They Were Left To Die
-
CIA told to stand down.........OP-... they were left to die
-
If a lib had a son who was a Navy Seal who died that way.....
what would you think of a VP who says "Did you son always have balls the size of cue balls?" ???
And a president who won't look you in the eye, and offer up a limp-wristed handshake and walk away?
And send out form letters to you?
Serious replies maybe?
-
Will Obama’s Benghazi Cover-Up Succeed?
Barack Obama’s prospects for re-election have been fading for some time now. As Mitt Romney surges, Obama flails, embarrassing himself with silly trivialities that are often summed up as Big Bird, binders and bayonets. That’s what happens when your record is so bad that you can’t talk about it; not truthfully, anyway. So it has been clear for a while that Obama’s re-election hopes can’t absorb another blow. Which the Benghazi story, to the extent the facts get out, surely is.
That is why Obama made a decision early on to stop referring to the Benghazi debacle as a successful terrorist attack. Acknowledging what really happened would have utterly destroyed one of Obama’s main campaign themes, that through his own personal heroism he had al Qaeda on the run. Instead, Obama chose to pretend that Benghazi was an unfortunate but essentially meaningless mob uprising, prompted by a YouTube video. So we got the nauseating spectacle of Hillary Clinton hugging the father of one of the murdered SEALS and assuring him not to worry, the Obama administration would prosecute the guy who made the video to the fullest extent of the law.
But, with a little over a week to go until the election, the lid was blown off the administration’s cover-up by Fox’s story yesterday, alleging that the administration turned down repeated pleas for help over the course of the seven-hour Benghazi battle, and by the white-hot anger of Charles Woods, who has repeatedly called Barack Obama and his White House “cowards” for failing to come to his son’s aid.
If the allegations of Fox’s story prove to be true–still an open question at this point–and if voters know about them, Obama has no chance on November 6. So how will the media formerly known as mainstream, which have done their best to try to drag Obama’s sorry campaign across the finish line, deal with the Benghazi story?
The New York Times, for one, has dealt with it by not mentioning the current allegations. This is what you get if you search the Times site for “Benghazi:”
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/10/will-obamas-benghazi-cover-up-succeed.php
Freedom of speech has also become a crime under the Obama/Stalin regime
-
I wonder what Petraeus thinks of this snafu.
(I mean really)
WSS
-
Obamao threw Higgardly and Petraeus sp? under the bus.
But it backfired. Now he's running from any press that might dare
ask him about what he really knew as it happened, and why he
would not approve a rescue by the Seals on the ground.
And, why, in August, the big security team was still brought out of there,
despite the ambassador, and the COMMANDER of that heavy duty security team's
requests to extend their stay out of increasing violence toward the embassy.
It's a gut wretching scandal that ObaMao needs to own up to, or he surely will
lose the election by a greater margin.
Obamao is now a disgrace, even to the dems.
-
Benghazi scandal demands answers Prez shows utter lack of integrity, leadership
Last week, in the final presidential debate on foreign policy, Mitt Romney made a deliberate decision not to go after the president on Benghazi. Romney’s task was to present himself as a plausible commander in chief. To do so, he needed to remain above the fray and avoid getting into a spat with the president over the details of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya.
Romney was right (politically) to avoid a tit-for-tat with Obama on Benghazi. With the White House changing its story daily, any attempt by Romney to criticize the president on this issue would only have left him with a major case of whip-lash.
But the public and the media must demand answers. What exactly happened this past Sept. 11 in Libya? And why was the Obama administration unable or unwilling to prevent it?
-
I find it telling how none of the Obama supporters aren't in here.
I think they know it isn't simply BS and not worthy of a comment. They simply want to ignore it.
Tell you what....if President Obama gets re-elected, this is what gets him impeached.
-
woodenpeckhead, I believe, DID say a while ago,
that he thought Benghazi was not a story.
Yes, Heckbunker is avoiding it frantically.
And, if Romney doesn't win....
we'd better hope and pray the Reps take back the Senate.
-
I find it telling how none of the Obama supporters aren't in here.
I think they know it isn't simply BS and not worthy of a comment. They simply want to ignore it.
Tell you what....if President Obama gets re-elected, this is what gets him impeached.
-
And what would be the impeachment charge again?
And I have no doubt that this will be the battle cry of Obama gets re-elected. Zero. They're going to go straight to investigating Bengazi just like they did Solyndra and Fast and Furious, and come up with nothing, just like they did with Solyndra and Fast and Furious, and they'll be a big movement among the Fox News watchers to impeach over Bengazi. Which won't go anywhere. But that's what the right will spend its time on.
-
Fast and Furious? Nothing? Just not enough, soon enough, because ObaMao hid behind his exec privelege.
Obamao didn't use his exec power for "nothing".
And he's running away from the Benghazi scandal desperately.
And, of course, the left sided media won't cover it.
No wonder lefties hate Fox News.
-
Benghazi is not "nothing".....
and the deaths, heckbunker, are sure as hell not "nothing", nor a "bump in the road"
*****************************
Congress steps up demands for info on Benghazi attack...
FACEBOOK Censors Navy SEALS to Protect President...
'The mysterious media Benghazi bugout'...
Hannity on WH Audio Tapes: 'I've Heard They Are Damning'...
WASHPOST: 'LINGERING QUESTIONS'...
LENO: 'Don't ask, don't tell is back ... Obama's new policy for questions about Libya'...
-
of course nothing can happen without a majority in both houses, in which congress would most likely make this investigation a priority.
there is no love lost with the house repubs- and the evidence will be treated with full attention...
and an Obama ouster would be the CRY of the nation imo....
Just think though, Biden? uugghh
-
We'd have to impeach both of them.
Then, it's the Speaker....@@
-
We'd have to impeach both of them.
Then, it's the Speaker....@@
OHIO - PLEASE ELECT ROMNEY / RYAN
-
Documents Back Up Claims of Requests for Greater Security in Benghazi
-
the legacy of Obamas administration "MIS handling" of intellegence leaks...
the total disregard of our military officials and the hard work they perform for our national security.....
PISSED away by a FAST and LOOSE policy of political gain.... SHAME!
One cannot help but wonder if this attitude has any bearing on the administrations current handling of the Bengahzi consulate terrorist plot...?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login