Skip to content

Liberals Are Racists

Political Discussion
41 9 1.6k
  • Well I guess it's too tough for an engineering student to understand.

    I mean really I've seen those engineering, science and mathematics text books and I think any idiot could learn that crap in a few hours.

    Actually I wouldn't be surprised if they monkey or a brain damaged person wouldn't do well in that field.

    So I guess if you are too stupid for liberal arts or physical education, engineering is the path to go.

    Of course I've never even opened 1 of those textbooks but seeing as how you set the rules for discussion I guess I don't need to right?

    So allow me to offer my thoughtful and considered response:

    YOU'RE A MORON!

    L O L O L O L O L!

    You know woody you are right.

    This makes it a lot easier.

    WSS

    *********************************

    I guess Heck got tired of getting his ass kicked by Steve, so he had Little Stupid Johnny Woodenpeckerhead stand in for him.

    "Hey, look at that fool engineering class guy !! he's standing up taking his test ! LOL LOL LOL"

    "Yeah, somebody online called him "Little Johnny Woodenpeckerhead...it fits...but what's with the standing up all the time?"

  • Woodlesspeckerhead lost the debate when he decided not to read the article. We shouldn't expect to much from these fucking fag loving liberal.

    Racist-Al-Sharpton.jpg

  • Whatever makes you guys feel better

  • You are not very smart woodlesspeckerhead.

  • Getting back to the topic,

    This article is wrong. There is a contrarian opinion provided by the author with no proof submitted what ever. Also, the person states that the history books lie as if the Republicans who also had a strong presence and still do and going to let history teachers concoct their own imagination and write is as text books.

    The next problem is that references to the OJ Simpson case. She declares that the mostly black jury sets the black man free, thereby making it sound like it was a black helping black thing which is not proven. What was evident in hindsight was the lack of preparation by the prosecution. Not only could they not put forth a solid case but they also failed in-fact to present evidence that could have solidified their case. They thought they had it under wraps, but were wrong.

    The only firm evidence that there are any actual racists left in America is the fact that so many whites voted for Obama as some sort of racial penance.

    The other problem is her assumption that Obama got elected simply he was black and white people feel the need to vote for him and the fact that no other forms of racism exist. Racism still exists. Also, It is foolish to assume that Obama was voted for because he was black - If that was possible then we should have black leaning folks voting for Al Sharpton before or Herman Cain as the GOP nominee.

    She completely overlooks the ability that Barack Obama's silver tongue and the campaign strategy and the people whom it targeted - The youth and immigrants. Just like the Simpson case the author too has not taken the time to carefully prepare the case.

  • Brown Indian.

    Approximately 13 percent of the citizenship is black.

    98 percent voted for Obama.

    That's to be expected but mainly because he's black and liberal.

    If a black candidate does not play the victimization card and the us against them ploy they don't get that vote. Otherwise they are considered race traitors like Allen keys or Colin Powell before he returned to the reservation.

    More importantly since the Obama candidacy was an historic event those who identify with him racially voted in higher numbers. His political ambition has been linked with race since his college days.

    Also you seem aghast at the idea that history books have been manipulated for political purpose.

    Are you kidding me?

    Personally I don't see racism as a real problem as we have defined it here.

    There is certainly racial preference and Prejudice on all sides.

    Obama gets a huge amount of attention because of his color and that's understandable.

    Like Tiger Woods or Doug Williams. Like Geraldine Ferraro because of her gender.

    It's perfectly understandable and up to you whether or not you think it's all that bad.

    I would imagine that a white heavyweight contenders would draw more attention then if he were black.

    But of course you also realize that we're not talking about Obama's teleprompter reading ability.

    But yes thats a factor.

    That's the way it goes. May as well vote for James Earl Jones.

    😉

    WSS

  • Brown Indian.

    Approximately 13 percent of the citizenship is black.

    98 percent voted for Obama.

    That's to be expected but mainly because he's black and liberal.

    If a black candidate does not play the victimization card and the us against them ploy they don't get that vote. Otherwise they are considered race traitors like Allen keys or Colin Powell before he returned to the reservation.

    More importantly since the Obama candidacy was an historic event those who identify with him racially voted in higher numbers. His political ambition has been linked with race since his college days.

    Also you seem aghast at the idea that history books have been manipulated for political purpose.

    Are you kidding me?

    Personally I don't see racism as a real problem as we have defined it here.

    There is certainly racial preference and Prejudice on all sides.

    Obama gets a huge amount of attention because of his color and that's understandable.

    Like Tiger Woods or Doug Williams. Like Geraldine Ferraro because of her gender.

    It's perfectly understandable and up to you whether or not you think it's all that bad.

    I would imagine that a white heavyweight contenders would draw more attention then if he were black.

    But of course you also realize that we're not talking about Obama's teleprompter reading ability.

