Presidential Debate 1 - Your Verdict
-
Sorry, I don't run right to this board and haven't looked at until now, but yes, Romney clearly won last night. It was one of the more lopsided debates I can remember. I don't think it could have gone better for him. It changes the race.
If he'd done poorly, or Obama had done better, that probably would have been the end of it. Now the media narrative is "Romney's back!" Because they're all in the tank for Obama.
Funny, because someone was asking me last night if the conservative or Tea Party wing of the Republican Party would be upset this morning because Romney played it like a total moderate last night. Which just made me laugh. Not at Romney - at my co-worker. Because it's about winning, and Romney won. They wouldn't care if he came out for abortion on demand.
Sorry, I don't run right to this board and haven't looked at until now, but yes, Romney clearly won last night. It was one of the more lopsided debates I can remember. I don't think it could have gone better for him. It changes the race.
If he'd done poorly, or Obama had done better, that probably would have been the end of it. Now the media narrative is "Romney's back!" Because they're all in the tank for Obama.
They still are. They just also what the story to draw attention.
Funny, because someone was asking me last night if the conservative or Tea Party wing of the Republican Party would be upset this morning because Romney played it like a total moderate last nights. Which just made me laugh. Not at Romney - at my co-worker. Because it's about winning, and Romney won. They wouldn't care if he came out for abortion on demand.
Or if he were sending hundreds of American kids to their deaths in an unwinnable war with no positive goal in sight......
Oh sorry, that's your base.
WSS
-
And Cal I too was surprised to see Romney a, do as well and b, get any credit whatsoever.
I didn't expect Heck to give anything less than his honest opinion.
WSS
-
I don't get how you see universal agreement among media pundits that Romney fared far better in the debate than President Obama, and yet not question your belief that many in the media actually take their jobs seriously and don't secretly scheme for their liberal candidate buddies?
Is it possible that you're, you know, wrong?
-
Sorry, I don't run right to this board and haven't looked at until now, but yes, Romney clearly won last night. It was one of the more lopsided debates I can remember. I don't think it could have gone better for him. It changes the race.
If he'd done poorly, or Obama had done better, that probably would have been the end of it. Now the media narrative is "Romney's back!" Because they're all in the tank for Obama.
They still are. They just also what the story to draw attention.
Funny, because someone was asking me last night if the conservative or Tea Party wing of the Republican Party would be upset this morning because Romney played it like a total moderate last nights. Which just made me laugh. Not at Romney - at my co-worker. Because it's about winning, and Romney won. They wouldn't care if he came out for abortion on demand.
Or if he were sending hundreds of American kids to their deaths in an unwinnable war with no positive goal in sight......
Oh sorry, that's your base.
WSS
Or if he were sending hundreds of American kids to their deaths in an unwinnable war with no positive goal in sight......
Oh sorry, that's your base.
WSS
They do care about that. I know I do. Among liberals I know, the war in Afghanistan is - easily - the number one complaint about the administration, followed by the continuation of Bush surveillance/anti-terror policies, and no movement at all in the war on drugs. Those would be the top three. If I had to go to four i'd say his lack of an effective policy to assist homeowners/stabilize the housing market.
Just to give you a little window into a world you clearly have little familiarity with.
-
<br />I don't get how you see universal agreement among media pundits that Romney fared far better in the debate than President Obama, and yet not question your belief that many in the media actually take their jobs seriously and don't secretly scheme for their liberal candidate buddies?<br /><br />Is it possible that you're, you know, wrong?<br />
Hey dipshit did you look at the CNN poll? Chris Matthews about had a heart attack with wimpy sniveling and bitching about Obama's Big Fail!
It took you almost a full day to come out of closet where you were licking your balls when you're boy got his ass handed to him last night.
-
I keep mentioning that Obamao has had more military deaths in Afghanistan in 3.7 years than Bush did in 8 years,
but Heck hasn't manned up and admitted that it's true.
Avoidance is his usual last resort defense....
-
I don't get how you see universal agreement among media pundits that Romney fared far better in the debate than President Obama, and yet not question your belief that many in the media actually take their jobs seriously and don't secretly scheme for their liberal candidate buddies?
Is it possible that you're, you know, wrong?
I don't get how you see universal agreement among media pundits that Romney fared far better in the debate than President Obama, and yet not question your belief that many in the media actually take their jobs seriously and don't secretly scheme for their liberal candidate buddies?
Is it possible that you're, you know, wrong?
Nope.
I think you're smart enough to know that a story can be written with a slant without actually lying.
You probably know that better than any of us.
And let us not forget that the mainstream media is a business too.
I think they will all grudgingly report a story that doesn't show their candidate in a good light.
