Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. All Over For Hostess

All Over For Hostess

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
36 Posts 13 Posters 1.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Browns149B Browns149

    @westside-steve said:

    not any more. The company is out of business.

    WSS

    so they are striking against Little Debbie too?

    Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
    • 39k Posts
    • 9k Reputation
    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @browns149 said:

    so they are striking against Little Debbie too?

    Why? As far There were other unions involved but they settled, only the Baker's held out.

    Seems to me that Little Debbie cakes are located in the South, possibly a right to work state. And the company probably is a dinosaur, even though I don't know if that makes them expendable.

    I mean those people could actually use the jobs, right?

    WSS

    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
    Browns149B 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • W Westside Steve

      @browns149 said:

      so they are striking against Little Debbie too?

      Why? As far There were other unions involved but they settled, only the Baker's held out.

      Seems to me that Little Debbie cakes are located in the South, possibly a right to work state. And the company probably is a dinosaur, even though I don't know if that makes them expendable.

      I mean those people could actually use the jobs, right?

      WSS

      Browns149 Browns149B Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 10k Posts
      • 2k Reputation
      Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
      #27

      @westside-steve said:

      Why? As far There were other unions involved but they settled, only the Baker's held out.

      Seems to me that Little Debbie cakes are located in the South, possibly a right to work state. And the company probably is a dinosaur, even though I don't know if that makes them expendable.

      I mean those people could actually use the jobs, right?

      WSS

      The reason I was asking, why haven't other companies gone under due to this strike? And I looked it up and Little Debbie is located in Tenn. And it is a privately owned company.

      "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Browns149B Browns149

        @westside-steve said:

        not any more. The company is out of business.

        WSS

        so they are striking against Little Debbie too?

        ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 9k Posts
        • 2k Reputation
        ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
        #28

        @browns149 said:

        so they are striking against Little Debbie too?

        McKee Bakery (Little Debbie) is headquartered in Collegedale, Tn, about 15 miles from where I live. They are non-union.

        McKee was the largest snack cake baker in the country. Hostess had a little more in sales but that included the sale of Wonder Bread. McKee is nothing but snack cakes and granola bars.

        The local article is McKee is ramping up production.

        http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2012/nov/17/mckee-ramps-up-amid-hostess-fall/

        If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • hammertime hammertimeH Dedicated Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
          • 4k Posts
          • 2k Reputation
          hammertimeH hammertime wrote on last edited by
          #29

          The 82-year-old Hostess wants permission to pay senior management a bonus of up to 75 percent of their annual pay so they will stay on and help wind-down the business.

          how convenient for a business hell bent on blaming their failures on the bakers union.

          guns don't kill kids-pitt bulls do.
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
            • 39k Posts
            • 9k Reputation
            W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
            #30

            It's still the unions. you can take every penny from every corporate executives and put it back into the company and it really wouldn't change things. It's just an easy thing to get riled up over like congressional pay.

            Or welfare, it's not that big a portion of the budget.

            WSS

            www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
            S 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • W Westside Steve

              It's still the unions. you can take every penny from every corporate executives and put it back into the company and it really wouldn't change things. It's just an easy thing to get riled up over like congressional pay.

              Or welfare, it's not that big a portion of the budget.

              WSS

              sadbrownsfan S
              • 1k Posts
              • 41 Reputation
              S sadbrownsfan wrote on last edited by
              #31

              @westside-steve said:

              It's still the unions. you can take every penny from every corporate executives and put it back into the company and it really wouldn't change things. It's just an easy thing to get riled up over like congressional pay.

              Or welfare, it's not that big a portion of the budget.

              WSS

              So you are ok with the executives getting up to 80% pay rise when the company was about 6 months to returning to bankruptcy and then asking union employees to take a 8% pay cut?

              W 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • S sadbrownsfan

                @westside-steve said:

                It's still the unions. you can take every penny from every corporate executives and put it back into the company and it really wouldn't change things. It's just an easy thing to get riled up over like congressional pay.

                Or welfare, it's not that big a portion of the budget.

                WSS

                So you are ok with the executives getting up to 80% pay rise when the company was about 6 months to returning to bankruptcy and then asking union employees to take a 8% pay cut?

                Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                • 39k Posts
                • 9k Reputation
                W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                #32

                @sadbrownsfan said:

                So you are ok with the executives getting up to 80% pay rise when the company was about 6 months to returning to bankruptcy and then asking union employees to take a 8% pay cut?