    But yes thats a factor.

    That's the way it goes. May as well vote for James Earl Jones.

    😉

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    May as well vote for James Earl Jones.

    😉

    WSS

    University of Michigan Grad

    I'm sure there were people that didn't vote for Obama because he was black too. But then again they probably weren't voting liberal anyway.

  • I'm sure there was a lot of stupid people who only voted for Obama because he was black and they will do it again.

    Look at this Retard

    Michigan Professor Strips Naked In Class, Shouts 'There Is No F--king God'

    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/10/02/michigan-professor-strips-naked-class-shouts-there-no-f-king-god#ixzz289wA9aaw

    How much do you want to bet this Retard voted for Obama?

  • How much you want to bet that he was Woodpecker's favorite professor?

  • I'm sure there was a lot of stupid people who only voted for Obama because he was black and they will do it again.

    Look at this Retard

    Michigan Professor Strips Naked In Class, Shouts 'There Is No F--king God'

    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/10/02/michigan-professor-strips-naked-class-shouts-there-no-f-king-god#ixzz289wA9aaw

    How much do you want to bet this Retard voted for Obama?

    @saint said:

    I'm sure there was a lot of stupid people who only voted for Obama because he was black and they will do it again.

    Look at this Retard

    Michigan Professor Strips Naked In Class, Shouts 'There Is No F--king God'

    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/10/02/michigan-professor-strips-naked-class-shouts-there-no-f-king-god#ixzz289wA9aaw

    How much do you want to bet this Retard voted for Obama?

    I know you don't understand irony, along with a lot of other things, but let's look at your source and see what we find.

    First line in the fucking article

    The rigors of teaching apparently got to Michigan State University professor John McCarthy Monday.

    but that's ok. I know reading is hard for you. Cal too apparently.

  • How much you want to bet that he was Woodpecker's favorite professor?

    They use to visit homo bars together.

    After meeting each others parents, both sets of parents decided that they were in favor of after-birth abortion. Even if the babies were past puberty.

  • But all of us don't.

    Some do, the left, for the most part......?

    But the gov ARE people.

    right now, Ghoolie - they are the enemies to America and what it stands for.

    Apparently, we are a nation where half of us understand honor, integrity, and hard work and self reliance.

    The other half wants mo big gubment, and more control over everything,

    where that control would vindicate what otherwise low class human beings they are.

    Like ObaMao and his cohorts. I believe in our new VP more than I do Romney.

    But I know that Obamao and co. are dangerous to American life, our Constitution, and ...all of us.

    And, all the left refuses NOW to even mention our devastating debt that has Obamao-spiriled into space.

    It wasn't anywhere near that bad under Bush, and he had 9/11 and other things to contend with.

    But now, it's dangerous. And seemingly, intended to be destructive by the dirtbags in our own gov.

    THIS huge and GROWING debt, will destroy us... but....... to ObaMao it will be "just a bump in the road"....

  • I think our problem is people that think everyone that has a differing viewpoint than them is a lazy, no good, anti-american waste of space.

  • You don't think it, because that's stupid.

    You feel it.

    The truth is, and I think it was FairHooker that posted it?

    Was the two guys making serious fun of the stupid and the gimme mo gubment ObaMao money crowd.

  • <br />Bunker and Saint are the same person.<br /><br />I am not going to take the time to go into all of Cal or Bunkers ridiculous "Obamao sucks, liberals sucks, go conservatives" threads with sources from completely biased sites and actually read through all of the info to find where it is false or incorrect or reaching to a conclusion.<br /><br />In this case, it seems pretty obvious. Ann Coulter is basically a female Bunker. She says as offensive and outrageous stuff as she can to get attention. Its something pro conservative and anti liberal. Same shit as always. She's a bitch and acts like one. It's all part of her act and how she gets her speaking fee money. At least I hope it is an act. Similar to Beck going from a radio jockey to what he is doing now. I am ashamed she got a law degree from Michigan. <br /><br />But anyway, she is a bitch trying to say ridiculous stuff so people interview her about the ridiculous stuff she has in a book or has said. Its an old game. And if she is serious its even worse.<br /><br />In summary, she is an annoying, bitter bitch.<br /><br /><br /><br />Go look up videos by her yourself if you want. I am not going to try to convince anyone here otherwise. I mean hell, we've flooded Cal with global warming evidence before WHILE proving his arguments wrong and we still didn't make any progress.<br />
    <br /><br /><br />

    You really are stupid.

  • Heck is the board's ass, and Little Pukey Johnny Woodypeckerhead is

    his private flea.

    Otherwise, we'd have a real political board, without the phoney, elitist

    nazi-collaborator mentality with regard to ObaMao.

    Mars has global warming. No people.

    Liberals are the stupidist people ever to emote about politics.