Still depending on ideology they may treat that story somewhere on the scale between the kid glove and the chainmail gauntlet.
WSS
-
Or if he were sending hundreds of American kids to their deaths in an unwinnable war with no positive goal in sight......
Oh sorry, that's your base.
WSS
They do care about that. I know I do. Among liberals I know, the war in Afghanistan is - easily - the number one complaint about the administration, followed by the continuation of Bush surveillance/anti-terror policies, and no movement at all in the war on drugs. Those would be the top three. If I had to go to four i'd say his lack of an effective policy to assist homeowners/stabilize the housing market.
Just to give you a little window into a world you clearly have little familiarity with.
They do care about that. I know I do. Among liberals I know, the war in Afghanistan is - easily - the number one complaint about the administration, followed by the continuation of Bush surveillance/anti-terror policies, and no movement at all in the war on drugs. Those would be the top three. If I had to go to four i'd say his lack of an effective policy to assist homeowners/stabilize the housing market.
Just to give you a little window into a world you clearly have little familiarity with.
Oh I have many friends among the left.
We should draw a line between the old guard party faithful and the true left wing idealogue.
Or right wing if you prefer.
Personally I thought afghanistan was a waste of time money and lives ever since we got involved.
but since you delight in pointing out the inconsistencies of your latest bogiemen the Tea Party, I feel it's only fair to underscore the hypocrisy of those who showed such abject hatred for George W Bush.
If there still is an anti war drum beat I can barely hear it.
We can take the drug laws and the housing crisis to another thread.
WSS
-
I don't get how you see universal agreement among media pundits that Romney fared far better in the debate than President Obama, and yet not question your belief that many in the media actually take their jobs seriously and don't secretly scheme for their liberal candidate buddies?
Is it possible that you're, you know, wrong?
Nope.
I think you're smart enough to know that a story can be written with a slant without actually lying.
You probably know that better than any of us.
And let us not forget that the mainstream media is a business too.
I think they will all grudgingly report a story that doesn't show their candidate in a good light.
Still depending on ideology they may treat that story somewhere on the scale between the kid glove and the chainmail gauntlet.
WSS
Nope.
I think you're smart enough to know that a story can be written with a slant without actually lying.
You probably know that better than any of us.
And let us not forget that the mainstream media is a business too.
I think they will all grudgingly report a story that doesn't show their candidate in a good light.
Still depending on ideology they may treat that story somewhere on the scale between the kid glove and the chainmail gauntlet.
WSS
Let's unpack this. Name me some of the mainstream journalists who you think are biased toward Obama.
-
I'd say every one of the networks, except perhaps Fox.
I'd say nearly every major newspaper except very few that are branded conservative.
What was that number when they asked journalists? 70 or 80 or even more percent are Democrats?
I'm pretty sure you know that's true, you're just tap dancing.
And just for the record people should take bias into account when reading news in the Washington Times or watching Fox as well. They just happen to be a tiny minority.
WSS
-
I mean people. Name individual journalists you think are biased.
-
Name me some of the mainstream journalists who you think are biased toward Obama. Heckbunker
********************************************************************************
ROF,L !!!!!!!
Oh, God help us and deliver us from ignorant liberal evil !!!!!!
HEE HEE HOO HOO HAW HAW HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!!!!!!
"snicker"
LOL
-
-
Seriously, Steve. Name some.
I think you're way off. (I know you're way off.) Fox News is designed to be a partisan news outlet that forwards Republican causes, both online and on TV. You may quibble with the slant of the network news, or of NPR, or of major newspapers, but they're simply not designed or run as partisan news outlets. There's simply no comparison in the real world.
Fox News isn't simply "slanted" to the right. Go look at their website. It's a campaign outfit. Then go look at any of the other outlets you just mentioned. They don't look anything alike. Here's NPR, for instance.
-
Obama is sinking fast after the debate.
It was only a matter of time before many of those so called "the middle of the road voters" would be awakened to a lazy ass Obama .
I clearly don't understand how anyone can live in the middle of the road without getting ran over. I believe they say this so they will not have to man up to their beliefs.
You can put it like this, either you suck cock or you don't, and everyone knows that democrat supporters suck cock so they cant say they are bisexual they have to tag themselves as flamming faggots and register with the local sherriff as a sexual predator.
-
Again, Bunker, you are a sad, sad man...
-
I love that he just hates, hates, hates gays and their awful gay sex so much that he just can't get gays and gay sex out of his head, and has to post about gay sex in every post. Just gay sex all the time with this guy. He can't stand it, those gays! And their cocksucking! I can't think of anything else! That's how much I hate gay cocksucking!
This guy is dressing up like a woman and tucking his dick between his legs in front of a full length mirror on a semi-regular basis. No doubt.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login