                Look, I said it pisses people off. I understand that. Like I said when Congress vote themselves a raise or the bum next door is getting welfare and refusing to work.

                But if you break down the numbers and compare executive pay to the entire operating cost of a company you will see it's meaningless.

                Let's say you had that 80 percent in cash. How long do you think you could run the company with that money? Another day? Another week?

                WSS

                www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                S 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Saint S
                  • 395 Posts
                  • 40 Reputation
                  S Saint wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  Hostess is only the beginning. 🙂 May all blue states continue their own suffering and enjoy their ebt cards while they last.

                  61190_10151132171852596_1178526313_n.png

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • hammertime hammertimeH Dedicated Conversation Starter Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 2k Reputation
                    hammertimeH hammertime wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    There cannot be 1 side who is abstained from fault in this Hostess debacle.

                    There is no harm in restructuring or renegotiating.

                    Although it appears the union did make cuts only to see management renig on marketing and production promises such as technology, equipment and transportation.

                    guns don't kill kids-pitt bulls do.
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • W Westside Steve

                      @sadbrownsfan said:

                      So you are ok with the executives getting up to 80% pay rise when the company was about 6 months to returning to bankruptcy and then asking union employees to take a 8% pay cut?

                      Look, I said it pisses people off. I understand that. Like I said when Congress vote themselves a raise or the bum next door is getting welfare and refusing to work.

                      But if you break down the numbers and compare executive pay to the entire operating cost of a company you will see it's meaningless.

                      Let's say you had that 80 percent in cash. How long do you think you could run the company with that money? Another day? Another week?

                      WSS

                      sadbrownsfan S
                      • 1k Posts
                      • 41 Reputation
                      S sadbrownsfan wrote on last edited by
                      #35

                      @westside-steve said:

                      Look, I said it pisses people off. I understand that. Like I said when Congress vote themselves a raise or the bum next door is getting welfare and refusing to work.

                      But if you break down the numbers and compare executive pay to the entire operating cost of a company you will see it's meaningless.

                      Let's say you had that 80 percent in cash. How long do you think you could run the company with that money? Another day? Another week?

                      WSS

                      Yes giving a few people an 80% raise or in one case a 300% raise if this article is correct http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/13/4983174/hostess-continues-pattern-of-misinformation.html#storylink=cpy doesn't equal the amount that would be saved by having about 18,000 employees taking an 8% pay cut. But how can these same people turn and blame the same unions that last time they where in bankruptcy agreed to about $110mill in concessions to give more concessions? The unions and outdated rules do play a part in the companies collapse, but you can not just point the finger at one side and say its their fault.

                      Browns149B 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • S sadbrownsfan

                        @westside-steve said:

                        Look, I said it pisses people off. I understand that. Like I said when Congress vote themselves a raise or the bum next door is getting welfare and refusing to work.

                        But if you break down the numbers and compare executive pay to the entire operating cost of a company you will see it's meaningless.

                        Let's say you had that 80 percent in cash. How long do you think you could run the company with that money? Another day? Another week?

                        WSS

                        Yes giving a few people an 80% raise or in one case a 300% raise if this article is correct http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/13/4983174/hostess-continues-pattern-of-misinformation.html#storylink=cpy doesn't equal the amount that would be saved by having about 18,000 employees taking an 8% pay cut. But how can these same people turn and blame the same unions that last time they where in bankruptcy agreed to about $110mill in concessions to give more concessions? The unions and outdated rules do play a part in the companies collapse, but you can not just point the finger at one side and say its their fault.

                        Browns149 Browns149B Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 10k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        Browns149B Browns149 wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        @sadbrownsfan said:

                        Yes giving a few people an 80% raise or in one case a 300% raise if this article is correct http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/13/4983174/hostess-continues-pattern-of-misinformation.html#storylink=cpy doesn't equal the amount that would be saved by having about 18,000 employees taking an 8% pay cut. But how can these same people turn and blame the same unions that last time they where in bankruptcy agreed to about $110mill in concessions to give more concessions? The unions and outdated rules do play a part in the companies collapse, but you can not just point the finger at one side and say its their fault.

                        Exactly correct. The unions hurt Hostess as did management. You can't just blame one side for everything that went wrong

                        "And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve."
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate