Week 12 Game Impressions: Steelers Vs. Browns
-
Harrison concusses another Brown indirectly. I wonder if he'll get fined?
:lol: "All Truth Passes Through Three stages. First, It Is Ridiculed, Second It Is Violently Opposed, And Third, It Is Accepted As Self-Evident" ~Arthur Schopenhauer -
How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses
How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses
It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.
I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.
You've got to be kidding me. Weeden is 100 times better then McCoy. I wish they would trade him.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
Harrison concusses another Brown indirectly. I wonder if he'll get fined?
:lol: Harrison concusses another Brown indirectly. I wonder if he'll get fined?
:lol: Adolf Baddell will find a way. Just wait.
-
How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses
How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses
But when we get injuries, we replace Weeden with Colt and run the same plays. Their offense is actually based around their starting qb. Basically my point is, we took a Retard tight end 6th overall in 2004 instead of a qb.
-
How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses
It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.
Homotron said:
It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.
Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..
-
as giftwrapped of a win as you'll ever see
-
How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses
But when we get injuries, we replace Weeden with Colt and run the same plays. Their offense is actually based around their starting qb. Basically my point is, we took a Retard tight end 6th overall in 2004 instead of a qb.
-
Shurmur tried his best to pull defeat from the jaws of victory.
-
Homotron said:
It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.
Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..
Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..
The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption. (Please check the state line for Ben in the Oakland game and report back)
EDIT: Actually I doubt you'll actually check and if you do you won't post it. He was 36 for 49 for 384 4 td's no int's. I'm not going to sh.it up this thread with a bunch of "woe is me" after a Browns win but the facts are the facts. You'd have likely lost if Ben played and I think that's pretty obvious. Enjoy the win. I just hope the Steelers can get healthy.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
Weeden couldn't outplay a 37 year old third string QB = fact. Start with your excuses for him now.
-
Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..
The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption. (Please check the state line for Ben in the Oakland game and report back)
EDIT: Actually I doubt you'll actually check and if you do you won't post it. He was 36 for 49 for 384 4 td's no int's. I'm not going to sh.it up this thread with a bunch of "woe is me" after a Browns win but the facts are the facts. You'd have likely lost if Ben played and I think that's pretty obvious. Enjoy the win. I just hope the Steelers can get healthy.
Homotron said:
The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption.
Assume meant make an ass out of you and me. And you lost.
-
How many times did the Browns have to start guys like Wallace and Dorsey against Pittsburgh? I don't want to hear any excuses
It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.
Homotron said:
It's not even close to the same, sorry. You also aren't hearing excuses. You'd have been slaughtered today if Ben played. I don't think anyone seated in reality on this board would suggest otherwise.
Yeah so? If Shur-loss hadn't tried to hand you the game- a competent team- like the Texans would have beaten you by 50. 7 turnovers, and it's a one score game? Get f**king real.
AS I SAID BEFORE THE GAME DON'T PULL OUT THE PITY CARD- IT WON'T PLAY. YOU FU**ING LOST ENJOY SEEING THE SB @ HOME- AGAIN.
PS the almighty Batch looks like a third string QB.
-
Woulda. Coulda. Shoulda. You lost to the Raiders with a healthy Roethlisberger so you can't claim that you would slaughter the Browns with him playing..
The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption. (Please check the state line for Ben in the Oakland game and report back)
EDIT: Actually I doubt you'll actually check and if you do you won't post it. He was 36 for 49 for 384 4 td's no int's. I'm not going to sh.it up this thread with a bunch of "woe is me" after a Browns win but the facts are the facts. You'd have likely lost if Ben played and I think that's pretty obvious. Enjoy the win. I just hope the Steelers can get healthy.
Homotron said:
The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption.
You are proving my point. I don't care how the defense or offense played. Bottom line - the steelers lost to the Raiders in a game that Ben played in. You aren't being a dick, you just aren't speaking the truth..
-
-
Weeden couldn't outplay a 37 year old third string QB = fact. Start with your excuses for him now.
Weeden couldn't outplay a 37 year old third string QB = fact. Start with your excuses for him now.
he really should have had 3 picks if not for the stone hands of steelers DBs
-
Weeden couldn't outplay a 37 year old third string QB = fact. Start with your excuses for him now.
Weeden couldn't outplay a 37 year old third string QB = fact. Start with your excuses for him now.
1 TD and 1 pick isn't better than 0 TDs and 3 INTs? Ok then...
-
I still want mccoy to start. I've seen all i need to see of weeden. Ever.
You've got to be kidding me. Weeden is 100 times better then McCoy. I wish they would trade him.
You've got to be kidding me. Weeden is 100 times better then McCoy. I wish they would trade him.
No. He sucks. They both suck but at least colt is a leader.
-
Homotron said:
The defense lost that game, apparently you didn't watch it. The defense isn't playing like that anymore so your point is pretty moot. The Browns would have lost by a few scores if Ben played. I'm not trying to be a dick, just a pretty solid assumption.
You are proving my point. I don't care how the defense or offense played. Bottom line - the steelers lost to the Raiders in a game that Ben played in. You aren't being a dick, you just aren't speaking the truth..
You are proving my point. I don't care how the defense or offense played. Bottom line - the steelers lost to the Raiders in a game that Ben played in. You aren't being a dick, you just aren't speaking the truth..
What do you mean you don't care? They lost to Oakland. I'm not denying that, but Ben was playing MVP type football before his injury and the defense early in the season wasn't playing well. Now the defense is playing well and Ben is hurt. Now combine the two and it's a Browns loss. I know you aren't stupid and I don't expect you to admit it but once again anyone seated in reality here know that would have been the likely outcome. (I posted Ben's stats for the Oakland game in my previous post)
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
Hey Colt got the win?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login