most of you in this place I am just calling it as I see it from an outsiders point of view. not many in here are being fair.
-
Cal I'm not a liberal
Cal, those people aren't "twisting words" or "changing the topic". They are providing evidence for why you are wrong. You just refuse to accept these articles or learn from them.
I only brought up the past to explain my thoughts on you not having very accurate or reliable sources. I brought up the neurosurgeon post because that is the quickest and easiest one to show you being wrong.
As for me not acknowledging any of your sources when they prove me wrong...uh... idk what you are talking about. I am pretty sure we shot down all of your sources in the global warming thread. But honestly, I don't want to take the time to find something wrong in all of your links from your right wing websites, especially when most breakdown into taking things out of context, overreations, opinions, etc.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login